Nearly every American had an opinion about President Jackson. To some, he epitomized democratic government and popular rule. To others, he represented the worst in a powerful and unaccountable executive, acting as president with the same arrogance he had shown as a general in Florida. One of the key issues dividing Americans during his presidency was a sectional dispute over national tax policy that would come to define Jackson\u2019s no-holds-barred approach to government.<\/p>\n
Once Andrew Jackson moved into the White House, most southerners expected him to do away with the hated Tariff of 1828, the so-called Tariff of Abominations. This import tax provided protection for northern manufacturing interests by raising the prices of European products in America. Southerners, however, blamed the tariff for a massive transfer of wealth. It forced them to purchase goods from the North\u2019s manufacturers at higher prices, and it provoked European countries to retaliate with high tariffs of their own, reducing foreign purchases of the South\u2019s raw materials.<\/p>\n
Only in South Carolina, though, did the discomfort turn into organized action. The state was still trying to shrug off the economic problems of the Panic of 1819, but it had also recently endured the Denmark Vesey slave conspiracy, which convinced white South Carolinians that antislavery ideas put them in danger of a massive slave uprising.<\/p>\n
Elite South Carolinians were especially worried that the tariff was merely an entering wedge for federal legislation that would limit slavery. Andrew Jackson\u2019s own vice president, John C. Calhoun, who was from South Carolina, asserted that the tariff was \u201cthe occasion, rather than the real cause of the present unhappy state of things.\u201d The real fear was that the federal government might attack \u201cthe peculiar domestick institutions of the Southern States\u201d\u2014meaning slavery. When Jackson failed to act against the tariff, Vice President Calhoun was caught in a tight position.<\/p>\n
In 1828, Calhoun secretly drafted the South Carolina Exposition and Protest<\/i>, a pamphlet that laid out the doctrine of \u201cnullification.\u201d Drawing from the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 and 1799, Calhoun argued that the United States was a compact among the states rather than among the whole American people. Since the states had created the Union, he had reasoned, they were still sovereign, so a state could nullify a federal statute it considered unconstitutional. Other states would then have to concede the right of nullification or agree to amend the Constitution. If necessary, a nullifying state could leave the Union.<\/p>\n
When Calhoun\u2019s authorship of the pamphlet became public, Jackson was furious, interpreting it both as a personal betrayal and as a challenge to his authority as president. His most dramatic confrontation with Calhoun came in 1832 during a commemoration for Thomas Jefferson. At dinner, the president rose and toasted, \u201cOur federal union\u2014it must be preserved.\u201d Calhoun responded with a toast of his own: \u201cThe Union\u2014next to liberty, most dear.\u201d Their divorce was not pretty. Martin Van Buren, a New York political leader whose skill in making deals had earned him the nickname \u201cthe Little Magician,\u201d replaced Calhoun as vice president when Jackson ran for reelection in 1832.<\/p>\n
Calhoun returned to South Carolina, where a special state convention nullified the federal tariffs of 1828 and 1832. It declared them unconstitutional and therefore \u201cnull, void, and no law\u201d within South Carolina. The convention ordered South Carolina customs officers not to collect tariff revenue and declared that any federal attempt to enforce the tariffs would cause the state to secede from the Union.<\/p>\n
President Jackson responded dramatically. He denounced the ordinance of nullification and declared that \u201cdisunion, by armed force, is TREASON,\u201d vowing to hang Calhoun and any other nullifier who defied federal power. He persuaded Congress to pass a Force Bill that authorized him to send the military to enforce the tariffs. Faced with such threats, other southern states declined to join South Carolina. Privately, however, Jackson supported the idea of compromise and allowed his political enemy Henry Clay to broker a solution with Calhoun. Congress passed a compromise bill that slowly lowered federal tariff rates. South Carolina rescinded nullification for the tariffs but nullified the Force Bill.<\/p>\n
The legacy of the Nullification Crisis is difficult to sort out. Jackson\u2019s decisive action seemed to have forced South Carolina to back down. But the crisis also united the ideas of secession and states\u2019 rights, two concepts that had not necessarily been linked before. Perhaps most clearly, nullification showed that the immense political power of slaveholders was matched only by their immense anxiety about the future of slavery. During later debates in the 1840s and 1850s, they would raise the ideas of the Nullification Crisis again.<\/p>\n\n\t\t\t Candela Citations<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t