{"id":544,"date":"2016-08-24T00:20:55","date_gmt":"2016-08-24T00:20:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/americangovernment\/?post_type=chapter&#038;p=544"},"modified":"2016-08-24T00:20:55","modified_gmt":"2016-08-24T00:20:55","slug":"glossary-13","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/atd-monroecc-americangovernment\/chapter\/glossary-13\/","title":{"raw":"Glossary","rendered":"Glossary"},"content":{"raw":"<h2>Guardians of the Constitution and Individual Rights<\/h2>\r\n<strong>appellate jurisdiction<\/strong> the power of a court to hear a case on appeal from a lower court and possibly change the lower court\u2019s decision\r\n\r\n<strong>common law<\/strong> the pattern of law developed by judges through case decisions largely based on precedent\r\n\r\n<strong>judicial review<\/strong> the power of the courts to review actions taken by the other branches of government and the states and to rule on whether those actions are constitutional\r\n\r\n<strong><em>Marbury v. Madison<\/em><\/strong> the 1803 Supreme Court case that established the courts\u2019 power of judicial review and the first time the Supreme Court ruled an act of Congress to be unconstitutional\r\n\r\n<strong>original jurisdiction<\/strong> the power of a court to hear a case for the first time\r\n<h2>The Dual Court System<\/h2>\r\n<strong>appellate court<\/strong> a court that reviews cases already decided by a lower or trial court and that may change the lower court\u2019s decision\r\n\r\n<strong>civil law<\/strong> a non-criminal law defining private rights and remedies\r\n\r\n<strong>criminal law<\/strong> a law that prohibits actions that could harm or endanger others, and establishes punishment for those actions\r\n\r\n<strong>dual court system<\/strong> the division of the courts into two separate systems, one federal and one state, with each of the fifty states having its own courts\r\n\r\n<strong>trial court<\/strong> the level of court in which a case starts or is first tried\r\n<h2>The Federal Court System<\/h2>\r\n<strong>circuit courts<\/strong> the appeals (appellate) courts of the federal court system that review decisions of the lower (district) courts; also called courts of appeals\r\n\r\n<strong>courts of appeals<\/strong> the appellate courts of the federal court system that review decisions of the lower (district) courts; also called circuit courts\r\n\r\n<strong>district courts<\/strong> the trial courts of the federal court system where cases are tried, evidence is presented, and witness testimony is heard\r\n\r\n<strong>precedent<\/strong> the principles or guidelines established by courts in earlier cases that frame the ongoing operation of the courts, steering the direction of the entire system\r\n\r\n<strong>senatorial courtesy<\/strong> an unwritten custom by which the president consults the senators in the state before nominating a candidate for a federal vacancy there, particularly for court positions\r\n\r\n<strong><em>stare decisis<\/em><\/strong> the principle by which courts rely on past decisions and their precedents when making decisions in new cases\r\n<h2>The Supreme Court<\/h2>\r\n<strong><em>amicus curiae<\/em><\/strong> literally a \"friend of the court\" and used for a brief filed by someone who is interested in but not party to a case\r\n\r\n<strong>associate justice<\/strong> a member of the Supreme Court who is not the chief justice\r\n\r\n<strong>brief<\/strong> a written legal argument presented to a court by one of the parties in a case\r\n\r\n<strong>chief justice<\/strong> the highest-ranking justice on the Supreme Court\r\n\r\n<strong>conference<\/strong> closed meeting of the justices to discuss cases on the docket and take an initial vote\r\n\r\n<strong>docket<\/strong> the list of cases pending on a court\u2019s calendar\r\n\r\n<strong>oral argument<\/strong> words spoken before the Supreme Court (usually by lawyers) explaining the legal reasons behind their position in a case and why it should prevail\r\n\r\n<strong>Rule of Four<\/strong> a Supreme Court custom in which a case will be heard when four justices decide to do so\r\n\r\n<strong>solicitor general<\/strong> the lawyer who represents the federal government and argues some cases before the Supreme Court\r\n\r\n<strong>writ of <em>certiorari<\/em><\/strong> an order of the Supreme Court calling up the records of the lower court so a case may be reviewed; sometimes abbreviated <em>cert<\/em>.\r\n<h2>Judicial Decision-Making and Implementation by the Supreme Court<\/h2>\r\n<strong>concurring opinion<\/strong> an opinion written by a justice who agrees with the Court\u2019s majority opinion but has different reasons for doing so\r\n\r\n<strong>dissenting opinion<\/strong> an opinion written by a justice who disagrees with the majority opinion of the Court\r\n\r\n<strong>judicial activism<\/strong> a judicial philosophy in which a justice is more likely to overturn decisions or rule actions by the other branches unconstitutional, especially in an attempt to broaden individual rights and liberties\r\n\r\n<strong>judicial restraint<\/strong> a judicial philosophy in which a justice is more likely to let stand the decisions or actions of the other branches of government\r\n\r\n<strong>majority opinion<\/strong> an opinion of the Court with which more than half the nine justices agree","rendered":"<h2>Guardians of the Constitution and Individual Rights<\/h2>\n<p><strong>appellate jurisdiction<\/strong> the power of a court to hear a case on appeal from a lower court and possibly change the lower court\u2019s decision<\/p>\n<p><strong>common law<\/strong> the pattern of law developed by judges through case decisions largely based on precedent<\/p>\n<p><strong>judicial review<\/strong> the power of the courts to review actions taken by the other branches of government and the states and to rule on whether those actions are constitutional<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Marbury v. Madison<\/em><\/strong> the 1803 Supreme Court case that established the courts\u2019 power of judicial review and the first time the Supreme Court ruled an act of Congress to be unconstitutional<\/p>\n<p><strong>original jurisdiction<\/strong> the power of a court to hear a case for the first time<\/p>\n<h2>The Dual Court System<\/h2>\n<p><strong>appellate court<\/strong> a court that reviews cases already decided by a lower or trial court and that may change the lower court\u2019s decision<\/p>\n<p><strong>civil law<\/strong> a non-criminal law defining private rights and remedies<\/p>\n<p><strong>criminal law<\/strong> a law that prohibits actions that could harm or endanger others, and establishes punishment for those actions<\/p>\n<p><strong>dual court system<\/strong> the division of the courts into two separate systems, one federal and one state, with each of the fifty states having its own courts<\/p>\n<p><strong>trial court<\/strong> the level of court in which a case starts or is first tried<\/p>\n<h2>The Federal Court System<\/h2>\n<p><strong>circuit courts<\/strong> the appeals (appellate) courts of the federal court system that review decisions of the lower (district) courts; also called courts of appeals<\/p>\n<p><strong>courts of appeals<\/strong> the appellate courts of the federal court system that review decisions of the lower (district) courts; also called circuit courts<\/p>\n<p><strong>district courts<\/strong> the trial courts of the federal court system where cases are tried, evidence is presented, and witness testimony is heard<\/p>\n<p><strong>precedent<\/strong> the principles or guidelines established by courts in earlier cases that frame the ongoing operation of the courts, steering the direction of the entire system<\/p>\n<p><strong>senatorial courtesy<\/strong> an unwritten custom by which the president consults the senators in the state before nominating a candidate for a federal vacancy there, particularly for court positions<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>stare decisis<\/em><\/strong> the principle by which courts rely on past decisions and their precedents when making decisions in new cases<\/p>\n<h2>The Supreme Court<\/h2>\n<p><strong><em>amicus curiae<\/em><\/strong> literally a &#8220;friend of the court&#8221; and used for a brief filed by someone who is interested in but not party to a case<\/p>\n<p><strong>associate justice<\/strong> a member of the Supreme Court who is not the chief justice<\/p>\n<p><strong>brief<\/strong> a written legal argument presented to a court by one of the parties in a case<\/p>\n<p><strong>chief justice<\/strong> the highest-ranking justice on the Supreme Court<\/p>\n<p><strong>conference<\/strong> closed meeting of the justices to discuss cases on the docket and take an initial vote<\/p>\n<p><strong>docket<\/strong> the list of cases pending on a court\u2019s calendar<\/p>\n<p><strong>oral argument<\/strong> words spoken before the Supreme Court (usually by lawyers) explaining the legal reasons behind their position in a case and why it should prevail<\/p>\n<p><strong>Rule of Four<\/strong> a Supreme Court custom in which a case will be heard when four justices decide to do so<\/p>\n<p><strong>solicitor general<\/strong> the lawyer who represents the federal government and argues some cases before the Supreme Court<\/p>\n<p><strong>writ of <em>certiorari<\/em><\/strong> an order of the Supreme Court calling up the records of the lower court so a case may be reviewed; sometimes abbreviated <em>cert<\/em>.<\/p>\n<h2>Judicial Decision-Making and Implementation by the Supreme Court<\/h2>\n<p><strong>concurring opinion<\/strong> an opinion written by a justice who agrees with the Court\u2019s majority opinion but has different reasons for doing so<\/p>\n<p><strong>dissenting opinion<\/strong> an opinion written by a justice who disagrees with the majority opinion of the Court<\/p>\n<p><strong>judicial activism<\/strong> a judicial philosophy in which a justice is more likely to overturn decisions or rule actions by the other branches unconstitutional, especially in an attempt to broaden individual rights and liberties<\/p>\n<p><strong>judicial restraint<\/strong> a judicial philosophy in which a justice is more likely to let stand the decisions or actions of the other branches of government<\/p>\n<p><strong>majority opinion<\/strong> an opinion of the Court with which more than half the nine justices agree<\/p>\n\n\t\t\t <section class=\"citations-section\" role=\"contentinfo\">\n\t\t\t <h3>Candela Citations<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t <div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t <div id=\"citation-list-544\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <div class=\"licensing\"><div class=\"license-attribution-dropdown-subheading\">CC licensed content, Shared previously<\/div><ul class=\"citation-list\"><li>American Government. <strong>Authored by<\/strong>: OpenStax. <strong>Provided by<\/strong>: OpenStax; Rice University. <strong>Located at<\/strong>: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/cnx.org\/contents\/W8wOWXNF@12.1:Y1CfqFju@5\/Preface\">https:\/\/cnx.org\/contents\/W8wOWXNF@12.1:Y1CfqFju@5\/Preface<\/a>. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"license\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/\">CC BY: Attribution<\/a><\/em><\/li><\/ul><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t <\/section>","protected":false},"author":20,"menu_order":7,"template":"","meta":{"_candela_citation":"[{\"type\":\"cc\",\"description\":\"American Government\",\"author\":\"OpenStax\",\"organization\":\"OpenStax; Rice University\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/cnx.org\/contents\/W8wOWXNF@12.1:Y1CfqFju@5\/Preface\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"cc-by\",\"license_terms\":\"\"}]","CANDELA_OUTCOMES_GUID":"","pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-544","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry"],"part":97,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/atd-monroecc-americangovernment\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/544","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/atd-monroecc-americangovernment\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/atd-monroecc-americangovernment\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/atd-monroecc-americangovernment\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/20"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/atd-monroecc-americangovernment\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/544\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":545,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/atd-monroecc-americangovernment\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/544\/revisions\/545"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/atd-monroecc-americangovernment\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/97"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/atd-monroecc-americangovernment\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/544\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/atd-monroecc-americangovernment\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=544"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/atd-monroecc-americangovernment\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=544"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/atd-monroecc-americangovernment\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=544"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/atd-monroecc-americangovernment\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=544"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}