The Punnett Square Approach for a Monohybrid Cross
A Punnett square applies the rules of probability to predict the possible outcomes of a monohybrid cross and their expected frequencies.
Describe the Punnett square approach to a monohybrid cross
- Fertilization between two true-breeding parents that differ in only one characteristic is called a monohybrid cross.
- For a monohybrid cross of two true-breeding parents, each parent contributes one type of allele resulting in all of the offspring with the same genotype.
- A test cross is a way to determine whether an organism that expressed a dominant trait was a heterozygote or a homozygote.
- monohybrid: a hybrid between two species that only have a difference of one gene
- homozygous: of an organism in which both copies of a given gene have the same allele
- heterozygous: of an organism which has two different alleles of a given gene
- Punnett square: a graphical representation used to determine the probability of an offspring expressing a particular genotype
Punnett Square Approach to a Monohybrid Cross
When fertilization occurs between two true-breeding parents that differ in only one characteristic, the process is called a monohybrid cross, and the resulting offspring are monohybrids. Mendel performed seven monohybrid crosses involving contrasting traits for each characteristic. On the basis of his results in F1 and F2 generations, Mendel postulated that each parent in the monohybrid cross contributed one of two paired unit factors to each offspring and that every possible combination of unit factors was equally likely.
To demonstrate a monohybrid cross, consider the case of true-breeding pea plants with yellow versus green pea seeds. The dominant seed color is yellow; therefore, the parental genotypes were YY ( homozygous dominant) for the plants with yellow seeds and yy (homozygous recessive ) for the plants with green seeds, respectively. A Punnett square, devised by the British geneticist Reginald Punnett, can be drawn that applies the rules of probability to predict the possible outcomes of a genetic cross or mating and their expected frequencies.To prepare a Punnett square, all possible combinations of the parental alleles are listed along the top (for one parent) and side (for the other parent) of a grid, representing their meiotic segregation into haploid gametes. Then the combinations of egg and sperm are made in the boxes in the table to show which alleles are combining. Each box then represents the diploid genotype of a zygote, or fertilized egg, that could result from this mating. Because each possibility is equally likely, genotypic ratios can be determined from a Punnett square. If the pattern of inheritance (dominant or recessive) is known, the phenotypic ratios can be inferred as well. For a monohybrid cross of two true-breeding parents, each parent contributes one type of allele. In this case, only one genotype is possible. All offspring are Yy and have yellow seeds.
A self-cross of one of the Yy heterozygous offspring can be represented in a 2 × 2 Punnett square because each parent can donate one of two different alleles. Therefore, the offspring can potentially have one of four allele combinations: YY, Yy, yY, or yy. Notice that there are two ways to obtain the Yy genotype: a Y from the egg and a y from the sperm, or a y from the egg and a Y from the sperm. Both of these possibilities must be counted. Recall that Mendel’s pea-plant characteristics behaved in the same way in reciprocal crosses. Therefore, the two possible heterozygous combinations produce offspring that are genotypically and phenotypically identical despite their dominant and recessive alleles deriving from different parents. They are grouped together. Because fertilization is a random event, we expect each combination to be equally likely and for the offspring to exhibit a ratio of YY:Yy:yy genotypes of 1:2:1. Furthermore, because the YY and Yy offspring have yellow seeds and are phenotypically identical, applying the sum rule of probability, we expect the offspring to exhibit a phenotypic ratio of 3 yellow:1 green. Indeed, working with large sample sizes, Mendel observed approximately this ratio in every F2 generation resulting from crosses for individual traits.
Beyond predicting the offspring of a cross between known homozygous or heterozygous parents, Mendel also developed a way to determine whether an organism that expressed a dominant trait was a heterozygote or a homozygote. Called the test cross, this technique is still used by plant and animal breeders. In a test cross, the dominant-expressing organism is crossed with an organism that is homozygous recessive for the same characteristic. If the dominant-expressing organism is a homozygote, then all F1 offspring will be heterozygotes expressing the dominant trait. Alternatively, if the dominant expressing organism is a heterozygote, the F1 offspring will exhibit a 1:1 ratio of heterozygotes and recessive homozygotes. The test cross further validates Mendel’s postulate that pairs of unit factors segregate equally.
Phenotypes and Genotypes
The observable traits expressed by an organism are referred to as its phenotype and its underlying genetic makeup is called its genotype.
Distinguish between the phenotype and the genotype of an organism
- Mendel used pea plants with seven distinct traits or phenotypes to determine the pattern of inheritance and the underlying genotypes.
- Mendel found that crossing two purebred pea plants which expressed different traits resulted in an F1 generation where all the pea plants expressed the same trait or phenotype.
- When Mendel allowed the F1 plants to self-fertilize, the F2 generation showed two different phenotypes, indicating that the F1 plants had different genotypes.
- phenotype: the appearance of an organism based on a multifactorial combination of genetic traits and environmental factors, especially used in pedigrees
- genotype: the combination of alleles, situated on corresponding chromosomes, that determines a specific trait of an individual, such as “Aa” or “aa”
Phenotypes and Genotypes
The observable traits expressed by an organism are referred to as its phenotype. An organism’s underlying genetic makeup, consisting of both physically visible and non-expressed alleles, is called its genotype. Johann Gregor Mendel’s (1822–1884) hybridization experiments demonstrate the difference between phenotype and genotype.
Mendel crossed or mated two true-breeding (self-pollinating) garden peas, Pisum saivum, by manually transferring pollen from the anther of a mature pea plant of one variety to the stigma of a separate mature pea plant of the second variety. Plants used in first-generation crosses were called P0, or parental generation one, plants. Mendel collected the seeds belonging to the P0 plants that resulted from each cross and grew them the following season. These offspring were called the F1, or the first filial (filial = offspring, daughter or son), generation. Once Mendel examined the characteristics in the F1 generation of plants, he allowed them to self-fertilize naturally. He then collected and grew the seeds from the F1 plants to produce the F2, or second filial, generation.
When true-breeding plants in which one parent had white flowers and one had violet flowers were cross-fertilized, all of the F1 hybrid offspring had violet flowers. That is, the hybrid offspring were phenotypically identical to the true-breeding parent with violet flowers. However, we know that the allele donated by the parent with white flowers was not simply lost because it reappeared in some of the F2 offspring. Therefore, the F1 plants must have been genotypically different from the parent with violet flowers.
In his 1865 publication, Mendel reported the results of his crosses involving seven different phenotypes, each with two contrasting traits. A trait is defined as a variation in the physical appearance of a heritable characteristic. The characteristics included plant height, seed texture, seed color, flower color, pea pod size, pea pod color, and flower position. To fully examine each characteristic, Mendel generated large numbers of F1 and F2 plants, reporting results from 19,959 F2 plants alone. His findings were consistent. First, Mendel confirmed that he had plants that bred true for white or violet flower color. Regardless of how many generations Mendel examined, all self-crossed offspring of parents with white flowers had white flowers, and all self-crossed offspring of parents with violet flowers had violet flowers. In addition, Mendel confirmed that, other than flower color, the pea plants were physically identical.
Mendel’s Model System
The garden pea has several advantageous characteristics that allowed Mendel to develop the laws of modern genetics.
Describe the scientific reasons for the success of Mendel’s experimental work
- Mendel used true-breeding plants in his experiments. These plants, when self-fertilized, always produce offspring with the same phenotype.
- Pea plants are easily manipulated, grow in one season, and can be grown in large quantities; these qualities allowed Mendel to conduct methodical, quantitative analyses using large sample sizes.
- Based on his experiments with the garden peas, Mendel found that one phenotype was always dominant over another recessive phenotype for the same trait.
- phenotype: the observable characteristics of an organism, often resulting from its genetic information or a combination of genetic information and environmental factors
- genotype: the specific genetic information of a cell or organism, usually a description of the allele or alleles relating to a specific gene.
- true-breeding plant: a plant that always produces offspring of the same phenotype when self-fertilized; one that is homozygous for the trait being followed.
Mendel’s Model System
Mendel’s seminal work was accomplished using the garden pea, Pisum sativum, to study inheritance. Pea plant reproduction is easily manipulated; large quantities of garden peas could be cultivated simultaneously, allowing Mendel to conclude that his results did not occur simply by chance. The garden pea also grows to maturity within one season; several generations could be evaluated over a relatively short time.
Pea plants have both male and female parts and can easily be grown in large numbers. For this reason, garden pea plants can either self-pollinate or cross-pollinate with other pea plants. In the absence of outside manipulation, this species naturally self-fertilizes: ova (the eggs) within individual flowers are fertilized by pollen (containing the sperm cell) from the same flower. The sperm and the eggs that produce the next generation of plants both come from the same parent. What’s more, the flower petals remain sealed tightly until after pollination, preventing pollination from other plants. The result is highly inbred, or “true-breeding,” pea plants. These are plants that always produce offspring that look like the parent. Today, we know that these “true-breeding” plants are homozygous for most traits.
A gardener or researcher, such as Mendel, can cross-pollinate these same plants by manually applying sperm from one plant to the pistil (containing the ova) of another plant. Now the sperm and eggs come from different parent plants. When Mendel cross-pollinated a true-breeding plant that only produced yellow peas with a true-breeding plant that only produced green peas, he found that the first generation of offspring is always all yellow peas. The green pea trait did not show up. However, if this first generation of yellow pea plants were allowed to self-pollinate, the following or second generation had a ratio of 3:1 yellow to green peas.
In this and all the other pea plant traits Mendel followed, one form of the trait was “dominant” over another so it masked the presence of the other “recessive” form in the first generation after cross-breeding two homozygous plants.. Even if the phenotype (visible form) is hidden, the genotype (allele controlling that form of the trait) can be passed on to next generation and produce the recessive form in the second generation. By experimenting with true-breeding pea plants, Mendel avoided the appearance of unexpected (recombinant) traits in offspring that might occur if the plants were not true breeding.