Flattening hierarchies can benefit smaller organizations by increasing employee empowerment, participation, and efficiency.
Define a flattened hierarchy, specifically in which situations where the utilization of this model is appropriate and beneficial for an organization
- A hierarchy can link entities either directly or indirectly; it can also link entities either vertically or horizontally. The only direct links in a hierarchy are to a person’s immediate superior or subordinates.
- The flat organization model essentially “flattens” the hierarchy and promotes employee involvement through a decentralized decision -making process.
- According to the logic behind this model, well-trained workers will be more productive when they are directly involved in the decision-making process rather than closely supervised by many layers of management.
- Flat organizations are most relevant in specific scenarios—most notably small organizations that are dependent upon creativity, freedom of action, and high-powered employees.
- hierarchy: An arrangement of items in which each item is represented as being above, below, or at the same level as other items.
Links within Hierarchies
Hierarchies can be linked in several different ways. A hierarchy can link entities either directly or indirectly; it can also link entities either vertically or horizontally. The only direct links in a hierarchy are to a person’s immediate superior or subordinates. Parts of the hierarchy that are not linked vertically to one another can be horizontally linked through a path by traveling up the hierarchy; this path eventually reaches a common direct or indirect superior and then travels down the hierarchy again. An example of this would be two colleagues who each report to a common superior but have the same relative amount of authority in the organization.
Flat (or horizontal) organizational structures have few or no levels of intervening management between staff and managers. This “flattened” hierarchy promotes employee involvement through a decentralized decision-making process. The idea is that well-trained workers will be more productive when they are directly involved in the decision-making process rather than closely supervised by many layers of management.
Advantages of Flattened Hierarchies
Flat structures empower each individual within the company to be involved in decision-making processes. This allows for a great deal of creative discussion and operational diversity and tends to create great variance in new ideas. By elevating the level of responsibility of baseline employees and eliminating layers of middle management, comments and feedback can quickly reach all personnel involved in decisions. Response to customer feedback can be carried out more rapidly.
This type of structure generally works best in smaller organizations or individual units within larger organizations. Start-up companies, “mom and pop shops,” and other small independent businesses are the most common examples of a flat structure.
Disadvantages of Flattened Hierarchies
Flat organizations are difficult to maintain as companies grow larger and more complex. When organizations reach a critical size, they can retain a streamlined structure; however, they cannot keep a completely flat manager-to-staff hierarchy without impacting productivity. Certain financial responsibilities may also require a traditional hierarchical structure. While the flat structure can foster employee empowerment, involvement, and creativity, it can also create inefficiency in decision-making processes. Some theorize that flat organizations become more traditionally hierarchical when they gear themselves more toward productivity.
Because the interaction between workers is more frequent, this organizational structure generally depends on a more personal relationship between workers and managers. As a result, the structure can be more time-consuming to build than a traditional hierarchical model.
In decentralized structures, responsibility for decision making is broadly dispersed down to the lower levels of an organization.
Compare and contrast centralization and decentralization of responsibility within the organizational hierarchy
- Decentralization is the process of dispersing decision making authority among the people, citizens, employees, or other elements of an organization or sector.
- A decentralized organization shows fewer tiers in the organizational structure, a wider span of control, and a bottom-to-top flow of ideas and decision making.
- The bottom-to-top flow of information allows lower-level employees to better inform the officials of the organization during any decision making processes.
- When companies decentralize authority, however, there can be confusion as to how final decisions are made.
- mechanistic organization: A bureaucratic structure.
- governance: Accountability for consistent and cohesive policies, processes, and decision rights.
- authority: The power to enforce rules or give orders.
Decentralization is the process of dispersing decision making authority among the people, citizens, employees, or other elements of an organization or sector. In decentralized structures, responsibility for decision making and accountability are broadly dispersed down to the lower levels of an organization. This dispersion can be intentional or unintentional. A decentralized organization tends to show fewer tiers in its organizational structure (less hierarchy ), a wider span of control, and a bottom-to-top or horizontal flow of decision making and ideas.
Contrasting Centralized and Decentralized Structures
In a centralized organization, decisions are made by top executives on the basis of current policies. These decisions or policies are then enforced through several tiers of hierarchy within the organization, gradually broadening the span of control until they reach the bottom tier.
In a decentralized organization, the top executives delegate much of their decision making authority to lower tiers of the organizational structure. This type of structure tends to be seen in organizations that run on less rigid policies and wider spans of control among each officer of the organization. The wider spans of control also reduce the number of tiers within the organization, giving its structure a flat appearance.
Advantages of Decentralization
One advantage of this structure—if the correct controls are in place—is the bottom-up flow of information. This flow allows lower-level employees to better inform the officials of the organization during any decision making processes. For example, if an experienced technician at the lowest tier of an organization knows how to increase the efficiency of the production, the bottom-to-top flow of information can allow this knowledge to pass up to the executive officers.
Disadvantages of Decentralization
On the other side of the argument, when companies decentralize authority there can be confusion as to how final decisions are made. It can be difficult to empower multiple people without certain decisions negatively interacting with other decisions. Decentralized organizations must be mindful of the possibility of running in too many different directions at once. Because of this, decentralization is most effective in organizations that have transparent strategies, a strong mission, and a clear vision.
Modern organizations are more aware of the value of empowered employees and actively strive to structurally increase empowerment.
Discuss the advantages of empowerment in an organization, and how organizational structure can improve upon the promotion of empowered employees
- Empowerment is a process that enables individuals and groups to fully access their personal and collective power, authority, and influence, and to employ this power when engaging with other people, other institutions, or society.
- Leaders within an organization can play a strong role in encouraging employees to put empowerment into practice.
- To enable empowerment, managers can share information, provide employees with autonomy, and migrate to self-managed teams when possible.
- Though the idea of empowerment can produce successful results, it is important to understand the risks. More decision -makers means more discussion about how a process should be accomplished and more moving parts within the organization, increasing complexity.
- empowerment: The accessing and employing of political, social, or economic power by an individual or group.
Empowerment is a process that enables individuals and groups to fully access personal and collective power and employ this power when engaging with other people, other institutions, or society. Empowerment does not give people power; rather, it helps to release and express the power that people already have.
Empowerment encourages people to gain the skills and knowledge that allows them to overcome obstacles in life and work. This will ultimately enable personal development and a deeper sense of professional fulfillment. Empowering people in organizations can encourage more confident, capable, and motivated employees. Organizations are increasingly aware that empowerment often leads to better performance and higher operational efficiency, and there is a general trend toward structuring organizations for empowerment.
Empowerment within the Organization
Empowering employees in the workplace means providing them with opportunities to make their own decisions related to their tasks. This can be a powerful and positive aspect within an organization that promotes shared power and enables checks and balances in decision-making processes.
Empowerment in organizations includes:
- Making decisions about personal and collective circumstances;
- Accessing information and resources for decision-making;
- Considering a range of options from which to choose (and understanding the options rather than just deciding yes or no);
- Exercising assertiveness in collective decision-making;
- Employing positive thoughts toward the ability to make change;
- Learning and accessing skills for improving personal and collective circumstances; and
- Informing others’ perceptions though exchange, education, and engagement.
Though the idea of empowerment can produce very successful results, there are certain risks are involved. When turning responsibility over to others, it is important to keep in mind that diversifying power creates more voices and therefore potentially more conflict and discussion. All of these elements can slow down the decision-making process. As organizations move toward higher levels of empowerment, protocols should be put in place to mitigate failure and improve decision-making efficiency across the board.
Leaders within an organization can encourage employees to put empowerment into practice in several ways. If leaders want to tap into the possibilities of an empowerment-based company, they need to have confidence in employees. Employees should also be given opportunities to make their own decisions and succeed. For an empowerment-based organization, rules and policies that interfere with self-management should be made more lenient. Leaders should also set goals that can inspire people.
The following are three key concepts that leaders can use to empower employees throughout an organization:
- Share information with everyone. By sharing information with everyone, leaders gain a clear picture of the company and its current situation. Allowing all employees to view company information helps to build trust between employers and employees. This also provides decision-makers with important perspectives to assess prior to deciding.
- Create autonomy through boundaries. By opening communication through information sharing, space can be created for feedback and dialogue about what holds people back from being empowered. It is critical that leaders minimize micro-management so that employees, who are specialists at the function they are assigned, can set the tone for how a particular task is accomplished.
- Replace the old hierarchy with self-managed teams. By replacing the old hierarchy with self-managed teams, more responsibility is placed upon unique and self-managed teams; this can lead to better communication, diversity of strategies, and higher performance.
The success of the modern organization relies heavily on understanding the complexity of a diverse global market. Leveraging employee knowledge and enabling autonomy is increasingly important in capturing value and attaining competitive advantages in this complex business environment.
In order to succeed, modern organizations must constantly adapt to evolving technologies and expanding global markets.
Identify the importance and inherent value of increasing adaptation within company structures and performance
- Technological advances, global market expansions, and the potential for constant (sometimes disruptive) innovation all point to the need for organizations to be adaptive.
- Blockbuster and Netflix provide a classic example: in this case, Blockbuster was simply too slow to adapt to the demand for live-streaming videos.
- If an organization takes on the identity of a growing, adapting, and learning organization, these qualities become part of the fabric of how it operates.
- Implementing an adaptable strategy may have effects that ripple across an organization. Minimizing disruption can reduce costs and save time.
- Resistance to change is considered a major obstacle to creating effective adaptability in an organization. Integrating changes step by step while utilizing focus groups and training sessions can improve the efficacy of adaptation.
- adaptation: Adjustment to extant conditions; modification of a thing or its parts in a way that makes it more fit for existence under the conditions of its current environment.
The Importance of Adaptation
Organizational adaption is becoming increasingly relevant to both strategy and structure as the business environment changes more quickly each year. Technological innovations, global market expansions, and the potential for constant (sometimes disruptive) innovation all point to the need for organizations to be adaptive.
There are a number of examples in which some organizations have adapted to new technologies or global competition, while others have failed to adapt and subsequently gone under. Blockbuster and Netflix provide a classic example: in this case, Blockbuster was simply too slow to adapt to the demand for live-streaming videos. Netflix, on the other hand, embraced this technological evolution and pioneered a user-friendly interface, gaining the company enormous value.
Strategic management largely pertains to adapting an organization to its business environment. The greatest agent for organizational change is the socialization aspect of culture, which can be empowered structurally. If an organization takes on the identity of a growing, adapting, and learning organization, these qualities become part of the fabric of how it operates. Knowing how and being able to increase this adaptability is important to organizational success.
Implementing a strategy of adaptation may have effects that ripple across an organization. Increasing an organization’s ability to adapt to change and minimize disruption can reduce costs and save time. One approach for increasing adaptation is to appoint an individual to champion the changes, address and eventually enlist opponents, and proactively identify and mitigate problems.
Challenges in Adaptation
Resistance to change is considered a major obstacle to creating effective adaptability in an organization. Organizational change can lead to loss of stability and—if this instability becomes great enough—loss of organizational effectiveness.
The following are methods that can be employed to help an organization and its staff to cope with change:
- Form focus groups. Staff from different departments can be selected to form focus groups, where quality data can be collected. In focus group discussions, staff should be given the chance to freely express their opinions and share their experiences.
- Provide training. Providing training courses to staff on new processes or structures can help to increase staff competence and reduce their resistance to change.
- Implement changes step by step. This involves first implementing the system in small groups—such as several departments or sections—and then widening the scope of implementation. This step-by-step approach can help by exposing problems raised simultaneously across the small groups and providing management with sufficient time to solve these problems before implementing the system across the organization.
Moving to Flexible Work Schedules
Employers can offer flexible working arrangements in the form of flextime and telecommuting work.
Identify critical factors of success in creating a “telework” organization
- Companies have begun to recognize how important a healthy work-life balance is to the productivity and creativity of their employees. Integrating new technologies for flexible schedules is a great opportunity to capture this value.
- Flextime and telecommuting (telework) are popular strategies that enable employees to set their own schedules and work from wherever is most convenient for them.
- In addition to supporting the required incremental technologies, a well-functioning telework organization needs a management system that is at least as effective as that of a traditional organization.
- Management teams face additional issues such as how to supervise employees who are often out of the office, how to monitor staff productivity with less personal interaction, how to build a strong virtual team, and how to maintain relationships between remote employees.
- telecommute: To work from home, sometimes for part of a working day or week, using a computer connected to the employer’s network or via the internet.
Companies have begun to recognize how important a healthy work-life balance is to the productivity and creativity of their employees. Research by Kenexa Research Institute in 2007 showed that employees who were more favorable toward their organization’s efforts to support work-life balance also indicated a lower intent to leave the organization, greater pride in their organization, a willingness to recommend the organization as a place to work, and higher overall job satisfaction.
Employers can offer a range of different programs and initiatives that support such a work-life balance. Flexible working arrangements such as flextime and telecommuting work are becoming increasingly popular. More proactive employers can also provide compulsory leave, implement strict maximum hours, or foster an environment that encourages employees not to continue working after hours.
Telecommuting (or telework) is a work arrangement in which employees do not commute to a central place of work. A person who telecommutes is known as a “telecommuter,” “teleworker,” or “home-sourced employee.” Many telecommuters work from home while others—sometimes called “nomad workers”—use mobile telecommunications technology to work from coffee shops or other locations. This allows employees the flexibility of adapting their work schedule to their living situation.
This arrangement is also quite popular in circumstances of sick leave, pregnancy, parenting, and other important life events. In the past these events could have resulted in temporary loss of employment. Being able to work from anywhere with an internet connection is a modern luxury that adaptable companies should be well aware of.
Flextime (also called flexitime or flexi-time) is a variable work schedule, unlike traditional work arrangements in which employees work a standard 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. shift. In this arrangement, there is typically a core period of approximately 50% of the total working day when employees are expected to be at work (for example, between 11 a.m. and 3 p.m.). The rest of the working day is “flextime” in which employees can choose when they work. Employees are still required to complete the necessary work and achieve total daily, weekly, or monthly hours in the region of what the employer expects.
A flextime policy allows staff to determine when they will work, and a flexplace policy allows staff to determine where they will work. These strategies allow employees to adapt their work hours based on public transport schedules, child-care responsibilities, rush-hour traffic, and other elements.
Establishing a Telework Organization
In addition to supporting the required incremental technologies, a well-functioning telework organization needs a management system that is at least as effective as that of a traditional organization. Management teams face additional issues such as how to supervise employees who are often out of the office, how to monitor staff productivity with less personal interaction, how to build a strong virtual team, and how to maintain relationships between remote employees.
Some suggested best practices for maintaining a successful telework organization include:
- Develop a daily schedule. Setting a standardized daily schedule can help remote teleworkers feel as though they are really at work. It can also make it easier for supervisors to monitor staff activities and can lead to increased productivity.
- Establish milestone dates. Milestone dates help keep projects on track and make it easier to spot problems while there is still time to effectively deal with them.
- Encourage social networking. Employee surveys show that being able to keep in touch and communicate with colleagues despite physical distance can boost employee satisfaction and encourage top talent to stick around.
- Address problems right away. Respond to problems immediately even if they are reported by email or text message. This will prevent teleworkers from feeling isolated.
- Design key performance indicators ( KPIs ) for remote workers. These KPIs can also be used to measure the effectiveness of in-office staff and maintain an equivalence among the distinct employee categories.
- Start workdays by holding a five-minute team video-conference. This helps supervisors to maintain a regular check-in routine; it also enables employees to catch up on team work progress and feel connected to the whole organization.
- Manage by observation. A successful telework or telecommuting program requires a management style that is results-oriented (as opposed to task-oriented). This is referred to as management by objectives as opposed to management by observation.
Increasing coordination helps organizations to maintain efficient operations through communication and control.
Identify the way in which effective coordination across an organization can be increased through effective structure and good management
- Coordination is a managerial function in which different activities of the business are properly adjusted and interlinked.
- The management team must pay special attention to issues related to coordination and governance and be able to improve upon coordination through effective management.
- Managers should strengthen communication across all facets of the organization to increase the level of integration between each moving part.
- If there is a lack of coordination, there is a risk that responsibility will become dispersed and tasks will be left unclaimed. Organizing accountability for every task helps to ensure that efforts are tangibly coordinated.
- division: A section of a large company.
- margin: A permissible difference; allowing some freedom to move within limits.
- centralization: The act or process of combining or reducing several parts into a whole.
Coordination is the act of organizing and enabling different people to work together to achieve an organization’s goals. It is a managerial function in which different activities of the business are properly adjusted and interlinked.
Employees within the functional divisions of an organization tend to perform a specialized set of tasks, such as engineering. This leads to operational efficiency within that group. However, it can also lead to a lack of communication between various functional groups within an organization, rendering the organization slow and inflexible.
Coordination is simply the managerial ability to maintain operations and ensure they are properly integrated with one another; therefore, increasing coordination is closely related to improving managerial skills. The management team must pay special attention to issues related to coordination and governance and be able to improve upon coordination through effective management.
Increasing coordination internally can be accomplished by keeping all moving parts of the organization on the same page. There are a number of ways to improve upon the coordination of different departments, work groups, teams, or functional specialists. These include creating a well-communicated and accurate mission statement; clearly defining strategic objectives; monitoring and evaluating each functional group; providing company-wide updates and communications from each department; and, wherever possible, promoting cross-departmental meetings and projects. While this list is long and complex, the underlying concept is relatively simple: managers should strengthen communication across all facets of the organization to increase the level of integration between each moving part.
In practice, coordination involves a delicate balance between centralization and decentralization. However, maintaining coordination does not necessarily imply that decision-making processes are centralized or that actions are carried out without the support of employees. Put simply, it is important to ensure that there is a person or team in place that takes responsibility for general tasks.
If there is a lack of coordination, there is a risk that responsibility will become dispersed and tasks will be left unclaimed. Organizing accountability for every task helps to ensure that efforts are tangibly coordinated and provides structure to operational expectations. Structure is a central determinant of effective coordination across an organization as it enables communications, underlines responsibilities, and provides concrete authority in decision-making.