{"id":156,"date":"2015-07-30T00:10:25","date_gmt":"2015-07-30T00:10:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/courses.candelalearning.com\/intlbusx1xmaster\/?post_type=chapter&#038;p=156"},"modified":"2017-01-09T19:14:38","modified_gmt":"2017-01-09T19:14:38","slug":"tying-it-all-together-using-the-hrm-balanced-scorecard-to-gauge-and-manage-human-capital-including-your-own","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/cerritos-internationalbusiness\/chapter\/tying-it-all-together-using-the-hrm-balanced-scorecard-to-gauge-and-manage-human-capital-including-your-own\/","title":{"raw":"Reading: Tying It All Together\u2014Using the HRM Balanced Scorecard to Gauge and Manage Human Capital, Including Your Own","rendered":"Reading: Tying It All Together\u2014Using the HRM Balanced Scorecard to Gauge and Manage Human Capital, Including Your Own"},"content":{"raw":"<div class=\"im_section\">\r\n<div class=\"bcc-box bcc-highlight\">\r\n<h3 class=\"im_title\">Learning Objectives<\/h3>\r\n<ol id=\"fwk-168388-ch12_s05_l01\" class=\"im_orderedlist\">\r\n\t<li>Describe the Balanced Scorecard method and how it can be applied to HRM.<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Discuss what is meant by \u201chuman capital.\u201d<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Understand why metrics are important to improving company performance.<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Consider how your human capital might be mapped on an HRM Balanced Scorecard.<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div id=\"fwk-168388-ch12_s05_s01\" class=\"im_section\">\r\n<h2 class=\"im_title im_editable im_block\">Applying the Balanced Scorecard Method to HRM<\/h2>\r\nYou may already be familiar with the Balanced Scorecard, a tool that helps managers measure what matters to a company. Developed by Robert Kaplan and David Norton, the <span class=\"im_margin_term\"><span class=\"im_glossterm\">Balanced Scorecard<\/span><\/span> helps managers define the performance categories that relate to the company\u2019s strategy. The managers then translate those categories into metrics and track performance on those metrics. Besides traditional financial and quality measures, companies use employee-performance measures to track their employees\u2019 knowledge, skills, and contributions to the company.<span id=\"fwk-carpibus-fn12_087\" class=\"im_footnote\">[footnote]Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton, <em class=\"im_emphasis\">The Balanced Scorecard<\/em> (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1996).[\/footnote]<\/span>\r\n\r\nThe employee-performance aspects of the Balanced Scorecard analyze employee capabilities, satisfaction, retention, and productivity. Companies also track whether employees are motivated (e.g., by tracking the number of suggestions made and implemented by employees) and whether employee performance goals are aligned with company goals.\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div id=\"fwk-168388-ch12_s05_s02\" class=\"im_section\">\r\n<h2 class=\"im_title im_editable im_block\">Applying the Balanced Scorecard Method to HRM<\/h2>\r\nBecause the Balanced Scorecard focuses on the strategy and metrics of the business, Mark Huselid and his colleagues took this concept a step further and developed the Workforce Scorecard to provide a framework specific to HRM. According to Huselid, the <span class=\"im_margin_term\"><span class=\"im_glossterm\">Workforce Scorecard<\/span><\/span> identifies and measures the behaviors, skills, mind-sets, and results required for the workforce to contribute to the company\u2019s success. Specifically, as summarized in the following figure, the Workforce Scorecard has four key sequential elements:<span id=\"fwk-carpibus-fn12_088\" class=\"im_footnote\">[footnote]Mark A. Huselid, Brian E. Becker, and Richard W. Beatty, <em class=\"im_emphasis\">The Workforce Scorecard: Managing Human Capital to Execute Strategy<\/em> (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2005).[\/footnote]<\/span>\r\n<ol id=\"fwk-168388-ch12_s05_s02_l01\" class=\"im_orderedlist im_editable im_block\">\r\n\t<li><strong class=\"im_emphasis im_bold\">Workforce mind-set and culture.<\/strong> Does the workforce understand the strategy and embrace it? Does the workforce have the culture needed to support strategy execution?<\/li>\r\n\t<li><strong class=\"im_emphasis im_bold\">Workforce competencies.<\/strong> Does the workforce, especially in the strategically important or \u201cA\u201d positions, have the skills it needs to execute the strategy? (Remember that \u201cA\u201d positions are those job categories most vital to the company\u2019s success.)<\/li>\r\n\t<li><strong class=\"im_emphasis im_bold\">Leadership and workforce behaviors.<\/strong> Are the leadership team and workforce consistently behaving in ways that will lead to the attainment of the company\u2019s key strategic objectives?<\/li>\r\n\t<li><strong class=\"im_emphasis im_bold\">Workforce success.<\/strong> Has the workforce achieved the key strategic objectives for the business? (If the organization can answer yes to the first three elements, then the answer should be yes here as well.)<span id=\"fwk-carpibus-fn12_089\" class=\"im_footnote\">[footnote]Mark A. Huselid, Brian E. Becker, and Richard W. Beatty, \u201c\u2018A Players\u2019 or \u2018A Positions\u2019? The Strategic Logic of Workforce Management,\u201d <em class=\"im_emphasis\">Harvard Business Review<\/em> 83, no. 12 (December 2005), <a class=\"im_link\" href=\"http:\/\/chrs.rutgers.edu\/pub_documents\/Huselid-Beatty-Becker%20HBR%20Paper.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/chrs.rutgers.edu\/pub_documents\/Huselid-Beatty-Becker%20HBR%20Paper.pdf<\/a>.[\/footnote]\u00a0The Workforce Balanced Scorecard bridges HRM best practices and the firm\u2019s comprehensive Balanced Scorecard.<\/span><\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<div id=\"fwk-168388-ch12_s05_s02_f01\" class=\"im_informalfigure im_large im_medium-height im_block\">\r\n\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/textimgs.s3.amazonaws.com\/intlbus\/section_16\/59945649e53e3fac7ebff2da3e221795.jpg\" target=\"_blank\"><img class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images-archive-read-only\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/789\/2015\/07\/23113815\/sm_59945649e53e3fac7ebff2da3e221795.jpg\" alt=\"The HR balanced scorecard forms a bridge\" width=\"500\" height=\"382\" \/><\/a>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div id=\"fwk-168388-ch12_s05_s02_s01\" class=\"im_section\">\r\n<h2 class=\"im_title im_editable im_block\">Human Capital<\/h2>\r\nImplementing the Workforce Scorecard requires a change in perspective, from seeing people as a cost to seeing people as the company\u2019s most important asset to be managed\u2014human capital. As discussed in the section\u00a0\"The Changing Role of Strategic Human Resources Management in International Business,\" human capital is the collective sum of the attributes, life experiences, knowledge, inventiveness, energy, and enthusiasm that a company\u2019s employees choose to invest in their work. Such an asset is difficult to measure because it\u2019s intangible, and factors like \u201cinventiveness\u201d are subjective and open to interpretation. The challenge for managers, then, is to develop measurement systems that are more rigorous and provide a frame of reference. The metrics can range from activity-based (transactional) metrics to strategic ones. Transactional metrics are the easiest to measure and include counting the number of new people hired, fired, transferred, and promoted. The measures associated with these include the cost of each new hire, the length of time and cost associated with transferring an employee, and so forth. Typical ratios associated with transactional metrics include the training cost factor (i.e., the total training cost divided by the number of employees trained) and training cost percentage (i.e., the total training cost divided by the operating expense).<span id=\"fwk-carpibus-fn12_090\" class=\"im_footnote\">[footnote]Leslie A. Weatherly, \u201cThe Value of People: The Challenges and Opportunities of Human Capital Measurement and Reporting,\u201d <em class=\"im_emphasis\">SHRM Research Quarterly<\/em> 3 (2003): 14\u201325, accessed February 6, 2011, <a class=\"im_link\" href=\"http:\/\/www.shrm.org\/Research\/Articles\/Articles\/Documents\/0303measurement.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/www.shrm.org\/Research\/Articles\/Articles\/Documents\/0303measurement.pdf<\/a>.[\/footnote]<\/span> But these transactional measures don\u2019t get at the strategic issues\u2014namely, whether the right employees are being trained and whether they\u2019re remembering and using what they learned. Measuring training effectiveness requires not only devising metrics but also changing the nature of the training.\r\n<div id=\"fwk-168388-ch12_s05_s02_s01_n01\" class=\"im_callout im_block\">\r\n<h3 class=\"im_title\">Ethics in Action<\/h3>\r\n<h4>How to Initiate an Ethics Program<\/h4>\r\nThe Balanced Scorecard doesn\u2019t explicitly have a facet on global ethics, but that doesn\u2019t mean you can\u2019t add one. Fostering business-ethics awareness in today\u2019s multicultural workplace and global marketplace is only the beginning. The following initiatives can be implemented to your corporate ethics program:\r\n<ul id=\"fwk-168388-ch12_s05_s02_s01_l01\" class=\"im_itemizedlist\">\r\n\t<li>Uncover or discover what the burning ethical issues are in your organization worldwide. This may involve conducting a broad survey to a cross section of all employees, covering all areas and departments of the organization worldwide.<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Make ethics explicit by developing a clear code of conduct that is based on values and that deals directly and cross-culturally with issues. Once articulated, the challenge is to communicate and inculcate this explicit code throughout the organization.<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Provide opportunities to learn about ethical dilemmas and how to resolve them. Practice doing so in nonthreatening, experiential ways, such as through simulation training or case studies. This might involve creating an ethics program built around the organization\u2019s explicit code of conduct.<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Network with others in your industry and with ethics personnel from other organizations and industries. This is an effective way to learn the best practices in the field and to benchmark your organization.<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Review the \u201cethical state of health\u201d on a continual basis by repeatedly revisiting your research, communication and training programs, code of conduct, and so forth. Times change, and strategies shift. Thus there is always a need to revisit the subject. Don\u2019t expect the core values to change. However, one word in a definition may need to be edited or replaced, or a new value may emerge that is critical to the future character and success of your business.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/div>\r\nThe BMO Bank of Montreal has taken this step. \u201cWhat we\u2019re trying to do at the Bank of Montreal is to build learning into what it is that people are doing,\u201d said Jim Rush of the Bank of Montreal\u2019s Institute for Learning. \u201cThe difficulty with training as we once conceived it is that you\u2019re taken off your job, you\u2019re taken out of context, you\u2019re taken away from those things that you\u2019re currently working on, and you go through some kind of training. And then you\u2019ve got to come back and begin to apply that. Well, you walk back to that environment and it hasn\u2019t changed. It\u2019s not supportive or conducive to you behaving in a different kind of way, so you revert back to the way you were, very naturally.\u201d To overcome this, the bank conducts training such that teams bring in specific tasks on which they\u2019re working, so that they learn by doing. This removes the gap between learning in one context and applying it in another. The bank then looks at performance indices directly related to the bottom line. \u201cIf we take an entire business unit through a program designed to help them learn how to increase the market share of a particular product, we can look at market share and see if it improved after the training,\u201d Rush said.<span id=\"fwk-carpibus-fn12_091\" class=\"im_footnote\">[footnote]Jim Rush, interview by Andrea Meyer, <em class=\"im_emphasis\">Fast Company<\/em>, July 1995.[\/footnote]<\/span>\r\n\r\nMotorola has adopted a similar approach, using action learning in its Senior Executive Program. Action learning teams are assigned a specific project by Motorola\u2019s CEO and are responsible for implementing the solutions they design. This approach not only educates the team members but also lets them implement the ideas, so they\u2019re in a position to influence the organization. In this way, the training seamlessly supports Motorola\u2019s goals.\r\n\r\nAs you can see in these examples, organizations need employees to apply their knowledge to activities that add value to the company. In planning and applying human capital measures, managers should use both retrospective (lagging) and prospective (leading) indicators. Lagging indicators are those that tell the company what it has accomplished (e.g., the Bank of Montreal\u2019s documenting the effect that training had on a business unit\u2019s performance). Leading indicators are forecasts that help an organization see where it is headed. Leading indicators include employee learning and growth indices.<span id=\"fwk-carpibus-fn12_092\" class=\"im_footnote\">[footnote]Leslie A. Weatherly, \u201cThe Value of People: The Challenges and Opportunities of Human Capital Measurement and Reporting,\u201d <em class=\"im_emphasis\">SHRM Research Quarterly<\/em> 3 (2003): 14\u201325, accessed February 6, 2011, <a class=\"im_link\" href=\"http:\/\/www.shrm.org\/Research\/Articles\/Articles\/Documents\/0303measurement.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/www.shrm.org\/Research\/Articles\/Articles\/Documents\/0303measurement.pdf<\/a>.[\/footnote]<\/span>\r\n<div id=\"fwk-168388-ch12_s05_s02_s01_n02\" class=\"im_callout im_editable im_block\">\r\n<h3 class=\"im_title\">Ethics in Action<\/h3>\r\nAs Mark Vickers of the Human Resource Institute points out, global corporations often have to operate in nations where bribery, sexual harassment, racial discrimination, and a variety of other issues are not uniformly viewed as illegal or even unethical.<span id=\"fwk-carpibus-fn12_093\" class=\"im_footnote\">[footnote]Mark R. Vickers, \u201cBusiness Ethics and the HR Role: Past, Present, and Future,\u201d <em class=\"im_emphasis\">Human Resource Planning<\/em> 28, no. 1 (2005), accessed January 28, 2011, <a class=\"im_link\" href=\"http:\/\/www.entrepreneur.com\/tradejournals\/article\/131500182_1.html\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/www.entrepreneur.com\/tradejournals\/article\/131500182_1.html<\/a>.[\/footnote]<\/span> As a result, companies must grapple with maintaining an enterprise-wide standard of ethics in countries where these practices are not the norm and may even be counter to local traditions. For many companies, China may be the test bed for dealing with these issues. A recent study reported that in China \u201cthere is a need to harness the (largely neglected) ethical dimension to transform business practice along international standards\u2026At a minimum, fraud and corruption must be suppressed in an atmosphere where contract and property rights are clearly defined and honored.\u201d<span id=\"fwk-carpibus-fn12_094\" class=\"im_footnote\">[footnote]Philip. C. Wright, Szeto Wing-Fu, and S. K. Lee, \u201cEthical Perceptions in China: The Reality of Business Ethics in an International Context,\u201d <em class=\"im_emphasis\">Management Decision<\/em> 41, no. 2 (2003): 182.[\/footnote]<\/span> As countries work together to develop multinational trade and labor agreements, a common set of ethical norms will develop over time, but the process will not happen overnight. In the meantime, companies will need to think internally about how to handle ethical issues in a way that makes sense at home and abroad.<span id=\"fwk-carpibus-fn12_095\" class=\"im_footnote\">[footnote]Philip C. Wright, Szeto Wing-Fu, and S. K. Lee, \u201cEthical Perceptions in China: The Reality of Business Ethics in an International Context,\u201d <em class=\"im_emphasis\">Management Decision<\/em> 41, no. 2 (2003): 180\u201389.[\/footnote]<\/span>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div id=\"fwk-168388-ch12_s05_s02_s02\" class=\"im_section\">\r\n<h2 class=\"im_title im_editable im_block\">The Payoff<\/h2>\r\nGiven the complexity of trying to measure intangibles with metrics and a scorecard, some managers may be inclined to ask, \u201cWhy bother doing all this?\u201d Research by John Lingle and William Schiemann provides a clear answer. Companies that make a concerted effort to measure intangibles such as employee performance, innovation, and change in addition to measuring financial benchmarks perform better. Lingle and Schiemann examined how executives measured six strategic performance areas: (1) financial performance, (2) operating efficiency, (3) customer satisfaction, (4) employee performance, (5) innovation and change, and (6) community\/environment issues. To evaluate how carefully the measures were tracked, the researchers asked the executives, \u201cHow highly do you value the information in each strategic performance area?\u201d and \u201cWould you bet your job on the quality of the information on each of these areas?\u201d The researchers found that the companies that paid the closest attention to the metrics and had the most credible information were the ones that had been identified as industry leaders over the previous three years (e.g., 74 percent of measurement-managed companies but only 44 percent of others) and reported financial performance in the top third of their industry (e.g., 83 percent compared with 52 percent).<span id=\"fwk-carpibus-fn12_096\" class=\"im_footnote\">[footnote]Leslie A. Weatherly \u201cThe Value of People: The Challenges and Opportunities of Human Capital Measurement and Reporting,\u201d <em class=\"im_emphasis\">HR Magazine<\/em>, January 30, 2011, <a class=\"im_link\" href=\"http:\/\/findarticles.com\/p\/articles\/mi_m3495\/is_9_48\/ai_108315188\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/findarticles.com\/p\/articles\/mi_m3495\/is_9_48\/ai_108315188<\/a>.[\/footnote]<\/span>\r\n\r\nThe Workforce Scorecard is vital because most organizations have much better control and accountability over their raw materials than they do over their workforce. For example, a retailer can quickly identify the source of a bad product, but the same retailer can\u2019t identify a poor manager whose negative attitude is poisoning morale and strategic execution.<span id=\"fwk-carpibus-fn12_097\" class=\"im_footnote\">[footnote]Brian E. Becker and Mark A. Huselid, \u201cStrategic Human Resources Management: Where Do We Go from Here?,\u201d <em class=\"im_emphasis\">Journal of Management<\/em> 32, no. 6 (2006): 898\u2013925.[\/footnote]<\/span>\r\n<div id=\"fwk-168388-ch12_s05_s02_s02_n01\" class=\"im_key_takeaways im_editable im_block\">\r\n<h3 class=\"im_title\">Key Takeaways<\/h3>\r\n<ul id=\"fwk-168388-ch12_s05_s02_s02_l01\" class=\"im_itemizedlist\">\r\n\t<li>The Balanced Scorecard, when applied to HRM, helps managers align all HRM activities with the company\u2019s strategic goals. Assigning metrics to the HRM activities lets managers track progress on goals and ensure that they\u2019re working toward strategic objectives. It adds rigor and lets managers quickly identify gaps.<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Companies that measure intangibles such as employee performance, innovation, and change perform better financially than companies that don\u2019t use such metrics.<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Rather than investing equally in training for all jobs, a company should invest disproportionately more in developing the people in the key strategic (\u201cA\u201d) jobs on which the company\u2019s success is most dependent.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"bcc-box bcc-info\">\r\n<h3 class=\"im_title\">Exercises[footnote](AACSB: Reflective Thinking, Analytical Skills)[\/footnote]<\/h3>\r\n<ol id=\"fwk-168388-ch12_s05_s02_s02_l02\" class=\"im_orderedlist\">\r\n\t<li>Define the Balanced Scorecard method.<\/li>\r\n\t<li>List the elements of a Workforce Scorecard.<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Discuss how human capital can be managed like a strategic asset.<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Why is it important to align HRM metrics with company strategy?<\/li>\r\n\t<li>What kind of metrics would be most useful for HRM to track?<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>","rendered":"<div class=\"im_section\">\n<div class=\"bcc-box bcc-highlight\">\n<h3 class=\"im_title\">Learning Objectives<\/h3>\n<ol id=\"fwk-168388-ch12_s05_l01\" class=\"im_orderedlist\">\n<li>Describe the Balanced Scorecard method and how it can be applied to HRM.<\/li>\n<li>Discuss what is meant by \u201chuman capital.\u201d<\/li>\n<li>Understand why metrics are important to improving company performance.<\/li>\n<li>Consider how your human capital might be mapped on an HRM Balanced Scorecard.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"fwk-168388-ch12_s05_s01\" class=\"im_section\">\n<h2 class=\"im_title im_editable im_block\">Applying the Balanced Scorecard Method to HRM<\/h2>\n<p>You may already be familiar with the Balanced Scorecard, a tool that helps managers measure what matters to a company. Developed by Robert Kaplan and David Norton, the <span class=\"im_margin_term\"><span class=\"im_glossterm\">Balanced Scorecard<\/span><\/span> helps managers define the performance categories that relate to the company\u2019s strategy. The managers then translate those categories into metrics and track performance on those metrics. Besides traditional financial and quality measures, companies use employee-performance measures to track their employees\u2019 knowledge, skills, and contributions to the company.<span id=\"fwk-carpibus-fn12_087\" class=\"im_footnote\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton, The Balanced Scorecard (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1996).\" id=\"return-footnote-156-1\" href=\"#footnote-156-1\" aria-label=\"Footnote 1\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[1]<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p>The employee-performance aspects of the Balanced Scorecard analyze employee capabilities, satisfaction, retention, and productivity. Companies also track whether employees are motivated (e.g., by tracking the number of suggestions made and implemented by employees) and whether employee performance goals are aligned with company goals.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"fwk-168388-ch12_s05_s02\" class=\"im_section\">\n<h2 class=\"im_title im_editable im_block\">Applying the Balanced Scorecard Method to HRM<\/h2>\n<p>Because the Balanced Scorecard focuses on the strategy and metrics of the business, Mark Huselid and his colleagues took this concept a step further and developed the Workforce Scorecard to provide a framework specific to HRM. According to Huselid, the <span class=\"im_margin_term\"><span class=\"im_glossterm\">Workforce Scorecard<\/span><\/span> identifies and measures the behaviors, skills, mind-sets, and results required for the workforce to contribute to the company\u2019s success. Specifically, as summarized in the following figure, the Workforce Scorecard has four key sequential elements:<span id=\"fwk-carpibus-fn12_088\" class=\"im_footnote\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Mark A. Huselid, Brian E. Becker, and Richard W. Beatty, The Workforce Scorecard: Managing Human Capital to Execute Strategy (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2005).\" id=\"return-footnote-156-2\" href=\"#footnote-156-2\" aria-label=\"Footnote 2\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[2]<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<ol id=\"fwk-168388-ch12_s05_s02_l01\" class=\"im_orderedlist im_editable im_block\">\n<li><strong class=\"im_emphasis im_bold\">Workforce mind-set and culture.<\/strong> Does the workforce understand the strategy and embrace it? Does the workforce have the culture needed to support strategy execution?<\/li>\n<li><strong class=\"im_emphasis im_bold\">Workforce competencies.<\/strong> Does the workforce, especially in the strategically important or \u201cA\u201d positions, have the skills it needs to execute the strategy? (Remember that \u201cA\u201d positions are those job categories most vital to the company\u2019s success.)<\/li>\n<li><strong class=\"im_emphasis im_bold\">Leadership and workforce behaviors.<\/strong> Are the leadership team and workforce consistently behaving in ways that will lead to the attainment of the company\u2019s key strategic objectives?<\/li>\n<li><strong class=\"im_emphasis im_bold\">Workforce success.<\/strong> Has the workforce achieved the key strategic objectives for the business? (If the organization can answer yes to the first three elements, then the answer should be yes here as well.)<span id=\"fwk-carpibus-fn12_089\" class=\"im_footnote\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Mark A. Huselid, Brian E. Becker, and Richard W. Beatty, \u201c\u2018A Players\u2019 or \u2018A Positions\u2019? The Strategic Logic of Workforce Management,\u201d Harvard Business Review 83, no. 12 (December 2005), http:\/\/chrs.rutgers.edu\/pub_documents\/Huselid-Beatty-Becker%20HBR%20Paper.pdf.\" id=\"return-footnote-156-3\" href=\"#footnote-156-3\" aria-label=\"Footnote 3\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[3]<\/sup><\/a>\u00a0The Workforce Balanced Scorecard bridges HRM best practices and the firm\u2019s comprehensive Balanced Scorecard.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<div id=\"fwk-168388-ch12_s05_s02_f01\" class=\"im_informalfigure im_large im_medium-height im_block\">\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/textimgs.s3.amazonaws.com\/intlbus\/section_16\/59945649e53e3fac7ebff2da3e221795.jpg\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images-archive-read-only\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/789\/2015\/07\/23113815\/sm_59945649e53e3fac7ebff2da3e221795.jpg\" alt=\"The HR balanced scorecard forms a bridge\" width=\"500\" height=\"382\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"fwk-168388-ch12_s05_s02_s01\" class=\"im_section\">\n<h2 class=\"im_title im_editable im_block\">Human Capital<\/h2>\n<p>Implementing the Workforce Scorecard requires a change in perspective, from seeing people as a cost to seeing people as the company\u2019s most important asset to be managed\u2014human capital. As discussed in the section\u00a0&#8220;The Changing Role of Strategic Human Resources Management in International Business,&#8221; human capital is the collective sum of the attributes, life experiences, knowledge, inventiveness, energy, and enthusiasm that a company\u2019s employees choose to invest in their work. Such an asset is difficult to measure because it\u2019s intangible, and factors like \u201cinventiveness\u201d are subjective and open to interpretation. The challenge for managers, then, is to develop measurement systems that are more rigorous and provide a frame of reference. The metrics can range from activity-based (transactional) metrics to strategic ones. Transactional metrics are the easiest to measure and include counting the number of new people hired, fired, transferred, and promoted. The measures associated with these include the cost of each new hire, the length of time and cost associated with transferring an employee, and so forth. Typical ratios associated with transactional metrics include the training cost factor (i.e., the total training cost divided by the number of employees trained) and training cost percentage (i.e., the total training cost divided by the operating expense).<span id=\"fwk-carpibus-fn12_090\" class=\"im_footnote\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Leslie A. Weatherly, \u201cThe Value of People: The Challenges and Opportunities of Human Capital Measurement and Reporting,\u201d SHRM Research Quarterly 3 (2003): 14\u201325, accessed February 6, 2011, http:\/\/www.shrm.org\/Research\/Articles\/Articles\/Documents\/0303measurement.pdf.\" id=\"return-footnote-156-4\" href=\"#footnote-156-4\" aria-label=\"Footnote 4\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[4]<\/sup><\/a><\/span> But these transactional measures don\u2019t get at the strategic issues\u2014namely, whether the right employees are being trained and whether they\u2019re remembering and using what they learned. Measuring training effectiveness requires not only devising metrics but also changing the nature of the training.<\/p>\n<div id=\"fwk-168388-ch12_s05_s02_s01_n01\" class=\"im_callout im_block\">\n<h3 class=\"im_title\">Ethics in Action<\/h3>\n<h4>How to Initiate an Ethics Program<\/h4>\n<p>The Balanced Scorecard doesn\u2019t explicitly have a facet on global ethics, but that doesn\u2019t mean you can\u2019t add one. Fostering business-ethics awareness in today\u2019s multicultural workplace and global marketplace is only the beginning. The following initiatives can be implemented to your corporate ethics program:<\/p>\n<ul id=\"fwk-168388-ch12_s05_s02_s01_l01\" class=\"im_itemizedlist\">\n<li>Uncover or discover what the burning ethical issues are in your organization worldwide. This may involve conducting a broad survey to a cross section of all employees, covering all areas and departments of the organization worldwide.<\/li>\n<li>Make ethics explicit by developing a clear code of conduct that is based on values and that deals directly and cross-culturally with issues. Once articulated, the challenge is to communicate and inculcate this explicit code throughout the organization.<\/li>\n<li>Provide opportunities to learn about ethical dilemmas and how to resolve them. Practice doing so in nonthreatening, experiential ways, such as through simulation training or case studies. This might involve creating an ethics program built around the organization\u2019s explicit code of conduct.<\/li>\n<li>Network with others in your industry and with ethics personnel from other organizations and industries. This is an effective way to learn the best practices in the field and to benchmark your organization.<\/li>\n<li>Review the \u201cethical state of health\u201d on a continual basis by repeatedly revisiting your research, communication and training programs, code of conduct, and so forth. Times change, and strategies shift. Thus there is always a need to revisit the subject. Don\u2019t expect the core values to change. However, one word in a definition may need to be edited or replaced, or a new value may emerge that is critical to the future character and success of your business.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<p>The BMO Bank of Montreal has taken this step. \u201cWhat we\u2019re trying to do at the Bank of Montreal is to build learning into what it is that people are doing,\u201d said Jim Rush of the Bank of Montreal\u2019s Institute for Learning. \u201cThe difficulty with training as we once conceived it is that you\u2019re taken off your job, you\u2019re taken out of context, you\u2019re taken away from those things that you\u2019re currently working on, and you go through some kind of training. And then you\u2019ve got to come back and begin to apply that. Well, you walk back to that environment and it hasn\u2019t changed. It\u2019s not supportive or conducive to you behaving in a different kind of way, so you revert back to the way you were, very naturally.\u201d To overcome this, the bank conducts training such that teams bring in specific tasks on which they\u2019re working, so that they learn by doing. This removes the gap between learning in one context and applying it in another. The bank then looks at performance indices directly related to the bottom line. \u201cIf we take an entire business unit through a program designed to help them learn how to increase the market share of a particular product, we can look at market share and see if it improved after the training,\u201d Rush said.<span id=\"fwk-carpibus-fn12_091\" class=\"im_footnote\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Jim Rush, interview by Andrea Meyer, Fast Company, July 1995.\" id=\"return-footnote-156-5\" href=\"#footnote-156-5\" aria-label=\"Footnote 5\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[5]<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p>Motorola has adopted a similar approach, using action learning in its Senior Executive Program. Action learning teams are assigned a specific project by Motorola\u2019s CEO and are responsible for implementing the solutions they design. This approach not only educates the team members but also lets them implement the ideas, so they\u2019re in a position to influence the organization. In this way, the training seamlessly supports Motorola\u2019s goals.<\/p>\n<p>As you can see in these examples, organizations need employees to apply their knowledge to activities that add value to the company. In planning and applying human capital measures, managers should use both retrospective (lagging) and prospective (leading) indicators. Lagging indicators are those that tell the company what it has accomplished (e.g., the Bank of Montreal\u2019s documenting the effect that training had on a business unit\u2019s performance). Leading indicators are forecasts that help an organization see where it is headed. Leading indicators include employee learning and growth indices.<span id=\"fwk-carpibus-fn12_092\" class=\"im_footnote\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Leslie A. Weatherly, \u201cThe Value of People: The Challenges and Opportunities of Human Capital Measurement and Reporting,\u201d SHRM Research Quarterly 3 (2003): 14\u201325, accessed February 6, 2011, http:\/\/www.shrm.org\/Research\/Articles\/Articles\/Documents\/0303measurement.pdf.\" id=\"return-footnote-156-6\" href=\"#footnote-156-6\" aria-label=\"Footnote 6\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[6]<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"fwk-168388-ch12_s05_s02_s01_n02\" class=\"im_callout im_editable im_block\">\n<h3 class=\"im_title\">Ethics in Action<\/h3>\n<p>As Mark Vickers of the Human Resource Institute points out, global corporations often have to operate in nations where bribery, sexual harassment, racial discrimination, and a variety of other issues are not uniformly viewed as illegal or even unethical.<span id=\"fwk-carpibus-fn12_093\" class=\"im_footnote\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Mark R. Vickers, \u201cBusiness Ethics and the HR Role: Past, Present, and Future,\u201d Human Resource Planning 28, no. 1 (2005), accessed January 28, 2011, http:\/\/www.entrepreneur.com\/tradejournals\/article\/131500182_1.html.\" id=\"return-footnote-156-7\" href=\"#footnote-156-7\" aria-label=\"Footnote 7\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[7]<\/sup><\/a><\/span> As a result, companies must grapple with maintaining an enterprise-wide standard of ethics in countries where these practices are not the norm and may even be counter to local traditions. For many companies, China may be the test bed for dealing with these issues. A recent study reported that in China \u201cthere is a need to harness the (largely neglected) ethical dimension to transform business practice along international standards\u2026At a minimum, fraud and corruption must be suppressed in an atmosphere where contract and property rights are clearly defined and honored.\u201d<span id=\"fwk-carpibus-fn12_094\" class=\"im_footnote\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Philip. C. Wright, Szeto Wing-Fu, and S. K. Lee, \u201cEthical Perceptions in China: The Reality of Business Ethics in an International Context,\u201d Management Decision 41, no. 2 (2003): 182.\" id=\"return-footnote-156-8\" href=\"#footnote-156-8\" aria-label=\"Footnote 8\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[8]<\/sup><\/a><\/span> As countries work together to develop multinational trade and labor agreements, a common set of ethical norms will develop over time, but the process will not happen overnight. In the meantime, companies will need to think internally about how to handle ethical issues in a way that makes sense at home and abroad.<span id=\"fwk-carpibus-fn12_095\" class=\"im_footnote\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Philip C. Wright, Szeto Wing-Fu, and S. K. Lee, \u201cEthical Perceptions in China: The Reality of Business Ethics in an International Context,\u201d Management Decision 41, no. 2 (2003): 180\u201389.\" id=\"return-footnote-156-9\" href=\"#footnote-156-9\" aria-label=\"Footnote 9\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[9]<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"fwk-168388-ch12_s05_s02_s02\" class=\"im_section\">\n<h2 class=\"im_title im_editable im_block\">The Payoff<\/h2>\n<p>Given the complexity of trying to measure intangibles with metrics and a scorecard, some managers may be inclined to ask, \u201cWhy bother doing all this?\u201d Research by John Lingle and William Schiemann provides a clear answer. Companies that make a concerted effort to measure intangibles such as employee performance, innovation, and change in addition to measuring financial benchmarks perform better. Lingle and Schiemann examined how executives measured six strategic performance areas: (1) financial performance, (2) operating efficiency, (3) customer satisfaction, (4) employee performance, (5) innovation and change, and (6) community\/environment issues. To evaluate how carefully the measures were tracked, the researchers asked the executives, \u201cHow highly do you value the information in each strategic performance area?\u201d and \u201cWould you bet your job on the quality of the information on each of these areas?\u201d The researchers found that the companies that paid the closest attention to the metrics and had the most credible information were the ones that had been identified as industry leaders over the previous three years (e.g., 74 percent of measurement-managed companies but only 44 percent of others) and reported financial performance in the top third of their industry (e.g., 83 percent compared with 52 percent).<span id=\"fwk-carpibus-fn12_096\" class=\"im_footnote\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Leslie A. Weatherly \u201cThe Value of People: The Challenges and Opportunities of Human Capital Measurement and Reporting,\u201d HR Magazine, January 30, 2011, http:\/\/findarticles.com\/p\/articles\/mi_m3495\/is_9_48\/ai_108315188.\" id=\"return-footnote-156-10\" href=\"#footnote-156-10\" aria-label=\"Footnote 10\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[10]<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p>The Workforce Scorecard is vital because most organizations have much better control and accountability over their raw materials than they do over their workforce. For example, a retailer can quickly identify the source of a bad product, but the same retailer can\u2019t identify a poor manager whose negative attitude is poisoning morale and strategic execution.<span id=\"fwk-carpibus-fn12_097\" class=\"im_footnote\"><a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Brian E. Becker and Mark A. Huselid, \u201cStrategic Human Resources Management: Where Do We Go from Here?,\u201d Journal of Management 32, no. 6 (2006): 898\u2013925.\" id=\"return-footnote-156-11\" href=\"#footnote-156-11\" aria-label=\"Footnote 11\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[11]<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"fwk-168388-ch12_s05_s02_s02_n01\" class=\"im_key_takeaways im_editable im_block\">\n<h3 class=\"im_title\">Key Takeaways<\/h3>\n<ul id=\"fwk-168388-ch12_s05_s02_s02_l01\" class=\"im_itemizedlist\">\n<li>The Balanced Scorecard, when applied to HRM, helps managers align all HRM activities with the company\u2019s strategic goals. Assigning metrics to the HRM activities lets managers track progress on goals and ensure that they\u2019re working toward strategic objectives. It adds rigor and lets managers quickly identify gaps.<\/li>\n<li>Companies that measure intangibles such as employee performance, innovation, and change perform better financially than companies that don\u2019t use such metrics.<\/li>\n<li>Rather than investing equally in training for all jobs, a company should invest disproportionately more in developing the people in the key strategic (\u201cA\u201d) jobs on which the company\u2019s success is most dependent.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"bcc-box bcc-info\">\n<h3 class=\"im_title\">Exercises<a class=\"footnote\" title=\"(AACSB: Reflective Thinking, Analytical Skills)\" id=\"return-footnote-156-12\" href=\"#footnote-156-12\" aria-label=\"Footnote 12\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[12]<\/sup><\/a><\/h3>\n<ol id=\"fwk-168388-ch12_s05_s02_s02_l02\" class=\"im_orderedlist\">\n<li>Define the Balanced Scorecard method.<\/li>\n<li>List the elements of a Workforce Scorecard.<\/li>\n<li>Discuss how human capital can be managed like a strategic asset.<\/li>\n<li>Why is it important to align HRM metrics with company strategy?<\/li>\n<li>What kind of metrics would be most useful for HRM to track?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"before-footnotes clear\" \/><div class=\"footnotes\"><ol><li id=\"footnote-156-1\">Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton, <em class=\"im_emphasis\">The Balanced Scorecard<\/em> (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1996). <a href=\"#return-footnote-156-1\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 1\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-156-2\">Mark A. Huselid, Brian E. Becker, and Richard W. Beatty, <em class=\"im_emphasis\">The Workforce Scorecard: Managing Human Capital to Execute Strategy<\/em> (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2005). <a href=\"#return-footnote-156-2\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 2\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-156-3\">Mark A. Huselid, Brian E. Becker, and Richard W. Beatty, \u201c\u2018A Players\u2019 or \u2018A Positions\u2019? The Strategic Logic of Workforce Management,\u201d <em class=\"im_emphasis\">Harvard Business Review<\/em> 83, no. 12 (December 2005), <a class=\"im_link\" href=\"http:\/\/chrs.rutgers.edu\/pub_documents\/Huselid-Beatty-Becker%20HBR%20Paper.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/chrs.rutgers.edu\/pub_documents\/Huselid-Beatty-Becker%20HBR%20Paper.pdf<\/a>. <a href=\"#return-footnote-156-3\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 3\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-156-4\">Leslie A. Weatherly, \u201cThe Value of People: The Challenges and Opportunities of Human Capital Measurement and Reporting,\u201d <em class=\"im_emphasis\">SHRM Research Quarterly<\/em> 3 (2003): 14\u201325, accessed February 6, 2011, <a class=\"im_link\" href=\"http:\/\/www.shrm.org\/Research\/Articles\/Articles\/Documents\/0303measurement.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/www.shrm.org\/Research\/Articles\/Articles\/Documents\/0303measurement.pdf<\/a>. <a href=\"#return-footnote-156-4\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 4\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-156-5\">Jim Rush, interview by Andrea Meyer, <em class=\"im_emphasis\">Fast Company<\/em>, July 1995. <a href=\"#return-footnote-156-5\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 5\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-156-6\">Leslie A. Weatherly, \u201cThe Value of People: The Challenges and Opportunities of Human Capital Measurement and Reporting,\u201d <em class=\"im_emphasis\">SHRM Research Quarterly<\/em> 3 (2003): 14\u201325, accessed February 6, 2011, <a class=\"im_link\" href=\"http:\/\/www.shrm.org\/Research\/Articles\/Articles\/Documents\/0303measurement.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/www.shrm.org\/Research\/Articles\/Articles\/Documents\/0303measurement.pdf<\/a>. <a href=\"#return-footnote-156-6\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 6\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-156-7\">Mark R. Vickers, \u201cBusiness Ethics and the HR Role: Past, Present, and Future,\u201d <em class=\"im_emphasis\">Human Resource Planning<\/em> 28, no. 1 (2005), accessed January 28, 2011, <a class=\"im_link\" href=\"http:\/\/www.entrepreneur.com\/tradejournals\/article\/131500182_1.html\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/www.entrepreneur.com\/tradejournals\/article\/131500182_1.html<\/a>. <a href=\"#return-footnote-156-7\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 7\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-156-8\">Philip. C. Wright, Szeto Wing-Fu, and S. K. Lee, \u201cEthical Perceptions in China: The Reality of Business Ethics in an International Context,\u201d <em class=\"im_emphasis\">Management Decision<\/em> 41, no. 2 (2003): 182. <a href=\"#return-footnote-156-8\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 8\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-156-9\">Philip C. Wright, Szeto Wing-Fu, and S. K. Lee, \u201cEthical Perceptions in China: The Reality of Business Ethics in an International Context,\u201d <em class=\"im_emphasis\">Management Decision<\/em> 41, no. 2 (2003): 180\u201389. <a href=\"#return-footnote-156-9\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 9\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-156-10\">Leslie A. Weatherly \u201cThe Value of People: The Challenges and Opportunities of Human Capital Measurement and Reporting,\u201d <em class=\"im_emphasis\">HR Magazine<\/em>, January 30, 2011, <a class=\"im_link\" href=\"http:\/\/findarticles.com\/p\/articles\/mi_m3495\/is_9_48\/ai_108315188\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/findarticles.com\/p\/articles\/mi_m3495\/is_9_48\/ai_108315188<\/a>. <a href=\"#return-footnote-156-10\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 10\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-156-11\">Brian E. Becker and Mark A. Huselid, \u201cStrategic Human Resources Management: Where Do We Go from Here?,\u201d <em class=\"im_emphasis\">Journal of Management<\/em> 32, no. 6 (2006): 898\u2013925. <a href=\"#return-footnote-156-11\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 11\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-156-12\">(AACSB: Reflective Thinking, Analytical Skills) <a href=\"#return-footnote-156-12\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 12\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><\/ol><\/div>","protected":false},"author":9,"menu_order":6,"template":"","meta":{"_candela_citation":"[]","CANDELA_OUTCOMES_GUID":"","pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-156","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry"],"part":145,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/cerritos-internationalbusiness\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/156","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/cerritos-internationalbusiness\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/cerritos-internationalbusiness\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/cerritos-internationalbusiness\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/cerritos-internationalbusiness\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/156\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":485,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/cerritos-internationalbusiness\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/156\/revisions\/485"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/cerritos-internationalbusiness\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/145"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/cerritos-internationalbusiness\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/156\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/cerritos-internationalbusiness\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=156"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/cerritos-internationalbusiness\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=156"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/cerritos-internationalbusiness\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=156"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/cerritos-internationalbusiness\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=156"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}