Module 3 Discussion: Take a Stance

In this module, you learned about the basics of essay-writing—finding thesis statements, organizing paragraphs, and supporting claims. While organizing your thoughts into a structured argument may feel awkward at first, you already do it naturally in conversations.

Think about the last time you were in a heated discussion. How did you defend your point of view? Did you provide examples, facts, or personal experiences? Did you appeal to logic (logos), emotions (pathos), credibility (ethos), or a mix of these?

In this discussion, you will take a stance on a real-world issue, support your argument with reasoning and evidence, and engage with others in thoughtful discussion.

Discussion Instructions

STEP 1: Pick ONE of the following questions to post about. Click on the link and read all of the corresponding background information about it from The New York Times, including the questions at the bottom of the page.

  1. Should Kids Be Social Media Influencers?
  2. Should Texting While Driving Be Treated Like Drunken Driving?
  3. Should ‘Sports’ Be a College Major?
  4. Should Social Media Companies Be Responsible for Fact-Checking Their Sites?

STEP 2: Post your reply (in at least 250 words) in the discussion forum. Your post should include:

  • A thesis statement that clearly states your position.
  • At least two pieces of supporting evidence (facts, research, personal experience, or logical reasoning) as to why you feel the way you do.
  • An explanation of how your evidence strengthens your argument.
  • Consideration of an opposing viewpoint and why your perspective is stronger.

Show that you can think critically on the topic by integrating your own thoughts, analysis, or experiences.

STEP 3: Respond to two classmates’ posts (in at least 75 words each). Beyond simply agreeing or disagreeing with their stance, engage thoughtfully by doing one or more of the following:

  • Extend their point with new evidence, examples, or perspectives.
  • Bring up a counterpoint, exception, or challenging question.
  • Offer a new approach or highlight an overlooked factor.

Aim for meaningful discussion—your response should show that you are thinking critically about their perspective, not just restating or summarizing their ideas.

Rubric

Sample Grading Rubric
Criteria Proficient Developing Not Evident Points
Follows prompt directions Follows the prompt instructions. Somewhat follows the prompt instructions. Examples may incomplete. Does not follow the instructions. __/10
Responds to peers Response is engaged with peer’s post. Posts on time. Response is somewhat engaged with peer’s post. Post is short and/or late. Does not follow the instructions. __/10
Total: __/20