Solve Absolute Value Inequalities

Learning Outcomes

  • Express solutions to inequalities containing absolute value
  • Identify solutions for absolute inequalities where there are no solutions

Solve Inequalities Containing Absolute Value

Let us apply what you know about solving equations that contain absolute value and what you know about inequalities to solve inequalities that contain absolute value. Let us start with a simple inequality.

|x|4|x|4

This inequality is read, “the absolute value of x is less than or equal to 44.” If you are asked to solve for x, you want to find out what values of x are 44 units or less away from 00 on a number line. You could start by thinking about the number line and what values of x would satisfy this equation.

44 and 44 are both four units away from 00, so they are solutions. 33 and 33 are also solutions because each of these values is less than 44 units away from 00. So are 11 and 11,0.50.5 and 0.50.5, and so on—there are an infinite number of values for x that will satisfy this inequality.

The graph of this inequality will have two closed circles, at 44 and 44. The distance between these two values on the number line is colored in blue because all of these values satisfy the inequality.

Number line. Closed blue circles on negative 4 and 4. Blue line between closed blue circles.

The solution can be written this way:

Inequality notation: 4x44x4

Interval notation: [4,4][4,4]

The situation is a little different when the inequality sign is “greater than” or “greater than or equal to.” Consider the simple inequality |x|>3|x|>3. Again, you could think of the number line and what values of x are greater than 33 units away from zero. This time, 33 and 33 are not included in the solution, so there are open circles on both of these values. 22 and 22 would not be solutions because they are not more than 33 units away from 00. But 55 and 55 would work and so would all of the values extending to the left of 33 and to the right of 33. The graph would look like the one below.

Number line. Open blue circles on negative three and three. Blue arrow through all numbers less than negative 3. Blue arrow through all numbers greater than 3.

The solution to this inequality can be written this way:

Inequality notation: x<3x<3 or x>3x>3.

Interval notation: (,3)(3,)(,3)(3,)

In the following video, you will see examples of how to solve and express the solution to absolute value inequalities involving both and and or.

Writing Solutions to Absolute Value Inequalities

For any positive value of and x, a single variable, or any algebraic expression:

Absolute Value Inequality Equivalent Inequality Interval Notation
|x|a|x|a axaaxa [a,a][a,a]
|x|<a|x|<a a<x<aa<x<a (a,a)(a,a)
|x|a|x|a x−ax−a or xaxa  (,a][a,)(,a][a,)
|x|>a|x|>a x<−ax<−a or x>ax>a  (,a)(a,)(,a)(a,)

Let us look at a few more examples of inequalities containing absolute value.

Example

Solve for x. |x+3|>4|x+3|>4

Example

Solve for y. 3|2y+6|9<27

In the following video, you will see an example of solving multi-step absolute value inequalities involving an or situation.

In the following video you will see an example of solving multi-step absolute value inequalities involving an and situation.

In the last video that follows, you will see an example of solving an absolute value inequality where you need to isolate the absolute value first.

Identify Cases of Inequalities Containing Absolute Value That Have No Solutions

As with equations, there may be instances where there is no solution to an inequality.

Example

Solve for x. |2x+3|+97

Summary

Inequalities containing absolute value can be solved by rewriting them using compound inequalities. The first step to solving absolute inequalities is to isolate the absolute value. The next step is to decide whether you are working with an or inequality or an and inequality. If the inequality is greater than a number, we will use or. If the inequality is less than a number, we will use and. Remember that if we end up with an absolute value greater than or less than a negative number, there is no solution.