#### Learning Objective

- Simplify overall rate laws using the steady state approximation for reactions with various or unknown rate-limiting steps, explainting the steady state approximation and when it is valid

#### Key Points

- If the rate-limiting step is unknown, or if more than one step is rate-limiting, we assume that the rate of each elementary step is equal. The overall rate law will then be derived from the final step in the reaction mechanism.
- The steady state approximation assumes that the concentration of reaction intermediates remains constant throughout the reaction.
- The concentration of reaction intermediates is assumed to be steady because the intermediates are being produced as fast as they are consumed.

#### Terms

- steady state approximationSets the rate of change of a reaction intermediate in a reaction mechanism to zero.
- steady stateA situation in which all state variables are constant in spite of ongoing processes that strive to change them.

## The Steady State Approximation

In our discussion so far, we have assumed that every reaction proceeds according to a mechanism that is made up of elementary steps, and that there is always one elementary step in the mechanism that is the slowest. This slowest step determines the rate of the entire reaction, and as such, it is called the rate-determining step. We will now consider cases in which the rate-determining step is either unknown or when more than one step in the mechanism is slow, which affects the overall reaction rate. Both cases can be addressed by using what is known as the steady state approximation.

## Applying the Steady State Approximation

Recall our mechanism for the reaction of nitric oxide and oxygen:

[latex]2\;NO(g)\rightleftharpoons N_2O_2(g)\quad\quad\quad\quad \text{Step 1}[/latex]

[latex]N_2O_2(g)+O_2(g)\xrightarrow{k_2} 2\;NO_2(g)\quad\quad \text{Step 2}[/latex]

Before, we assumed that the first step was fast, and that the second step was slow, thereby making it rate-determining. We will now proceed as if we had no such prior knowledge, and we do not know which, if either, of these steps is rate-determining. In such a case, we must assume that the reaction rate of each elementary step is equal, and the overall rate law for the reaction will be the final step in the mechanism, since this is the step that gives us our final products. In this case, the overall rate law will be:

[latex](1)\quad\quad rate=k_2[N_2O_2][O_2][/latex]

However, this rate law contains a reaction intermediate, which is not permitted in this process. We need to write this rate law in terms of reactants only. In order to do so, we must assume that the state of the reaction intermediate, N_{2}O_{2}, remains *steady*, or constant, throughout the course of the reaction. The idea is analogous to a tub being filled with water while the drain is open. At a certain point, the flow of water into the tub will equal the flow of water out of the tub, so that the height of the water in the tub remains constant. In reality, however, water is flowing into and out of the tub at all times; the overall amount of water in the tub at any given time does not change. Our reaction intermediate, N_{2}O_{2}, is like the water in the tub, because it is being produced and consumed at equal rates. Therefore, we can rewrite our initial equilibrium step as the following combination of reverse reactions:

[latex]2\;NO(g)\xrightarrow{k_1} N_2O_2(g)[/latex]

[latex]2\;NO(g)\xleftarrow{k_{-1}} N_2O_2(g)[/latex]

Here, k_{1} and k_{-1} are the rate constants for the forward and reverse reactions, respectively. With the steady state assumption, we can write the following:

[latex]\text{rate of formation of }N_2O_2=\text{rate of disappearance of }N_2O_2[/latex]

Now, both of these rates can be written as rate laws derived from our elementary steps. We can write them as follows:

[latex]k_1[NO]^2=k_{-1}[N_2O_2]+k_2[N_2O_2][O_2][/latex]

Note that the second side of the equation, which equals the rate of disappearance of our reaction intermediate N_{2}O_{2}, is written with two terms. The first term takes into account the disappearance of N_{2}O_{2} in the reverse reaction of the initial step, and the second term takes into account the disappearance of N_{2}O_{2} as a *reactant* in the second elementary step. We can rearrange this equation in terms of [N_{2}O_{2}]:

[latex]k_1[NO]^2=[N_2O_2](k_{-1}+k_2[O_2])[/latex]

[latex]\frac{k_1[NO]^2}{k_{-1}+k_2[O_2]}=[N_2O_2][/latex]

Lastly, now that we have [N_{2}O_{2}] in terms of our reactants only, we can substitute this entire expression into our equation for the overall rate law (equation 1 above). This yields the following:

[latex]rate=\frac{k_1k_2[NO]^2[O_2]}{k_{-1}+k_2[O_2]}[/latex]

Here we have our final rate law for the overall reaction. We had no knowledge of the rate-determining step, so we used the steady state approximation for our reaction intermediate, N_{2}O_{2}.