{"id":439,"date":"2015-04-28T17:59:19","date_gmt":"2015-04-28T17:59:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/courses.candelalearning.com\/masteryart1x6xmaster\/?post_type=chapter&p=439"},"modified":"2015-06-07T19:17:13","modified_gmt":"2015-06-07T19:17:13","slug":"reading-toward-the-high-renaissance","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/mcc-artappreciation\/chapter\/reading-toward-the-high-renaissance\/","title":{"raw":"Reading: Toward the High Renaissance","rendered":"Reading: Toward the High Renaissance"},"content":{"raw":"The High Renaissance is just that\u2014the height of the Renaissance! When you think of the Renaissance, the names that come to mind are probably the artists of this period: Leonardo and Michelangelo, for instance. When many people think of the greatest work of art in the Western world, they think of Michelangelo's Sistine Ceiling<\/i>. This is a period of big, ambitious projects.\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignright\" width=\"300\"]\"Fra Fra Filippo Lippi, Madonna and Child with Two Angels, tempera on wood, ca. 1455\u20131466 (Galleria degli Uffizi, Florence)[\/caption]\r\n\r\nWhat exactly is the High Renaissance, and how is it different from the Early Renaissance?\r\n\r\nAs the humanism of the Early Renaissance grows, a problem begins to develop. Have a look again at Fra Filippo Lippi's Madonna and Child with Angels<\/i>. We see in this painting an image of the Madonna and Christ Child that has become so real, the figures so human, that we can hardly tell that these are spiritual figures (except for the faint shadow of a halo). On the other hand, as we have seen in the Middle Ages, if you want to make your figure spiritual then you sacrifice its realism.\r\n\r\nIt's almost as if there is this feeling in the Early Renaissance that if you want to be spiritual, then your painting can't look real, and if you want it to be real, then it loses some spirituality. It has to be one or the other. Well, Leonardo da Vinci comes along, and basically says\u2014you don't have to make that choice. It's not either\/or. Leonardo is able to create figures that\u00a0are physical and real\u2014just as real as Lippi's or Masaccio's figures and yet they have an undeniable and intense spirituality at the same time. So we can say that Leonardo unites the real and spiritual, or soul and substance.\r\n\r\nThe best way to see this is in this painting by Verrocchio, to whom Leonardo was apprenticed when he was young.\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"500\"]\"Andrea Andrea del Verrocchio (with Leonardo), Baptism of Christ, 1470-75, oil and tempera on panel, 70 3\/4 x 59 3\/4 inches or 180 x 152 cm (Galleria degli Uffizi, Florence)[\/caption]\r\n\r\nVerocchio asked Leonardo to paint one of the angels in his painting of the Baptism of Christ<\/i>, which\u00a0we see here. Can you tell which angel is Leonardo's?\r\n\r\nOne angel should look more like a boy\u2014that's the Early Renaissance angel (the one painted by Verrocchio) and the other angel should look like a High Renaissance angel, like a spiritual figure\u2014truly like an angel sent by God from heaven (that's Leonardo's angel).\r\n\r\nCan you tell which one is by Leonardo? Take a minute and look closely.\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"560\"]\"Detail Detail. Andrea del Verrocchio (with Leonardo), Baptism of Christ, 1470-75, oil and tempera on panel, 70 3\/4 x 59 3\/4 inches or 180 x 152 cm (Galleria degli Uffizi, Florence)[\/caption]\r\n\r\n(Answer: the angel on the left)\r\n\r\nLeonardo's angel is ideally beautiful and moves in a graceful and complex way, twisting to the left but raising her head up and to the right. Figures that are elegant and ideally beautiful are a key characteristic of the High Renaissance.\r\n

Leonardo da Vinci<\/h2>\r\n

Leonardo's Early Life and Training<\/h3>\r\nLeonardo was born illegitimate to a prominent Tuscan family of potters and notaries. He may have traveled from Vinci to Florence where his father worked for several powerful families including the Medici. At age seventeen, Leonardo reportedly apprenticed with the Florentine artist Verrocchio. Here, Leonardo gained an appreciation for the achievements of Giotto and Masaccio and in 1472 he joined the artists\u2019 guild, Compagnia di San Luca. Because of his family\u2019s ties, Leonardo benefited when Lorenzo de\u2019 Medici (the Magnificent) ruled Florence. By 1478 Leonardo was completely independent of Verrocchio and may have then met the exiled Ludovico Sforza, the future Duke of Milan, who would later commission the Last Supper.\r\n

Leonardo in Milan<\/h3>\r\nFour years later, Leonardo arrived in Milan bearing a silver lyre (which he may have been able to play), a gift for the regent Ludovico from the Florentine ruler, Lorenzo the Magnificent. Ludovico sought to transform Milan into a center of humanist learning to rival Florence.\r\n\r\nLeonardo flourished in this intellectual environment. He opened a studio, received numerous commissions, instructed students, and began to systematically record his scientific and artistic investigations in a series of notebooks. The archetypal \u201crenaissance man,\u201d Leonardo was an unrivaled painter, an accomplished architect, an engineer, cartographer, and scientist (he was particularly interested in biology and physics). He was influenced by a variety of ancient texts including Plato's Timaeus, Ptolemy\u2019s Cosmography, and Vitruvius\u2019s On Architecture. Leonardo is credited with having assisted Luca Pacioli with his treatise, Divina Proportione (1509). Joining the practical and the theoretical, Leonardo designed numerous mechanical devices for battle, including a submarine, and even experimented with designs for flight.\r\n\r\nIn a now famous letter, Leonardo listed his talents to the Duke, focusing mostly on his abilities as a military engineer. The letter begins:\r\n
Having until now sufficiently studied and examined the experiments of all those who claim to be experts and inventors of war machines, and having found that their machines do not differ in the least from those ordinarily in use, I shall make so bold, without wanting to cause harm to anyone, as to address myself to Your Excellency to divulge my secrets to him, and offer to demonstrate to him, at his pleasure, all the things briefly enumerated below.<\/blockquote>\r\nIn ten short paragraphs, Leonardo enumerated the service he could perform for the Duke \u2014 he said (among other things) that he could build bridges, tunnels, fortresses, and \u201cmake siege guns, mortars and other machines, of beautiful and practical shape, completely different from what is generally in use.\u201d\r\n\r\nWhat might seem amazing to us is that it is not until the very last paragraph that Leonardo mentions art, and he mentions it so modestly! Here is what he wrote:\r\n<\/i>\r\n
In time of peace, I believe I am capable of giving you as much satisfaction as anyone, whether it be in architecture, for the construction of public or private buildings, or in bringing water from one place to another. Item, I can sculpt in marble, bronze or terracotta; while in painting, my work is the equal of anyone\u2019s.<\/blockquote>\r\n

Return to Florence, Then France<\/h3>\r\nIn 1489, Leonardo secured a long awaited contract with Ludovico and was honored with the title, \u201cThe Florentine Apelles,\u201d a reference to an ancient Greek painter revered for his great naturalism. Leonardo returned to Florence when Ludovico was deposed by the French King, Charles VII. While there, Leonardo would meet the Niccol\u00f2 Machiavelli, author of The Prince and his future patron, Fran\u00e7ois I. In 1516, after numerous invitations, Leonardo traveled to France and joined the royal court. Leonardo died on May 2, 1519 in the king\u2019s chateau at Cloux.\r\n

Leonardo\u2019s Death and the Changing Status of the Artist<\/h3>\r\n
Finally, having grown old, he remained ill many months, and, feeling himself near to death, asked to have himself diligently informed of the teaching of the Catholic faith, and of the good way and holy Christian religion; and then, with many moans, he confessed and was penitent; and although he could not raise himself well on his feet, supporting himself on the arms of his friends and servants, he was pleased to take devoutly the most holy Sacrament, out of his bed. The King, who was wont often and lovingly to visit him, then came into the room; wherefore he, out of reverence, having raised himself to sit upon the bed, giving him an account of his sickness and the circumstances of it, showed withal how much he had offended God and mankind in not having worked at his art as he should have done. Thereupon he was seized by a paroxysm, the messenger of death; for which reason the King having risen and having taken his head, in order to assist him and show him favour, to then end that he might alleviate his pain, his spirit, which was divine, knowing that it could not have any greater honour, expired in the arms of the King. (Vasari)<\/blockquote>\r\nThis story is a good indication of the changing status of the artist. Leonardo, who spent the last years of his life in France working for King Francis I, was often visited by the King! Remember that the artist was considered only a skilled artisan in the Middle Ages and for much of the Early Renaissance.\r\n\r\nIn the High Renaissance, beginning with Leonardo, we find that artists are considered intellectuals, and that they keep company with the highest levels of society. Quite a change! All of this has to do with Humanism in the Renaissance of course, and the growing recognition of the achievement of great individuals (something virtually unheard of in the Middle Ages!). Artists in the Early Renaissance insisted that they should in fact be considered intellectuals because they worked with their brains as well as with their hands. They defended this position by pointing to the scientific tools that they used to make their work more naturalistic (scientific naturalism): the study of human anatomy, of mathematics and geometry, of linear perspective. These were clearly all intellectual pursuits!\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignright\" width=\"200\"]\"Leonardo, Leonardo da Vinci, Self-Portrait[\/caption]\r\n\r\nLook closely at this self-portrait. Isn\u2019t it clear that Leonardo thought of himself as a thinker, a philosopher, an intellectual?\r\n

Leonardo's Naturalism<\/h3>\r\nAncient Greek physicians dissected cadavers.\u00a0The early church\u2019s rejection of the science of the classical world, along with the possibility of bodily resurrection led to prohibitions against dissection.\u00a0 Both Leonardo and Michelangelo performed them -- probably exclusively on the bodies of executed criminals.\u00a0 According to his own count, Leonardo dissected 30 corpses during his lifetime.\r\n\r\n \r\n\r\nhttps:\/\/youtu.be\/URcpchlTNBY\r\n
<\/div>\r\n
<\/div>","rendered":"

The High Renaissance is just that\u2014the height of the Renaissance! When you think of the Renaissance, the names that come to mind are probably the artists of this period: Leonardo and Michelangelo, for instance. When many people think of the greatest work of art in the Western world, they think of Michelangelo’s Sistine Ceiling<\/i>. This is a period of big, ambitious projects.<\/p>\n

\"Fra<\/p>\n

Fra Filippo Lippi, Madonna and Child with Two Angels, tempera on wood, ca. 1455\u20131466 (Galleria degli Uffizi, Florence)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

What exactly is the High Renaissance, and how is it different from the Early Renaissance?<\/p>\n

As the humanism of the Early Renaissance grows, a problem begins to develop. Have a look again at Fra Filippo Lippi’s Madonna and Child with Angels<\/i>. We see in this painting an image of the Madonna and Christ Child that has become so real, the figures so human, that we can hardly tell that these are spiritual figures (except for the faint shadow of a halo). On the other hand, as we have seen in the Middle Ages, if you want to make your figure spiritual then you sacrifice its realism.<\/p>\n

It’s almost as if there is this feeling in the Early Renaissance that if you want to be spiritual, then your painting can’t look real, and if you want it to be real, then it loses some spirituality. It has to be one or the other. Well, Leonardo da Vinci comes along, and basically says\u2014you don’t have to make that choice. It’s not either\/or. Leonardo is able to create figures that\u00a0are physical and real\u2014just as real as Lippi’s or Masaccio’s figures and yet they have an undeniable and intense spirituality at the same time. So we can say that Leonardo unites the real and spiritual, or soul and substance.<\/p>\n

The best way to see this is in this painting by Verrocchio, to whom Leonardo was apprenticed when he was young.<\/p>\n

\"Andrea<\/p>\n

Andrea del Verrocchio (with Leonardo), Baptism of Christ, 1470-75, oil and tempera on panel, 70 3\/4 x 59 3\/4 inches or 180 x 152 cm (Galleria degli Uffizi, Florence)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Verocchio asked Leonardo to paint one of the angels in his painting of the Baptism of Christ<\/i>, which\u00a0we see here. Can you tell which angel is Leonardo’s?<\/p>\n

One angel should look more like a boy\u2014that’s the Early Renaissance angel (the one painted by Verrocchio) and the other angel should look like a High Renaissance angel, like a spiritual figure\u2014truly like an angel sent by God from heaven (that’s Leonardo’s angel).<\/p>\n

Can you tell which one is by Leonardo? Take a minute and look closely.<\/p>\n

\"Detail<\/p>\n

Detail. Andrea del Verrocchio (with Leonardo), Baptism of Christ, 1470-75, oil and tempera on panel, 70 3\/4 x 59 3\/4 inches or 180 x 152 cm (Galleria degli Uffizi, Florence)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

(Answer: the angel on the left)<\/p>\n

Leonardo’s angel is ideally beautiful and moves in a graceful and complex way, twisting to the left but raising her head up and to the right. Figures that are elegant and ideally beautiful are a key characteristic of the High Renaissance.<\/p>\n

Leonardo da Vinci<\/h2>\n

Leonardo’s Early Life and Training<\/h3>\n

Leonardo was born illegitimate to a prominent Tuscan family of potters and notaries. He may have traveled from Vinci to Florence where his father worked for several powerful families including the Medici. At age seventeen, Leonardo reportedly apprenticed with the Florentine artist Verrocchio. Here, Leonardo gained an appreciation for the achievements of Giotto and Masaccio and in 1472 he joined the artists\u2019 guild, Compagnia di San Luca. Because of his family\u2019s ties, Leonardo benefited when Lorenzo de\u2019 Medici (the Magnificent) ruled Florence. By 1478 Leonardo was completely independent of Verrocchio and may have then met the exiled Ludovico Sforza, the future Duke of Milan, who would later commission the Last Supper.<\/p>\n

Leonardo in Milan<\/h3>\n

Four years later, Leonardo arrived in Milan bearing a silver lyre (which he may have been able to play), a gift for the regent Ludovico from the Florentine ruler, Lorenzo the Magnificent. Ludovico sought to transform Milan into a center of humanist learning to rival Florence.<\/p>\n

Leonardo flourished in this intellectual environment. He opened a studio, received numerous commissions, instructed students, and began to systematically record his scientific and artistic investigations in a series of notebooks. The archetypal \u201crenaissance man,\u201d Leonardo was an unrivaled painter, an accomplished architect, an engineer, cartographer, and scientist (he was particularly interested in biology and physics). He was influenced by a variety of ancient texts including Plato’s Timaeus, Ptolemy\u2019s Cosmography, and Vitruvius\u2019s On Architecture. Leonardo is credited with having assisted Luca Pacioli with his treatise, Divina Proportione (1509). Joining the practical and the theoretical, Leonardo designed numerous mechanical devices for battle, including a submarine, and even experimented with designs for flight.<\/p>\n

In a now famous letter, Leonardo listed his talents to the Duke, focusing mostly on his abilities as a military engineer. The letter begins:<\/p>\n

Having until now sufficiently studied and examined the experiments of all those who claim to be experts and inventors of war machines, and having found that their machines do not differ in the least from those ordinarily in use, I shall make so bold, without wanting to cause harm to anyone, as to address myself to Your Excellency to divulge my secrets to him, and offer to demonstrate to him, at his pleasure, all the things briefly enumerated below.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

In ten short paragraphs, Leonardo enumerated the service he could perform for the Duke \u2014 he said (among other things) that he could build bridges, tunnels, fortresses, and \u201cmake siege guns, mortars and other machines, of beautiful and practical shape, completely different from what is generally in use.\u201d<\/p>\n

What might seem amazing to us is that it is not until the very last paragraph that Leonardo mentions art, and he mentions it so modestly! Here is what he wrote:
\n<\/i><\/p>\n

In time of peace, I believe I am capable of giving you as much satisfaction as anyone, whether it be in architecture, for the construction of public or private buildings, or in bringing water from one place to another. Item, I can sculpt in marble, bronze or terracotta; while in painting, my work is the equal of anyone\u2019s.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Return to Florence, Then France<\/h3>\n

In 1489, Leonardo secured a long awaited contract with Ludovico and was honored with the title, \u201cThe Florentine Apelles,\u201d a reference to an ancient Greek painter revered for his great naturalism. Leonardo returned to Florence when Ludovico was deposed by the French King, Charles VII. While there, Leonardo would meet the Niccol\u00f2 Machiavelli, author of The Prince and his future patron, Fran\u00e7ois I. In 1516, after numerous invitations, Leonardo traveled to France and joined the royal court. Leonardo died on May 2, 1519 in the king\u2019s chateau at Cloux.<\/p>\n

Leonardo\u2019s Death and the Changing Status of the Artist<\/h3>\n

Finally, having grown old, he remained ill many months, and, feeling himself near to death, asked to have himself diligently informed of the teaching of the Catholic faith, and of the good way and holy Christian religion; and then, with many moans, he confessed and was penitent; and although he could not raise himself well on his feet, supporting himself on the arms of his friends and servants, he was pleased to take devoutly the most holy Sacrament, out of his bed. The King, who was wont often and lovingly to visit him, then came into the room; wherefore he, out of reverence, having raised himself to sit upon the bed, giving him an account of his sickness and the circumstances of it, showed withal how much he had offended God and mankind in not having worked at his art as he should have done. Thereupon he was seized by a paroxysm, the messenger of death; for which reason the King having risen and having taken his head, in order to assist him and show him favour, to then end that he might alleviate his pain, his spirit, which was divine, knowing that it could not have any greater honour, expired in the arms of the King. (Vasari)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

This story is a good indication of the changing status of the artist. Leonardo, who spent the last years of his life in France working for King Francis I, was often visited by the King! Remember that the artist was considered only a skilled artisan in the Middle Ages and for much of the Early Renaissance.<\/p>\n

In the High Renaissance, beginning with Leonardo, we find that artists are considered intellectuals, and that they keep company with the highest levels of society. Quite a change! All of this has to do with Humanism in the Renaissance of course, and the growing recognition of the achievement of great individuals (something virtually unheard of in the Middle Ages!). Artists in the Early Renaissance insisted that they should in fact be considered intellectuals because they worked with their brains as well as with their hands. They defended this position by pointing to the scientific tools that they used to make their work more naturalistic (scientific naturalism): the study of human anatomy, of mathematics and geometry, of linear perspective. These were clearly all intellectual pursuits!<\/p>\n

\"Leonardo,<\/p>\n

Leonardo da Vinci, Self-Portrait<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Look closely at this self-portrait. Isn\u2019t it clear that Leonardo thought of himself as a thinker, a philosopher, an intellectual?<\/p>\n

Leonardo’s Naturalism<\/h3>\n

Ancient Greek physicians dissected cadavers.\u00a0The early church\u2019s rejection of the science of the classical world, along with the possibility of bodily resurrection led to prohibitions against dissection.\u00a0 Both Leonardo and Michelangelo performed them — probably exclusively on the bodies of executed criminals.\u00a0 According to his own count, Leonardo dissected 30 corpses during his lifetime.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n