{"id":942,"date":"2015-05-26T16:20:05","date_gmt":"2015-05-26T16:20:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/courses.candelalearning.com\/masterybusinesslaw1x6xmaster\/?post_type=chapter&#038;p=942"},"modified":"2017-01-09T19:42:42","modified_gmt":"2017-01-09T19:42:42","slug":"introduction-to-agency-and-the-types-of-agents","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/montgomerycollege-masterybusinesslaw2\/chapter\/introduction-to-agency-and-the-types-of-agents\/","title":{"raw":"Reading: Introduction to Agency and the Types of Agents","rendered":"Reading: Introduction to Agency and the Types of Agents"},"content":{"raw":"<h3 class=\"title editable block\">LEARNING OBJECTIVES<\/h3>\r\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_n01\" class=\"learning_objectives editable block\">\r\n<ol id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_l01\" class=\"orderedlist\">\r\n\t<li>Understand why agency law is important.<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Recognize the recurring legal issues in agency law.<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Know the types of agents.<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Understand how the agency relationship is created.<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s01\" class=\"section\">\r\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Introduction to Agency Law<\/h2>\r\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s01_s01\" class=\"section\">\r\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Why Is Agency Law Important, and What Is an Agent?<\/h2>\r\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s01_s01_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">An agent is a person who acts in the name of and on behalf of another, having been given and assumed some degree of authority to do so. Most organized human activity\u2014and virtually all commercial activity\u2014is carried on through agency. No corporation would be possible, even in theory, without such a concept. We might say \u201cGeneral Motors is building cars in China,\u201d for example, but we can\u2019t shake hands with General Motors. \u201cThe General,\u201d as people say, exists and works through agents. Likewise, partnerships and other business organizations rely extensively on agents to conduct their business. Indeed, it is not an exaggeration to say that agency is the cornerstone of enterprise organization. In a partnership each partner is a general agent, while under corporation law the officers and all employees are agents of the corporation.<\/p>\r\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s01_s01_p02\" class=\"para editable block\">The existence of agents does not, however, require a whole new law of torts or contracts. A tort is no less harmful when committed by an agent; a contract is no less binding when negotiated by an agent. What does need to be taken into account, though, is the manner in which an agent acts on behalf of his principal and toward a third party.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s01_s02\" class=\"section\">\r\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Recurring Issues in Agency Law<\/h2>\r\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s01_s02_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">Several problematic fact scenarios recur in agency, and law has developed in response.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s01_s02_s01\" class=\"section\">\r\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">John Alden<\/h2>\r\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s01_s02_s01_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">Consider John Alden (1599\u20131687), one of the most famous agents in American literature. He is said to have been the first person from the <em class=\"emphasis\">Mayflower<\/em> to set foot on Plymouth Rock in 1620; he was a carpenter, a cooper (barrel maker), and a diplomat. His agency task\u2014of interest here\u2014was celebrated in Henry Wadsworth Longfellow\u2019s \u201cThe Courtship of Miles Standish.\u201d He was to woo Priscilla Mullins (d. 1680), \u201cthe loveliest maiden of Plymouth,\u201d on behalf of Captain Miles Standish, a valiant soldier who was too shy to propose marriage. Standish turned to John Alden, his young and eloquent prot\u00e9g\u00e9, and beseeched Alden to speak on his behalf, unaware that Alden himself was in love with Priscilla. Alden accepted his captain\u2019s assignment, despite the knowledge that he would thus lose Priscilla for himself, and sought out the lady. But Alden was so tongue-tied that his vaunted eloquence fell short, turned Priscilla cold toward the object of Alden\u2019s mission, and eventually led her to turn the tables in one of the most famous lines in American literature and poetry: \u201cWhy don\u2019t you speak for yourself, John?\u201d John eventually did: the two were married in 1623 in Plymouth.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s01_s02_s02\" class=\"section\">\r\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Recurring Issues in Agency<\/h2>\r\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s01_s02_s02_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">Let\u2019s analyze this sequence of events in legal terms\u2014recognizing, of course, that this example is an analogy and that the law, even today, would not impose consequences on Alden for his failure to carry out Captain Standish\u2019s wishes. Alden was the captain\u2019s agent: he was specifically authorized to speak in his name in a manner agreed on, toward a specified end, and he accepted the assignment in consideration of the captain\u2019s friendship. He had, however, a conflict of interest. He attempted to carry out the assignment, but he did not perform according to expectations. Eventually, he wound up with the prize himself. Here are some questions to consider, the same questions that will recur throughout the discussion of agency:<\/p>\r\n\r\n<ul id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s01_s02_s02_l01\" class=\"itemizedlist editable block\">\r\n\t<li>How extensive was John\u2019s authority? Could he have made promises to Priscilla on the captain\u2019s behalf\u2014for example, that Standish would have built her a fine house?<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Could he, if he committed a tort, have imposed liability on his principal? Suppose, for example, that he had ridden at breakneck speed to reach Priscilla\u2019s side and while en route ran into and injured a pedestrian on the road. Could the pedestrian have sued Standish?<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Suppose Alden had injured himself on the journey. Would Standish be liable to Alden?<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Is Alden liable to Standish for stealing the heart of Priscilla\u2014that is, for taking the \u201cprofits\u201d of the enterprise for himself?<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s01_s02_s02_p02\" class=\"para editable block\">As these questions suggest, agency law often involves three parties\u2014the principal, the agent, and a third party. It therefore deals with three different relationships: between principal and agent, between principal and third party, and between agent and third party. These relationships can be summed up in a simple diagram (see <a class=\"xref\" href=\"http:\/\/2012books.lardbucket.org\/books\/the-legal-environment-and-business-law-executive-mba-edition\/s14-relationships-between-principa.html#mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s01_s02_s02_f01\">Figure 11.1 \"Agency Relationships\"<\/a>).<\/p>\r\n\r\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s01_s02_s02_f01\" class=\"figure large editable block\">\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignnone\" width=\"652\"]<img src=\"http:\/\/2012books.lardbucket.org\/books\/the-legal-environment-and-business-law-executive-mba-edition\/section_14\/e89c3ecb4f0a749c64a99a8c1085687c.jpg\" alt=\"Image showing the principal over the agent and the agent over the third party.\" width=\"652\" height=\"411\" \/> Figure 11.1 Agency Relationships.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s01_s02_s02_p03\" class=\"para editable block\">In this chapter, we will consider the principal-agent side of the triangle. In the next chapter we will turn to relationships involving third parties.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02\" class=\"section\">\r\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Types of Agents<\/h2>\r\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">There are five types of agents.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s01\" class=\"section\">\r\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">General Agent<\/h2>\r\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s01_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">The general agent possesses the authority to carry out a broad range of transactions in the name and on behalf of the principal. The general agent may be the manager of a business or may have a more limited but nevertheless ongoing role\u2014for example, as a purchasing agent or as a life insurance agent authorized to sign up customers for the home office. In either case, the general agent has authority to alter the principal\u2019s legal relationships with third parties. One who is designated a general agent has the authority to act in any way required by the principal\u2019s business. To restrict the general agent\u2019s authority, the principal must spell out the limitations explicitly, and even so the principal may be liable for any of the agent\u2019s acts in excess of his authority.<\/p>\r\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s01_p02\" class=\"para editable block\">Normally, the general agent is a business agent, but there are circumstances under which an individual may appoint a general agent for personal purposes. One common form of a personal general agent is the person who holds another\u2019s power of attorney. This is a delegation of authority to another to act in his stead; it can be accomplished by executing a simple form, such as the one shown in <a class=\"xref\" href=\"http:\/\/2012books.lardbucket.org\/books\/the-legal-environment-and-business-law-executive-mba-edition\/s14-relationships-between-principa.html#mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s01_f01\">Figure 11.2 \"General Power of Attorney\"<\/a>. Ordinarily, the power of attorney is used for a special purpose\u2014for example, to sell real estate or securities in the absence of the owner. But a person facing a lengthy operation and recuperation in a hospital might give a general power of attorney to a trusted family member or friend.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s01_f01\" class=\"figure large editable block\">\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignnone\" width=\"741\"]<img src=\"http:\/\/2012books.lardbucket.org\/books\/the-legal-environment-and-business-law-executive-mba-edition\/section_14\/c67c5f0a8eed6db544e95a189c281d96.jpg\" alt=\"Image of a General Power of Attorney. It reads that a person grants another person &quot;to be my agent and attorney in fact. I grant my agent full authority and power to act on my behalf to do anything I could do if I were personally present.&quot;\" width=\"741\" height=\"520\" \/> Figure 11.2 General Power of Attorney.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s02\" class=\"section\">\r\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Special Agent<\/h2>\r\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s02_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">The special agent is one who has authority to act only in a specifically designated instance or in a specifically designated set of transactions. For example, a real estate broker is usually a special agent hired to find a buyer for the principal\u2019s land. Suppose Sam, the seller, appoints an agent Alberta to find a buyer for his property. Alberta\u2019s commission depends on the selling price, which, Sam states in a letter to her, \u201cin any event may be no less than $150,000.\u201d If Alberta locates a buyer, Bob, who agrees to purchase the property for $160,000, her signature on the contract of sale will not bind Sam. As a special agent, Alberta had authority only to find a buyer; she had no authority to sign the contract.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s03\" class=\"section\">\r\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Agency Coupled with an Interest<\/h2>\r\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s03_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">An agent whose reimbursement depends on his continuing to have the authority to act as an agent is said to have an agency coupled with an interest if he has a property interest in the business. A literary or author\u2019s agent, for example, customarily agrees to sell a literary work to a publisher in return for a percentage of all monies the author earns from the sale of the work. The literary agent also acts as a collection agent to ensure that his commission will be paid. By agreeing with the principal that the agency is coupled with an interest, the agent can prevent his own rights in a particular literary work from being terminated to his detriment.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s04\" class=\"section\">\r\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Subagent<\/h2>\r\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s04_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">To carry out her duties, an agent will often need to appoint her own agents. These appointments may or may not be authorized by the principal. An insurance company, for example, might name a general agent to open offices in cities throughout a certain state. The agent will necessarily conduct her business through agents of her own choosing. These agents are subagents of the principal if the general agent had the express or implied authority of the principal to hire them. For legal purposes, they are agents of both the principal and the principal\u2019s general agent, and both are liable for the subagent\u2019s conduct although normally the general agent agrees to be primarily liable (see <a class=\"xref\" href=\"http:\/\/2012books.lardbucket.org\/books\/the-legal-environment-and-business-law-executive-mba-edition\/s14-relationships-between-principa.html#mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s04_f01\">Figure 11.3 \"Subagent\"<\/a>).<\/p>\r\n\r\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s04_f01\" class=\"figure large medium-height editable block\">\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignnone\" width=\"447\"]<img src=\"http:\/\/2012books.lardbucket.org\/books\/the-legal-environment-and-business-law-executive-mba-edition\/section_14\/d2fa4f60a6b482e3a9cde69e51eb5c1c.jpg\" alt=\"Image showing the principal over the agent who is over the subagent and then arrows depicting that a subagent reports back to both the agent and principal.\" width=\"447\" height=\"642\" \/> Figure 11.3 Subagent.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s05\" class=\"section\">\r\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Servant<\/h2>\r\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s05_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">The final category of agent is the servant. Until the early nineteenth century, any employee whose work duties were subject to an employer\u2019s control was called a servant; we would not use that term so broadly in modern English. The Restatement (Second) of Agency, Section 2, defines a servant as \u201can agent employed by a master [employer] to perform service in his affairs whose physical conduct in the performance of the service is controlled or is subject to the right to control by the master.\u201d<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s06\" class=\"section\">\r\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Independent Contractor<\/h2>\r\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s06_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">Not every contract for services necessarily creates a master-servant relationship. There is an important distinction made between the status of a servant and that of an independent contractor. According to the Restatement (Second) of Agency, Section 2, \u201can independent contractor is a person who contracts with another to do something for him but who is not controlled by the other nor subject to the other\u2019s right to control with respect to his physical conduct in the performance of the undertaking.\u201d As the name implies, the independent contractor is legally autonomous. A plumber salaried to a building contractor is an employee and agent of the contractor. But a plumber who hires himself out to repair pipes in people\u2019s homes is an independent contractor. If you hire a lawyer to settle a dispute, that person is not your employee or your servant; she is an independent contractor. The terms \u201cagent\u201d and \u201cindependent contractor\u201d are not necessarily mutually exclusive. In fact, by definition, \u201c\u2026 an independent contractor is an agent in the broad sense of the term in undertaking, at the request of another, to do something for the other. As a general rule the line of demarcation between an independent contractor and a servant is not clearly drawn.\u201d<span id=\"mayer_1.0-fn38_001\" class=\"footnote\">1. <em class=\"emphasis\">Flick v. Crouch<\/em>, 434 P.2d 256, 260 (OK, 1967).<\/span><\/p>\r\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s06_p02\" class=\"para editable block\">This distinction between agent and independent contractor has important legal consequences for taxation, workers\u2019 compensation, and liability insurance. For example, employers are required to withhold income taxes from their employees\u2019 paychecks. But payment to an independent contractor, such as the plumber for hire, does not require such withholding. Deciding who is an independent contractor is not always easy; there is no single factor or mechanical answer. In <em class=\"emphasis\">Robinson v. New York Commodities Corp.<\/em>, an injured salesman sought workers\u2019 compensation benefits, claiming to be an employee of the New York Commodities Corporation.<span id=\"mayer_1.0-fn38_002\" class=\"footnote\"><em class=\"emphasis\">Robinson v. New York Commodities Corp.<\/em>, 396 N.Y.S.2d 725, App. Div. (1977).<\/span> But the state workmen\u2019s compensation board ruled against him, citing a variety of factors. The claimant sold canned meats, making rounds in his car from his home. The company did not establish hours for him, did not control his movements in any way, and did not reimburse him for mileage or any other expenses or withhold taxes from its straight commission payments to him. He reported his taxes on a form for the self-employed and hired an accountant to prepare it for him. The court agreed with the compensation board that these facts established the salesman\u2019s status as an independent contractor.<\/p>\r\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s06_p03\" class=\"para editable block\">The factual situation in each case determines whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor. Neither the company nor the worker can establish the worker\u2019s status by agreement. As the North Dakota Workmen\u2019s Compensation Bureau put it in a bulletin to real estate brokers, \u201cIt has come to the Bureau\u2019s attention that many employers are requiring that those who work for them sign \u2018independent contractor\u2019 forms so that the employer does not have to pay workmen\u2019s compensation premiums for his employees. Such forms are meaningless if the worker is in fact an employee.\u201d<em class=\"emphasis\">Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corporation<\/em>, discussed in <a class=\"xref\" href=\"http:\/\/2012books.lardbucket.org\/books\/the-legal-environment-and-business-law-executive-mba-edition\/s14-relationships-between-principa.html#mayer_1.0-ch38_s03_s02\">Section 11.3.2 \"Employee versus Independent Contractor\"<\/a>, examines the distinction.<\/p>\r\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s06_p04\" class=\"para editable block\">In addition to determining a worker\u2019s status for tax and compensation insurance purposes, it is sometimes critical for decisions involving personal liability insurance policies, which usually exclude from coverage accidents involving employees of the insureds. <em class=\"emphasis\">General Accident Fire &amp; Life Assurance Corp v. Pro Golf Association<\/em><span id=\"mayer_1.0-fn38_003\" class=\"footnote\"><em class=\"emphasis\">General Accident Fire &amp; Life Assurance Corp v. Pro Golf Association<\/em>, 352 N.E.2d 441 (Ill. App. 1976).<\/span> involved such a situation. The insurance policy in question covered members of the Professional Golfers Association. Gerald Hall, a golf pro employed by the local park department, was afforded coverage under the policy, which excluded \u201cbodily injury to any employee of the insured arising out of and in the course of his employment by the insured.\u201d That is, no employee of Hall\u2019s would be covered (rather, any such person would have coverage under workers\u2019 compensation statutes). Bradley Martin, age thirteen, was at the golf course for junior league play. At Hall\u2019s request, he agreed to retrieve or \u201cshag\u201d golf balls to be hit during a lesson Hall was giving; he was\u2014as Hall put it\u2014to be compensated \u201ceither through golf instructions or money or hotdogs or whatever.\u201d During the course of the lesson, a golf ball hit by Hall hit young Martin in the eye. If Martin was an employee, the insurance company would be liable; if he was not an employee, the insurance company would not liable. The trial court determined he was not an employee. The evidence showed: sometimes the boys who \u201cshagged\u201d balls got paid, got golfing instructions, or got food, so the question of compensation was ambiguous. Martin was not directed in how to perform (the admittedly simple) task of retrieving golf balls, no control was exercised over him, and no equipment was required other than a bag to collect the balls: \u201cWe believe the evidence is susceptible of different inferences.\u2026We cannot say that the decision of the trial court is against the manifest weight of the evidence.\u201d<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03\" class=\"section\">\r\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Creation of the Agency Relationship<\/h2>\r\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">The agency relationship can be created in two ways: by agreement (expressly) or by operation of law (constructively or impliedly).<\/p>\r\n\r\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s01\" class=\"section\">\r\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Agency Created by Agreement<\/h2>\r\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s01_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">Most agencies are created by contract. Thus the general rules of contract law covered in <a class=\"xref\" href=\"http:\/\/2012books.lardbucket.org\/books\/the-legal-environment-and-business-law-executive-mba-edition\/s11-contracts.html#e1.mayermaster_1.0-ch08\">Chapter 8 \"Contracts\"<\/a> govern the law of agency. But agencies can also be created without contract, by agreement. Therefore, three contract principles are especially important: the first is the requirement for consideration, the second for a writing, and the third concerns contractual capacity.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s01_s01\" class=\"section\">\r\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Consideration<\/h2>\r\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s01_s01_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">Agencies created by consent\u2014agreement\u2014are not necessarily contractual. It is not uncommon for one person to act as an agent for another without consideration. For example, Abe asks Byron to run some errands for him: to buy some lumber on his account at the local lumberyard. Such a gratuitous agency gives rise to no different results than the more common contractual agency.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s01_s02\" class=\"section\">\r\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Formalities<\/h2>\r\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s01_s02_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">Most oral agency contracts are legally binding; the law does not require that they be reduced to writing. In practice, many agency contracts are written to avoid problems of proof. And there are situations where an agency contract must be in writing: (1) if the agreed-on purpose of the agency cannot be fulfilled within one year or if the agency relationship is to last more than one year; (2) in many states, an agreement to pay a commission to a real estate broker; (3) in many states, authority given to an agent to sell real estate; and (4) in several states, contracts between companies and sales representatives.<\/p>\r\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s01_s02_p02\" class=\"para editable block\">Even when the agency contract is not required to be in writing, contracts that agents make with third parties often must be in writing. Thus Section 2-201 of the Uniform Commercial Code specifically requires contracts for the sale of goods for the price of five hundred dollars or more to be in writing and \u201csigned by the party against whom enforcement is sought or by his authorized agent.\u201d<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s01_s03\" class=\"section\">\r\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Capacity<\/h2>\r\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s01_s03_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">A contract is void or voidable when one of the parties lacks capacity to make one. If both principal and agent lack capacity\u2014for example, a minor appoints another minor to negotiate or sign an agreement\u2014there can be no question of the contract\u2019s voidability. But suppose only one or the other lacks capacity. Generally, the law focuses on the principal. If the principal is a minor or otherwise lacks capacity, the contract can be avoided even if the agent is fully competent. There are, however, a few situations in which the capacity of the agent is important. Thus a mentally incompetent agent cannot bind a principal.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s02\" class=\"section\">\r\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Agency Created by Operation of Law<\/h2>\r\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s02_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">Most agencies are made by contract, but agency also may arise impliedly or apparently.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s02_s01\" class=\"section\">\r\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Implied Agency<\/h2>\r\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s02_s01_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">In areas of social need, courts have declared an agency to exist in the absence of an agreement. The agency relationship then is said to have been implied \u201cby operation of law.\u201d Children in most states may purchase necessary items\u2014food or medical services\u2014on the parent\u2019s account. Long-standing social policy deems it desirable for the head of a family to support his dependents, and the courts will put the expense on the family head in order to provide for the dependents\u2019 welfare. The courts achieve this result by supposing the dependent to be the family head\u2019s agent, thus allowing creditors to sue the family head for the debt.<\/p>\r\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s02_s01_p02\" class=\"para editable block\">Implied agencies also arise where one person behaves as an agent would and the \u201cprincipal,\u201d knowing that the \u201cagent\u201d is behaving so, acquiesces, allowing the person to hold himself out as an agent. Such are the basic facts in <em class=\"emphasis\">Weingart v. Directoire Restaurant, Inc.<\/em> in <a class=\"xref\" href=\"http:\/\/2012books.lardbucket.org\/books\/the-legal-environment-and-business-law-executive-mba-edition\/s14-relationships-between-principa.html#mayer_1.0-ch38_s03_s01\">Section 11.3.1 \"Creation of Agency: Liability of Parent for Contracts Made by \u201cAgent\u201d Child\"<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s02_s02\" class=\"section\">\r\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Apparent Agency<\/h2>\r\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s02_s02_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">Suppose Arthur is Paul\u2019s agent, employed through October 31. On November 1, Arthur buys materials at Lumber Yard\u2014as he has been doing since early spring\u2014and charges them to Paul\u2019s account. Lumber Yard, not knowing that Arthur\u2019s employment terminated the day before, bills Paul. Will Paul have to pay? Yes, because the termination of the agency was not communicated to Lumber Yard. It<em class=\"emphasis\">appeared<\/em> that Arthur was an authorized agent. This issue is discussed further in <a class=\"xref\" href=\"http:\/\/2012books.lardbucket.org\/books\/the-legal-environment-and-business-law-executive-mba-edition\/s15-liability-of-principal-and-age.html#mayer_1.0-ch39\">Chapter 12 \"Liability of Principal and Agent; Termination of Agency\"<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s02_s02_n01\" class=\"key_takeaways editable block\">\r\n<h3 class=\"title\">KEY TAKEAWAY<\/h3>\r\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s02_s02_p02\" class=\"para\">An agent is one who acts on behalf of another. Many transactions are conducted by agents so acting. All corporate transactions, including those involving governmental organizations, are so conducted because corporations cannot themselves actually act; they are legal fictions. Agencies may be created expressly, impliedly, or apparently. Recurring issues in agency law include whether the \u201cagent\u201d really is such, the scope of the agent\u2019s authority, and the duties among the parties. The five types of agents include: general agent, special agent, subagent, agency coupled with an interest, and servant (or employee). The independent contractor is not an employee; her activities are not specifically controlled by her client, and the client is not liable for payroll taxes, Social Security, and the like. But it is not uncommon for an employer to claim workers are independent contractors when in fact they are employees, and the cases are often hard-fought on the facts.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s02_s02_n02\" class=\"exercises editable block\">\r\n<h3 class=\"title\">PRACTICE EXERCISES<\/h3>\r\n<ol id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s02_s02_l01\" class=\"orderedlist\">\r\n\t<li>Why is agency law especially important in the business and government context?<\/li>\r\n\t<li>What are the five types of agents?<\/li>\r\n\t<li>What distinguishes an employee from an independent contractor?<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Why do employers frequently try to pass off employees as independent contractors?<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<h2><span class=\"il\">Reflection<\/span> <span class=\"il\">Questions<\/span><\/h2>\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li>What learning outcome\u00a0relates to this content?<\/li>\r\n\t<li>What are the key topics covered in this content?<\/li>\r\n\t<li>How can the content in this section help you demonstrate mastery of the learning outcome?<\/li>\r\n\t<li>What <span class=\"il\">questions<\/span> do you have about this content?<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>","rendered":"<h3 class=\"title editable block\">LEARNING OBJECTIVES<\/h3>\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_n01\" class=\"learning_objectives editable block\">\n<ol id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_l01\" class=\"orderedlist\">\n<li>Understand why agency law is important.<\/li>\n<li>Recognize the recurring legal issues in agency law.<\/li>\n<li>Know the types of agents.<\/li>\n<li>Understand how the agency relationship is created.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s01\" class=\"section\">\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Introduction to Agency Law<\/h2>\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s01_s01\" class=\"section\">\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Why Is Agency Law Important, and What Is an Agent?<\/h2>\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s01_s01_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">An agent is a person who acts in the name of and on behalf of another, having been given and assumed some degree of authority to do so. Most organized human activity\u2014and virtually all commercial activity\u2014is carried on through agency. No corporation would be possible, even in theory, without such a concept. We might say \u201cGeneral Motors is building cars in China,\u201d for example, but we can\u2019t shake hands with General Motors. \u201cThe General,\u201d as people say, exists and works through agents. Likewise, partnerships and other business organizations rely extensively on agents to conduct their business. Indeed, it is not an exaggeration to say that agency is the cornerstone of enterprise organization. In a partnership each partner is a general agent, while under corporation law the officers and all employees are agents of the corporation.<\/p>\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s01_s01_p02\" class=\"para editable block\">The existence of agents does not, however, require a whole new law of torts or contracts. A tort is no less harmful when committed by an agent; a contract is no less binding when negotiated by an agent. What does need to be taken into account, though, is the manner in which an agent acts on behalf of his principal and toward a third party.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s01_s02\" class=\"section\">\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Recurring Issues in Agency Law<\/h2>\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s01_s02_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">Several problematic fact scenarios recur in agency, and law has developed in response.<\/p>\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s01_s02_s01\" class=\"section\">\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">John Alden<\/h2>\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s01_s02_s01_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">Consider John Alden (1599\u20131687), one of the most famous agents in American literature. He is said to have been the first person from the <em class=\"emphasis\">Mayflower<\/em> to set foot on Plymouth Rock in 1620; he was a carpenter, a cooper (barrel maker), and a diplomat. His agency task\u2014of interest here\u2014was celebrated in Henry Wadsworth Longfellow\u2019s \u201cThe Courtship of Miles Standish.\u201d He was to woo Priscilla Mullins (d. 1680), \u201cthe loveliest maiden of Plymouth,\u201d on behalf of Captain Miles Standish, a valiant soldier who was too shy to propose marriage. Standish turned to John Alden, his young and eloquent prot\u00e9g\u00e9, and beseeched Alden to speak on his behalf, unaware that Alden himself was in love with Priscilla. Alden accepted his captain\u2019s assignment, despite the knowledge that he would thus lose Priscilla for himself, and sought out the lady. But Alden was so tongue-tied that his vaunted eloquence fell short, turned Priscilla cold toward the object of Alden\u2019s mission, and eventually led her to turn the tables in one of the most famous lines in American literature and poetry: \u201cWhy don\u2019t you speak for yourself, John?\u201d John eventually did: the two were married in 1623 in Plymouth.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s01_s02_s02\" class=\"section\">\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Recurring Issues in Agency<\/h2>\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s01_s02_s02_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">Let\u2019s analyze this sequence of events in legal terms\u2014recognizing, of course, that this example is an analogy and that the law, even today, would not impose consequences on Alden for his failure to carry out Captain Standish\u2019s wishes. Alden was the captain\u2019s agent: he was specifically authorized to speak in his name in a manner agreed on, toward a specified end, and he accepted the assignment in consideration of the captain\u2019s friendship. He had, however, a conflict of interest. He attempted to carry out the assignment, but he did not perform according to expectations. Eventually, he wound up with the prize himself. Here are some questions to consider, the same questions that will recur throughout the discussion of agency:<\/p>\n<ul id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s01_s02_s02_l01\" class=\"itemizedlist editable block\">\n<li>How extensive was John\u2019s authority? Could he have made promises to Priscilla on the captain\u2019s behalf\u2014for example, that Standish would have built her a fine house?<\/li>\n<li>Could he, if he committed a tort, have imposed liability on his principal? Suppose, for example, that he had ridden at breakneck speed to reach Priscilla\u2019s side and while en route ran into and injured a pedestrian on the road. Could the pedestrian have sued Standish?<\/li>\n<li>Suppose Alden had injured himself on the journey. Would Standish be liable to Alden?<\/li>\n<li>Is Alden liable to Standish for stealing the heart of Priscilla\u2014that is, for taking the \u201cprofits\u201d of the enterprise for himself?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s01_s02_s02_p02\" class=\"para editable block\">As these questions suggest, agency law often involves three parties\u2014the principal, the agent, and a third party. It therefore deals with three different relationships: between principal and agent, between principal and third party, and between agent and third party. These relationships can be summed up in a simple diagram (see <a class=\"xref\" href=\"http:\/\/2012books.lardbucket.org\/books\/the-legal-environment-and-business-law-executive-mba-edition\/s14-relationships-between-principa.html#mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s01_s02_s02_f01\">Figure 11.1 &#8220;Agency Relationships&#8221;<\/a>).<\/p>\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s01_s02_s02_f01\" class=\"figure large editable block\">\n<div style=\"width: 662px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/2012books.lardbucket.org\/books\/the-legal-environment-and-business-law-executive-mba-edition\/section_14\/e89c3ecb4f0a749c64a99a8c1085687c.jpg\" alt=\"Image showing the principal over the agent and the agent over the third party.\" width=\"652\" height=\"411\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 11.1 Agency Relationships.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s01_s02_s02_p03\" class=\"para editable block\">In this chapter, we will consider the principal-agent side of the triangle. In the next chapter we will turn to relationships involving third parties.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02\" class=\"section\">\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Types of Agents<\/h2>\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">There are five types of agents.<\/p>\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s01\" class=\"section\">\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">General Agent<\/h2>\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s01_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">The general agent possesses the authority to carry out a broad range of transactions in the name and on behalf of the principal. The general agent may be the manager of a business or may have a more limited but nevertheless ongoing role\u2014for example, as a purchasing agent or as a life insurance agent authorized to sign up customers for the home office. In either case, the general agent has authority to alter the principal\u2019s legal relationships with third parties. One who is designated a general agent has the authority to act in any way required by the principal\u2019s business. To restrict the general agent\u2019s authority, the principal must spell out the limitations explicitly, and even so the principal may be liable for any of the agent\u2019s acts in excess of his authority.<\/p>\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s01_p02\" class=\"para editable block\">Normally, the general agent is a business agent, but there are circumstances under which an individual may appoint a general agent for personal purposes. One common form of a personal general agent is the person who holds another\u2019s power of attorney. This is a delegation of authority to another to act in his stead; it can be accomplished by executing a simple form, such as the one shown in <a class=\"xref\" href=\"http:\/\/2012books.lardbucket.org\/books\/the-legal-environment-and-business-law-executive-mba-edition\/s14-relationships-between-principa.html#mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s01_f01\">Figure 11.2 &#8220;General Power of Attorney&#8221;<\/a>. Ordinarily, the power of attorney is used for a special purpose\u2014for example, to sell real estate or securities in the absence of the owner. But a person facing a lengthy operation and recuperation in a hospital might give a general power of attorney to a trusted family member or friend.<\/p>\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s01_f01\" class=\"figure large editable block\">\n<div style=\"width: 751px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/2012books.lardbucket.org\/books\/the-legal-environment-and-business-law-executive-mba-edition\/section_14\/c67c5f0a8eed6db544e95a189c281d96.jpg\" alt=\"Image of a General Power of Attorney. It reads that a person grants another person &quot;to be my agent and attorney in fact. I grant my agent full authority and power to act on my behalf to do anything I could do if I were personally present.&quot;\" width=\"741\" height=\"520\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 11.2 General Power of Attorney.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s02\" class=\"section\">\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Special Agent<\/h2>\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s02_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">The special agent is one who has authority to act only in a specifically designated instance or in a specifically designated set of transactions. For example, a real estate broker is usually a special agent hired to find a buyer for the principal\u2019s land. Suppose Sam, the seller, appoints an agent Alberta to find a buyer for his property. Alberta\u2019s commission depends on the selling price, which, Sam states in a letter to her, \u201cin any event may be no less than $150,000.\u201d If Alberta locates a buyer, Bob, who agrees to purchase the property for $160,000, her signature on the contract of sale will not bind Sam. As a special agent, Alberta had authority only to find a buyer; she had no authority to sign the contract.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s03\" class=\"section\">\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Agency Coupled with an Interest<\/h2>\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s03_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">An agent whose reimbursement depends on his continuing to have the authority to act as an agent is said to have an agency coupled with an interest if he has a property interest in the business. A literary or author\u2019s agent, for example, customarily agrees to sell a literary work to a publisher in return for a percentage of all monies the author earns from the sale of the work. The literary agent also acts as a collection agent to ensure that his commission will be paid. By agreeing with the principal that the agency is coupled with an interest, the agent can prevent his own rights in a particular literary work from being terminated to his detriment.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s04\" class=\"section\">\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Subagent<\/h2>\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s04_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">To carry out her duties, an agent will often need to appoint her own agents. These appointments may or may not be authorized by the principal. An insurance company, for example, might name a general agent to open offices in cities throughout a certain state. The agent will necessarily conduct her business through agents of her own choosing. These agents are subagents of the principal if the general agent had the express or implied authority of the principal to hire them. For legal purposes, they are agents of both the principal and the principal\u2019s general agent, and both are liable for the subagent\u2019s conduct although normally the general agent agrees to be primarily liable (see <a class=\"xref\" href=\"http:\/\/2012books.lardbucket.org\/books\/the-legal-environment-and-business-law-executive-mba-edition\/s14-relationships-between-principa.html#mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s04_f01\">Figure 11.3 &#8220;Subagent&#8221;<\/a>).<\/p>\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s04_f01\" class=\"figure large medium-height editable block\">\n<div style=\"width: 457px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/2012books.lardbucket.org\/books\/the-legal-environment-and-business-law-executive-mba-edition\/section_14\/d2fa4f60a6b482e3a9cde69e51eb5c1c.jpg\" alt=\"Image showing the principal over the agent who is over the subagent and then arrows depicting that a subagent reports back to both the agent and principal.\" width=\"447\" height=\"642\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 11.3 Subagent.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s05\" class=\"section\">\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Servant<\/h2>\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s05_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">The final category of agent is the servant. Until the early nineteenth century, any employee whose work duties were subject to an employer\u2019s control was called a servant; we would not use that term so broadly in modern English. The Restatement (Second) of Agency, Section 2, defines a servant as \u201can agent employed by a master [employer] to perform service in his affairs whose physical conduct in the performance of the service is controlled or is subject to the right to control by the master.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s06\" class=\"section\">\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Independent Contractor<\/h2>\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s06_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">Not every contract for services necessarily creates a master-servant relationship. There is an important distinction made between the status of a servant and that of an independent contractor. According to the Restatement (Second) of Agency, Section 2, \u201can independent contractor is a person who contracts with another to do something for him but who is not controlled by the other nor subject to the other\u2019s right to control with respect to his physical conduct in the performance of the undertaking.\u201d As the name implies, the independent contractor is legally autonomous. A plumber salaried to a building contractor is an employee and agent of the contractor. But a plumber who hires himself out to repair pipes in people\u2019s homes is an independent contractor. If you hire a lawyer to settle a dispute, that person is not your employee or your servant; she is an independent contractor. The terms \u201cagent\u201d and \u201cindependent contractor\u201d are not necessarily mutually exclusive. In fact, by definition, \u201c\u2026 an independent contractor is an agent in the broad sense of the term in undertaking, at the request of another, to do something for the other. As a general rule the line of demarcation between an independent contractor and a servant is not clearly drawn.\u201d<span id=\"mayer_1.0-fn38_001\" class=\"footnote\">1. <em class=\"emphasis\">Flick v. Crouch<\/em>, 434 P.2d 256, 260 (OK, 1967).<\/span><\/p>\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s06_p02\" class=\"para editable block\">This distinction between agent and independent contractor has important legal consequences for taxation, workers\u2019 compensation, and liability insurance. For example, employers are required to withhold income taxes from their employees\u2019 paychecks. But payment to an independent contractor, such as the plumber for hire, does not require such withholding. Deciding who is an independent contractor is not always easy; there is no single factor or mechanical answer. In <em class=\"emphasis\">Robinson v. New York Commodities Corp.<\/em>, an injured salesman sought workers\u2019 compensation benefits, claiming to be an employee of the New York Commodities Corporation.<span id=\"mayer_1.0-fn38_002\" class=\"footnote\"><em class=\"emphasis\">Robinson v. New York Commodities Corp.<\/em>, 396 N.Y.S.2d 725, App. Div. (1977).<\/span> But the state workmen\u2019s compensation board ruled against him, citing a variety of factors. The claimant sold canned meats, making rounds in his car from his home. The company did not establish hours for him, did not control his movements in any way, and did not reimburse him for mileage or any other expenses or withhold taxes from its straight commission payments to him. He reported his taxes on a form for the self-employed and hired an accountant to prepare it for him. The court agreed with the compensation board that these facts established the salesman\u2019s status as an independent contractor.<\/p>\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s06_p03\" class=\"para editable block\">The factual situation in each case determines whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor. Neither the company nor the worker can establish the worker\u2019s status by agreement. As the North Dakota Workmen\u2019s Compensation Bureau put it in a bulletin to real estate brokers, \u201cIt has come to the Bureau\u2019s attention that many employers are requiring that those who work for them sign \u2018independent contractor\u2019 forms so that the employer does not have to pay workmen\u2019s compensation premiums for his employees. Such forms are meaningless if the worker is in fact an employee.\u201d<em class=\"emphasis\">Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corporation<\/em>, discussed in <a class=\"xref\" href=\"http:\/\/2012books.lardbucket.org\/books\/the-legal-environment-and-business-law-executive-mba-edition\/s14-relationships-between-principa.html#mayer_1.0-ch38_s03_s02\">Section 11.3.2 &#8220;Employee versus Independent Contractor&#8221;<\/a>, examines the distinction.<\/p>\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s02_s06_p04\" class=\"para editable block\">In addition to determining a worker\u2019s status for tax and compensation insurance purposes, it is sometimes critical for decisions involving personal liability insurance policies, which usually exclude from coverage accidents involving employees of the insureds. <em class=\"emphasis\">General Accident Fire &amp; Life Assurance Corp v. Pro Golf Association<\/em><span id=\"mayer_1.0-fn38_003\" class=\"footnote\"><em class=\"emphasis\">General Accident Fire &amp; Life Assurance Corp v. Pro Golf Association<\/em>, 352 N.E.2d 441 (Ill. App. 1976).<\/span> involved such a situation. The insurance policy in question covered members of the Professional Golfers Association. Gerald Hall, a golf pro employed by the local park department, was afforded coverage under the policy, which excluded \u201cbodily injury to any employee of the insured arising out of and in the course of his employment by the insured.\u201d That is, no employee of Hall\u2019s would be covered (rather, any such person would have coverage under workers\u2019 compensation statutes). Bradley Martin, age thirteen, was at the golf course for junior league play. At Hall\u2019s request, he agreed to retrieve or \u201cshag\u201d golf balls to be hit during a lesson Hall was giving; he was\u2014as Hall put it\u2014to be compensated \u201ceither through golf instructions or money or hotdogs or whatever.\u201d During the course of the lesson, a golf ball hit by Hall hit young Martin in the eye. If Martin was an employee, the insurance company would be liable; if he was not an employee, the insurance company would not liable. The trial court determined he was not an employee. The evidence showed: sometimes the boys who \u201cshagged\u201d balls got paid, got golfing instructions, or got food, so the question of compensation was ambiguous. Martin was not directed in how to perform (the admittedly simple) task of retrieving golf balls, no control was exercised over him, and no equipment was required other than a bag to collect the balls: \u201cWe believe the evidence is susceptible of different inferences.\u2026We cannot say that the decision of the trial court is against the manifest weight of the evidence.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03\" class=\"section\">\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Creation of the Agency Relationship<\/h2>\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">The agency relationship can be created in two ways: by agreement (expressly) or by operation of law (constructively or impliedly).<\/p>\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s01\" class=\"section\">\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Agency Created by Agreement<\/h2>\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s01_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">Most agencies are created by contract. Thus the general rules of contract law covered in <a class=\"xref\" href=\"http:\/\/2012books.lardbucket.org\/books\/the-legal-environment-and-business-law-executive-mba-edition\/s11-contracts.html#e1.mayermaster_1.0-ch08\">Chapter 8 &#8220;Contracts&#8221;<\/a> govern the law of agency. But agencies can also be created without contract, by agreement. Therefore, three contract principles are especially important: the first is the requirement for consideration, the second for a writing, and the third concerns contractual capacity.<\/p>\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s01_s01\" class=\"section\">\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Consideration<\/h2>\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s01_s01_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">Agencies created by consent\u2014agreement\u2014are not necessarily contractual. It is not uncommon for one person to act as an agent for another without consideration. For example, Abe asks Byron to run some errands for him: to buy some lumber on his account at the local lumberyard. Such a gratuitous agency gives rise to no different results than the more common contractual agency.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s01_s02\" class=\"section\">\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Formalities<\/h2>\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s01_s02_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">Most oral agency contracts are legally binding; the law does not require that they be reduced to writing. In practice, many agency contracts are written to avoid problems of proof. And there are situations where an agency contract must be in writing: (1) if the agreed-on purpose of the agency cannot be fulfilled within one year or if the agency relationship is to last more than one year; (2) in many states, an agreement to pay a commission to a real estate broker; (3) in many states, authority given to an agent to sell real estate; and (4) in several states, contracts between companies and sales representatives.<\/p>\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s01_s02_p02\" class=\"para editable block\">Even when the agency contract is not required to be in writing, contracts that agents make with third parties often must be in writing. Thus Section 2-201 of the Uniform Commercial Code specifically requires contracts for the sale of goods for the price of five hundred dollars or more to be in writing and \u201csigned by the party against whom enforcement is sought or by his authorized agent.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s01_s03\" class=\"section\">\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Capacity<\/h2>\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s01_s03_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">A contract is void or voidable when one of the parties lacks capacity to make one. If both principal and agent lack capacity\u2014for example, a minor appoints another minor to negotiate or sign an agreement\u2014there can be no question of the contract\u2019s voidability. But suppose only one or the other lacks capacity. Generally, the law focuses on the principal. If the principal is a minor or otherwise lacks capacity, the contract can be avoided even if the agent is fully competent. There are, however, a few situations in which the capacity of the agent is important. Thus a mentally incompetent agent cannot bind a principal.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s02\" class=\"section\">\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Agency Created by Operation of Law<\/h2>\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s02_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">Most agencies are made by contract, but agency also may arise impliedly or apparently.<\/p>\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s02_s01\" class=\"section\">\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Implied Agency<\/h2>\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s02_s01_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">In areas of social need, courts have declared an agency to exist in the absence of an agreement. The agency relationship then is said to have been implied \u201cby operation of law.\u201d Children in most states may purchase necessary items\u2014food or medical services\u2014on the parent\u2019s account. Long-standing social policy deems it desirable for the head of a family to support his dependents, and the courts will put the expense on the family head in order to provide for the dependents\u2019 welfare. The courts achieve this result by supposing the dependent to be the family head\u2019s agent, thus allowing creditors to sue the family head for the debt.<\/p>\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s02_s01_p02\" class=\"para editable block\">Implied agencies also arise where one person behaves as an agent would and the \u201cprincipal,\u201d knowing that the \u201cagent\u201d is behaving so, acquiesces, allowing the person to hold himself out as an agent. Such are the basic facts in <em class=\"emphasis\">Weingart v. Directoire Restaurant, Inc.<\/em> in <a class=\"xref\" href=\"http:\/\/2012books.lardbucket.org\/books\/the-legal-environment-and-business-law-executive-mba-edition\/s14-relationships-between-principa.html#mayer_1.0-ch38_s03_s01\">Section 11.3.1 &#8220;Creation of Agency: Liability of Parent for Contracts Made by \u201cAgent\u201d Child&#8221;<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s02_s02\" class=\"section\">\n<h2 class=\"title editable block\">Apparent Agency<\/h2>\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s02_s02_p01\" class=\"para editable block\">Suppose Arthur is Paul\u2019s agent, employed through October 31. On November 1, Arthur buys materials at Lumber Yard\u2014as he has been doing since early spring\u2014and charges them to Paul\u2019s account. Lumber Yard, not knowing that Arthur\u2019s employment terminated the day before, bills Paul. Will Paul have to pay? Yes, because the termination of the agency was not communicated to Lumber Yard. It<em class=\"emphasis\">appeared<\/em> that Arthur was an authorized agent. This issue is discussed further in <a class=\"xref\" href=\"http:\/\/2012books.lardbucket.org\/books\/the-legal-environment-and-business-law-executive-mba-edition\/s15-liability-of-principal-and-age.html#mayer_1.0-ch39\">Chapter 12 &#8220;Liability of Principal and Agent; Termination of Agency&#8221;<\/a>.<\/p>\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s02_s02_n01\" class=\"key_takeaways editable block\">\n<h3 class=\"title\">KEY TAKEAWAY<\/h3>\n<p id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s02_s02_p02\" class=\"para\">An agent is one who acts on behalf of another. Many transactions are conducted by agents so acting. All corporate transactions, including those involving governmental organizations, are so conducted because corporations cannot themselves actually act; they are legal fictions. Agencies may be created expressly, impliedly, or apparently. Recurring issues in agency law include whether the \u201cagent\u201d really is such, the scope of the agent\u2019s authority, and the duties among the parties. The five types of agents include: general agent, special agent, subagent, agency coupled with an interest, and servant (or employee). The independent contractor is not an employee; her activities are not specifically controlled by her client, and the client is not liable for payroll taxes, Social Security, and the like. But it is not uncommon for an employer to claim workers are independent contractors when in fact they are employees, and the cases are often hard-fought on the facts.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s02_s02_n02\" class=\"exercises editable block\">\n<h3 class=\"title\">PRACTICE EXERCISES<\/h3>\n<ol id=\"mayer_1.0-ch38_s01_s03_s02_s02_l01\" class=\"orderedlist\">\n<li>Why is agency law especially important in the business and government context?<\/li>\n<li>What are the five types of agents?<\/li>\n<li>What distinguishes an employee from an independent contractor?<\/li>\n<li>Why do employers frequently try to pass off employees as independent contractors?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h2><span class=\"il\">Reflection<\/span> <span class=\"il\">Questions<\/span><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>What learning outcome\u00a0relates to this content?<\/li>\n<li>What are the key topics covered in this content?<\/li>\n<li>How can the content in this section help you demonstrate mastery of the learning outcome?<\/li>\n<li>What <span class=\"il\">questions<\/span> do you have about this content?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t <section class=\"citations-section\" role=\"contentinfo\">\n\t\t\t <h3>Candela Citations<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t <div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t <div id=\"citation-list-942\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <div class=\"licensing\"><div class=\"license-attribution-dropdown-subheading\">CC licensed content, Shared previously<\/div><ul class=\"citation-list\"><li>The Legal Environment and Business Law: Executive MBA Edition, Chapter 11.1. <strong>Authored by<\/strong>: Mayer, Warner, Siedel, Lieberman, Martina. <strong>Located at<\/strong>: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/2012books.lardbucket.org\/books\/the-legal-environment-and-business-law-executive-mba-edition\/s14-relationships-between-principa.html\">http:\/\/2012books.lardbucket.org\/books\/the-legal-environment-and-business-law-executive-mba-edition\/s14-relationships-between-principa.html<\/a>. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"license\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike<\/a><\/em><\/li><\/ul><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t <\/section>","protected":false},"author":74,"menu_order":21,"template":"","meta":{"_candela_citation":"[{\"type\":\"cc\",\"description\":\"The Legal Environment and Business Law: Executive MBA Edition, Chapter 11.1\",\"author\":\"Mayer, Warner, Siedel, Lieberman, Martina\",\"organization\":\"\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/2012books.lardbucket.org\/books\/the-legal-environment-and-business-law-executive-mba-edition\/s14-relationships-between-principa.html\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"cc-by-nc-sa\",\"license_terms\":\"\"}]","CANDELA_OUTCOMES_GUID":"","pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-942","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry"],"part":81,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/montgomerycollege-masterybusinesslaw2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/942","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/montgomerycollege-masterybusinesslaw2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/montgomerycollege-masterybusinesslaw2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/montgomerycollege-masterybusinesslaw2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/74"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/montgomerycollege-masterybusinesslaw2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/942\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1452,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/montgomerycollege-masterybusinesslaw2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/942\/revisions\/1452"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/montgomerycollege-masterybusinesslaw2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/81"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/montgomerycollege-masterybusinesslaw2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/942\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/montgomerycollege-masterybusinesslaw2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=942"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/montgomerycollege-masterybusinesslaw2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=942"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/montgomerycollege-masterybusinesslaw2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=942"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/montgomerycollege-masterybusinesslaw2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=942"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}