Exponential Regression

As we have learned, there are a multitude of situations that can be modeled by exponential functions, such as investment growth, radioactive decay, atmospheric pressure changes, and temperatures of a cooling object. What do these phenomena have in common? For one thing, all the models either increase or decrease as time moves forward. But that’s not the whole story. It’s the way data increase or decrease that helps us determine whether it is best modeled by an exponential function. Knowing the behavior of exponential functions in general allows us to recognize when to use exponential regression, so let’s review exponential growth and decay.

Recall that exponential functions have the form [latex]y=a{b}^{x}[/latex] or [latex]y={A}_{0}{e}^{kx}[/latex]. When performing regression analysis, we use the form most commonly used on graphing utilities, [latex]y=a{b}^{x}[/latex]. Take a moment to reflect on the characteristics we’ve already learned about the exponential function [latex]y=a{b}^{x}[/latex] (assume a > 0):

• b must be greater than zero and not equal to one.
• The initial value of the model is a.
  • If b > 1, the function models exponential growth. As x increases, the outputs of the model increase slowly at first, but then increase more and more rapidly, without bound.
  • If 0 < b < 1, the function models exponential decay. As x increases, the outputs for the model decrease rapidly at first and then level off to become asymptotic to the x-axis. In other words, the outputs never become equal to or less than zero.

As part of the results, your calculator will display a number known as the correlation coefficient, labeled by the variable r or [latex]{r}^{2}[/latex]. (You may have to change the calculator’s settings for these to be shown.) The values are an indication of the “goodness of fit” of the regression equation to the data. We more commonly use the value of [latex]{r}^{2}[/latex] instead of r, but the closer either value is to 1, the better the regression equation approximates the data.

Example: Using Exponential Regression to Fit a Model to Data

In 2007, a university study was published investigating the crash risk of alcohol impaired driving. Data from 2,871 crashes were used to measure the association of a person’s blood alcohol level (BAC) with the risk of being in an accident. The table below shows results from the study.^[1] The relative risk is a measure of how many times more likely a person is to crash. So, for example, a person with a BAC of 0.09 is 3.54 times as likely to crash as a person who has not been drinking alcohol.

BAC	0	0.01	0.03	0.05	0.07	0.09
Relative Risk of Crashing	1	1.03	1.06	1.38	2.09	3.54
BAC	0.11	0.13	0.15	0.17	0.19	0.21
Relative Risk of Crashing	6.41	12.6	22.1	39.05	65.32	99.78

1. Let x represent the BAC level and let y represent the corresponding relative risk. Use exponential regression to fit a model to these data.
2. After 6 drinks, a person weighing 160 pounds will have a BAC of about 0.16. How many times more likely is a person with this weight to crash if they drive after having a 6-pack of beer? Round to the nearest hundredth.

Show Solution

1. Using an online graphing tool, create a table by clicking on the + in the upper left and selecting the table icon. Enter the data.

Below your table enter [latex]y_1[/latex]~[latex]ab^{x_1}[/latex].

Notice that [latex]{r}^{2}[/latex] is very close to 1 which indicates the model is a good fit to the data.

If using an online graphing tool, the model obtained is [latex]y=0.55877{\left(\text{57,700,000,000}\right)}^{x}[/latex]

If using a graphing calculator, the model obtained is [latex]y=0.58304829{\left(\text{22,072,021,300}\right)}^{x}[/latex]

2. Use the model to estimate the risk associated with a BAC of 0.16. Substitute 0.16 for x in the model and solve for y.

Using the online graphing tool model:

[latex]\begin{array}{l}y\hfill & =0.55877{\left(\text{57,700,000,000}\right)}^{x}\hfill & \text{Use the regression model found in part (a)}\text{.}\hfill \\ \hfill & =0.55877{\left(\text{57,700,000,000}\right)}^{0.16}\hfill & \text{Substitute 0}\text{.16 for }x\text{.}\hfill \\ \hfill & \approx \text{29}\text{.44}\hfill & \text{Round to the nearest hundredth}\text{.}\hfill \end{array}[/latex]

If a 160-pound person drives after having 6 drinks, he or she is about 29.44 times more likely to crash than if driving while sober.

Using the graphing calculator model:

[latex]\begin{array}{l}y\hfill & =0.58304829{\left(\text{22,072,021,300}\right)}^{x}\hfill & \text{Use the regression model found in part (a)}\text{.}\hfill \\ \hfill & =0.58304829{\left(\text{22,072,021,300}\right)}^{0.16}\hfill & \text{Substitute 0}\text{.16 for }x\text{.}\hfill \\ \hfill & \approx \text{26}\text{.35}\hfill & \text{Round to the nearest hundredth}\text{.}\hfill \end{array}[/latex]

If a 160-pound person drives after having 6 drinks, he or she is about 26.35 times more likely to crash than if driving while sober.