{"id":425,"date":"2018-07-10T18:36:54","date_gmt":"2018-07-10T18:36:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/olemiss-readinganthology\/?post_type=chapter&p=425"},"modified":"2018-08-13T17:50:03","modified_gmt":"2018-08-13T17:50:03","slug":"avoiding-plagiarism","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/olemiss-readinganthology\/chapter\/avoiding-plagiarism\/","title":{"raw":"Avoiding Plagiarism","rendered":"Avoiding Plagiarism"},"content":{"raw":"

How to Avoid Plagiarism in the Research Process<\/h2>\r\nPlagiarism is the unauthorized or uncredited use of the writings or ideas of another in your writing. While it might not be as tangible as auto theft or burglary, plagiarism is still a form of theft.\r\n\r\nIn the academic world, plagiarism is a serious matter because ideas in the forms of research, creative work, and original thought are highly valued. The University of Mississippi\u00a0has strict rules about what happens when someone is caught plagiarizing. Possible penalties include everything from failing the assignment, failing the class, or expulsion.<\/strong>\r\n
\r\n\r\nPlagiarism can take several different forms. The most well known,\u00a0purposeful plagiarism<\/strong>, is handing in an essay written by someone else and representing it as your own, copying your essay word for word from a magazine or journal, or downloading an essay from the Internet.\r\n\r\nA much more common and less understood phenomenon is\u00a0accidental plagiarism<\/strong>. Accidental plagiarism is the result of improperly paraphrasing, summarizing, quoting, or citing your evidence in your academic writing. Generally, writers accidentally plagiarize because they simply don\u2019t know or they fail to follow the rules for giving credit to the ideas of others in their writing.\r\n\r\nBoth purposeful and accidental plagiarism are wrong, against the rules, and can result in harsh punishments. Ignoring or not knowing the rules of how to not plagiarize and properly cite evidence might be an\u00a0explanation<\/em>, but it is not an excuse.\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\nConsider the examples below that use quotations and paraphrases from this brief passage:\r\n
\r\n\r\nThose who denounce cyberculture today strangely resemble those who criticized rock music during the fifties and sixties. Rock started out as an Anglo-American phenomenon and has become an industry. Nonetheless, it was able to capture the hopes of young people around the world and provided enjoyment to those of us who listened to or played rock. Sixties pop was the conscience of one or two generations that helped bring the war in Vietnam to a close. Obviously, neither rock nor pop has solved global poverty or hunger. But is this a reason to be \u201cagainst\u201d them? (ix).\r\n\r\nHere is the citation in MLA style:\r\n

L\u00e9vy, Pierre. Cyberculture. Trans. Robert Bononno. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2001.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\nHere\u2019s an obvious example of plagiarism:\u00a0<\/strong>\r\n

Those who denounce cyberculture today strangely resemble those who criticized rock music during the fifties and sixties.<\/p>\r\nIn this case, the writer has literally taken one of L\u00e9vy\u2019s sentences and represented it as her own. That\u2019s clearly against the rules.\r\n\r\nHere\u2019s another example of plagiarism, perhaps less obvious:<\/strong>\r\n

The same kind of people who criticize cyberculture are the same kind of people who criticized rock and roll music back in the fifties and sixties. But both cyberculture and rock music inspire and entertain young people.<\/p>\r\nWhile these aren\u2019t L\u00e9vy\u2019s exact words, they are certainly close enough to constitute a form of plagiarism. And again, even though you might think that this is a \u201clesser\u201d form of plagiarism, it\u2019s still plagiarism.\r\n\r\nBoth of these passages can easily be corrected to make them acceptable quotations or paraphrases!<\/strong>\r\n

Pierre L\u00e9vy observes that\u00a0<\/strong>\u201cThose who denounce cyberculture today strangely resemble those who criticized rock music during the fifties and sixties\u201d\u00a0(ix)<\/strong>.<\/p>\r\n

Pierre L\u00e9vy suggests<\/strong>\u00a0that the same kind of people who criticize cyberculture are the same kind of people who criticized rock and roll music back in the fifties and sixties. But both cyberculture and rock music inspire and entertain young people\u00a0(ix)<\/strong>.<\/p>\r\n\r\n

Plagiarism and the Internet<\/h2>\r\nThe ease of finding and retrieving information on the World Wide Web can lead readers to think that this information does not need to be cited. After all, it isn\u2019t a traditional source like a book or a journal; it is available for \u201cfree.\u201d All a research writer needs to do with a web site is \u201ccut and paste\u201d whatever he needs into his essay, right? Wrong!\r\n\r\nYou need to cite the evidence you find from the Internet or the World Wide Web the same way you cite evidence from other sources.<\/strong>\u00a0To not do this is plagiarism, or, more bluntly, cheating. Just because the information is \u201cfreely\u201d available on the Internet does not mean you can use this information in your academic writing without properly citing it, much in the same way that the information from library journals and books \u201cfreely\u201d available to you needs to be cited in order to give credit where credit is due.\r\n\r\nIt is also not acceptable to simply download graphics from the World Wide Web. Images found on the Internet are protected by copyright laws. Quite literally, taking images from the Web (particularly from commercial sources) is an offense that could lead to legal action. There are places where you can find graphics and clip art that Web publishers have made publicly available for anyone to use, but be sure that the Web site where you find the graphics makes this explicit before you take graphics as your own.\r\n\r\nIn short, you can use evidence from the Web as long as you don\u2019t plagiarize and as long as you properly cite it; don\u2019t take graphics from the Web unless you know the images are in the public domain.","rendered":"

How to Avoid Plagiarism in the Research Process<\/h2>\n

Plagiarism is the unauthorized or uncredited use of the writings or ideas of another in your writing. While it might not be as tangible as auto theft or burglary, plagiarism is still a form of theft.<\/p>\n

In the academic world, plagiarism is a serious matter because ideas in the forms of research, creative work, and original thought are highly valued. The University of Mississippi\u00a0has strict rules about what happens when someone is caught plagiarizing. Possible penalties include everything from failing the assignment, failing the class, or expulsion.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

Plagiarism can take several different forms. The most well known,\u00a0purposeful plagiarism<\/strong>, is handing in an essay written by someone else and representing it as your own, copying your essay word for word from a magazine or journal, or downloading an essay from the Internet.<\/p>\n

A much more common and less understood phenomenon is\u00a0accidental plagiarism<\/strong>. Accidental plagiarism is the result of improperly paraphrasing, summarizing, quoting, or citing your evidence in your academic writing. Generally, writers accidentally plagiarize because they simply don\u2019t know or they fail to follow the rules for giving credit to the ideas of others in their writing.<\/p>\n

Both purposeful and accidental plagiarism are wrong, against the rules, and can result in harsh punishments. Ignoring or not knowing the rules of how to not plagiarize and properly cite evidence might be an\u00a0explanation<\/em>, but it is not an excuse.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Consider the examples below that use quotations and paraphrases from this brief passage:<\/p>\n

\n

Those who denounce cyberculture today strangely resemble those who criticized rock music during the fifties and sixties. Rock started out as an Anglo-American phenomenon and has become an industry. Nonetheless, it was able to capture the hopes of young people around the world and provided enjoyment to those of us who listened to or played rock. Sixties pop was the conscience of one or two generations that helped bring the war in Vietnam to a close. Obviously, neither rock nor pop has solved global poverty or hunger. But is this a reason to be \u201cagainst\u201d them? (ix).<\/p>\n

Here is the citation in MLA style:<\/p>\n

L\u00e9vy, Pierre. Cyberculture. Trans. Robert Bononno. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2001.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Here\u2019s an obvious example of plagiarism:\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Those who denounce cyberculture today strangely resemble those who criticized rock music during the fifties and sixties.<\/p>\n

In this case, the writer has literally taken one of L\u00e9vy\u2019s sentences and represented it as her own. That\u2019s clearly against the rules.<\/p>\n

Here\u2019s another example of plagiarism, perhaps less obvious:<\/strong><\/p>\n

The same kind of people who criticize cyberculture are the same kind of people who criticized rock and roll music back in the fifties and sixties. But both cyberculture and rock music inspire and entertain young people.<\/p>\n

While these aren\u2019t L\u00e9vy\u2019s exact words, they are certainly close enough to constitute a form of plagiarism. And again, even though you might think that this is a \u201clesser\u201d form of plagiarism, it\u2019s still plagiarism.<\/p>\n

Both of these passages can easily be corrected to make them acceptable quotations or paraphrases!<\/strong><\/p>\n

Pierre L\u00e9vy observes that\u00a0<\/strong>\u201cThose who denounce cyberculture today strangely resemble those who criticized rock music during the fifties and sixties\u201d\u00a0(ix)<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Pierre L\u00e9vy suggests<\/strong>\u00a0that the same kind of people who criticize cyberculture are the same kind of people who criticized rock and roll music back in the fifties and sixties. But both cyberculture and rock music inspire and entertain young people\u00a0(ix)<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Plagiarism and the Internet<\/h2>\n

The ease of finding and retrieving information on the World Wide Web can lead readers to think that this information does not need to be cited. After all, it isn\u2019t a traditional source like a book or a journal; it is available for \u201cfree.\u201d All a research writer needs to do with a web site is \u201ccut and paste\u201d whatever he needs into his essay, right? Wrong!<\/p>\n

You need to cite the evidence you find from the Internet or the World Wide Web the same way you cite evidence from other sources.<\/strong>\u00a0To not do this is plagiarism, or, more bluntly, cheating. Just because the information is \u201cfreely\u201d available on the Internet does not mean you can use this information in your academic writing without properly citing it, much in the same way that the information from library journals and books \u201cfreely\u201d available to you needs to be cited in order to give credit where credit is due.<\/p>\n

It is also not acceptable to simply download graphics from the World Wide Web. Images found on the Internet are protected by copyright laws. Quite literally, taking images from the Web (particularly from commercial sources) is an offense that could lead to legal action. There are places where you can find graphics and clip art that Web publishers have made publicly available for anyone to use, but be sure that the Web site where you find the graphics makes this explicit before you take graphics as your own.<\/p>\n

In short, you can use evidence from the Web as long as you don\u2019t plagiarize and as long as you properly cite it; don\u2019t take graphics from the Web unless you know the images are in the public domain.<\/p>\n\n\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t

Candela Citations<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
CC licensed content, Shared previously<\/div>