{"id":128,"date":"2016-04-29T02:40:20","date_gmt":"2016-04-29T02:40:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontosociology-waymaker\/?post_type=chapter&p=128"},"modified":"2016-07-19T20:39:17","modified_gmt":"2016-07-19T20:39:17","slug":"reading-formal-organizations","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/pima-intro-to-sociology\/chapter\/reading-formal-organizations\/","title":{"raw":"Reading: Types of Formal Organizations","rendered":"Reading: Types of Formal Organizations"},"content":{"raw":"
A complaint of modern life is that society is dominated by large and impersonal secondary organizations. From schools to businesses to healthcare to government, these organizations, referred to as formal organizations<\/span><\/strong>, are highly bureaucratized. Indeed, all formal organizations are, or likely will become, bureaucracies<\/span><\/strong>. A bureaucracy is an ideal type of formal organization. Ideal doesn\u2019t mean \u201cbest\u201d in its sociological usage; it refers to a general model that describes a collection of characteristics, or a type that could describe most examples of the item under discussion. For example, if your professor were to tell the class to picture a car in their minds, most students will picture a car that shares a set of characteristics: four wheels, a windshield, and so on. Everyone\u2019s car will be somewhat different, however. Some might picture a two-door sports car while others picture an SUV. The general idea of the car that everyone shares is the ideal type. We will discuss bureaucracies as an ideal type of organization.<\/div>\r\n
\r\n

Types of Formal Organizations<\/h2>\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_1043\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"704\"]\"Figure Girl Scout troops and correctional facilities are both formal organizations. (Photo (a) courtesy of moonlightbulb\/flickr; Photo (b) courtesy of CxOxS\/flickr)[\/caption]\r\n

Sociologist Amitai Etzioni (1975) posited that formal organizations fall into three categories. Normative organizations<\/span><\/strong>, also called voluntary organizations<\/strong><\/span>, are based on shared interests. As the name suggests, joining them is voluntary and typically done because people find membership rewarding in an intangible way. The Audubon Society and a ski club are examples of normative organizations. Coercive organizations<\/span><\/strong> are groups that we must be coerced, or pushed, to join. These may include prison or a rehabilitation center. Symbolic interactionist Erving Goffman states that most coercive organizations are total institutions<\/span><\/strong> (1961). A total institution is one in which inmates or military soldiers live a controlled lifestyle and in which total resocialization takes place. The third type is utilitarian organizations<\/span><\/strong>, which, as the name suggests, are joined because of the need for a specific material reward. High school and the workplace fall into this category\u2014one joined in pursuit of a diploma, the other in order to make money.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n
Table of Formal Organizations. This table shows Etzioni\u2019s three types of formal organizations. (Table courtesy of Etzioni 1975)<\/caption>\r\n
<\/th>\r\nNormative or Voluntary<\/th>\r\nCoercive<\/th>\r\nUtilitarian<\/th>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/thead>\r\n
Benefit of Membership<\/td>\r\nIntangible benefit<\/td>\r\nCorrective benefit<\/td>\r\nTangible benefit<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Type of Membership<\/td>\r\nVolunteer basis<\/td>\r\nRequired<\/td>\r\nContractual basis<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Feeling of Connectedness<\/td>\r\nShared affinity<\/td>\r\nNo affinity<\/td>\r\nSome affinity<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n
\r\n

Bureaucracies<\/h2>\r\n

Bureaucracies are an ideal type of formal organization. Pioneer sociologist Max Weber popularly characterized a bureaucracy as having a hierarchy of authority, a clear division of labor, explicit rules, and impersonality (1922). People often complain about bureaucracies\u2013\u2013declaring them slow, rule-bound, difficult to navigate, and unfriendly. Let\u2019s take a look at terms that define a bureaucracy to understand what they mean.<\/p>\r\n

Hierarchy of authority<\/span><\/strong> refers to the aspect of bureaucracy that places one individual or office in charge of another, who in turn must answer to her own superiors. For example, as an employee at Walmart, your shift manager assigns you tasks. Your shift manager answers to his store manager, who must answer to her regional manager, and so on in a chain of command, up to the CEO who must answer to the board members, who in turn answer to the stockholders. Everyone in this bureaucracy follows the chain of command.<\/p>\r\n

A clear division of labor<\/span><\/strong> refers to the fact that within a bureaucracy, each individual has a specialized task to perform. For example, psychology professors teach psychology, but they do not attempt to provide students with financial aid forms. In this case, it is a clear and commonsense division. But what about in a restaurant where food is backed up in the kitchen and a hostess is standing nearby texting on her phone? Her job is to seat customers, not to deliver food. Is this a smart division of labor?<\/p>\r\n

The existence of explicit rules<\/span><\/strong> refers to the way in which rules are outlined, written down, and standardized. For example, at your college or university, the student guidelines are contained within the Student Handbook. As technology changes and campuses encounter new concerns like cyberbullying, identity theft, and other hot-button issues, organizations are scrambling to ensure their explicit rules cover these emerging topics.<\/p>\r\n

Finally, bureaucracies are also characterized by impersonality<\/span><\/strong>, which takes personal feelings out of professional situations. This characteristic grew, to some extent, out of a desire to protect organizations from nepotism, backroom deals, and other types of favoritism, simultaneously protecting customers and others served by the organization. Impersonality is an attempt by large formal organizations to protect their members. Large business organizations like Walmart often situate themselves as bureaucracies. This allows them to effectively and efficiently serve volumes of customers quickly and with affordable products. This results in an impersonal organization. Customers frequently complain that stores like Walmart care little about individuals, other businesses, and the community at large.<\/p>\r\n

Bureaucracies are, in theory at least, meritocracies<\/span><\/strong>, meaning that hiring and promotion is based on proven and documented skills, rather than on nepotism or random choice. In order to get into a prestigious college, you need to perform well on the SAT and have an impressive transcript. In order to become a lawyer and represent clients, you must graduate law school and pass the state bar exam. Of course, there are many well-documented examples of success by those who did not proceed through traditional meritocracies. Think about technology companies with founders who dropped out of college, or performers who became famous after a YouTube video went viral. How well do you think established meritocracies identify talent? Wealthy families hire tutors, interview coaches, test-prep services, and consultants to help their kids get into the best schools. This starts as early as kindergarten in New York City, where competition for the most highly-regarded schools is especially fierce. Are these schools, many of which have copious scholarship funds that are intended to make the school more democratic, really offering all applicants a fair shake?<\/p>\r\n

There are several positive aspects of bureaucracies. They are intended to improve efficiency, ensure equal opportunities, and ensure that most people can be served. And there are times when rigid hierarchies are needed. But remember that many of our bureaucracies grew large at the same time that our school model was developed\u2013\u2013during the Industrial Revolution. Young workers were trained, and organizations were built for mass production, assembly line work, and factory jobs. In these scenarios, a clear chain of command was critical. Now, in the information age, this kind of rigid training and adherence to protocol can actually decrease both productivity and efficiency.<\/p>\r\n

Today\u2019s workplace requires a faster pace, more problem solving, and a flexible approach to work. Too much adherence to explicit rules and a division of labor can leave an organization behind. And unfortunately, once established, bureaucracies can take on a life of their own. Maybe you have heard the expression \u201ctrying to turn a tanker around mid-ocean,\u201d which refers to the difficulties of changing direction with something large and set in its ways. State governments and current budget crises are examples of this challenge. It is almost impossible to make quick changes, leading states to continue, year after year, with increasingly unbalanced budgets. Finally, bureaucracies, as mentioned, grew as institutions at a time when privileged white males held all the power. While ostensibly based on meritocracy, bureaucracies can perpetuate the existing balance of power by only recognizing the merit in traditionally male and privileged paths.<\/p>\r\nMichels (1911) suggested that all large organizations are characterized by the Iron Rule of Oligarchy<\/span><\/strong>,<\/strong> wherein an entire organization is ruled by a few elites. Do you think this is true? Can a large organization be collaborative?\r\n<\/span><\/span>\r\n

\r\n

Further Research<\/h3>\r\nWatch this Khan Academy video<\/a> to learn more about types of organization.\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/section><\/section>
\r\n
\r\n

Think It Over<\/h3>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
    \r\n \t
  1. Do you consider today\u2019s large companies like General Motors, Amazon, or Facebook to be bureaucracies? Why, or why not? Which of the main characteristics of bureaucracies do you see in them? Which are absent?<\/li>\r\n \t
  2. Where do you prefer to shop, eat out, or grab a cup of coffee? Large chains like Walmart or smaller retailers? Starbucks or a local restaurant? What do you base your decisions on? Does this section change how you think about these choices? Why, or why not?<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/section><\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
    \r\n

    Practice<\/h3>\r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n

    1. Which is not<\/em> an example of a normative organization?<\/p>\r\n\r\n

      \r\n \t
    1. A book club<\/li>\r\n \t
    2. A church youth group<\/li>\r\n \t
    3. A People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) protest group<\/li>\r\n \t
    4. A study hall<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n[reveal-answer q=\"68635\"]Show Answer[\/reveal-answer]\r\n[hidden-answer a=\"68635\"]d[\/hidden-answer]\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/section><\/div>\r\n
      \r\n
      \r\n

      2. Which of these is an example of a total institution?<\/p>\r\n\r\n

        \r\n \t
      1. Jail<\/li>\r\n \t
      2. High school<\/li>\r\n \t
      3. Political party<\/li>\r\n \t
      4. A gym<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n[reveal-answer q=\"189656\"]Show Answer[\/reveal-answer]\r\n[hidden-answer a=\"189656\"]a[\/hidden-answer]\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/section><\/div>\r\n
        \r\n
        \r\n

        3. Why do people join utilitarian organizations?<\/p>\r\n\r\n

          \r\n \t
        1. Because they feel an affinity with others there<\/li>\r\n \t
        2. Because they receive a tangible benefit from joining<\/li>\r\n \t
        3. Because they have no choice<\/li>\r\n \t
        4. Because they feel pressured to do so<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n[reveal-answer q=\"825958\"]Show Answer[\/reveal-answer]\r\n[hidden-answer a=\"825958\"]b[\/hidden-answer]\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/section><\/div>\r\n
          \r\n
          \r\n

          4. Which of the following is not<\/em> a characteristic of bureaucracies?<\/p>\r\n\r\n

            \r\n \t
          1. Coercion to join<\/li>\r\n \t
          2. Hierarchy of authority<\/li>\r\n \t
          3. Explicit rules<\/li>\r\n \t
          4. Division of labor<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n[reveal-answer q=\"480245\"]Show Answer[\/reveal-answer]\r\n[hidden-answer a=\"480245\"]a[\/hidden-answer]\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/section><\/div>\r\n
            \r\n
            \r\n

            5. What are some of the intended positive aspects of bureaucracies?<\/p>\r\n\r\n

              \r\n \t
            1. Increased productivity<\/li>\r\n \t
            2. Increased efficiency<\/li>\r\n \t
            3. Equal treatment for all<\/li>\r\n \t
            4. All of the above<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n[reveal-answer q=\"826278\"]Show Answer[\/reveal-answer]\r\n[hidden-answer a=\"826278\"]d[\/hidden-answer]\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/section><\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/section>
              <\/section>
              <\/section>
              [reveal-answer q=\"934927\"]Show Glossary[\/reveal-answer]\r\n[hidden-answer a=\"934927\"]\r\n
              \r\n \t
              bureaucracies:<\/dt>\r\n \t
              formal organizations characterized by a hierarchy of authority, a clear division of labor, explicit rules, and impersonality.<\/dd>\r\n<\/dl>\r\n
              \r\n \t
              clear division of labor:<\/dt>\r\n \t
              the fact that each individual in a bureaucracy has a specialized task to perform<\/dd>\r\n<\/dl>\r\n
              \r\n \t
              coercive organizations:<\/dt>\r\n \t
              organizations that people do not voluntarily join, such as prison or a mental hospital<\/dd>\r\n<\/dl>\r\n
              \r\n \t
              explicit rules:<\/dt>\r\n \t
              the types of rules in a bureaucracy; rules that are outlined, recorded, and standardized<\/dd>\r\n<\/dl>\r\n
              \r\n \t
              formal organizations:<\/dt>\r\n \t
              large, impersonal organizations<\/dd>\r\n<\/dl>\r\n
              \r\n \t
              hierarchy of authority:<\/dt>\r\n \t
              a clear chain of command found in a bureaucracy<\/dd>\r\n<\/dl>\r\n
              \r\n \t
              impersonality:<\/dt>\r\n \t
              the removal of personal feelings from a professional situation<\/dd>\r\n<\/dl>\r\n
              \r\n \t
              Iron Rule of Oligarchy:<\/dt>\r\n \t
              the theory that an organization is ruled by a few elites rather than through collaboration<\/dd>\r\n<\/dl>\r\n
              \r\n \t
              meritocracy:<\/dt>\r\n \t
              a bureaucracy where membership and advancement is based on merit\u2014proven and documented skills<\/dd>\r\n<\/dl>\r\n
              \r\n \t
              normative or voluntary organizations:<\/dt>\r\n \t
              organizations that people join to pursue shared interests or because they provide some intangible rewards<\/dd>\r\n<\/dl>\r\n
              \r\n \t
              total institution:<\/dt>\r\n \t
              an organization in which participants live a controlled lifestyle and in which total resocialization occurs<\/dd>\r\n<\/dl>\r\n
              \r\n \t
              utilitarian organizations:<\/dt>\r\n \t
              organizations that are joined to fill a specific material need<\/dd>\r\n<\/dl>\r\n[\/hidden-answer]\r\n

              Self-Check: Formal Organizations<\/h2>\r\n

              You\u2019ll have more success on the Self-Check, if you\u2019ve completed both Readings in this section.<\/span><\/p>\r\nhttps:\/\/assessments.lumenlearning.com\/assessments\/1007\r\n\r\n<\/section>\r\n

              <\/div>\r\n
              <\/section>","rendered":"
              A complaint of modern life is that society is dominated by large and impersonal secondary organizations. From schools to businesses to healthcare to government, these organizations, referred to as formal organizations<\/span><\/strong>, are highly bureaucratized. Indeed, all formal organizations are, or likely will become, bureaucracies<\/span><\/strong>. A bureaucracy is an ideal type of formal organization. Ideal doesn\u2019t mean \u201cbest\u201d in its sociological usage; it refers to a general model that describes a collection of characteristics, or a type that could describe most examples of the item under discussion. For example, if your professor were to tell the class to picture a car in their minds, most students will picture a car that shares a set of characteristics: four wheels, a windshield, and so on. Everyone\u2019s car will be somewhat different, however. Some might picture a two-door sports car while others picture an SUV. The general idea of the car that everyone shares is the ideal type. We will discuss bureaucracies as an ideal type of organization.<\/div>\n
              \n

              Types of Formal Organizations<\/h2>\n
              \"Figure<\/p>\n

              Girl Scout troops and correctional facilities are both formal organizations. (Photo (a) courtesy of moonlightbulb\/flickr; Photo (b) courtesy of CxOxS\/flickr)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

              Sociologist Amitai Etzioni (1975) posited that formal organizations fall into three categories. Normative organizations<\/span><\/strong>, also called voluntary organizations<\/strong><\/span>, are based on shared interests. As the name suggests, joining them is voluntary and typically done because people find membership rewarding in an intangible way. The Audubon Society and a ski club are examples of normative organizations. Coercive organizations<\/span><\/strong> are groups that we must be coerced, or pushed, to join. These may include prison or a rehabilitation center. Symbolic interactionist Erving Goffman states that most coercive organizations are total institutions<\/span><\/strong> (1961). A total institution is one in which inmates or military soldiers live a controlled lifestyle and in which total resocialization takes place. The third type is utilitarian organizations<\/span><\/strong>, which, as the name suggests, are joined because of the need for a specific material reward. High school and the workplace fall into this category\u2014one joined in pursuit of a diploma, the other in order to make money.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
              Table of Formal Organizations. This table shows Etzioni\u2019s three types of formal organizations. (Table courtesy of Etzioni 1975)<\/caption>\n
              <\/th>\nNormative or Voluntary<\/th>\nCoercive<\/th>\nUtilitarian<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
              Benefit of Membership<\/td>\nIntangible benefit<\/td>\nCorrective benefit<\/td>\nTangible benefit<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
              Type of Membership<\/td>\nVolunteer basis<\/td>\nRequired<\/td>\nContractual basis<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
              Feeling of Connectedness<\/td>\nShared affinity<\/td>\nNo affinity<\/td>\nSome affinity<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
              \n

              Bureaucracies<\/h2>\n

              Bureaucracies are an ideal type of formal organization. Pioneer sociologist Max Weber popularly characterized a bureaucracy as having a hierarchy of authority, a clear division of labor, explicit rules, and impersonality (1922). People often complain about bureaucracies\u2013\u2013declaring them slow, rule-bound, difficult to navigate, and unfriendly. Let\u2019s take a look at terms that define a bureaucracy to understand what they mean.<\/p>\n

              Hierarchy of authority<\/span><\/strong> refers to the aspect of bureaucracy that places one individual or office in charge of another, who in turn must answer to her own superiors. For example, as an employee at Walmart, your shift manager assigns you tasks. Your shift manager answers to his store manager, who must answer to her regional manager, and so on in a chain of command, up to the CEO who must answer to the board members, who in turn answer to the stockholders. Everyone in this bureaucracy follows the chain of command.<\/p>\n

              A clear division of labor<\/span><\/strong> refers to the fact that within a bureaucracy, each individual has a specialized task to perform. For example, psychology professors teach psychology, but they do not attempt to provide students with financial aid forms. In this case, it is a clear and commonsense division. But what about in a restaurant where food is backed up in the kitchen and a hostess is standing nearby texting on her phone? Her job is to seat customers, not to deliver food. Is this a smart division of labor?<\/p>\n

              The existence of explicit rules<\/span><\/strong> refers to the way in which rules are outlined, written down, and standardized. For example, at your college or university, the student guidelines are contained within the Student Handbook. As technology changes and campuses encounter new concerns like cyberbullying, identity theft, and other hot-button issues, organizations are scrambling to ensure their explicit rules cover these emerging topics.<\/p>\n

              Finally, bureaucracies are also characterized by impersonality<\/span><\/strong>, which takes personal feelings out of professional situations. This characteristic grew, to some extent, out of a desire to protect organizations from nepotism, backroom deals, and other types of favoritism, simultaneously protecting customers and others served by the organization. Impersonality is an attempt by large formal organizations to protect their members. Large business organizations like Walmart often situate themselves as bureaucracies. This allows them to effectively and efficiently serve volumes of customers quickly and with affordable products. This results in an impersonal organization. Customers frequently complain that stores like Walmart care little about individuals, other businesses, and the community at large.<\/p>\n

              Bureaucracies are, in theory at least, meritocracies<\/span><\/strong>, meaning that hiring and promotion is based on proven and documented skills, rather than on nepotism or random choice. In order to get into a prestigious college, you need to perform well on the SAT and have an impressive transcript. In order to become a lawyer and represent clients, you must graduate law school and pass the state bar exam. Of course, there are many well-documented examples of success by those who did not proceed through traditional meritocracies. Think about technology companies with founders who dropped out of college, or performers who became famous after a YouTube video went viral. How well do you think established meritocracies identify talent? Wealthy families hire tutors, interview coaches, test-prep services, and consultants to help their kids get into the best schools. This starts as early as kindergarten in New York City, where competition for the most highly-regarded schools is especially fierce. Are these schools, many of which have copious scholarship funds that are intended to make the school more democratic, really offering all applicants a fair shake?<\/p>\n

              There are several positive aspects of bureaucracies. They are intended to improve efficiency, ensure equal opportunities, and ensure that most people can be served. And there are times when rigid hierarchies are needed. But remember that many of our bureaucracies grew large at the same time that our school model was developed\u2013\u2013during the Industrial Revolution. Young workers were trained, and organizations were built for mass production, assembly line work, and factory jobs. In these scenarios, a clear chain of command was critical. Now, in the information age, this kind of rigid training and adherence to protocol can actually decrease both productivity and efficiency.<\/p>\n

              Today\u2019s workplace requires a faster pace, more problem solving, and a flexible approach to work. Too much adherence to explicit rules and a division of labor can leave an organization behind. And unfortunately, once established, bureaucracies can take on a life of their own. Maybe you have heard the expression \u201ctrying to turn a tanker around mid-ocean,\u201d which refers to the difficulties of changing direction with something large and set in its ways. State governments and current budget crises are examples of this challenge. It is almost impossible to make quick changes, leading states to continue, year after year, with increasingly unbalanced budgets. Finally, bureaucracies, as mentioned, grew as institutions at a time when privileged white males held all the power. While ostensibly based on meritocracy, bureaucracies can perpetuate the existing balance of power by only recognizing the merit in traditionally male and privileged paths.<\/p>\n

              Michels (1911) suggested that all large organizations are characterized by the Iron Rule of Oligarchy<\/span><\/strong>,<\/strong> wherein an entire organization is ruled by a few elites. Do you think this is true? Can a large organization be collaborative?
              \n<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

              \n

              Further Research<\/h3>\n

              Watch this Khan Academy video<\/a> to learn more about types of organization.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/section>\n

              \n
              \n

              Think It Over<\/h3>\n
              \n
              \n
              \n
                \n
              1. Do you consider today\u2019s large companies like General Motors, Amazon, or Facebook to be bureaucracies? Why, or why not? Which of the main characteristics of bureaucracies do you see in them? Which are absent?<\/li>\n
              2. Where do you prefer to shop, eat out, or grab a cup of coffee? Large chains like Walmart or smaller retailers? Starbucks or a local restaurant? What do you base your decisions on? Does this section change how you think about these choices? Why, or why not?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
                \n

                Practice<\/h3>\n
                \n
                \n
                \n

                1. Which is not<\/em> an example of a normative organization?<\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. A book club<\/li>\n
                2. A church youth group<\/li>\n
                3. A People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) protest group<\/li>\n
                4. A study hall<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
                  Show Answer<\/span><\/p>\n
                  d<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n
                  \n
                  \n
                  \n

                  2. Which of these is an example of a total institution?<\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. Jail<\/li>\n
                  2. High school<\/li>\n
                  3. Political party<\/li>\n
                  4. A gym<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
                    Show Answer<\/span><\/p>\n
                    a<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n
                    \n
                    \n
                    \n

                    3. Why do people join utilitarian organizations?<\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. Because they feel an affinity with others there<\/li>\n
                    2. Because they receive a tangible benefit from joining<\/li>\n
                    3. Because they have no choice<\/li>\n
                    4. Because they feel pressured to do so<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
                      Show Answer<\/span><\/p>\n
                      b<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n
                      \n
                      \n
                      \n

                      4. Which of the following is not<\/em> a characteristic of bureaucracies?<\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. Coercion to join<\/li>\n
                      2. Hierarchy of authority<\/li>\n
                      3. Explicit rules<\/li>\n
                      4. Division of labor<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
                        Show Answer<\/span><\/p>\n
                        a<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n
                        \n
                        \n
                        \n

                        5. What are some of the intended positive aspects of bureaucracies?<\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. Increased productivity<\/li>\n
                        2. Increased efficiency<\/li>\n
                        3. Equal treatment for all<\/li>\n
                        4. All of the above<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
                          Show Answer<\/span><\/p>\n
                          d<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n
                          <\/section>\n
                          <\/section>\n
                          \n
                          Show Glossary<\/span><\/p>\n
                          \n
                          \n
                          bureaucracies:<\/dt>\n
                          formal organizations characterized by a hierarchy of authority, a clear division of labor, explicit rules, and impersonality.<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n
                          \n
                          clear division of labor:<\/dt>\n
                          the fact that each individual in a bureaucracy has a specialized task to perform<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n
                          \n
                          coercive organizations:<\/dt>\n
                          organizations that people do not voluntarily join, such as prison or a mental hospital<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n
                          \n
                          explicit rules:<\/dt>\n
                          the types of rules in a bureaucracy; rules that are outlined, recorded, and standardized<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n
                          \n
                          formal organizations:<\/dt>\n
                          large, impersonal organizations<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n
                          \n
                          hierarchy of authority:<\/dt>\n
                          a clear chain of command found in a bureaucracy<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n
                          \n
                          impersonality:<\/dt>\n
                          the removal of personal feelings from a professional situation<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n
                          \n
                          Iron Rule of Oligarchy:<\/dt>\n
                          the theory that an organization is ruled by a few elites rather than through collaboration<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n
                          \n
                          meritocracy:<\/dt>\n
                          a bureaucracy where membership and advancement is based on merit\u2014proven and documented skills<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n
                          \n
                          normative or voluntary organizations:<\/dt>\n
                          organizations that people join to pursue shared interests or because they provide some intangible rewards<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n
                          \n
                          total institution:<\/dt>\n
                          an organization in which participants live a controlled lifestyle and in which total resocialization occurs<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n
                          \n
                          utilitarian organizations:<\/dt>\n
                          organizations that are joined to fill a specific material need<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

                          Self-Check: Formal Organizations<\/h2>\n

                          You\u2019ll have more success on the Self-Check, if you\u2019ve completed both Readings in this section.<\/span><\/p>\n

                          \t