{"id":1676,"date":"2015-08-20T04:20:20","date_gmt":"2015-08-20T04:20:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/courses.candelalearning.com\/americanyawphist118x15x1\/?post_type=chapter&p=1676"},"modified":"2015-08-20T04:20:29","modified_gmt":"2015-08-20T04:20:29","slug":"conservative-ascendance-2","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/sanjacinto-atdcoursereview-ushistory2-1\/chapter\/conservative-ascendance-2\/","title":{"raw":"Conservative Ascendance","rendered":"Conservative Ascendance"},"content":{"raw":"The \u201cReagan Revolution\u201d marked the culmination of a long process of political mobilization on the American right. In the first two decades after World War II the New Deal seemed firmly embedded in American electoral politics and public policy. Even two-term Republican President Dwight D. Eisenhower declined to roll back the welfare state. To be sure, National Review <\/i>founder William F. Buckley tapped into a deep vein of elite conservatism in 1955 with his call to \u201cstand athwart history yelling \u2018stop.\u2019\u201d Senator Joseph McCarthy and John Birch Society founder Robert Welch stirred anti-communist fervor. But in general, the far right lacked organizational cohesion. Following Lyndon Johnson\u2019s resounding defeat of Republican Barry Goldwater in the 1964 presidential election, many observers declared American conservatism finished. New York Times columnist James Reston wrote that Goldwater had \u201cwrecked his party for a long time to come.\u201d\r\n\r\nThe Conservative insurgency occurred within both major political parties, but the New Right gradually coalesced under the Republican tent. The heightened appeal of conservatism had several causes. The expansive social and economic agenda of Johnson\u2019s Great Society reminded anti-communists of Soviet-style central planning and enflamed fiscal conservatives worried about deficits. Race also drove the creation of the New Right. The civil rights movement, along with the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act, upended the racial hierarchy of the Jim Crow South. All of these occurred under Democratic leadership, pushing the South toward the Republican Party. In the late 1960s and early 1970s, Black Power, affirmative action, and court-ordered busing of children between schools to achieve racial balance brought \u201cwhite backlash\u201d to the North, often in cities previously known for political liberalism. To many ordinary Americans, the urban rebellions, antiwar protests, and student uprisings of the late 1960s unleashed social chaos. At the same time, declining wages, rising prices, and growing tax burdens brought economic vulnerability to many working- and middle-class citizens. Liberalism no longer seemed to offer ordinary Americans a roadmap to prosperity, so they searched for new political solutions.\r\n\r\nFormer Alabama governor and conservative Democrat George Wallace masterfully exploited the racial, cultural, and economic resentments of working-class whites during presidential runs in 1968 and 1972. Wallace\u2019s record as a staunch segregationist made him a hero in the Deep South, where he won five states as a third-party candidate in the 1968 general election. Wallace\u2019s populist message also resonated with blue-collar voters in the industrial North who felt left behind by the rights revolution. On the campaign stump, the fiery candidate lambasted hippies, anti-war protestors, and government bureaucrats. He assailed female welfare recipients for \u201cbreeding children as a cash crop\u201d and ridiculed \u201cover-educated, ivory-tower\u201d intellectuals who \u201cdon\u2019t know how to park a bicycle straight.\u201d Yet, Wallace also advanced progressive proposals for federal job training programs, a minimum wage hike, and legal protections for collective bargaining. Running as a Democrat in 1972 (and with anti-busing rhetoric as a new arrow in his quiver), Wallace captured the Michigan primary and polled second in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Indiana. In May 1972 an assassin\u2019s bullet left Wallace paralyzed and ended his campaign. Nevertheless, his amalgamation of older, New Deal-style proposals and conservative populism emblemized the rapid re-ordering of party loyalties in the late \u201960s and early \u201970s. Richard Nixon similarly harnessed the New Right\u2019s sense of grievance through his rhetoric about \u201claw and order\u201d and the \u201csilent majority.\u201d But the New Right remained restive under Nixon and his Republican successor, Gerald Ford.\r\n\r\nReligious conservatives also felt themselves under siege from liberalism. In the early 1960s, the Supreme Court decisions prohibiting teacher-led prayer (Engel v. Vitale<\/i>) <\/i>and Bible reading in public schools (Abington v. Schempp<\/i>) led some on the right to conclude that a liberal judicial system threatened Christian values. In the following years, the counterculture\u2019s celebration sex and drugs, along with relaxed obscenity and pornography laws, intensified the conviction that \u201cpermissive\u201d liberalism encouraged immorality in private life. Evangelical Protestants\u2014Christians who professed a personal relationship with Jesus Christ, upheld the Bible as an infallible source of truth, and felt a duty to convert, or evangelize, nonbelievers\u2014comprised the core of the so-called \u201creligious right.\u201d The movement also drew energy from devout Catholics. The development of the religious right was not inevitable for several reasons. First, many evangelicals had for decades eschewed politics in favor of spiritual matters; moreover, evangelicalism did not necessarily lead to conservative politics (Democrat Jimmy Carter was an evangelical). Second, Roman Catholics had a long record of loyalty to the Democratic Party. Third, the alliance between evangelicals and Catholics had to overcome decades of mutual antagonism. Only the common enemy of liberalism brought the groups together.\r\n\r\nBeginning in the early 1970s the religious right mobilized to protect the \u201ctraditional\u201d family. Women comprised a striking number of the religious right\u2019s foot soldiers. Catholic activist Phyllis Schlafly marshaled opposition to the Equal Rights Amendment, while evangelical pop singer Anita Bryant drew national headlines for her successful fight to repeal Miami\u2019s gay rights ordinance in 1977. In 1979, Beverly LaHaye (whose husband Tim\u2014an evangelical pastor in San Diego\u2014would later co-author the Left Behind<\/i> novels) founded Concerned Women for America, which linked small groups of local activists opposed to the ERA abortion, homosexuality, and no-fault divorce.\r\n\r\nActivists like Schlafly and LaHaye valorized motherhood as the highest calling of all women and abortion therefore struck at the core of female identity. More than perhaps any other issue, abortion drew different segments of the religious right\u2014Catholics and Protestants, women and men\u2014together. The Supreme Court\u2019s 1973 Roe v. Wade <\/i>ruling outraged many devout Catholics, including Long Island housewife and political novice Ellen McCormack. In 1976, McCormack entered the Democratic presidential primaries in an unsuccessful attempt to steer the party to a pro-life position. Roe v. Wade<\/i> also intensified anti-abortion sentiment among evangelicals (who had been less universally opposed to the procedure than their Catholic counterparts). Christian author Francis Schaeffer cultivated evangelical opposition to abortion through the 1979 documentary film\u00a0Whatever Happened to the Human Race?<\/i> arguing that the \u201cfate of the unborn is the fate of the human race.\u201d With the procedure framed in stark, existential terms, many evangelicals felt compelled to combat the procedure through political action.\r\n
\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_970\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"500\"]\"Cover<\/a> This book cover succinctly demonstrates the mindset of many conservatives in the Reagan era: what happened to the human race?\u00a0University of Wales<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\nGrassroots passion drove anti-abortion activism, but a set of religious and secular institutions turned the various strands of the New Right into a sophisticated movement.\r\n\r\nIn 1979 Jerry Falwell\u2014a Baptist minister and religious broadcaster from Lynchburg, Virginia\u2014founded the Moral Majority, an explicitly political organization dedicated to advancing a \u201cpro-life, pro-family, pro-morality, and pro-American\u201d agenda. Business-oriented institutions also joined the attack on liberalism, fueled by stagflation and by the federal government\u2019s creation of new regulatory agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Conservative business leaders bankrolled new \u201cthink tanks\u201d like the Heritage Foundation and the Cato Institute. These organizations provided grassroots activists with ready-made policy prescriptions. Other business leaders took a more direct approach by hiring Washington lobbyists and creating Political Action Committees (PACs) to press their agendas in the halls of Congress and federal agencies. Between 1976 and 1980 the number of corporate PACS rose from under 300 to over 1200.\r\n\r\nGrassroots activists and business leaders received unlikely support from a circle of \u201cneoconservatives\u201d\u2014disillusioned intellectuals who had rejected liberalism and become Republicans. Irving Kristol, a former Marxist who championed free-market capitalism as a Wall Street Journal <\/i>columnist, defined a neoconservative as a \u201cliberal who has been mugged by reality.\u201d Neoconservative journals like Commentary <\/i>and Public Interest<\/i> argued that the Great Society had proven counterproductive, perpetuating the poverty and racial segregation that it aimed to cure. By the middle of the 1970s, neoconservatives felt mugged by foreign affairs as well. As ardent Cold Warriors, they argued that Nixon\u2019s policy of d\u00e9tente left the United States vulnerable to the Soviet Union.\r\n\r\nIn sum, several streams of conservative political mobilization converged in the late 1970s. Each wing of the burgeoning conservative movement\u2014disaffected blue-collar workers, white Southerners, evangelicals and devout Catholics, business leaders, disillusioned intellectuals, and Cold War hawks\u2014turned to the Republican Party as the most effective vehicle for their political counter-assault on liberalism and the New Deal political order. After years of mobilization, the domestic and foreign policy catastrophes of the Carter administration provided the head winds that brought the conservative movement to shore.","rendered":"

The \u201cReagan Revolution\u201d marked the culmination of a long process of political mobilization on the American right. In the first two decades after World War II the New Deal seemed firmly embedded in American electoral politics and public policy. Even two-term Republican President Dwight D. Eisenhower declined to roll back the welfare state. To be sure, National Review <\/i>founder William F. Buckley tapped into a deep vein of elite conservatism in 1955 with his call to \u201cstand athwart history yelling \u2018stop.\u2019\u201d Senator Joseph McCarthy and John Birch Society founder Robert Welch stirred anti-communist fervor. But in general, the far right lacked organizational cohesion. Following Lyndon Johnson\u2019s resounding defeat of Republican Barry Goldwater in the 1964 presidential election, many observers declared American conservatism finished. New York Times columnist James Reston wrote that Goldwater had \u201cwrecked his party for a long time to come.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Conservative insurgency occurred within both major political parties, but the New Right gradually coalesced under the Republican tent. The heightened appeal of conservatism had several causes. The expansive social and economic agenda of Johnson\u2019s Great Society reminded anti-communists of Soviet-style central planning and enflamed fiscal conservatives worried about deficits. Race also drove the creation of the New Right. The civil rights movement, along with the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act, upended the racial hierarchy of the Jim Crow South. All of these occurred under Democratic leadership, pushing the South toward the Republican Party. In the late 1960s and early 1970s, Black Power, affirmative action, and court-ordered busing of children between schools to achieve racial balance brought \u201cwhite backlash\u201d to the North, often in cities previously known for political liberalism. To many ordinary Americans, the urban rebellions, antiwar protests, and student uprisings of the late 1960s unleashed social chaos. At the same time, declining wages, rising prices, and growing tax burdens brought economic vulnerability to many working- and middle-class citizens. Liberalism no longer seemed to offer ordinary Americans a roadmap to prosperity, so they searched for new political solutions.<\/p>\n

Former Alabama governor and conservative Democrat George Wallace masterfully exploited the racial, cultural, and economic resentments of working-class whites during presidential runs in 1968 and 1972. Wallace\u2019s record as a staunch segregationist made him a hero in the Deep South, where he won five states as a third-party candidate in the 1968 general election. Wallace\u2019s populist message also resonated with blue-collar voters in the industrial North who felt left behind by the rights revolution. On the campaign stump, the fiery candidate lambasted hippies, anti-war protestors, and government bureaucrats. He assailed female welfare recipients for \u201cbreeding children as a cash crop\u201d and ridiculed \u201cover-educated, ivory-tower\u201d intellectuals who \u201cdon\u2019t know how to park a bicycle straight.\u201d Yet, Wallace also advanced progressive proposals for federal job training programs, a minimum wage hike, and legal protections for collective bargaining. Running as a Democrat in 1972 (and with anti-busing rhetoric as a new arrow in his quiver), Wallace captured the Michigan primary and polled second in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Indiana. In May 1972 an assassin\u2019s bullet left Wallace paralyzed and ended his campaign. Nevertheless, his amalgamation of older, New Deal-style proposals and conservative populism emblemized the rapid re-ordering of party loyalties in the late \u201960s and early \u201970s. Richard Nixon similarly harnessed the New Right\u2019s sense of grievance through his rhetoric about \u201claw and order\u201d and the \u201csilent majority.\u201d But the New Right remained restive under Nixon and his Republican successor, Gerald Ford.<\/p>\n

Religious conservatives also felt themselves under siege from liberalism. In the early 1960s, the Supreme Court decisions prohibiting teacher-led prayer (Engel v. Vitale<\/i>) <\/i>and Bible reading in public schools (Abington v. Schempp<\/i>) led some on the right to conclude that a liberal judicial system threatened Christian values. In the following years, the counterculture\u2019s celebration sex and drugs, along with relaxed obscenity and pornography laws, intensified the conviction that \u201cpermissive\u201d liberalism encouraged immorality in private life. Evangelical Protestants\u2014Christians who professed a personal relationship with Jesus Christ, upheld the Bible as an infallible source of truth, and felt a duty to convert, or evangelize, nonbelievers\u2014comprised the core of the so-called \u201creligious right.\u201d The movement also drew energy from devout Catholics. The development of the religious right was not inevitable for several reasons. First, many evangelicals had for decades eschewed politics in favor of spiritual matters; moreover, evangelicalism did not necessarily lead to conservative politics (Democrat Jimmy Carter was an evangelical). Second, Roman Catholics had a long record of loyalty to the Democratic Party. Third, the alliance between evangelicals and Catholics had to overcome decades of mutual antagonism. Only the common enemy of liberalism brought the groups together.<\/p>\n

Beginning in the early 1970s the religious right mobilized to protect the \u201ctraditional\u201d family. Women comprised a striking number of the religious right\u2019s foot soldiers. Catholic activist Phyllis Schlafly marshaled opposition to the Equal Rights Amendment, while evangelical pop singer Anita Bryant drew national headlines for her successful fight to repeal Miami\u2019s gay rights ordinance in 1977. In 1979, Beverly LaHaye (whose husband Tim\u2014an evangelical pastor in San Diego\u2014would later co-author the Left Behind<\/i> novels) founded Concerned Women for America, which linked small groups of local activists opposed to the ERA abortion, homosexuality, and no-fault divorce.<\/p>\n

Activists like Schlafly and LaHaye valorized motherhood as the highest calling of all women and abortion therefore struck at the core of female identity. More than perhaps any other issue, abortion drew different segments of the religious right\u2014Catholics and Protestants, women and men\u2014together. The Supreme Court\u2019s 1973 Roe v. Wade <\/i>ruling outraged many devout Catholics, including Long Island housewife and political novice Ellen McCormack. In 1976, McCormack entered the Democratic presidential primaries in an unsuccessful attempt to steer the party to a pro-life position. Roe v. Wade<\/i> also intensified anti-abortion sentiment among evangelicals (who had been less universally opposed to the procedure than their Catholic counterparts). Christian author Francis Schaeffer cultivated evangelical opposition to abortion through the 1979 documentary film\u00a0Whatever Happened to the Human Race?<\/i> arguing that the \u201cfate of the unborn is the fate of the human race.\u201d With the procedure framed in stark, existential terms, many evangelicals felt compelled to combat the procedure through political action.<\/p>\n

\n
\"Cover<\/a><\/p>\n

This book cover succinctly demonstrates the mindset of many conservatives in the Reagan era: what happened to the human race?\u00a0University of Wales<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Grassroots passion drove anti-abortion activism, but a set of religious and secular institutions turned the various strands of the New Right into a sophisticated movement.<\/p>\n

In 1979 Jerry Falwell\u2014a Baptist minister and religious broadcaster from Lynchburg, Virginia\u2014founded the Moral Majority, an explicitly political organization dedicated to advancing a \u201cpro-life, pro-family, pro-morality, and pro-American\u201d agenda. Business-oriented institutions also joined the attack on liberalism, fueled by stagflation and by the federal government\u2019s creation of new regulatory agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Conservative business leaders bankrolled new \u201cthink tanks\u201d like the Heritage Foundation and the Cato Institute. These organizations provided grassroots activists with ready-made policy prescriptions. Other business leaders took a more direct approach by hiring Washington lobbyists and creating Political Action Committees (PACs) to press their agendas in the halls of Congress and federal agencies. Between 1976 and 1980 the number of corporate PACS rose from under 300 to over 1200.<\/p>\n

Grassroots activists and business leaders received unlikely support from a circle of \u201cneoconservatives\u201d\u2014disillusioned intellectuals who had rejected liberalism and become Republicans. Irving Kristol, a former Marxist who championed free-market capitalism as a Wall Street Journal <\/i>columnist, defined a neoconservative as a \u201cliberal who has been mugged by reality.\u201d Neoconservative journals like Commentary <\/i>and Public Interest<\/i> argued that the Great Society had proven counterproductive, perpetuating the poverty and racial segregation that it aimed to cure. By the middle of the 1970s, neoconservatives felt mugged by foreign affairs as well. As ardent Cold Warriors, they argued that Nixon\u2019s policy of d\u00e9tente left the United States vulnerable to the Soviet Union.<\/p>\n

In sum, several streams of conservative political mobilization converged in the late 1970s. Each wing of the burgeoning conservative movement\u2014disaffected blue-collar workers, white Southerners, evangelicals and devout Catholics, business leaders, disillusioned intellectuals, and Cold War hawks\u2014turned to the Republican Party as the most effective vehicle for their political counter-assault on liberalism and the New Deal political order. After years of mobilization, the domestic and foreign policy catastrophes of the Carter administration provided the head winds that brought the conservative movement to shore.<\/p>\n\n\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t

Candela Citations<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
CC licensed content, Shared previously<\/div>