The protesters in Tunisia and the civil rights protesters of Martin Luther King, Jr.\u2019s day had influence apart from their position in a government. Their influence came, in part, from their ability to advocate for what many people held as important values. Government leaders might have this kind of influence as well, but they also have the advantage of wielding power associated with their position in the government. As this example indicates, there is more than one type of authority in a community.<\/p>\r\n
Authority<\/span><\/strong> refers to accepted power\u2014that is, power that people agree to follow. People listen to authority figures because they feel that these individuals are worthy of respect. Generally speaking, people perceive the objectives and demands of an authority figure as reasonable and beneficial, or true.<\/p>\r\n A citizen\u2019s interaction with a police officer is a good example of how people react to authority in everyday life. For instance, a person who sees the flashing red and blue lights of a police car in his rearview mirror usually pulls to the side of the road without hesitation. Such a driver most likely assumes that the police officer behind him serves as a legitimate source of authority and has the right to pull him over. As part of her official duties, the police officer then has the power to issue a speeding ticket if the driver was driving too fast. If the same officer, however, were to command the driver to follow her home and mow her lawn, the driver would likely protest that the officer does not have the authority to make such a request.<\/p>\r\n Not all authority figures are police officers, elected officials or government authorities. Besides formal offices, authority can arise from tradition and personal qualities. Economist and sociologist Max Weber realized this when he examined individual action as it relates to authority, as well as large-scale structures of authority and how they relate to a society\u2019s economy. Based on this work, Weber developed a classification system for authority. His three types of authority are traditional authority, charismatic authority and legal-rational authority (Weber 1922).<\/p>\r\n\r\n A more modern form of traditional authority is patrimonialism<\/span><\/strong>, which is traditional domination facilitated by an administration and military that are purely personal instruments of the master (Eisenberg 1998). In this form of authority, all officials are personal favorites appointed by the ruler. These officials have no rights, and their privileges can be increased or withdrawn based on the caprices of the leader. The political organization of ancient Egypt typified such a system: when the royal household decreed that a pyramid be built, every Egyptian was forced to work toward its construction.<\/p>\r\n Traditional authority can be intertwined with race, class, and gender. In most societies, for instance, men are more likely to be privileged than women and thus are more likely to hold roles of authority. Similarly, members of dominant racial groups or upper-class families also win respect more readily. In the United States, the Kennedy family, which has produced many prominent politicians, exemplifies this model.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/section> Followers accept the power of charismatic authority<\/span><\/strong> because they are drawn to the leader\u2019s personal qualities. The appeal of a charismatic leader can be extraordinary, and can inspire followers to make unusual sacrifices or to persevere in the midst of great hardship and persecution. Charismatic leaders usually emerge in times of crisis and offer innovative or radical solutions. They may even offer a vision of a new world order. Hitler\u2019s rise to power in the postwar economic depression of Germany is an example.<\/p>\r\n Charismatic leaders tend to hold power for short durations, and according to Weber, they are just as likely to be tyrannical as they are heroic. Diverse male leaders such as Hitler, Napoleon, Jesus Christ, C\u00e9sar Ch\u00e1vez, Malcolm X, and Winston Churchill are all considered charismatic leaders. Because so few women have held dynamic positions of leadership throughout history, the list of charismatic female leaders is comparatively short. Many historians consider figures such as Joan of Arc, Margaret Thatcher, and Mother Teresa to be charismatic leaders.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/section> According to Weber, power made legitimate by laws, written rules, and regulations is termed rational-legal authority<\/span><\/strong>. In this type of authority, power is vested in a particular rationale, system, or ideology and not necessarily in the person who implements the specifics of that doctrine. A nation that follows a constitution applies this type of authority. On a smaller scale, you might encounter rational-legal authority in the workplace via the standards set forth in the employee handbook, which provides a different type of authority than that of your boss.<\/p>\r\n Of course, ideals are seldom replicated in the real world. Few governments or leaders can be neatly categorized. Some leaders, like Mohandas Gandhi for instance, can be considered charismatic and<\/em> legal-rational authority figures. Similarly, a leader or government can start out exemplifying one type of authority and gradually evolve or change into another type.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/section> 1. Which statement best expresses the difference between power and authority?<\/p>\r\n\r\n 2. Which of the following types of authority does not<\/em><\/em> reside primarily in a leader?<\/p>\r\n\r\n 3. In the U.S. Senate, it is customary to assign each senator a seniority ranking based on years of government service and the population of the state he or she represents. A top ranking gives the senator priority for assignments to office space, committee chair positions, and seating on the senate floor. What type of authority does this example best illustrate?<\/p>\r\n\r\n 4. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. used his public speaking abilities and magnetism to inspire African Americans to stand up against injustice in an extremely hostile environment. He is an example of a(n) __________ leader.<\/p>\r\n\r\n 5. Which current world figure has the least amount of political power?<\/p>\r\n\r\n 6. Which statement best expresses why there have been so few charismatic female leaders throughout history?<\/p>\r\n\r\n You\u2019ll have more success on the Self-Check, if you\u2019ve completed both Readings in this section.<\/span><\/p>\r\nhttps:\/\/assessments.lumenlearning.com\/assessments\/1052\r\n\r\n<\/section>","rendered":" The protesters in Tunisia and the civil rights protesters of Martin Luther King, Jr.\u2019s day had influence apart from their position in a government. Their influence came, in part, from their ability to advocate for what many people held as important values. Government leaders might have this kind of influence as well, but they also have the advantage of wielding power associated with their position in the government. As this example indicates, there is more than one type of authority in a community.<\/p>\n Authority<\/span><\/strong> refers to accepted power\u2014that is, power that people agree to follow. People listen to authority figures because they feel that these individuals are worthy of respect. Generally speaking, people perceive the objectives and demands of an authority figure as reasonable and beneficial, or true.<\/p>\n A citizen\u2019s interaction with a police officer is a good example of how people react to authority in everyday life. For instance, a person who sees the flashing red and blue lights of a police car in his rearview mirror usually pulls to the side of the road without hesitation. Such a driver most likely assumes that the police officer behind him serves as a legitimate source of authority and has the right to pull him over. As part of her official duties, the police officer then has the power to issue a speeding ticket if the driver was driving too fast. If the same officer, however, were to command the driver to follow her home and mow her lawn, the driver would likely protest that the officer does not have the authority to make such a request.<\/p>\n Not all authority figures are police officers, elected officials or government authorities. Besides formal offices, authority can arise from tradition and personal qualities. Economist and sociologist Max Weber realized this when he examined individual action as it relates to authority, as well as large-scale structures of authority and how they relate to a society\u2019s economy. Based on this work, Weber developed a classification system for authority. His three types of authority are traditional authority, charismatic authority and legal-rational authority (Weber 1922).<\/p>\n Modern British Parliament<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n According to Weber, the power of traditional authority<\/span><\/strong> is accepted because that has traditionally been the case; its legitimacy exists because it has been accepted for a long time. Britain\u2019s Queen Elizabeth, for instance, occupies a position that she inherited based on the traditional rules of succession for the monarchy. People adhere to traditional authority because they are invested in the past and feel obligated to perpetuate it. In this type of authority, a ruler typically has no real force to carry out his will or maintain his position but depends primarily on a group\u2019s respect.<\/p>\n A more modern form of traditional authority is patrimonialism<\/span><\/strong>, which is traditional domination facilitated by an administration and military that are purely personal instruments of the master (Eisenberg 1998). In this form of authority, all officials are personal favorites appointed by the ruler. These officials have no rights, and their privileges can be increased or withdrawn based on the caprices of the leader. The political organization of ancient Egypt typified such a system: when the royal household decreed that a pyramid be built, every Egyptian was forced to work toward its construction.<\/p>\n Traditional authority can be intertwined with race, class, and gender. In most societies, for instance, men are more likely to be privileged than women and thus are more likely to hold roles of authority. Similarly, members of dominant racial groups or upper-class families also win respect more readily. In the United States, the Kennedy family, which has produced many prominent politicians, exemplifies this model.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n Followers accept the power of charismatic authority<\/span><\/strong> because they are drawn to the leader\u2019s personal qualities. The appeal of a charismatic leader can be extraordinary, and can inspire followers to make unusual sacrifices or to persevere in the midst of great hardship and persecution. Charismatic leaders usually emerge in times of crisis and offer innovative or radical solutions. They may even offer a vision of a new world order. Hitler\u2019s rise to power in the postwar economic depression of Germany is an example.<\/p>\n Charismatic leaders tend to hold power for short durations, and according to Weber, they are just as likely to be tyrannical as they are heroic. Diverse male leaders such as Hitler, Napoleon, Jesus Christ, C\u00e9sar Ch\u00e1vez, Malcolm X, and Winston Churchill are all considered charismatic leaders. Because so few women have held dynamic positions of leadership throughout history, the list of charismatic female leaders is comparatively short. Many historians consider figures such as Joan of Arc, Margaret Thatcher, and Mother Teresa to be charismatic leaders.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n According to Weber, power made legitimate by laws, written rules, and regulations is termed rational-legal authority<\/span><\/strong>. In this type of authority, power is vested in a particular rationale, system, or ideology and not necessarily in the person who implements the specifics of that doctrine. A nation that follows a constitution applies this type of authority. On a smaller scale, you might encounter rational-legal authority in the workplace via the standards set forth in the employee handbook, which provides a different type of authority than that of your boss.<\/p>\n Of course, ideals are seldom replicated in the real world. Few governments or leaders can be neatly categorized. Some leaders, like Mohandas Gandhi for instance, can be considered charismatic and<\/em> legal-rational authority figures. Similarly, a leader or government can start out exemplifying one type of authority and gradually evolve or change into another type.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n 1. Which statement best expresses the difference between power and authority?<\/p>\n 2. Which of the following types of authority does not<\/em><\/em> reside primarily in a leader?<\/p>\n 3. In the U.S. Senate, it is customary to assign each senator a seniority ranking based on years of government service and the population of the state he or she represents. A top ranking gives the senator priority for assignments to office space, committee chair positions, and seating on the senate floor. What type of authority does this example best illustrate?<\/p>\n 4. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. used his public speaking abilities and magnetism to inspire African Americans to stand up against injustice in an extremely hostile environment. He is an example of a(n) __________ leader.<\/p>\n 5. Which current world figure has the least amount of political power?<\/p>\n 6. Which statement best expresses why there have been so few charismatic female leaders throughout history?<\/p>\n You\u2019ll have more success on the Self-Check, if you\u2019ve completed both Readings in this section.<\/span><\/p>\n \t\r\n Weber\u2019s Three Types of Authority<\/th>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n \r\n \r\n<\/th>\r\n Traditional<\/th>\r\n Charismatic<\/th>\r\n Legal-Rational<\/th>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/thead>\r\n \r\n Source of Power<\/strong><\/td>\r\n Legitimized by long-standing custom<\/td>\r\n Based on a leader\u2019s personal qualities<\/td>\r\n Authority resides in the office, not the person<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n \r\n Leadership Style<\/strong><\/td>\r\n Historic personality<\/td>\r\n Dynamic personality<\/td>\r\n Bureaucratic officials<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n \r\n Example<\/strong><\/td>\r\n Patriarchy (traditional positions of authority)<\/td>\r\n Napoleon, Jesus Christ, Mother Teresa, Martin Luther King, Jr.<\/td>\r\n U.S. presidency and Congress\r\n Traditional Authority<\/h2>\r\nAccording to Weber, the power of traditional authority<\/span><\/strong> is accepted because that has traditionally been the case; its legitimacy exists because it has been accepted for a long time. Britain\u2019s Queen Elizabeth, for instance, occupies a position that she inherited based on the traditional rules of succession for the monarchy. People adhere to traditional authority because they are invested in the past and feel obligated to perpetuate it. In this type of authority, a ruler typically has no real force to carry out his will or maintain his position but depends primarily on a group\u2019s respect.\r\n
Charismatic Authority<\/h2>\r\n
Rational-Legal Authority<\/h2>\r\n
Think It Over<\/h3>\r\n
\r\n \t
Practice<\/h3>\r\n
\r\n \t
\r\n \t
\r\n \t
\r\n \t
\r\n \t
\r\n \t
\r\n \t
\r\n \t
\r\n \t
\r\n \t
\r\n \t
Self-Check: Power and Authority<\/h2>\r\n
Types of Authority<\/h2>\n
\n
\n Weber\u2019s Three Types of Authority<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n<\/th>\n Traditional<\/th>\n Charismatic<\/th>\n Legal-Rational<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n \n Source of Power<\/strong><\/td>\n Legitimized by long-standing custom<\/td>\n Based on a leader\u2019s personal qualities<\/td>\n Authority resides in the office, not the person<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Leadership Style<\/strong><\/td>\n Historic personality<\/td>\n Dynamic personality<\/td>\n Bureaucratic officials<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Example<\/strong><\/td>\n Patriarchy (traditional positions of authority)<\/td>\n Napoleon, Jesus Christ, Mother Teresa, Martin Luther King, Jr.<\/td>\n U.S. presidency and Congress<\/p>\n Traditional Authority<\/h2>\n
Charismatic Authority<\/h2>\n
Rational-Legal Authority<\/h2>\n
Think It Over<\/h3>\n
\n
Practice<\/h3>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Self-Check: Power and Authority<\/h2>\n