{"id":284,"date":"2016-05-04T03:20:03","date_gmt":"2016-05-04T03:20:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontosociology-waymaker\/?post_type=chapter&p=284"},"modified":"2016-07-05T18:16:19","modified_gmt":"2016-07-05T18:16:19","slug":"reading-the-sociological-approach-to-religion","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/sanjacinto-introsociology-1\/chapter\/reading-the-sociological-approach-to-religion\/","title":{"raw":"Reading: The History of Religion","rendered":"Reading: The History of Religion"},"content":{"raw":"
<\/figcaption><\/figure>\r\n

What is religion? Pioneer sociologist \u00c9mile Durkheim described it with the ethereal statement that it consists of \u201cthings that surpass the limits of our knowledge\u201d (1915). He went on to elaborate: Religion is \u201ca unified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things, that is to say set apart and forbidden, beliefs and practices which unite into one single moral community, called a church, all those who adhere to them\u201d (1915). Some people associate religion with places of worship (a synagogue or church), others with a practice (confession or meditation), and still others with a concept that guides their daily lives (like dharma or sin). All these people can agree that religion<\/span> is a system of beliefs, values, and practices concerning what a person holds sacred or considers to be spiritually significant.<\/p>\r\n\r\n

<\/section>\r\n
\r\n\r\nFrom the Latin religio<\/em> (respect for what is sacred) and religare<\/em> (to bind, in the sense of an obligation), the term religion describes various systems of belief and practice that define what people consider to be sacred or spiritual (Fasching and deChant 2001; Durkheim 1915). Throughout history, and in societies across the world, leaders have used religious narratives, symbols, and traditions in an attempt to give more meaning to life and understand the universe. Some form of religion is found in every known culture, and it is usually practiced in a public way by a group. The practice of religion can include feasts and festivals, intercession with God or gods, marriage and funeral services, music and art, meditation or initiation, sacrifice or service, and other aspects of culture.\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n

While some people think of religion as something individual because religious beliefs can be highly personal, religion is also a social institution. Social scientists recognize that religion exists as an organized and integrated set of beliefs, behaviors, and norms centered on basic social needs and values. Moreover, religion is a cultural universal found in all social groups. For instance, in every culture, funeral rites are practiced in some way, although these customs vary between cultures and within religious affiliations. Despite differences, there are common elements in a ceremony marking a person\u2019s death, such as announcement of the death, care of the deceased, disposition, and ceremony or ritual. These universals, and the differences in the way societies and individuals experience religion, provide rich material for sociological study.<\/p>\r\n

In studying religion, sociologists distinguish between what they term the experience, beliefs, and rituals of a religion. Religious experience<\/span><\/strong> refers to the conviction or sensation that we are connected to \u201cthe divine.\u201d This type of communion might be experienced when people are pray or meditate. Religious beliefs<\/span><\/strong> are specific ideas members of a particular faith hold to be true, such as that Jesus Christ was the son of God, or that reincarnation exists. Another illustration of religious beliefs is the creation stories we find in different religions. Religious rituals<\/span><\/strong> are behaviors or practices that are either required or expected of the members of a particular group, such as bar mitzvah or confession of sins (Barkan and Greenwood 2003).<\/p>\r\n\r\n

\r\n

The History of Religion as a Sociological Concept<\/h2>\r\n

In the wake of nineteenth century European industrialization and secularization, three social theorists attempted to examine the relationship between religion and society: \u00c9mile Durkheim, Max Weber, and Karl Marx. They are among the founding thinkers of modern sociology.<\/p>\r\nAs stated earlier, French sociologist \u00c9mile Durkheim (1858\u20131917) defined religion as a \u201cunified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things\u201d (1915). To him, sacred meant extraordinary\u2014something that inspired wonder and that seemed connected to the concept of \u201cthe divine.\u201d Durkheim argued that \u201creligion happens\u201d in society when there is a separation between the profane (ordinary life) and the sacred (1915). A rock, for example, isn\u2019t sacred or profane as it exists. But if someone makes it into a headstone, or another person uses it for landscaping, it takes on different meanings\u2014one sacred, one profane.\r\n

Durkheim is generally considered the first sociologist who analyzed religion in terms of its societal impact. Above all, he believed religion is about community: It binds people together (social cohesion), promotes behavior consistency (social control), and offers strength during life\u2019s transitions and tragedies (meaning and purpose). By applying the methods of natural science to the study of society, Durkheim held that the source of religion and morality is the collective mind-set of society and that the cohesive bonds of social order result from common values in a society. He contended that these values need to be maintained to maintain social stability.<\/p>\r\n

But what would happen if religion were to decline? This question led Durkheim to posit that religion is not just a social creation but something that represents the power of society: When people celebrate sacred things, they celebrate the power of their society. By this reasoning, even if traditional religion disappeared, society wouldn\u2019t necessarily dissolve.<\/p>\r\n

Whereas Durkheim saw religion as a source of social stability, German sociologist and political economist Max Weber (1864\u20131920) believed it was a precipitator of social change. He examined the effects of religion on economic activities and noticed that heavily Protestant societies\u2014such as those in the Netherlands, England, Scotland, and Germany\u2014were the most highly developed capitalist societies and that their most successful business leaders were Protestant. In his writing The Protestant Work Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism<\/em> (1905), he contends that the Protestant work ethic influenced the development of capitalism. Weber noted that certain kinds of Protestantism supported the pursuit of material gain by motivating believers to work hard, be successful, and not spend their profits on frivolous things. (The modern use of \u201cwork ethic\u201d comes directly from Weber\u2019s Protestant ethic, although it has now lost its religious connotations.)<\/p>\r\n\r\n

\r\n

The Protestant Work Ethic in the Information Age<\/h3>\r\n

Max Weber (1904) posited that, in Europe in his time, Protestants were more likely than Catholics to value capitalist ideology, and believed in hard work and savings. He showed that Protestant values directly influenced the rise of capitalism and helped create the modern world order. Weber thought the emphasis on community in Catholicism versus the emphasis on individual achievement in Protestantism made a difference. His century-old claim that the Protestant work ethic led to the development of capitalism has been one of the most important and controversial topics in the sociology of religion. In fact, scholars have found little merit to his contention when applied to modern society (Greeley 1989).<\/p>\r\n

What does the concept of work ethic mean today? The work ethic in the information age has been affected by tremendous cultural and social change, just as workers in the mid- to late nineteenth century were influenced by the wake of the Industrial Revolution. Factory jobs tend to be simple, uninvolved, and require very little thinking or decision making on the part of the worker. Today, the work ethic of the modern workforce has been transformed, as more thinking and decision making is required. Employees also seek autonomy and fulfillment in their jobs, not just wages. Higher levels of education have become necessary, as well as people management skills and access to the most recent information on any given topic. The information age has increased the rapid pace of production expected in many jobs.<\/p>\r\n

On the other hand, the \u201cMcDonaldization\u201d of the United States (Hightower 1975; Ritzer 1993), in which many service industries, such as the fast-food industry, have established routinized roles and tasks, has resulted in a \u201cdiscouragement\u201d of the work ethic. In jobs where roles and tasks are highly prescribed, workers have no opportunity to make decisions. They are considered replaceable commodities as opposed to valued employees. During times of recession, these service jobs may be the only employment possible for younger individuals or those with low-level skills. The pay, working conditions, and robotic nature of the tasks dehumanizes the workers and strips them of incentives for doing quality work.<\/p>\r\n

Working hard also doesn\u2019t seem to have any relationship with Catholic or Protestant religious beliefs anymore, or those of other religions; information age workers expect talent and hard work to be rewarded by material gain and career advancement.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n

German philosopher, journalist, and revolutionary socialist\u00a0Karl Marx\u00a0(1818\u20131883) also studied the social impact of religion. He believed religion reflects the social stratification of society and that it maintains inequality and perpetuates the status quo. For him, religion was just an extension of working-class (proletariat) economic suffering. He famously argued that religion \u201cis the opium of the people\u201d (1844).<\/p>\r\n

For Durkheim, Weber, and Marx, who were reacting to the great social and economic upheaval of the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century in Europe, religion was an integral part of society. For Durkheim, religion was a force for cohesion that helped bind the members of society to the group, while Weber believed religion could be understood as something separate from society. Marx considered religion inseparable from the economy and the worker. Religion could not be understood apart from the capitalist society that perpetuated inequality. Despite their different views, these social theorists all believed in the centrality of religion to society.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/section>

\r\n
\r\n

Further Research<\/h3>\r\n

For more discussion on the study of sociology and religion, check out the following blog:\u00a0The Immanent Frame<\/a>. It is a forum for the exchange of ideas about religion, secularism, and society by leading thinkers in the social sciences and humanities.<\/p>\r\n

Some would argue that the Protestant work ethic is still alive and well in the United States. Read British historian Niall Ferguson\u2019s view here<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/section><\/section>

\r\n
\r\n

Think It Over<\/h3>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
    \r\n \t
  1. List some ways that you see religion having social control in the everyday world.<\/li>\r\n \t
  2. What are some sacred items that you\u2019re familiar with? Are there some objects, such as cups, candles, or clothing, that would be considered profane in normal settings but are considered sacred in special circumstances or when used in specific ways?<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
    \r\n

    Practice<\/h3>\r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n

    1. In what ways does religion serve the role of a social institution?<\/p>\r\n\r\n

      \r\n \t
    1. Religions have a complex and integrated set of norms.<\/li>\r\n \t
    2. Religious practices and beliefs are related to societal values.<\/li>\r\n \t
    3. Religions often meet several basic needs.<\/li>\r\n \t
    4. All of the above<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
      \r\n
      [reveal-answer q=\"36168\"]Show Answer[\/reveal-answer]\r\n[hidden-answer a=\"36168\"]d[\/hidden-answer]<\/div>\r\n
      <\/div>\r\n
      \r\n
      2. A cultural universal is something that:<\/div>\r\n<\/section><\/div>\r\n<\/section><\/div>\r\n
      \r\n
      \r\n
        \r\n \t
      1. addresses all aspects of a group\u2019s behavior<\/li>\r\n \t
      2. is found in all cultures<\/li>\r\n \t
      3. is based on social norms<\/li>\r\n \t
      4. may or may not be of value in meeting social needs<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
        \r\n
        [reveal-answer q=\"133438\"]Show Answer[\/reveal-answer]\r\n[hidden-answer a=\"133438\"]b[\/hidden-answer]<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/section><\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n[reveal-answer q=\"912955\"]Show Glossary[\/reveal-answer]\r\n[hidden-answer a=\"912955\"]\r\n
        \r\n \t
        religion:<\/dt>\r\n \t
        a system of beliefs, values, and practices concerning what a person holds to be sacred or spiritually significant<\/dd>\r\n \t
        <\/dd>\r\n \t
        religious experience:<\/dt>\r\n \t
        the conviction or sensation that one is connected to \u201cthe divine\u201d<\/dd>\r\n<\/dl>\r\n
        \r\n \t
        religious beliefs:<\/dt>\r\n \t
        specific ideas that members of a particular faith hold to be true<\/dd>\r\n<\/dl>\r\n
        \r\n \t
        religious rituals:<\/dt>\r\n \t
        behaviors or practices that are either required for or expected of the members of a particular group<\/dd>\r\n<\/dl>\r\n[\/hidden-answer]\r\n\r\n<\/section>","rendered":"
        <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

        What is religion? Pioneer sociologist \u00c9mile Durkheim described it with the ethereal statement that it consists of \u201cthings that surpass the limits of our knowledge\u201d (1915). He went on to elaborate: Religion is \u201ca unified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things, that is to say set apart and forbidden, beliefs and practices which unite into one single moral community, called a church, all those who adhere to them\u201d (1915). Some people associate religion with places of worship (a synagogue or church), others with a practice (confession or meditation), and still others with a concept that guides their daily lives (like dharma or sin). All these people can agree that religion<\/span> is a system of beliefs, values, and practices concerning what a person holds sacred or considers to be spiritually significant.<\/p>\n

        <\/section>\n
        \n

        From the Latin religio<\/em> (respect for what is sacred) and religare<\/em> (to bind, in the sense of an obligation), the term religion describes various systems of belief and practice that define what people consider to be sacred or spiritual (Fasching and deChant 2001; Durkheim 1915). Throughout history, and in societies across the world, leaders have used religious narratives, symbols, and traditions in an attempt to give more meaning to life and understand the universe. Some form of religion is found in every known culture, and it is usually practiced in a public way by a group. The practice of religion can include feasts and festivals, intercession with God or gods, marriage and funeral services, music and art, meditation or initiation, sacrifice or service, and other aspects of culture.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

        While some people think of religion as something individual because religious beliefs can be highly personal, religion is also a social institution. Social scientists recognize that religion exists as an organized and integrated set of beliefs, behaviors, and norms centered on basic social needs and values. Moreover, religion is a cultural universal found in all social groups. For instance, in every culture, funeral rites are practiced in some way, although these customs vary between cultures and within religious affiliations. Despite differences, there are common elements in a ceremony marking a person\u2019s death, such as announcement of the death, care of the deceased, disposition, and ceremony or ritual. These universals, and the differences in the way societies and individuals experience religion, provide rich material for sociological study.<\/p>\n

        In studying religion, sociologists distinguish between what they term the experience, beliefs, and rituals of a religion. Religious experience<\/span><\/strong> refers to the conviction or sensation that we are connected to \u201cthe divine.\u201d This type of communion might be experienced when people are pray or meditate. Religious beliefs<\/span><\/strong> are specific ideas members of a particular faith hold to be true, such as that Jesus Christ was the son of God, or that reincarnation exists. Another illustration of religious beliefs is the creation stories we find in different religions. Religious rituals<\/span><\/strong> are behaviors or practices that are either required or expected of the members of a particular group, such as bar mitzvah or confession of sins (Barkan and Greenwood 2003).<\/p>\n

        \n

        The History of Religion as a Sociological Concept<\/h2>\n

        In the wake of nineteenth century European industrialization and secularization, three social theorists attempted to examine the relationship between religion and society: \u00c9mile Durkheim, Max Weber, and Karl Marx. They are among the founding thinkers of modern sociology.<\/p>\n

        As stated earlier, French sociologist \u00c9mile Durkheim (1858\u20131917) defined religion as a \u201cunified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things\u201d (1915). To him, sacred meant extraordinary\u2014something that inspired wonder and that seemed connected to the concept of \u201cthe divine.\u201d Durkheim argued that \u201creligion happens\u201d in society when there is a separation between the profane (ordinary life) and the sacred (1915). A rock, for example, isn\u2019t sacred or profane as it exists. But if someone makes it into a headstone, or another person uses it for landscaping, it takes on different meanings\u2014one sacred, one profane.<\/p>\n

        Durkheim is generally considered the first sociologist who analyzed religion in terms of its societal impact. Above all, he believed religion is about community: It binds people together (social cohesion), promotes behavior consistency (social control), and offers strength during life\u2019s transitions and tragedies (meaning and purpose). By applying the methods of natural science to the study of society, Durkheim held that the source of religion and morality is the collective mind-set of society and that the cohesive bonds of social order result from common values in a society. He contended that these values need to be maintained to maintain social stability.<\/p>\n

        But what would happen if religion were to decline? This question led Durkheim to posit that religion is not just a social creation but something that represents the power of society: When people celebrate sacred things, they celebrate the power of their society. By this reasoning, even if traditional religion disappeared, society wouldn\u2019t necessarily dissolve.<\/p>\n

        Whereas Durkheim saw religion as a source of social stability, German sociologist and political economist Max Weber (1864\u20131920) believed it was a precipitator of social change. He examined the effects of religion on economic activities and noticed that heavily Protestant societies\u2014such as those in the Netherlands, England, Scotland, and Germany\u2014were the most highly developed capitalist societies and that their most successful business leaders were Protestant. In his writing The Protestant Work Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism<\/em> (1905), he contends that the Protestant work ethic influenced the development of capitalism. Weber noted that certain kinds of Protestantism supported the pursuit of material gain by motivating believers to work hard, be successful, and not spend their profits on frivolous things. (The modern use of \u201cwork ethic\u201d comes directly from Weber\u2019s Protestant ethic, although it has now lost its religious connotations.)<\/p>\n

        \n

        The Protestant Work Ethic in the Information Age<\/h3>\n

        Max Weber (1904) posited that, in Europe in his time, Protestants were more likely than Catholics to value capitalist ideology, and believed in hard work and savings. He showed that Protestant values directly influenced the rise of capitalism and helped create the modern world order. Weber thought the emphasis on community in Catholicism versus the emphasis on individual achievement in Protestantism made a difference. His century-old claim that the Protestant work ethic led to the development of capitalism has been one of the most important and controversial topics in the sociology of religion. In fact, scholars have found little merit to his contention when applied to modern society (Greeley 1989).<\/p>\n

        What does the concept of work ethic mean today? The work ethic in the information age has been affected by tremendous cultural and social change, just as workers in the mid- to late nineteenth century were influenced by the wake of the Industrial Revolution. Factory jobs tend to be simple, uninvolved, and require very little thinking or decision making on the part of the worker. Today, the work ethic of the modern workforce has been transformed, as more thinking and decision making is required. Employees also seek autonomy and fulfillment in their jobs, not just wages. Higher levels of education have become necessary, as well as people management skills and access to the most recent information on any given topic. The information age has increased the rapid pace of production expected in many jobs.<\/p>\n

        On the other hand, the \u201cMcDonaldization\u201d of the United States (Hightower 1975; Ritzer 1993), in which many service industries, such as the fast-food industry, have established routinized roles and tasks, has resulted in a \u201cdiscouragement\u201d of the work ethic. In jobs where roles and tasks are highly prescribed, workers have no opportunity to make decisions. They are considered replaceable commodities as opposed to valued employees. During times of recession, these service jobs may be the only employment possible for younger individuals or those with low-level skills. The pay, working conditions, and robotic nature of the tasks dehumanizes the workers and strips them of incentives for doing quality work.<\/p>\n

        Working hard also doesn\u2019t seem to have any relationship with Catholic or Protestant religious beliefs anymore, or those of other religions; information age workers expect talent and hard work to be rewarded by material gain and career advancement.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

        German philosopher, journalist, and revolutionary socialist\u00a0Karl Marx\u00a0(1818\u20131883) also studied the social impact of religion. He believed religion reflects the social stratification of society and that it maintains inequality and perpetuates the status quo. For him, religion was just an extension of working-class (proletariat) economic suffering. He famously argued that religion \u201cis the opium of the people\u201d (1844).<\/p>\n

        For Durkheim, Weber, and Marx, who were reacting to the great social and economic upheaval of the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century in Europe, religion was an integral part of society. For Durkheim, religion was a force for cohesion that helped bind the members of society to the group, while Weber believed religion could be understood as something separate from society. Marx considered religion inseparable from the economy and the worker. Religion could not be understood apart from the capitalist society that perpetuated inequality. Despite their different views, these social theorists all believed in the centrality of religion to society.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n

        \n
        \n
        \n

        Further Research<\/h3>\n

        For more discussion on the study of sociology and religion, check out the following blog:\u00a0The Immanent Frame<\/a>. It is a forum for the exchange of ideas about religion, secularism, and society by leading thinkers in the social sciences and humanities.<\/p>\n

        Some would argue that the Protestant work ethic is still alive and well in the United States. Read British historian Niall Ferguson\u2019s view here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/section>\n

        \n
        \n

        Think It Over<\/h3>\n
        \n
        \n
          \n
        1. List some ways that you see religion having social control in the everyday world.<\/li>\n
        2. What are some sacred items that you\u2019re familiar with? Are there some objects, such as cups, candles, or clothing, that would be considered profane in normal settings but are considered sacred in special circumstances or when used in specific ways?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
          \n

          Practice<\/h3>\n
          \n
          \n
          \n

          1. In what ways does religion serve the role of a social institution?<\/p>\n

            \n
          1. Religions have a complex and integrated set of norms.<\/li>\n
          2. Religious practices and beliefs are related to societal values.<\/li>\n
          3. Religions often meet several basic needs.<\/li>\n
          4. All of the above<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n
            \n
            \n
            Show Answer<\/span><\/p>\n
            d<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
            <\/div>\n
            \n
            2. A cultural universal is something that:<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n
            \n
            \n
            \n
              \n
            1. addresses all aspects of a group\u2019s behavior<\/li>\n
            2. is found in all cultures<\/li>\n
            3. is based on social norms<\/li>\n
            4. may or may not be of value in meeting social needs<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n
              \n
              \n
              Show Answer<\/span><\/p>\n
              b<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
              Show Glossary<\/span><\/p>\n
              \n
              \n
              religion:<\/dt>\n
              a system of beliefs, values, and practices concerning what a person holds to be sacred or spiritually significant<\/dd>\n
              <\/dd>\n
              religious experience:<\/dt>\n
              the conviction or sensation that one is connected to \u201cthe divine\u201d<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n
              \n
              religious beliefs:<\/dt>\n
              specific ideas that members of a particular faith hold to be true<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n
              \n
              religious rituals:<\/dt>\n
              behaviors or practices that are either required for or expected of the members of a particular group<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n\n\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t

              Candela Citations<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
              CC licensed content, Shared previously<\/div>