{"id":250,"date":"2016-06-10T23:59:30","date_gmt":"2016-06-10T23:59:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/waymaker-level3-english\/?post_type=chapter&#038;p=250"},"modified":"2016-10-06T20:18:46","modified_gmt":"2016-10-06T20:18:46","slug":"text-logical-fallacies","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-corningcc-engcomp1wmopen-1\/chapter\/text-logical-fallacies\/","title":{"raw":"Logical Fallacies","rendered":"Logical Fallacies"},"content":{"raw":"<h2 class=\"p1\"><b><\/b><span class=\"s1\"><b>Defining Fallacy<\/b><\/span><\/h2>\r\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>Fallacies<\/b>\u00a0are errors or tricks of reasoning. We call a fallacy an\u00a0<i>error<\/i> of reasoning if it occurs accidentally; we call it a <i>trick<\/i> of reasoning if a speaker or writer uses it in order to deceive or manipulate his audience. Fallacies can be either\u00a0<b>formal<\/b>\u00a0or\u00a0<b>informal<\/b>.<\/span><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\">Whether a fallacy is an error or a trick, whether it is formal or informal, its use undercuts the validity and soundness of any argument. At the same time, fallacious reasoning can damage the credibility of the speaker\/writer and improperly manipulate the emotions of the audience\/reader.<\/span><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"p3\"><img class=\"aligncenter wp-image-316\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/107\/2016\/06\/12194511\/163204801_d1ab4ffb54_z-300x199.jpg\" alt=\"Photo taken underwater, looking up to a building on the surface. The result is very abstract, with squiggly black lines, and blurbs of gray and green color.\" width=\"500\" height=\"332\" \/><\/p>\r\n\r\n<h2 class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>Formal Fallacies<\/b><\/span><\/h2>\r\n<p class=\"p2\"><span class=\"s1\">Most<b>\u00a0formal fallacies<\/b>\u00a0are errors of logic: the conclusion doesn\u2019t really \u201cfollow from\u201d (is not supported by) the premises. Either the premises are untrue or the argument is invalid. Below is an example of an invalid deductive argument.<\/span><\/p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span class=\"s1\"><strong>Premise<\/strong>: All black bears are omnivores.<\/span><\/p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span class=\"s1\"><strong>Premise<\/strong>: All raccoons are omnivores.<\/span><\/p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span class=\"s1\"><strong>Conclusion<\/strong>: All raccoons are black bears.<\/span><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\">Bears are a subset of omnivores. Raccoons also are a subset of omnivores. But these two subsets do not overlap, and that fact makes the conclusion illogical. The argument is invalid\u2014that is, the relationship between the premises doesn\u2019t support the conclusion.<\/span><\/p>\r\n\r\n<h3 class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>Recognizing Formal Fallacies<\/b><\/span><\/h3>\r\n<p class=\"p2\"><span class=\"s1\">\u201cRaccoons are black bears\u201d is instantaneously recognizable as fallacious and may seem too silly to be worth bothering about. However, that and other forms of poor logic play out on a daily basis, and they have real world consequences. Below is an example of a fallacious argument:<\/span><\/p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span class=\"s1\"><strong>Premise<\/strong>: All Arabs are Muslims.<\/span><\/p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span class=\"s1\"><strong>Premise<\/strong>: All Iranians are Muslims.<\/span><\/p>\r\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span class=\"s1\"><strong>Conclusion<\/strong>: All Iranians are Arabs.<\/span><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\">This argument fails on two levels. First, the premises are untrue because although many Arabs and Iranians are Muslim, not all are. Second, the two ethnic groups are sets that do not overlap; nevertheless, the two groups are confounded because they (largely) share one quality in common. One only has to look at comments on the web to realize that the confusion is widespread and that it influences attitudes and opinions about U.S. foreign policy.<\/span><\/p>\r\n\r\n<h2 class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"><b><img class=\"aligncenter wp-image-317\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/107\/2016\/06\/12195235\/95303778_249f5889f9_z-300x225.jpg\" alt=\"Time lapse photo showing lights in concentric rings\" width=\"500\" height=\"375\" \/>Informal Fallacies<\/b><\/span><\/h2>\r\n<p class=\"p2\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>Informal fallacies<\/b>\u00a0take many forms and are widespread in everyday discourse. Very often they involve bringing irrelevant information into an argument or they are based on assumptions that, when examined, prove to be incorrect. Formal fallacies are created when the relationship between premises and conclusion does not hold up or when premises are unsound; informal fallacies are more dependent on misuse of language and of evidence.<\/span><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\">It is easy to find fairly well-accepted lists of informal fallacies, but that does not mean that it is always easy to spot them. Some moves are always fallacious; others may be allowable given the context.<\/span><\/p>\r\n\r\n<h2 class=\"p1\">Using Ethos, Logos, and Pathos to Test Arguments for Fallacies<\/h2>\r\n<p class=\"p2\"><span class=\"s1\">One way to go about evaluating an argument for fallacies is to return to the concept of the three fundamental appeals: <strong>ethos<\/strong>, <strong>logos<\/strong>, and <strong>pathos<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"p2\">As a quick reminder,<\/p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li class=\"p2\"><strong>Ethos<\/strong> is an argument that appeals to ethics, authority, and\/or credibility<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"p2\"><strong>Logos<\/strong> is an argument that appeals to logic<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"p2\"><strong>Pathos<\/strong> is an argument that appeals to emotion<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Once you have refreshed your memory of the basics, you may begin to understand how ethos, logos, and pathos can be used appropriately to strengthen your argument or inappropriately to manipulate an audience through the use of fallacies. Classifying fallacies as fallacies of ethos, logos, or pathos will help you both to understand their nature and to recognize them when you encounter them. Please keep in mind, however, that some fallacies may fit into multiple categories.<\/span><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>Fallacies of ethos<\/b> relate to credibility. These fallacies may unfairly build up the credibility of the author (or his allies) or unfairly attack the credibility of the author\u2019s opponent (or her allies). Some fallacies give an unfair advantage to the claims of the speaker or writer or an unfair disadvantage to his opponent\u2019s claims. These are <b>fallacies of logos<\/b>. <b>Fallacies of pathos<\/b> rely excessively upon emotional appeals, attaching positive associations to the author\u2019s argument and negative ones to his opponent\u2019s position.<\/span><\/p>\r\n\r\n<h2 class=\"p2\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>Conclusion<\/b><\/span><\/h2>\r\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\">Both formal and informal fallacies are errors of reasoning, and if a speaker or writer relies on such fallacies, even unintentionally, she undercuts her argument. For example, if someone defines a key term in her argument in an ambiguous, vague, or circular way, her argument will appear very weak to an critical\u00a0audience.<\/span><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">In addition, when listeners or readers spot questionable reasoning or unfair attempts at audience manipulation, more than their evaluation of the author\u2019s argument (<i>logos<\/i>) may be compromised. Their evaluation of the credibility of the speaker (<i>ethos<\/i>), and perhaps their ability to connect with that speaker on the level of shared values (<i>pathos<\/i>), also may be compromised. At the very least, the presence of fallacies will suggest to an audience that the speaker or writer lacks argumentative skill.<\/span><\/p>","rendered":"<h2 class=\"p1\"><b><\/b><span class=\"s1\"><b>Defining Fallacy<\/b><\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>Fallacies<\/b>\u00a0are errors or tricks of reasoning. We call a fallacy an\u00a0<i>error<\/i> of reasoning if it occurs accidentally; we call it a <i>trick<\/i> of reasoning if a speaker or writer uses it in order to deceive or manipulate his audience. Fallacies can be either\u00a0<b>formal<\/b>\u00a0or\u00a0<b>informal<\/b>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\">Whether a fallacy is an error or a trick, whether it is formal or informal, its use undercuts the validity and soundness of any argument. At the same time, fallacious reasoning can damage the credibility of the speaker\/writer and improperly manipulate the emotions of the audience\/reader.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-316\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/107\/2016\/06\/12194511\/163204801_d1ab4ffb54_z-300x199.jpg\" alt=\"Photo taken underwater, looking up to a building on the surface. The result is very abstract, with squiggly black lines, and blurbs of gray and green color.\" width=\"500\" height=\"332\" \/><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>Formal Fallacies<\/b><\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"p2\"><span class=\"s1\">Most<b>\u00a0formal fallacies<\/b>\u00a0are errors of logic: the conclusion doesn\u2019t really \u201cfollow from\u201d (is not supported by) the premises. Either the premises are untrue or the argument is invalid. Below is an example of an invalid deductive argument.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span class=\"s1\"><strong>Premise<\/strong>: All black bears are omnivores.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span class=\"s1\"><strong>Premise<\/strong>: All raccoons are omnivores.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span class=\"s1\"><strong>Conclusion<\/strong>: All raccoons are black bears.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\">Bears are a subset of omnivores. Raccoons also are a subset of omnivores. But these two subsets do not overlap, and that fact makes the conclusion illogical. The argument is invalid\u2014that is, the relationship between the premises doesn\u2019t support the conclusion.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3 class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>Recognizing Formal Fallacies<\/b><\/span><\/h3>\n<p class=\"p2\"><span class=\"s1\">\u201cRaccoons are black bears\u201d is instantaneously recognizable as fallacious and may seem too silly to be worth bothering about. However, that and other forms of poor logic play out on a daily basis, and they have real world consequences. Below is an example of a fallacious argument:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span class=\"s1\"><strong>Premise<\/strong>: All Arabs are Muslims.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span class=\"s1\"><strong>Premise<\/strong>: All Iranians are Muslims.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span class=\"s1\"><strong>Conclusion<\/strong>: All Iranians are Arabs.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\">This argument fails on two levels. First, the premises are untrue because although many Arabs and Iranians are Muslim, not all are. Second, the two ethnic groups are sets that do not overlap; nevertheless, the two groups are confounded because they (largely) share one quality in common. One only has to look at comments on the web to realize that the confusion is widespread and that it influences attitudes and opinions about U.S. foreign policy.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"><b><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-317\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/107\/2016\/06\/12195235\/95303778_249f5889f9_z-300x225.jpg\" alt=\"Time lapse photo showing lights in concentric rings\" width=\"500\" height=\"375\" \/>Informal Fallacies<\/b><\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"p2\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>Informal fallacies<\/b>\u00a0take many forms and are widespread in everyday discourse. Very often they involve bringing irrelevant information into an argument or they are based on assumptions that, when examined, prove to be incorrect. Formal fallacies are created when the relationship between premises and conclusion does not hold up or when premises are unsound; informal fallacies are more dependent on misuse of language and of evidence.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\">It is easy to find fairly well-accepted lists of informal fallacies, but that does not mean that it is always easy to spot them. Some moves are always fallacious; others may be allowable given the context.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"p1\">Using Ethos, Logos, and Pathos to Test Arguments for Fallacies<\/h2>\n<p class=\"p2\"><span class=\"s1\">One way to go about evaluating an argument for fallacies is to return to the concept of the three fundamental appeals: <strong>ethos<\/strong>, <strong>logos<\/strong>, and <strong>pathos<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\">As a quick reminder,<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"p2\"><strong>Ethos<\/strong> is an argument that appeals to ethics, authority, and\/or credibility<\/li>\n<li class=\"p2\"><strong>Logos<\/strong> is an argument that appeals to logic<\/li>\n<li class=\"p2\"><strong>Pathos<\/strong> is an argument that appeals to emotion<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Once you have refreshed your memory of the basics, you may begin to understand how ethos, logos, and pathos can be used appropriately to strengthen your argument or inappropriately to manipulate an audience through the use of fallacies. Classifying fallacies as fallacies of ethos, logos, or pathos will help you both to understand their nature and to recognize them when you encounter them. Please keep in mind, however, that some fallacies may fit into multiple categories.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>Fallacies of ethos<\/b> relate to credibility. These fallacies may unfairly build up the credibility of the author (or his allies) or unfairly attack the credibility of the author\u2019s opponent (or her allies). Some fallacies give an unfair advantage to the claims of the speaker or writer or an unfair disadvantage to his opponent\u2019s claims. These are <b>fallacies of logos<\/b>. <b>Fallacies of pathos<\/b> rely excessively upon emotional appeals, attaching positive associations to the author\u2019s argument and negative ones to his opponent\u2019s position.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"p2\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>Conclusion<\/b><\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\">Both formal and informal fallacies are errors of reasoning, and if a speaker or writer relies on such fallacies, even unintentionally, she undercuts her argument. For example, if someone defines a key term in her argument in an ambiguous, vague, or circular way, her argument will appear very weak to an critical\u00a0audience.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">In addition, when listeners or readers spot questionable reasoning or unfair attempts at audience manipulation, more than their evaluation of the author\u2019s argument (<i>logos<\/i>) may be compromised. Their evaluation of the credibility of the speaker (<i>ethos<\/i>), and perhaps their ability to connect with that speaker on the level of shared values (<i>pathos<\/i>), also may be compromised. At the very least, the presence of fallacies will suggest to an audience that the speaker or writer lacks argumentative skill.<\/span><\/p>\n\n\t\t\t <section class=\"citations-section\" role=\"contentinfo\">\n\t\t\t <h3>Candela Citations<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t <div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t <div id=\"citation-list-250\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <div class=\"licensing\"><div class=\"license-attribution-dropdown-subheading\">CC licensed content, Original<\/div><ul class=\"citation-list\"><li>Revision and Adaptation. <strong>Provided by<\/strong>: Lumen Learning. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"license\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/\">CC BY: Attribution<\/a><\/em><\/li><\/ul><div class=\"license-attribution-dropdown-subheading\">CC licensed content, Shared previously<\/div><ul class=\"citation-list\"><li>Image of underwater abstract. <strong>Authored by<\/strong>: Laura Thorne. <strong>Located at<\/strong>: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/flic.kr\/p\/fqt6T\">https:\/\/flic.kr\/p\/fqt6T<\/a>. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"license\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-ND: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives <\/a><\/em><\/li><\/ul><div class=\"license-attribution-dropdown-subheading\">Public domain content<\/div><ul class=\"citation-list\"><li>The Logical Structure of Arguments. <strong>Provided by<\/strong>: Radford University. <strong>Located at<\/strong>: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/lcubbison.pressbooks.com\/chapter\/core-201-analyzing-arguments\/\">http:\/\/lcubbison.pressbooks.com\/chapter\/core-201-analyzing-arguments\/<\/a>. <strong>Project<\/strong>: Core Curriculum Handbook. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"license\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/about\/pdm\">Public Domain: No Known Copyright<\/a><\/em><\/li><\/ul><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t <\/section>","protected":false},"author":19,"menu_order":1,"template":"","meta":{"_candela_citation":"[{\"type\":\"pd\",\"description\":\"The Logical Structure of Arguments\",\"author\":\"\",\"organization\":\"Radford University\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/lcubbison.pressbooks.com\/chapter\/core-201-analyzing-arguments\/\",\"project\":\"Core Curriculum Handbook\",\"license\":\"pd\",\"license_terms\":\"\"},{\"type\":\"cc\",\"description\":\"Image of underwater abstract\",\"author\":\"Laura Thorne\",\"organization\":\"\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/flic.kr\/p\/fqt6T\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"cc-by-nc-nd\",\"license_terms\":\"\"},{\"type\":\"original\",\"description\":\"Revision and Adaptation\",\"author\":\"\",\"organization\":\"Lumen Learning\",\"url\":\"\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"cc-by\",\"license_terms\":\"\"}]","CANDELA_OUTCOMES_GUID":"","pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-250","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry"],"part":1839,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-corningcc-engcomp1wmopen-1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/250","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-corningcc-engcomp1wmopen-1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-corningcc-engcomp1wmopen-1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-corningcc-engcomp1wmopen-1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/19"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-corningcc-engcomp1wmopen-1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/250\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1716,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-corningcc-engcomp1wmopen-1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/250\/revisions\/1716"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-corningcc-engcomp1wmopen-1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/1839"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-corningcc-engcomp1wmopen-1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/250\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-corningcc-engcomp1wmopen-1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=250"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-corningcc-engcomp1wmopen-1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=250"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-corningcc-engcomp1wmopen-1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=250"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-corningcc-engcomp1wmopen-1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=250"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}