{"id":483,"date":"2020-01-07T19:53:29","date_gmt":"2020-01-07T19:53:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-esc-westernciv-humandevelopment\/chapter\/m6-discussion-6-1-beyond-darwin-eugenics-social-darwinism-and-the-social-theory-of-the-natural-selection-of-humans\/"},"modified":"2020-01-14T18:25:30","modified_gmt":"2020-01-14T18:25:30","slug":"m6-discussion-6-1-beyond-darwin-eugenics-social-darwinism-and-the-social-theory-of-the-natural-selection-of-humans","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-esc-westernciv-humandevelopment\/chapter\/m6-discussion-6-1-beyond-darwin-eugenics-social-darwinism-and-the-social-theory-of-the-natural-selection-of-humans\/","title":{"raw":"M6 - Discussion 1: Beyond Darwin: Eugenics, Social Darwinism, and the Social Theory of the Natural Selection of Humans","rendered":"M6 – Discussion 1: Beyond Darwin: Eugenics, Social Darwinism, and the Social Theory of the Natural Selection of Humans"},"content":{"raw":"
\r\n

Galton, Spencer and other 19th century thinkers believed that the new discoveries about evolution and genetics could be used in the service of social progress<\/em>. Over the following century, however, these ideas in the form of eugenics and \"Social Darwinism\" became associated with widespread human rights abuses and genocide during World War II. Does this mean that the original ideas upon which these perspectives were based were somehow flawed? How else can we account for these disastrous consequences? For ideas about this topic, you can start with the following link:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Beyond Darwin: Eugenics, Social Darwinism, and the Social Theory of the Natural Selection of Humans <\/span><\/a>http:\/\/blogs.britannica.com\/2009\/02\/beyond-darwin-eugenics-social-darwinism-and-the-social-theory-of-the-natural-selection-of-humans\/<\/span><\/a><\/p>\r\n

Many others are available as well. Be sure to cite your sources.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>","rendered":"

\n

Galton, Spencer and other 19th century thinkers believed that the new discoveries about evolution and genetics could be used in the service of social progress<\/em>. Over the following century, however, these ideas in the form of eugenics and “Social Darwinism” became associated with widespread human rights abuses and genocide during World War II. Does this mean that the original ideas upon which these perspectives were based were somehow flawed? How else can we account for these disastrous consequences? For ideas about this topic, you can start with the following link:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Beyond Darwin: Eugenics, Social Darwinism, and the Social Theory of the Natural Selection of Humans <\/span><\/a>http:\/\/blogs.britannica.com\/2009\/02\/beyond-darwin-eugenics-social-darwinism-and-the-social-theory-of-the-natural-selection-of-humans\/<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

Many others are available as well. Be sure to cite your sources.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t

Candela Citations<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
CC licensed content, Original<\/div>