{"id":103,"date":"2014-11-10T18:57:54","date_gmt":"2014-11-10T18:57:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/courses.candelalearning.com\/englishcomp1kaleidoscoperevisedmaster\/?post_type=chapter&#038;p=103"},"modified":"2019-08-23T16:57:56","modified_gmt":"2019-08-23T16:57:56","slug":"argument-essay-writing-prompt","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-fmcc-englishcomp-1\/chapter\/argument-essay-writing-prompt\/","title":{"raw":"Argument Essay Materials","rendered":"Argument Essay Materials"},"content":{"raw":"<h2>Argument Essay Prompt<\/h2>\r\nIn this assignment choose a specific issue in which two credible parties have documented the following:\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li>Clearly opposing positions, and<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Clear agendas.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\nChoose the position you agree with and argue that position using:\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li>Three separate lines of reasoning to support your position<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Research to support each line of reasoning (example, testimony, and fact\/data, or any combination) that supports your position<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Research about the opposing position's views<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Presentation of the opposing views, along with lines of reasoning to refute them<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<h3>Essay Requirements<\/h3>\r\nThis assignment requires an \u201cissue statement\u201d (refer to the ANNOTATED Student Sample for further explanation about issue statements).\r\n\r\nThis assignment requires a two-part thesis:\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li>Statement of position; and<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Forecast (essentially a \"preview\") of your lines of reasoning<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\nThe assignment also requires:\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li>A\u00a0minimum of three credible outside sources formatted on a source page (MLA, Works Cited)<\/li>\r\n\t<li>MLA citation style for the paper<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Minimum of four (4) FULL pages <span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">not including<\/span> the Works Cited page<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<h3>Writing Tip #1<\/h3>\r\nThis Argument Essay is a Classical Argument Essay aimed at both arguing the author's thesis and refuting the opponent's thesis. It is NOT a Persuasive Essay, where the purpose is to pursuade without necessarily arguing against an opposing perspective. The difference is that an argument essay tries both to persuade and refute against an opposing view.\r\n\r\nWith this in mind, you should not choose a generic issue that has no credible opposing view - like \u201cenergy conservation\u201d - for a Classical Argument essay. One can try to write a persuasive essay that makes an appeal to a reader to conserve energy. But unless you can find a credible opponent with an active agenda opposing your appeal (\u201cWe should NOT conserve energy\u201d), then you cannot write a Classical Argument essay.\r\n<h3>Writing Tip #2<\/h3>\r\nIt can be helpful to look into current legislation under debate everywhere from your city council, state legislature or even at the federal level. But be careful with large issues. Students often like to take them on, but they can be too unwieldy for a short assignment like this.\r\n<h3>Writing Your Argument Essay<\/h3>\r\nTo get started writing your essay:\r\n<ol>\r\n\t<li>Review \"What Is An Essay?\"<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Take time to review possible subjects.<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Use prewriting to help you narrow your topic.<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\nRemember that \"story starters\" are everywhere.\u00a0Think about issues that come up in status updates or \"likes\" on social media. What issues are being debated in student forums on your campus? What are the headlines in the college paper? Your local television news or newspaper website?\u00a0Your topic may be closer than you think!\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<h2>Outline<\/h2>\r\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\"><strong>ATTENTION: For this assignment you are <span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">not required<\/span> to write a complete draft of your Argument Essay. Instead, you are to select a topic for your Argument Essay and write a detailed outline of your essay based on the model below.<\/strong><\/div>\r\n<h3>Argument Essay Outline<\/h3>\r\n<table style=\"height: 177px\" width=\"812\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>1) Issue statement<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>2) Two-part thesis (assertion\u00a0plus\u00a0forecast)<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>3) Opponent\u2019s first claim\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li>One sentence summary of opponent\u2019s source support<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>4) Opponent\u2019s second claim\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li>One sentence summary of opponent\u2019s source support<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>5) Your first claim with \u201ckeyword\u201d\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li>One sentence summary of your source support #1<\/li>\r\n\t<li>One sentence summary of your source support #2<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>6) Your second claim with \u201ckeyword\u201d\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li>One sentence summary of your source support #1<\/li>\r\n\t<li>One sentence summary of your source support #2<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>7) Your third claim with \u201ckeyword\u201d\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li>One sentence summary of your source support #1<\/li>\r\n\t<li>One sentence summary of your source support #2<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>8) Conclusion: Summation of arguments and why should we care? What\u2019s at stake?<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\"><strong>Please Note<\/strong>: a \"one sentence summary\" is the same thing as the first sentence in a normal summary, i.e., author, title, source, and \"main point\" of the source.<\/div>\r\nPapers submitted that do not meet the requirements will be returned to you ungraded.\r\n<h3>Assignment Checklist<\/h3>\r\nBe sure to:\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li>Choose a specific issue in which two credible parties have documented clearly opposing positions and clear agendas<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Choose the position you agree with and argue that position using the following:\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li>Three separate lines of reasoning;<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Each line of reasoning will support your position with research (example, testimony, and fact\/data, or any combination) that supports your position; and<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Research about the opposing position's views<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Present the opposing views and refute them.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Include a two-part thesis with:\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li>Statement of position; and<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Forecast of your lines of reasoning<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Develop an enticing title that implies your position.<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Use a sympathetic appeal and\/or cited research in the introduction to establish the issue.<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Avoid addressing the assignment directly. (Don't write \"I am going to argue about...\" Instead, introduce the issue in a more compelling way that makes the reader care.)<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Your voice should be professional and scholarly.<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Package your source material with appropriate signaling and commentary.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n5. Submit your detailed outline\u00a0as a single file upload.\r\n<div><\/div>\r\n<h4>Grading Rubric: Argument\u00a0Essay Outline<\/h4>\r\n<table style=\"height: 127px\" width=\"818\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td><strong>Criteria<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<td><strong>Ratings<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<td><strong>Point Total:\u00a050<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>Ideas<\/td>\r\n<td>\n\n15\u00a0pts:\u00a0The outline\u00a0demonstrates outstanding idea development.\r\n\r\n12\u00a0pts:\u00a0The outline\u00a0demonstrates above average idea development.\r\n\r\n11 pts: The writer sufficiently defines the topic, even though development is still basic or general.\r\n\r\n9 pts: The outline\u00a0has an idea that needs to be developed.\r\n\r\n0 pts: There is no coherent idea.<\/td>\r\n<td>15\u00a0pts<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>Content<\/td>\r\n<td>\n\n15 pts:\u00a0The outline\u00a0demonstrates outstanding evidence of supporting the main point.\r\n\r\n12\u00a0pts:\u00a0The outline\u00a0demonstrates above average\u00a0evidence of supporting the main point.\r\n\r\n11 pts: The outline\u00a0demonstrates sufficient support of the main point.\r\n\r\n9 pts: The outline\u00a0requires more supporting evidence of the main point.\r\n\r\n0 pts: There is little content supporting the main idea.<\/td>\r\n<td>15 pts<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>Organization<\/td>\r\n<td>\n\n15 pts:\u00a0The organization is outstanding and showcases the central theme. The presentation of information is compelling.\r\n\r\n13 pts:\u00a0The organizational structure is above average.\r\n\r\n10 pts: The organizational structure is strong enough to move the reader through the text without too much confusion.\r\n\r\n8 pts: The writing needs a clearer sense of direction. The internal structure is weak.\r\n\r\n0 pts: The organization is poor.<\/td>\r\n<td>15 pts<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>Word Choice, Sentence Fluency, Conventions<\/td>\r\n<td>\n\n5\u00a0pts:\u00a0The writer demonstrates an outstanding word choice selection, flow and cadence, with well-built sentences and strong grasp of standard writing conventions.\r\n\r\n3\u00a0pts:\u00a0The writer demonstrates above average\u00a0word choice selection, flow and cadence, with well-built sentences and strong grasp of standard writing conventions.\r\n\r\n2 pts: The writer demonstrates sufficient selection of words. The text tends to be more mechanical and contains\u00a0some errors of standard writing conventions.\r\n\r\n1 pts: The writer demonstrates a limited vocabulary and lack of fluidity. Errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, usage and grammar repeatedly distract the reader and make the text difficult to read.\r\n\r\n0 pts: No marks.<\/td>\r\n<td>5\u00a0pts<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<h2>Draft<\/h2>\r\nFor this assignment, you will work through the drafting stage of your writing process in an argument essay.\r\n\r\n<em><strong>Directions:<\/strong><\/em>\r\n\r\n1. Review the\u00a0grading rubric as listed on this page.\r\n\r\n2. Review the instructions and writing tips on the \u201cArgument Essay: Writing Prompt\u201d\u00a0page.\r\n\r\n3.\u00a0Review the Argument Essay Outline you submitted along with feedback you received from that assignment. Make adjustments to the outline in accordance with the feedback. This may include strengthening lines of reasoning, expanding or improving research sources for supporting evidence, creating a more sympathetic introduction to your position, etc.\r\n\r\n4. Develop a complete draft of your essay using your improved Argument Essay Outline. It should meet the following requirements:\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li>A two-part thesis including statement of position; and forecast of your lines of reasoning<\/li>\r\n\t<li>A\u00a0minimum of three credible outside sources formatted on a source page (MLA, Works Cited)<\/li>\r\n\t<li>MLA citation style for the paper<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Minimum of four (4) FULL pages not including the Works Cited page<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p class=\"indent\">*Papers submitted that do not meet the requirements will be returned to you ungraded.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h3>Assignment Checklist<\/h3>\r\nBe sure to:\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li>Choose a specific issue in which two credible parties have documented clearly opposing positions and clear agendas<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Choose the position you agree with and argue that position using the following:\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li>Three separate lines of reasoning;<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Each line of reasoning will support your position with research (example, testimony, and fact\/data, or any combination) that supports your position; and<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Research about the opposing position's views<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Present the opposing views and refute them.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Include a two-part thesis with:\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li>Statement of position; and<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Forecast of your lines of reasoning<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Develop an enticing title that implies your position.<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Use a sympathetic appeal and\/or cited research in the introduction to establish the issue.<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Avoid addressing the assignment directly. (Don't write \"I am going to argue about...\" Instead, introduce the issue in a more compelling way that makes the reader care.)<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Your voice should be professional and scholarly.<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Package your source material with appropriate signaling and commentary.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n5. Submit your detailed outline\u00a0as a single file upload.\r\n<div><\/div>\r\n<h4>Grading Rubric: Argument\u00a0Essay Draft<\/h4>\r\n<table style=\"height: 127px\" width=\"818\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td><strong>Criteria<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<td><strong>Ratings<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<td><strong>Point Total:\u00a050<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>Ideas<\/td>\r\n<td>\n\n15\u00a0pts:\u00a0The paper demonstrates outstanding idea development.\r\n\r\n12\u00a0pts:\u00a0The paper demonstrates above average idea development.\r\n\r\n11 pts: The writer sufficiently defines the topic, even though development is still basic or general.\r\n\r\n9 pts: The paper has an idea that needs to be developed.\r\n\r\n0 pts: There is no coherent idea.<\/td>\r\n<td>15\u00a0pts<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>Content<\/td>\r\n<td>\n\n15 pts:\u00a0The\u00a0paper demonstrates outstanding evidence of supporting the main point.\r\n\r\n12\u00a0pts:\u00a0The paper demonstrates above average\u00a0evidence of supporting the main point.\r\n\r\n11 pts: The paper demonstrates sufficient support of the main point.\r\n\r\n9 pts: The paper requires more supporting evidence of the main point.\r\n\r\n0 pts: There is little content supporting the main idea.<\/td>\r\n<td>15 pts<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>Organization<\/td>\r\n<td>\n\n15 pts:\u00a0The organization is outstanding and showcases the central theme. The presentation of information is compelling.\r\n\r\n13 pts:\u00a0The organizational structure is above average.\r\n\r\n10 pts: The organizational structure is strong enough to move the reader through the text without too much confusion.\r\n\r\n8 pts: The writing needs a clearer sense of direction. The internal structure is weak.\r\n\r\n0 pts: The organization is poor.<\/td>\r\n<td>15 pts<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>Word Choice, Sentence Fluency, Conventions<\/td>\r\n<td>\n\n5\u00a0pts:\u00a0The writer demonstrates an outstanding word choice selection, flow and cadence, with well-built sentences and strong grasp of standard writing conventions.\r\n\r\n3\u00a0pts:\u00a0The writer demonstrates above average\u00a0word choice selection, flow and cadence, with well-built sentences and strong grasp of standard writing conventions.\r\n\r\n2 pts: The writer demonstrates sufficient selection of words. The text tends to be more mechanical and contains\u00a0some errors of standard writing conventions.\r\n\r\n1 pts: The writer demonstrates a limited vocabulary and lack of fluidity. Errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, usage and grammar repeatedly distract the reader and make the text difficult to read.\r\n\r\n0 pts: No marks.<\/td>\r\n<td>5\u00a0pts<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<h2>Writing Community Review<\/h2>\r\nFor this assignment, you will need to share your\u00a0Argument Essay with your writing community via the discussion. Then you will choose a peer's essay outline from your writing community and conduct a review.\r\n\r\n<em><strong>Directions:<\/strong><\/em>\r\n\r\n1. View the grading rubric for this assignment on this page.\r\n\r\nTo post your Argument Essay to the discussion:\r\n<ol>\r\n\t<li>Copy and paste your draft in a new Google Doc.\u00a0If you aren\u2019t familiar with Google Docs, try this\u00a0<a class=\"external\" href=\"https:\/\/support.google.com\/drive\/bin\/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=143206&amp;topic=21008&amp;rd=1\" target=\"_blank\">resource by Google<\/a>\u00a0to assist you.<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Title the Google Doc with your first initial, last name, and Argument Essay Outline, example: RSmith Argument Essay Outline<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Set the share and edit permissions of the Google Doc to \"Anyone with the link.\"<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Copy and paste the URL address of the Google Doc into a new discussion post.<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\nTo review a peer's Argument Essay in your writing community:\r\n<ol>\r\n\t<li>Select the URL address of the peer's essay from the discussion you want to review.<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Develop your response to your peer's writing by focusing on each of these talking points:<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<ul>\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li>What makes the essay memorable? What did you like best?<\/li>\r\n\t<li>What makes the topic important to the writer? What makes it compelling to the reader?<\/li>\r\n\t<li>How did the writer structure the essay? Is there a beginning, middle, and end?<\/li>\r\n\t<li>How effective are the author's lines of reasoning arguing his or her position?<\/li>\r\n\t<li>What details may be missing and are needed for clarity? \u00a0Is there something that the writer implies but does not actually carry out in the\u00a0reasoning and discussion within the essay?<\/li>\r\n\t<li>How compelling is the supporting research and\/or evidence for the author's position? How might it be improved?<\/li>\r\n\t<li>How well does the author present and refute the opposing position's viewpoints (including supporting sources\/evidence)? How might this be improved?<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Is the essay focused at an appropriate level? Is the topic narrowed enough?<\/li>\r\n\t<li>What specific places in the essay did your peer succeed in describing a singular event or vivid, memorable details or experiences?<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Where might the essay need cuts, adds, or reorders?<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Using the\u00a0<a title=\"6+1 Traits Rubric\" href=\"http:\/\/educationnorthwest.org\/sites\/default\/files\/5-pointwriters-rubric.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">6+1 Traits Rubric<\/a>,\u00a0are there any weaknesses in the essay that stand out?<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Using the\u00a0Dartmouth Writing Program\u00a0\"<a title=\"Attending to Grammar: Dartmouth Institute for Writing and Rhetoric\" href=\"http:\/\/writing-speech.dartmouth.edu\/learning\/materials-first-year-writers\/attending-grammar\" target=\"_blank\">Attending to Grammar<\/a>\"\u00a0link,\u00a0do\u00a0you recognize a grammar problem with the essay? If so, where?<\/li>\r\n\t<li>What other supportive suggestions can you identify to improve the writing?<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n3. Copy and paste your response at the end of the peer's Argument Essay in their Google Doc.\r\n<h4><\/h4>\r\n<h4>Grading Rubric: Argument\u00a0Essay - Writing Community Review<\/h4>\r\n<table style=\"height: 127px\" width=\"818\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td><strong>Criteria<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<td><strong>Ratings<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<td><strong>Point Total: 10<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>\n\nStudent shares their essay with the class via\r\n\r\nGoogle Doc URL posted in the discussion<\/td>\r\n<td>\n\n1 pts: Full marks\r\n\r\n0 pts: No\u00a0marks<\/td>\r\n<td>\u00a01\u00a0pts<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>Student chooses a peer's essay to review<\/td>\r\n<td>\n\n1 pts: Full marks\r\n\r\n0 pts: No\u00a0marks<\/td>\r\n<td>1\u00a0pts<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>\n\nStudent addresses what makes the essay\r\n\r\nmemorable<\/td>\r\n<td>\n\n1 pts: Full marks\r\n\r\n0 pts: No\u00a0marks<\/td>\r\n<td>1\u00a0pts<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>Student addresses the theme or meaning of the\u00a0essay<\/td>\r\n<td>\n\n1\u00a0pts: Full marks\r\n\r\n0 pts: No\u00a0marks<\/td>\r\n<td>1\u00a0pts<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>Student addresses essay structure<\/td>\r\n<td>\n\n1\u00a0pts: Full marks\r\n\r\n0 pts: No\u00a0marks<\/td>\r\n<td>1\u00a0pts<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>Student addresses essay details to enhance clarity<\/td>\r\n<td>\n\n1\u00a0pts: Full marks\r\n\r\n0 pts: No\u00a0marks<\/td>\r\n<td>1\u00a0pts<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>\n\nStudent addresses supporting research and evidence\r\n\r\nprovided in essay<\/td>\r\n<td>\n\n1\u00a0pts: Full marks\r\n\r\n0 pts: No\u00a0marks<\/td>\r\n<td>1\u00a0pts<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>\n\nStudent addresses whether essay might need cuts,\r\n\r\nadds, reorders<\/td>\r\n<td>\n\n1\u00a0pts: Full marks\r\n\r\n0 pts: No\u00a0marks<\/td>\r\n<td>1\u00a0pts<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>Student applies 6+1 Writing Rubric and Grammar<\/td>\r\n<td>\n\n1\u00a0pts: Full marks\r\n\r\n0 pts: No\u00a0marks<\/td>\r\n<td>1\u00a0pts<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>\n\nStudent makes supportive suggestions for\r\n\r\nimproving the essay<\/td>\r\n<td>\n\n1\u00a0pts: Full marks\r\n\r\n0 pts: No\u00a0marks<\/td>\r\n<td>1\u00a0pts<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<h2>Argument Essay Final Draft<\/h2>\r\nFor this assignment, review the feedback posted from your writing community\u00a0in the prior assignment:\u00a0<em>Argument Essay: Writing Community Review.\u00a0<\/em>Work your way through the revising and proofreading stages of your writing process, and submit your final version.\r\n\r\n<em><strong>Directions:<\/strong><\/em>\r\n\r\n1. Review the\u00a0grading rubric as listed on this page.\r\n\r\n2. Review the feedback posted on your Google Doc from the\u00a0<em>Argument Essay: Writing Community Review.<\/em><a title=\"Narrative Essay: Prewriting and Draft\" href=\"https:\/\/lumen.instructure.com\/courses\/202941\/assignments\/2157747\">\r\n<\/a>\r\n\r\n3. Work through the revise stage of the writing process.\r\n\r\n4. Work through the proofread stage of the writing process.\r\n\r\n5. Create a final version of your Argument Essay according to the following:\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li>Minimum of 4 typed, double-spaced pages (about 800-950 words), Times New Roman, 12 pt font size (not including the Works Cited page)<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Minimum of 3 credible outside sources formatted on a source page (MLA, Works Cited)<\/li>\r\n\t<li>MLA formatting (see the \"Formatting Style for Paper\"\u00a0page as needed)<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Submitted as either a .doc, .docx, .rtf file<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n*Papers submitted that do not meet the requirements will be returned to you ungraded.\r\n\r\nBe sure to:\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li>Choose a specific issue in which two credible parties have documented clearly opposing positions, and clear agendas<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Choose the position you agree with and argue that position using\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li>Three separate lines of reasoning;<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Each line of reasoning will support your position with research (example, testimony, and fact\/data, or any combination) that supports your position; and<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Research the opponent\u2019s views<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Present the opponent's views and refute them.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Include a two-part thesis:\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li>Statement of position; and<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Forecast of your lines of reasoning<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Develop an enticing title that implies your position<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Use a \"sympathetic\" appeal and\/or cited research the introduction to establish the issue<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Avoid addressing the assignment directly (don't write \"I am going to write about...\" - this takes the fun out of reading the work!)<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Your voice should be professional and scholarly<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Package your source material with appropriate signaling and commentary<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n6. Submit your final version of your Argument Essay as a single file upload.\r\n<h4>Grading Rubric: Argument Essay - Final<\/h4>\r\n<table style=\"height: 127px\" width=\"818\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td><strong>Criteria<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<td><strong>Ratings<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<td><strong>Point Total:\u00a0100<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>Ideas<\/td>\r\n<td>\n\n30\u00a0pts:\u00a0The paper demonstrates outstanding idea development.\r\n\r\n24\u00a0pts:\u00a0The paper demonstrates above average idea development.\r\n\r\n22\u00a0pts: The writer sufficiently defines the topic, even though development is still basic or general.\r\n\r\n18\u00a0pts: The paper has an idea that needs to be developed.\r\n\r\n0 pts: There is no coherent idea.<\/td>\r\n<td>30\u00a0pts<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>Content<\/td>\r\n<td>\n\n30\u00a0pts:\u00a0The\u00a0paper demonstrates outstanding evidence of supporting the main point.\r\n\r\n24\u00a0pts:\u00a0The paper demonstrates above average\u00a0evidence of supporting the main point.\r\n\r\n22\u00a0pts: The paper demonstrates sufficient support of the main point.\r\n\r\n18\u00a0pts: The paper requires more supporting evidence of the main point.\r\n\r\n0 pts: There is little content supporting the main idea.<\/td>\r\n<td>30\u00a0pts<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>Organization<\/td>\r\n<td>\n\n30\u00a0pts:\u00a0The organization is outstanding and showcases the central theme. The presentation of information is compelling.\r\n\r\n26\u00a0pts:\u00a0The organizational structure is above average.\r\n\r\n20\u00a0pts: The organizational structure is strong enough to move the reader through the text without too much confusion.\r\n\r\n16\u00a0pts: The writing needs a clearer sense of direction. The internal structure is weak.\r\n\r\n0 pts: The organization is poor.<\/td>\r\n<td>30\u00a0pts<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>Word Choice, Sentence Fluency, Conventions<\/td>\r\n<td>\n\n10\u00a0pts:\u00a0The writer demonstrates an outstanding word choice selection, flow and cadence, with well-built sentences and strong grasp of standard writing conventions.\r\n\r\n6\u00a0pts:\u00a0The writer demonstrates above average\u00a0word choice selection, flow and cadence, with well-built sentences and strong grasp of standard writing conventions.\r\n\r\n4\u00a0pts: The writer demonstrates sufficient selection of words. The text tends to be more mechanical and contains\u00a0some errors of standard writing conventions.\r\n\r\n2\u00a0pts: The writer demonstrates a limited vocabulary and lack of fluidity. Errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, usage and grammar repeatedly distract the reader and make the text difficult to read.\r\n\r\n0 pts: No marks.<\/td>\r\n<td>10\u00a0pts<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<h2>Reflection<\/h2>\r\nNow that you have completed your Argument\u00a0Essay, take a few minutes to reflect on the experience and write about your process and what you learned. Write a reflection on your Argument\u00a0Essay writing experience using complete sentences.\r\n\r\n<em><strong>Directions:<\/strong><\/em>\r\n\r\n1. Review the\u00a0grading rubric as listed on this page.\r\n\r\n2. Consider the following questions.\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li>What was most the challenging aspect of creating this essay?<\/li>\r\n\t<li>What did you learn about yourself as a writer?<\/li>\r\n\t<li>What might you do differently\u00a0the next time you write this type of essay knowing what you know now after writing this essay?<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n3.\u00a0\u00a0Write your reflection on each question listed above, using complete sentences. Your final reflection assignment should fit the following guidelines:\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li>1-1.5 typed, double-spaced pages, 12 pt font size, Times New Roman;<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Submitted as either a .doc, .docx, .rtf file.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n4. Submit your reflections as a single file upload.\r\n<h4>Grading Rubric: Argument\u00a0Essay - Reflection<\/h4>\r\n<table style=\"height: 127px\" width=\"818\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td><strong>Criteria<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<td><strong>Ratings<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<td><strong>Point Total: 15<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>\n\nStudent writes a\u00a0thoughtful response to each question using complete sentences.\r\n\r\nAssignment adheres to formatting guidelines.<\/td>\r\n<td>\n\nFor each question:\r\n\r\n5\u00a0pts:\u00a0Full\u00a0marks\r\n\r\n0 pts: No\u00a0marks<\/td>\r\n<td>15\u00a0pts<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n&nbsp;","rendered":"<h2>Argument Essay Prompt<\/h2>\n<p>In this assignment choose a specific issue in which two credible parties have documented the following:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Clearly opposing positions, and<\/li>\n<li>Clear agendas.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Choose the position you agree with and argue that position using:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Three separate lines of reasoning to support your position<\/li>\n<li>Research to support each line of reasoning (example, testimony, and fact\/data, or any combination) that supports your position<\/li>\n<li>Research about the opposing position&#8217;s views<\/li>\n<li>Presentation of the opposing views, along with lines of reasoning to refute them<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Essay Requirements<\/h3>\n<p>This assignment requires an \u201cissue statement\u201d (refer to the ANNOTATED Student Sample for further explanation about issue statements).<\/p>\n<p>This assignment requires a two-part thesis:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Statement of position; and<\/li>\n<li>Forecast (essentially a &#8220;preview&#8221;) of your lines of reasoning<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The assignment also requires:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>A\u00a0minimum of three credible outside sources formatted on a source page (MLA, Works Cited)<\/li>\n<li>MLA citation style for the paper<\/li>\n<li>Minimum of four (4) FULL pages <span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">not including<\/span> the Works Cited page<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Writing Tip #1<\/h3>\n<p>This Argument Essay is a Classical Argument Essay aimed at both arguing the author&#8217;s thesis and refuting the opponent&#8217;s thesis. It is NOT a Persuasive Essay, where the purpose is to pursuade without necessarily arguing against an opposing perspective. The difference is that an argument essay tries both to persuade and refute against an opposing view.<\/p>\n<p>With this in mind, you should not choose a generic issue that has no credible opposing view &#8211; like \u201cenergy conservation\u201d &#8211; for a Classical Argument essay. One can try to write a persuasive essay that makes an appeal to a reader to conserve energy. But unless you can find a credible opponent with an active agenda opposing your appeal (\u201cWe should NOT conserve energy\u201d), then you cannot write a Classical Argument essay.<\/p>\n<h3>Writing Tip #2<\/h3>\n<p>It can be helpful to look into current legislation under debate everywhere from your city council, state legislature or even at the federal level. But be careful with large issues. Students often like to take them on, but they can be too unwieldy for a short assignment like this.<\/p>\n<h3>Writing Your Argument Essay<\/h3>\n<p>To get started writing your essay:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Review &#8220;What Is An Essay?&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>Take time to review possible subjects.<\/li>\n<li>Use prewriting to help you narrow your topic.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Remember that &#8220;story starters&#8221; are everywhere.\u00a0Think about issues that come up in status updates or &#8220;likes&#8221; on social media. What issues are being debated in student forums on your campus? What are the headlines in the college paper? Your local television news or newspaper website?\u00a0Your topic may be closer than you think!<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2>Outline<\/h2>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\"><strong>ATTENTION: For this assignment you are <span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">not required<\/span> to write a complete draft of your Argument Essay. Instead, you are to select a topic for your Argument Essay and write a detailed outline of your essay based on the model below.<\/strong><\/div>\n<h3>Argument Essay Outline<\/h3>\n<table style=\"height: 177px; width: 812px;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>1) Issue statement<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2) Two-part thesis (assertion\u00a0plus\u00a0forecast)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>3) Opponent\u2019s first claim<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>One sentence summary of opponent\u2019s source support<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>4) Opponent\u2019s second claim<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>One sentence summary of opponent\u2019s source support<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>5) Your first claim with \u201ckeyword\u201d<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>One sentence summary of your source support #1<\/li>\n<li>One sentence summary of your source support #2<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>6) Your second claim with \u201ckeyword\u201d<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>One sentence summary of your source support #1<\/li>\n<li>One sentence summary of your source support #2<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>7) Your third claim with \u201ckeyword\u201d<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>One sentence summary of your source support #1<\/li>\n<li>One sentence summary of your source support #2<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>8) Conclusion: Summation of arguments and why should we care? What\u2019s at stake?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\"><strong>Please Note<\/strong>: a &#8220;one sentence summary&#8221; is the same thing as the first sentence in a normal summary, i.e., author, title, source, and &#8220;main point&#8221; of the source.<\/div>\n<p>Papers submitted that do not meet the requirements will be returned to you ungraded.<\/p>\n<h3>Assignment Checklist<\/h3>\n<p>Be sure to:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Choose a specific issue in which two credible parties have documented clearly opposing positions and clear agendas<\/li>\n<li>Choose the position you agree with and argue that position using the following:\n<ul>\n<li>Three separate lines of reasoning;<\/li>\n<li>Each line of reasoning will support your position with research (example, testimony, and fact\/data, or any combination) that supports your position; and<\/li>\n<li>Research about the opposing position&#8217;s views<\/li>\n<li>Present the opposing views and refute them.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>Include a two-part thesis with:\n<ul>\n<li>Statement of position; and<\/li>\n<li>Forecast of your lines of reasoning<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>Develop an enticing title that implies your position.<\/li>\n<li>Use a sympathetic appeal and\/or cited research in the introduction to establish the issue.<\/li>\n<li>Avoid addressing the assignment directly. (Don&#8217;t write &#8220;I am going to argue about&#8230;&#8221; Instead, introduce the issue in a more compelling way that makes the reader care.)<\/li>\n<li>Your voice should be professional and scholarly.<\/li>\n<li>Package your source material with appropriate signaling and commentary.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>5. Submit your detailed outline\u00a0as a single file upload.<\/p>\n<div><\/div>\n<h4>Grading Rubric: Argument\u00a0Essay Outline<\/h4>\n<table style=\"height: 127px; width: 818px;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Criteria<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>Ratings<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>Point Total:\u00a050<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Ideas<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>15\u00a0pts:\u00a0The outline\u00a0demonstrates outstanding idea development.<\/p>\n<p>12\u00a0pts:\u00a0The outline\u00a0demonstrates above average idea development.<\/p>\n<p>11 pts: The writer sufficiently defines the topic, even though development is still basic or general.<\/p>\n<p>9 pts: The outline\u00a0has an idea that needs to be developed.<\/p>\n<p>0 pts: There is no coherent idea.<\/td>\n<td>15\u00a0pts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Content<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>15 pts:\u00a0The outline\u00a0demonstrates outstanding evidence of supporting the main point.<\/p>\n<p>12\u00a0pts:\u00a0The outline\u00a0demonstrates above average\u00a0evidence of supporting the main point.<\/p>\n<p>11 pts: The outline\u00a0demonstrates sufficient support of the main point.<\/p>\n<p>9 pts: The outline\u00a0requires more supporting evidence of the main point.<\/p>\n<p>0 pts: There is little content supporting the main idea.<\/td>\n<td>15 pts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Organization<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>15 pts:\u00a0The organization is outstanding and showcases the central theme. The presentation of information is compelling.<\/p>\n<p>13 pts:\u00a0The organizational structure is above average.<\/p>\n<p>10 pts: The organizational structure is strong enough to move the reader through the text without too much confusion.<\/p>\n<p>8 pts: The writing needs a clearer sense of direction. The internal structure is weak.<\/p>\n<p>0 pts: The organization is poor.<\/td>\n<td>15 pts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Word Choice, Sentence Fluency, Conventions<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>5\u00a0pts:\u00a0The writer demonstrates an outstanding word choice selection, flow and cadence, with well-built sentences and strong grasp of standard writing conventions.<\/p>\n<p>3\u00a0pts:\u00a0The writer demonstrates above average\u00a0word choice selection, flow and cadence, with well-built sentences and strong grasp of standard writing conventions.<\/p>\n<p>2 pts: The writer demonstrates sufficient selection of words. The text tends to be more mechanical and contains\u00a0some errors of standard writing conventions.<\/p>\n<p>1 pts: The writer demonstrates a limited vocabulary and lack of fluidity. Errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, usage and grammar repeatedly distract the reader and make the text difficult to read.<\/p>\n<p>0 pts: No marks.<\/td>\n<td>5\u00a0pts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2>Draft<\/h2>\n<p>For this assignment, you will work through the drafting stage of your writing process in an argument essay.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Directions:<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>1. Review the\u00a0grading rubric as listed on this page.<\/p>\n<p>2. Review the instructions and writing tips on the \u201cArgument Essay: Writing Prompt\u201d\u00a0page.<\/p>\n<p>3.\u00a0Review the Argument Essay Outline you submitted along with feedback you received from that assignment. Make adjustments to the outline in accordance with the feedback. This may include strengthening lines of reasoning, expanding or improving research sources for supporting evidence, creating a more sympathetic introduction to your position, etc.<\/p>\n<p>4. Develop a complete draft of your essay using your improved Argument Essay Outline. It should meet the following requirements:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>A two-part thesis including statement of position; and forecast of your lines of reasoning<\/li>\n<li>A\u00a0minimum of three credible outside sources formatted on a source page (MLA, Works Cited)<\/li>\n<li>MLA citation style for the paper<\/li>\n<li>Minimum of four (4) FULL pages not including the Works Cited page<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"indent\">*Papers submitted that do not meet the requirements will be returned to you ungraded.<\/p>\n<h3>Assignment Checklist<\/h3>\n<p>Be sure to:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Choose a specific issue in which two credible parties have documented clearly opposing positions and clear agendas<\/li>\n<li>Choose the position you agree with and argue that position using the following:\n<ul>\n<li>Three separate lines of reasoning;<\/li>\n<li>Each line of reasoning will support your position with research (example, testimony, and fact\/data, or any combination) that supports your position; and<\/li>\n<li>Research about the opposing position&#8217;s views<\/li>\n<li>Present the opposing views and refute them.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>Include a two-part thesis with:\n<ul>\n<li>Statement of position; and<\/li>\n<li>Forecast of your lines of reasoning<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>Develop an enticing title that implies your position.<\/li>\n<li>Use a sympathetic appeal and\/or cited research in the introduction to establish the issue.<\/li>\n<li>Avoid addressing the assignment directly. (Don&#8217;t write &#8220;I am going to argue about&#8230;&#8221; Instead, introduce the issue in a more compelling way that makes the reader care.)<\/li>\n<li>Your voice should be professional and scholarly.<\/li>\n<li>Package your source material with appropriate signaling and commentary.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>5. Submit your detailed outline\u00a0as a single file upload.<\/p>\n<div><\/div>\n<h4>Grading Rubric: Argument\u00a0Essay Draft<\/h4>\n<table style=\"height: 127px; width: 818px;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Criteria<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>Ratings<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>Point Total:\u00a050<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Ideas<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>15\u00a0pts:\u00a0The paper demonstrates outstanding idea development.<\/p>\n<p>12\u00a0pts:\u00a0The paper demonstrates above average idea development.<\/p>\n<p>11 pts: The writer sufficiently defines the topic, even though development is still basic or general.<\/p>\n<p>9 pts: The paper has an idea that needs to be developed.<\/p>\n<p>0 pts: There is no coherent idea.<\/td>\n<td>15\u00a0pts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Content<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>15 pts:\u00a0The\u00a0paper demonstrates outstanding evidence of supporting the main point.<\/p>\n<p>12\u00a0pts:\u00a0The paper demonstrates above average\u00a0evidence of supporting the main point.<\/p>\n<p>11 pts: The paper demonstrates sufficient support of the main point.<\/p>\n<p>9 pts: The paper requires more supporting evidence of the main point.<\/p>\n<p>0 pts: There is little content supporting the main idea.<\/td>\n<td>15 pts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Organization<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>15 pts:\u00a0The organization is outstanding and showcases the central theme. The presentation of information is compelling.<\/p>\n<p>13 pts:\u00a0The organizational structure is above average.<\/p>\n<p>10 pts: The organizational structure is strong enough to move the reader through the text without too much confusion.<\/p>\n<p>8 pts: The writing needs a clearer sense of direction. The internal structure is weak.<\/p>\n<p>0 pts: The organization is poor.<\/td>\n<td>15 pts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Word Choice, Sentence Fluency, Conventions<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>5\u00a0pts:\u00a0The writer demonstrates an outstanding word choice selection, flow and cadence, with well-built sentences and strong grasp of standard writing conventions.<\/p>\n<p>3\u00a0pts:\u00a0The writer demonstrates above average\u00a0word choice selection, flow and cadence, with well-built sentences and strong grasp of standard writing conventions.<\/p>\n<p>2 pts: The writer demonstrates sufficient selection of words. The text tends to be more mechanical and contains\u00a0some errors of standard writing conventions.<\/p>\n<p>1 pts: The writer demonstrates a limited vocabulary and lack of fluidity. Errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, usage and grammar repeatedly distract the reader and make the text difficult to read.<\/p>\n<p>0 pts: No marks.<\/td>\n<td>5\u00a0pts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2>Writing Community Review<\/h2>\n<p>For this assignment, you will need to share your\u00a0Argument Essay with your writing community via the discussion. Then you will choose a peer&#8217;s essay outline from your writing community and conduct a review.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Directions:<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>1. View the grading rubric for this assignment on this page.<\/p>\n<p>To post your Argument Essay to the discussion:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Copy and paste your draft in a new Google Doc.\u00a0If you aren\u2019t familiar with Google Docs, try this\u00a0<a class=\"external\" href=\"https:\/\/support.google.com\/drive\/bin\/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=143206&amp;topic=21008&amp;rd=1\" target=\"_blank\">resource by Google<\/a>\u00a0to assist you.<\/li>\n<li>Title the Google Doc with your first initial, last name, and Argument Essay Outline, example: RSmith Argument Essay Outline<\/li>\n<li>Set the share and edit permissions of the Google Doc to &#8220;Anyone with the link.&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>Copy and paste the URL address of the Google Doc into a new discussion post.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>To review a peer&#8217;s Argument Essay in your writing community:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Select the URL address of the peer&#8217;s essay from the discussion you want to review.<\/li>\n<li>Develop your response to your peer&#8217;s writing by focusing on each of these talking points:<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<ul>\n<li>What makes the essay memorable? What did you like best?<\/li>\n<li>What makes the topic important to the writer? What makes it compelling to the reader?<\/li>\n<li>How did the writer structure the essay? Is there a beginning, middle, and end?<\/li>\n<li>How effective are the author&#8217;s lines of reasoning arguing his or her position?<\/li>\n<li>What details may be missing and are needed for clarity? \u00a0Is there something that the writer implies but does not actually carry out in the\u00a0reasoning and discussion within the essay?<\/li>\n<li>How compelling is the supporting research and\/or evidence for the author&#8217;s position? How might it be improved?<\/li>\n<li>How well does the author present and refute the opposing position&#8217;s viewpoints (including supporting sources\/evidence)? How might this be improved?<\/li>\n<li>Is the essay focused at an appropriate level? Is the topic narrowed enough?<\/li>\n<li>What specific places in the essay did your peer succeed in describing a singular event or vivid, memorable details or experiences?<\/li>\n<li>Where might the essay need cuts, adds, or reorders?<\/li>\n<li>Using the\u00a0<a title=\"6+1 Traits Rubric\" href=\"http:\/\/educationnorthwest.org\/sites\/default\/files\/5-pointwriters-rubric.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">6+1 Traits Rubric<\/a>,\u00a0are there any weaknesses in the essay that stand out?<\/li>\n<li>Using the\u00a0Dartmouth Writing Program\u00a0&#8220;<a title=\"Attending to Grammar: Dartmouth Institute for Writing and Rhetoric\" href=\"http:\/\/writing-speech.dartmouth.edu\/learning\/materials-first-year-writers\/attending-grammar\" target=\"_blank\">Attending to Grammar<\/a>&#8221;\u00a0link,\u00a0do\u00a0you recognize a grammar problem with the essay? If so, where?<\/li>\n<li>What other supportive suggestions can you identify to improve the writing?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>3. Copy and paste your response at the end of the peer&#8217;s Argument Essay in their Google Doc.<\/p>\n<h4><\/h4>\n<h4>Grading Rubric: Argument\u00a0Essay &#8211; Writing Community Review<\/h4>\n<table style=\"height: 127px; width: 818px;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Criteria<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>Ratings<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>Point Total: 10<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\n<p>Student shares their essay with the class via<\/p>\n<p>Google Doc URL posted in the discussion<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>1 pts: Full marks<\/p>\n<p>0 pts: No\u00a0marks<\/td>\n<td>\u00a01\u00a0pts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Student chooses a peer&#8217;s essay to review<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>1 pts: Full marks<\/p>\n<p>0 pts: No\u00a0marks<\/td>\n<td>1\u00a0pts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\n<p>Student addresses what makes the essay<\/p>\n<p>memorable<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>1 pts: Full marks<\/p>\n<p>0 pts: No\u00a0marks<\/td>\n<td>1\u00a0pts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Student addresses the theme or meaning of the\u00a0essay<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>1\u00a0pts: Full marks<\/p>\n<p>0 pts: No\u00a0marks<\/td>\n<td>1\u00a0pts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Student addresses essay structure<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>1\u00a0pts: Full marks<\/p>\n<p>0 pts: No\u00a0marks<\/td>\n<td>1\u00a0pts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Student addresses essay details to enhance clarity<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>1\u00a0pts: Full marks<\/p>\n<p>0 pts: No\u00a0marks<\/td>\n<td>1\u00a0pts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\n<p>Student addresses supporting research and evidence<\/p>\n<p>provided in essay<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>1\u00a0pts: Full marks<\/p>\n<p>0 pts: No\u00a0marks<\/td>\n<td>1\u00a0pts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\n<p>Student addresses whether essay might need cuts,<\/p>\n<p>adds, reorders<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>1\u00a0pts: Full marks<\/p>\n<p>0 pts: No\u00a0marks<\/td>\n<td>1\u00a0pts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Student applies 6+1 Writing Rubric and Grammar<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>1\u00a0pts: Full marks<\/p>\n<p>0 pts: No\u00a0marks<\/td>\n<td>1\u00a0pts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\n<p>Student makes supportive suggestions for<\/p>\n<p>improving the essay<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>1\u00a0pts: Full marks<\/p>\n<p>0 pts: No\u00a0marks<\/td>\n<td>1\u00a0pts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2>Argument Essay Final Draft<\/h2>\n<p>For this assignment, review the feedback posted from your writing community\u00a0in the prior assignment:\u00a0<em>Argument Essay: Writing Community Review.\u00a0<\/em>Work your way through the revising and proofreading stages of your writing process, and submit your final version.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Directions:<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>1. Review the\u00a0grading rubric as listed on this page.<\/p>\n<p>2. Review the feedback posted on your Google Doc from the\u00a0<em>Argument Essay: Writing Community Review.<\/em><a title=\"Narrative Essay: Prewriting and Draft\" href=\"https:\/\/lumen.instructure.com\/courses\/202941\/assignments\/2157747\"><br \/>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<p>3. Work through the revise stage of the writing process.<\/p>\n<p>4. Work through the proofread stage of the writing process.<\/p>\n<p>5. Create a final version of your Argument Essay according to the following:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Minimum of 4 typed, double-spaced pages (about 800-950 words), Times New Roman, 12 pt font size (not including the Works Cited page)<\/li>\n<li>Minimum of 3 credible outside sources formatted on a source page (MLA, Works Cited)<\/li>\n<li>MLA formatting (see the &#8220;Formatting Style for Paper&#8221;\u00a0page as needed)<\/li>\n<li>Submitted as either a .doc, .docx, .rtf file<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>*Papers submitted that do not meet the requirements will be returned to you ungraded.<\/p>\n<p>Be sure to:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Choose a specific issue in which two credible parties have documented clearly opposing positions, and clear agendas<\/li>\n<li>Choose the position you agree with and argue that position using\n<ul>\n<li>Three separate lines of reasoning;<\/li>\n<li>Each line of reasoning will support your position with research (example, testimony, and fact\/data, or any combination) that supports your position; and<\/li>\n<li>Research the opponent\u2019s views<\/li>\n<li>Present the opponent&#8217;s views and refute them.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>Include a two-part thesis:\n<ul>\n<li>Statement of position; and<\/li>\n<li>Forecast of your lines of reasoning<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>Develop an enticing title that implies your position<\/li>\n<li>Use a &#8220;sympathetic&#8221; appeal and\/or cited research the introduction to establish the issue<\/li>\n<li>Avoid addressing the assignment directly (don&#8217;t write &#8220;I am going to write about&#8230;&#8221; &#8211; this takes the fun out of reading the work!)<\/li>\n<li>Your voice should be professional and scholarly<\/li>\n<li>Package your source material with appropriate signaling and commentary<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>6. Submit your final version of your Argument Essay as a single file upload.<\/p>\n<h4>Grading Rubric: Argument Essay &#8211; Final<\/h4>\n<table style=\"height: 127px; width: 818px;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Criteria<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>Ratings<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>Point Total:\u00a0100<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Ideas<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>30\u00a0pts:\u00a0The paper demonstrates outstanding idea development.<\/p>\n<p>24\u00a0pts:\u00a0The paper demonstrates above average idea development.<\/p>\n<p>22\u00a0pts: The writer sufficiently defines the topic, even though development is still basic or general.<\/p>\n<p>18\u00a0pts: The paper has an idea that needs to be developed.<\/p>\n<p>0 pts: There is no coherent idea.<\/td>\n<td>30\u00a0pts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Content<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>30\u00a0pts:\u00a0The\u00a0paper demonstrates outstanding evidence of supporting the main point.<\/p>\n<p>24\u00a0pts:\u00a0The paper demonstrates above average\u00a0evidence of supporting the main point.<\/p>\n<p>22\u00a0pts: The paper demonstrates sufficient support of the main point.<\/p>\n<p>18\u00a0pts: The paper requires more supporting evidence of the main point.<\/p>\n<p>0 pts: There is little content supporting the main idea.<\/td>\n<td>30\u00a0pts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Organization<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>30\u00a0pts:\u00a0The organization is outstanding and showcases the central theme. The presentation of information is compelling.<\/p>\n<p>26\u00a0pts:\u00a0The organizational structure is above average.<\/p>\n<p>20\u00a0pts: The organizational structure is strong enough to move the reader through the text without too much confusion.<\/p>\n<p>16\u00a0pts: The writing needs a clearer sense of direction. The internal structure is weak.<\/p>\n<p>0 pts: The organization is poor.<\/td>\n<td>30\u00a0pts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Word Choice, Sentence Fluency, Conventions<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>10\u00a0pts:\u00a0The writer demonstrates an outstanding word choice selection, flow and cadence, with well-built sentences and strong grasp of standard writing conventions.<\/p>\n<p>6\u00a0pts:\u00a0The writer demonstrates above average\u00a0word choice selection, flow and cadence, with well-built sentences and strong grasp of standard writing conventions.<\/p>\n<p>4\u00a0pts: The writer demonstrates sufficient selection of words. The text tends to be more mechanical and contains\u00a0some errors of standard writing conventions.<\/p>\n<p>2\u00a0pts: The writer demonstrates a limited vocabulary and lack of fluidity. Errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, usage and grammar repeatedly distract the reader and make the text difficult to read.<\/p>\n<p>0 pts: No marks.<\/td>\n<td>10\u00a0pts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2>Reflection<\/h2>\n<p>Now that you have completed your Argument\u00a0Essay, take a few minutes to reflect on the experience and write about your process and what you learned. Write a reflection on your Argument\u00a0Essay writing experience using complete sentences.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Directions:<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>1. Review the\u00a0grading rubric as listed on this page.<\/p>\n<p>2. Consider the following questions.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What was most the challenging aspect of creating this essay?<\/li>\n<li>What did you learn about yourself as a writer?<\/li>\n<li>What might you do differently\u00a0the next time you write this type of essay knowing what you know now after writing this essay?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>3.\u00a0\u00a0Write your reflection on each question listed above, using complete sentences. Your final reflection assignment should fit the following guidelines:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>1-1.5 typed, double-spaced pages, 12 pt font size, Times New Roman;<\/li>\n<li>Submitted as either a .doc, .docx, .rtf file.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>4. Submit your reflections as a single file upload.<\/p>\n<h4>Grading Rubric: Argument\u00a0Essay &#8211; Reflection<\/h4>\n<table style=\"height: 127px; width: 818px;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Criteria<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>Ratings<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>Point Total: 15<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\n<p>Student writes a\u00a0thoughtful response to each question using complete sentences.<\/p>\n<p>Assignment adheres to formatting guidelines.<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>For each question:<\/p>\n<p>5\u00a0pts:\u00a0Full\u00a0marks<\/p>\n<p>0 pts: No\u00a0marks<\/td>\n<td>15\u00a0pts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\t\t\t <section class=\"citations-section\" role=\"contentinfo\">\n\t\t\t <h3>Candela Citations<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t <div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t <div id=\"citation-list-103\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <div class=\"licensing\"><div class=\"license-attribution-dropdown-subheading\">CC licensed content, Original<\/div><ul class=\"citation-list\"><li><strong>Provided by<\/strong>: Lumen Learning. <strong>Located at<\/strong>: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/lumenlearning.com\/\">http:\/\/lumenlearning.com\/<\/a>. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"license\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/\">CC BY: Attribution<\/a><\/em><\/li><\/ul><div class=\"license-attribution-dropdown-subheading\">CC licensed content, Shared previously<\/div><ul class=\"citation-list\"><li><strong>Authored by<\/strong>: Daryl Smith O&#039; Hare and Susan C. Hines. <strong>Provided by<\/strong>: Chadron State College. <strong>Project<\/strong>: Kaleidoscope Open Course Initiative. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"license\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/\">CC BY: Attribution<\/a><\/em><\/li><li><strong>Authored by<\/strong>: Paul Powell. <strong>Provided by<\/strong>: Central Community College. <strong>Project<\/strong>: Kaleidoscope Open Course Initiative. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"license\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/\">CC BY: Attribution<\/a><\/em><\/li><\/ul><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t <\/section>","protected":false},"author":9,"menu_order":15,"template":"","meta":{"_candela_citation":"[{\"type\":\"original\",\"description\":\"\",\"author\":\"\",\"organization\":\"Lumen Learning\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/lumenlearning.com\/\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"cc-by\",\"license_terms\":\"\"},{\"type\":\"cc\",\"description\":\"\",\"author\":\"Daryl Smith O\\' Hare and Susan C. Hines\",\"organization\":\"Chadron State College\",\"url\":\"\",\"project\":\"Kaleidoscope Open Course Initiative\",\"license\":\"cc-by\",\"license_terms\":\"\"},{\"type\":\"cc\",\"description\":\"\",\"author\":\"Paul Powell\",\"organization\":\"Central Community College\",\"url\":\"\",\"project\":\"Kaleidoscope Open Course Initiative\",\"license\":\"cc-by\",\"license_terms\":\"\"}]","CANDELA_OUTCOMES_GUID":"","pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-103","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry"],"part":123,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-fmcc-englishcomp-1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/103","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-fmcc-englishcomp-1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-fmcc-englishcomp-1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-fmcc-englishcomp-1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-fmcc-englishcomp-1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/103\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":993,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-fmcc-englishcomp-1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/103\/revisions\/993"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-fmcc-englishcomp-1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/123"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-fmcc-englishcomp-1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/103\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-fmcc-englishcomp-1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=103"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-fmcc-englishcomp-1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=103"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-fmcc-englishcomp-1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=103"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-fmcc-englishcomp-1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=103"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}