{"id":357,"date":"2019-12-24T15:10:13","date_gmt":"2019-12-24T15:10:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-fmcc-philosophy1\/?post_type=chapter&#038;p=357"},"modified":"2026-01-08T12:18:02","modified_gmt":"2026-01-08T12:18:02","slug":"2-3-hellenistic-philosophy","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-fmcc-philosophy1\/chapter\/2-3-hellenistic-philosophy\/","title":{"raw":"1.5: Hellenistic and Roman Philosophy","rendered":"1.5: Hellenistic and Roman Philosophy"},"content":{"raw":"<span style=\"font-size: 1rem; text-align: initial;\">The Hellenistic age is defined negatively, as the interregnum between two empires. It starts with the death of Alexander the Great in 323\u00a0bc\u00a0and the collapse of his empire, and ends with the battle of Actium in 31\u00a0bc, the official start of the Roman Empire. Its main positive feature is the \u2018Hellenization\u2019 of \u2013 that is, the spread of Greek culture to \u2013 much of the Mediterranean world, especially the East. A high proportion of the converts to the Hellenistic philosophical schools flocked to Athens from the cities of western Asia, and a sense of excitement about Greek culture was one factor in the emergence of new philosophical schools. A favoured alternative explanation is that the collapse of the old Greek\u00a0<\/span><i style=\"font-size: 1rem; text-align: initial;\">polis<\/i><span style=\"font-size: 1rem; text-align: initial;\">, or city state, had left people feeling lost and in need of philosophical succour, but it is doubtful whether that hypothesis, even if sustainable, could account for more than a fraction of the new converts.<\/span>\r\n<div class=\"section\">\r\n<p id=\"A053P3\">Although Alexandria eclipsed it as a centre of learning, Athens remained the headquarters of philosophy almost throughout the era. Hence in many ways Hellenistic philosophy would better be dated from 306\u00a0bc, when\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www-rep-routledge-com.ep.fmcc.edu\/articles\/biographical\/epicurus-341-271-bc\/v-1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Epicurus<\/a>\u00a0founded his school in Athens, to 88\u00a0bc, when the Athenian schools were badly weakened in war, never fully to recover their institutional supremacy. The succeeding era was marked by a philosophical diaspora throughout the Roman Empire.<\/p>\r\n<p id=\"A053P4\">A Hellenistic doctrinal philosophy was a complete system, which had to offer: (1) an understanding of the world\u2019s origins, components and organization, and of our place in it; (2) a methodology of discovery, which included in particular naming one or more \u2018criteria of truth\u2019; (3) an account of what the \u2018goal\u2019, happiness (see\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www-rep-routledge-com.ep.fmcc.edu\/articles\/thematic\/eudaimonia\/v-1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Eudaimonia<\/a>), consists in. These three areas correspond to what had become the standard tripartition of philosophy into (1) physics, (2) logic and (3) ethics.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<div class=\"inline-ad\">\r\n<div id=\"DFP_4\" class=\"DFP_AD google-ad-iframe middle-xs center-xs\">\r\n<div id=\"google_ads_iframe_\/15510053\/EB_C\/DESKTOP_3__container__\">\r\n\r\nPhilosophy was one strategy for steadying oneself\u2026. Consequently, the schools of Plato and Aristotle had lost prestige as a result of their increasingly specialized pursuits, seemingly so detached from the everyday concerns that motivated Socrates and their own founders. Many people were impatient with speculation and relied more on what their senses could tell them. People required philosophies that were portable, easily learned, and plainly engaged with the fortunes and misfortunes of everyday life. Eclecticism and syncretism characterize Hellenistic culture as much as Greek domination.\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div>Hellenistic philosophy can be broken down into five movements:<\/div>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><b>Cynicism<\/b>, which\u00a0argues nature is the opposite of society\u2019s conventions and norms. All that the ordinary social herd is interested in is getting on in this world\u2026. Social conventions, then, are nothing but\u00a0<i>bad habits<\/i>, that damage the soul.\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>In contrast, the good life is lived according to nature, and it is a life of\u00a0<i>self-sufficiency<\/i>. Self-sufficiency can be realized through training (<em>ascesis<\/em>)\u2026.\u00a0<b><\/b>This achievement is described as\u00a0<i>apatheia<\/i>, \u2018indifference to suffering.\u2019 [\u2026.]\u00a0Cynics were noted for their bold speech and \u2018shameless\u2019 behavior.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Skepticism<\/strong>, which asserted\u00a0the likelihood of being able to achieve certain knowledge about any of the topics of philosophical concern listed previously was slim. Far better to own up to this, and seek \u2018tranquillity and happiness through suspension of judgment\u2019 (Sharples, 9).\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>Pyrrho of Elis (c. 365\/360-275\/270 BCE) was the first celebrated Skeptic. He was said to have accompanied Alexander to India. His philosophical position was that we can only know how things appear to us, and we can\u2019t rightly resolve disagreements as to what appears. This is all very disturbing. Wouldn\u2019t it be better just to suspend judgment and live according to probable opinion and custom?<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Epicureanism<\/strong>, which like\u00a0Stoicism sought to give\u00a0<i>ataraxia<\/i>, or peace of mind. For Epicurus the aim of life was pleasure; the highest pleasure was absence of pain; pleasure of the mind was preferable to that of the body. The soul dies with the body, so we must not fear death or afterlife; the gods exist but do not concern themselves with humanity or natural phenomena (all of which can be explained scientifically); we should avoid public life and emotional commitments in order to escape the pains likely to be caused by them. The physical world was explained by the atomic theory adapted from Democritus.<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Stoicism<\/strong>, which forwarded that the world is entirely material and perfectly ordered [so] it is also thoroughly determined. Thus, it is also correct to name the divine as fortune. The earlier Stoics put a brave spin on this, and said that the plan evidenced divine\u00a0<i>providence<\/i>, a reassuring God. Later Stoics, who must have been a bit discouraged by suicides, exiles and the like, thought that the plan was more like an impersonal, implacable fate.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<h2>Roman Philosophy<\/h2>\r\nGreek philosophy was the dominant philosophy for years, including in the Roman Republic and in the imperial era.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/iep.utm.edu\/cicero\/\">Cicero<\/a>\u00a0(106-43 B.C.E.) considered himself to be an Academic Skeptic, although he did not take his skepticism as far as a renunciation of politics and ethics. He is a very useful source for the preservation of and commentary upon not only Academic Skepticism, but also the Peripatetics, Stoics, and Skeptics. He was also an accomplished orator and politician, and authored many works of his own, which often employed skeptic principles or commented upon other philosophies. He took pains, as a true Skeptic, to present both sides of an argument. Cicero was murdered during the rise of the Roman empire.\r\n\r\nStoicism played an important role in the imperial period, especially with the Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius. Marcus is most famous for his so-called\u00a0<em>Meditations<\/em>, which is a translation of the Greek\u00a0<em>ta eis heauton<\/em>, \u201c[things] to himself.\u201d As the Greek title clearly shows, these meditations were meant for Marcus himself. These were reminders on how to live, especially as an emperor who saw turbulent times. This work, in its usually short, pithy statements, reveals some principles of stoic physics, but this only in service of its larger ethical orientation. It advocates a life of simplicity and tranquility lived according to nature.\r\n\r\nCoinciding with the eventual decline of the Roman Empire and rise of Christianity is the rise of Neoplatonism, which would become the dominant philosophy for over a half millennium. Although Neoplatonism is often cited as the last philosophical movement of classical Greco-Roman antiquity, its rise, even in its non-Christian form in the 3rd century CE via <a href=\"https:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/plotinus\/\">Plotinus<\/a>, it is likely better to consider it as the foundation for early Medieval philosophy. As such, it will be addressed in the next part of the textbook.\r\n\r\n<\/div>","rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-size: 1rem; text-align: initial;\">The Hellenistic age is defined negatively, as the interregnum between two empires. It starts with the death of Alexander the Great in 323\u00a0bc\u00a0and the collapse of his empire, and ends with the battle of Actium in 31\u00a0bc, the official start of the Roman Empire. Its main positive feature is the \u2018Hellenization\u2019 of \u2013 that is, the spread of Greek culture to \u2013 much of the Mediterranean world, especially the East. A high proportion of the converts to the Hellenistic philosophical schools flocked to Athens from the cities of western Asia, and a sense of excitement about Greek culture was one factor in the emergence of new philosophical schools. A favoured alternative explanation is that the collapse of the old Greek\u00a0<\/span><i style=\"font-size: 1rem; text-align: initial;\">polis<\/i><span style=\"font-size: 1rem; text-align: initial;\">, or city state, had left people feeling lost and in need of philosophical succour, but it is doubtful whether that hypothesis, even if sustainable, could account for more than a fraction of the new converts.<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"section\">\n<p id=\"A053P3\">Although Alexandria eclipsed it as a centre of learning, Athens remained the headquarters of philosophy almost throughout the era. Hence in many ways Hellenistic philosophy would better be dated from 306\u00a0bc, when\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www-rep-routledge-com.ep.fmcc.edu\/articles\/biographical\/epicurus-341-271-bc\/v-1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Epicurus<\/a>\u00a0founded his school in Athens, to 88\u00a0bc, when the Athenian schools were badly weakened in war, never fully to recover their institutional supremacy. The succeeding era was marked by a philosophical diaspora throughout the Roman Empire.<\/p>\n<p id=\"A053P4\">A Hellenistic doctrinal philosophy was a complete system, which had to offer: (1) an understanding of the world\u2019s origins, components and organization, and of our place in it; (2) a methodology of discovery, which included in particular naming one or more \u2018criteria of truth\u2019; (3) an account of what the \u2018goal\u2019, happiness (see\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www-rep-routledge-com.ep.fmcc.edu\/articles\/thematic\/eudaimonia\/v-1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Eudaimonia<\/a>), consists in. These three areas correspond to what had become the standard tripartition of philosophy into (1) physics, (2) logic and (3) ethics.<\/p>\n<div class=\"inline-ad\">\n<div id=\"DFP_4\" class=\"DFP_AD google-ad-iframe middle-xs center-xs\">\n<div id=\"google_ads_iframe_\/15510053\/EB_C\/DESKTOP_3__container__\">\n<p>Philosophy was one strategy for steadying oneself\u2026. Consequently, the schools of Plato and Aristotle had lost prestige as a result of their increasingly specialized pursuits, seemingly so detached from the everyday concerns that motivated Socrates and their own founders. Many people were impatient with speculation and relied more on what their senses could tell them. People required philosophies that were portable, easily learned, and plainly engaged with the fortunes and misfortunes of everyday life. Eclecticism and syncretism characterize Hellenistic culture as much as Greek domination.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div>Hellenistic philosophy can be broken down into five movements:<\/div>\n<ul>\n<li><b>Cynicism<\/b>, which\u00a0argues nature is the opposite of society\u2019s conventions and norms. All that the ordinary social herd is interested in is getting on in this world\u2026. Social conventions, then, are nothing but\u00a0<i>bad habits<\/i>, that damage the soul.\n<ul>\n<li>In contrast, the good life is lived according to nature, and it is a life of\u00a0<i>self-sufficiency<\/i>. Self-sufficiency can be realized through training (<em>ascesis<\/em>)\u2026.\u00a0<b><\/b>This achievement is described as\u00a0<i>apatheia<\/i>, \u2018indifference to suffering.\u2019 [\u2026.]\u00a0Cynics were noted for their bold speech and \u2018shameless\u2019 behavior.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Skepticism<\/strong>, which asserted\u00a0the likelihood of being able to achieve certain knowledge about any of the topics of philosophical concern listed previously was slim. Far better to own up to this, and seek \u2018tranquillity and happiness through suspension of judgment\u2019 (Sharples, 9).\n<ul>\n<li>Pyrrho of Elis (c. 365\/360-275\/270 BCE) was the first celebrated Skeptic. He was said to have accompanied Alexander to India. His philosophical position was that we can only know how things appear to us, and we can\u2019t rightly resolve disagreements as to what appears. This is all very disturbing. Wouldn\u2019t it be better just to suspend judgment and live according to probable opinion and custom?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Epicureanism<\/strong>, which like\u00a0Stoicism sought to give\u00a0<i>ataraxia<\/i>, or peace of mind. For Epicurus the aim of life was pleasure; the highest pleasure was absence of pain; pleasure of the mind was preferable to that of the body. The soul dies with the body, so we must not fear death or afterlife; the gods exist but do not concern themselves with humanity or natural phenomena (all of which can be explained scientifically); we should avoid public life and emotional commitments in order to escape the pains likely to be caused by them. The physical world was explained by the atomic theory adapted from Democritus.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Stoicism<\/strong>, which forwarded that the world is entirely material and perfectly ordered [so] it is also thoroughly determined. Thus, it is also correct to name the divine as fortune. The earlier Stoics put a brave spin on this, and said that the plan evidenced divine\u00a0<i>providence<\/i>, a reassuring God. Later Stoics, who must have been a bit discouraged by suicides, exiles and the like, thought that the plan was more like an impersonal, implacable fate.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Roman Philosophy<\/h2>\n<p>Greek philosophy was the dominant philosophy for years, including in the Roman Republic and in the imperial era.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/iep.utm.edu\/cicero\/\">Cicero<\/a>\u00a0(106-43 B.C.E.) considered himself to be an Academic Skeptic, although he did not take his skepticism as far as a renunciation of politics and ethics. He is a very useful source for the preservation of and commentary upon not only Academic Skepticism, but also the Peripatetics, Stoics, and Skeptics. He was also an accomplished orator and politician, and authored many works of his own, which often employed skeptic principles or commented upon other philosophies. He took pains, as a true Skeptic, to present both sides of an argument. Cicero was murdered during the rise of the Roman empire.<\/p>\n<p>Stoicism played an important role in the imperial period, especially with the Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius. Marcus is most famous for his so-called\u00a0<em>Meditations<\/em>, which is a translation of the Greek\u00a0<em>ta eis heauton<\/em>, \u201c[things] to himself.\u201d As the Greek title clearly shows, these meditations were meant for Marcus himself. These were reminders on how to live, especially as an emperor who saw turbulent times. This work, in its usually short, pithy statements, reveals some principles of stoic physics, but this only in service of its larger ethical orientation. It advocates a life of simplicity and tranquility lived according to nature.<\/p>\n<p>Coinciding with the eventual decline of the Roman Empire and rise of Christianity is the rise of Neoplatonism, which would become the dominant philosophy for over a half millennium. Although Neoplatonism is often cited as the last philosophical movement of classical Greco-Roman antiquity, its rise, even in its non-Christian form in the 3rd century CE via <a href=\"https:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/plotinus\/\">Plotinus<\/a>, it is likely better to consider it as the foundation for early Medieval philosophy. As such, it will be addressed in the next part of the textbook.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t <section class=\"citations-section\" role=\"contentinfo\">\n\t\t\t <h3>Candela Citations<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t <div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t <div id=\"citation-list-357\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <div class=\"licensing\"><div class=\"license-attribution-dropdown-subheading\">All rights reserved content<\/div><ul class=\"citation-list\"><li>Hellenistic philosophy. <strong>Authored by<\/strong>: David Sedley. <strong>Provided by<\/strong>: Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy Online. <strong>Located at<\/strong>: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www-rep-routledge-com.ep.fmcc.edu\/articles\/thematic\/hellenistic-philosophy\/v-1\">https:\/\/www-rep-routledge-com.ep.fmcc.edu\/articles\/thematic\/hellenistic-philosophy\/v-1<\/a>. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em>All Rights Reserved<\/em><\/li><li>Neo-Platonism. <strong>Authored by<\/strong>: Edward Moore. <strong>Provided by<\/strong>: Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. <strong>Located at<\/strong>: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/iep.utm.edu\/neoplato\/\">https:\/\/iep.utm.edu\/neoplato\/<\/a>. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em>All Rights Reserved<\/em><\/li><li>Ancient Greek Philosophy. <strong>Authored by<\/strong>: Jacob N. Graham. <strong>Provided by<\/strong>: Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. <strong>Located at<\/strong>: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/iep.utm.edu\/ancient-greek-philosophy\/#H6\">https:\/\/iep.utm.edu\/ancient-greek-philosophy\/#H6<\/a>. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"license\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/about\/pdm\">Public Domain: No Known Copyright<\/a><\/em>. <strong>License Terms<\/strong>: https:\/\/iep.utm.edu\/home\/copyright\/<\/li><\/ul><div class=\"license-attribution-dropdown-subheading\">Public domain content<\/div><ul class=\"citation-list\"><li>Hellenistic Philosophy (300BCE-200CE). <strong>Authored by<\/strong>: Andrew Irvine. <strong>Provided by<\/strong>: Boston University. <strong>Located at<\/strong>: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/people.bu.edu\/wwildman\/WeirdWildWeb\/courses\/wphil\/lectures\/wphil_theme04.htm#Cynicism\">http:\/\/people.bu.edu\/wwildman\/WeirdWildWeb\/courses\/wphil\/lectures\/wphil_theme04.htm#Cynicism<\/a>. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"license\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/about\/cc0\">CC0: No Rights Reserved<\/a><\/em><\/li><li>Hellenistic Philosophy. <strong>Authored by<\/strong>: Richard Hooker. <strong>Provided by<\/strong>: University of Massachusetts Boston. <strong>Located at<\/strong>: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.faculty.umb.edu\/gary_zabel\/Courses\/Phil%20281b\/Philosophy%20of%20Magic\/Dante.%20etc\/Philosophers\/Idea\/www.wsu.edu_8080\/~dee\/GREECE\/HELLPHIL.HTM\">http:\/\/www.faculty.umb.edu\/gary_zabel\/Courses\/Phil%20281b\/Philosophy%20of%20Magic\/Dante.%20etc\/Philosophers\/Idea\/www.wsu.edu_8080\/~dee\/GREECE\/HELLPHIL.HTM<\/a>. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"license\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/about\/pdm\">Public Domain: No Known Copyright<\/a><\/em><\/li><\/ul><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t <\/section>","protected":false},"author":6525,"menu_order":12,"template":"","meta":{"_candela_citation":"[{\"type\":\"copyrighted_video\",\"description\":\"Hellenistic philosophy\",\"author\":\"David Sedley\",\"organization\":\"Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy Online\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www-rep-routledge-com.ep.fmcc.edu\/articles\/thematic\/hellenistic-philosophy\/v-1\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"arr\",\"license_terms\":\"\"},{\"type\":\"pd\",\"description\":\"Hellenistic Philosophy (300BCE-200CE)\",\"author\":\"Andrew Irvine\",\"organization\":\"Boston University\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/people.bu.edu\/wwildman\/WeirdWildWeb\/courses\/wphil\/lectures\/wphil_theme04.htm#Cynicism\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"cc0\",\"license_terms\":\"\"},{\"type\":\"pd\",\"description\":\"Hellenistic Philosophy\",\"author\":\"Richard Hooker\",\"organization\":\"University of Massachusetts Boston\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/www.faculty.umb.edu\/gary_zabel\/Courses\/Phil%20281b\/Philosophy%20of%20Magic\/Dante.%20etc\/Philosophers\/Idea\/www.wsu.edu_8080\/~dee\/GREECE\/HELLPHIL.HTM\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"pd\",\"license_terms\":\"\"},{\"type\":\"copyrighted_video\",\"description\":\"Neo-Platonism\",\"author\":\"Edward Moore\",\"organization\":\"Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/iep.utm.edu\/neoplato\/\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"arr\",\"license_terms\":\"\"},{\"type\":\"copyrighted_video\",\"description\":\"Ancient Greek Philosophy\",\"author\":\"Jacob N. Graham\",\"organization\":\"Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/iep.utm.edu\/ancient-greek-philosophy\/#H6\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"pd\",\"license_terms\":\"https:\/\/iep.utm.edu\/home\/copyright\/\"}]","CANDELA_OUTCOMES_GUID":"","pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-357","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry"],"part":30,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-fmcc-philosophy1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/357","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-fmcc-philosophy1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-fmcc-philosophy1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-fmcc-philosophy1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6525"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-fmcc-philosophy1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/357\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":862,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-fmcc-philosophy1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/357\/revisions\/862"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-fmcc-philosophy1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/30"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-fmcc-philosophy1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/357\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-fmcc-philosophy1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=357"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-fmcc-philosophy1\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=357"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-fmcc-philosophy1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=357"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-fmcc-philosophy1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=357"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}