\r\nThe expenditure-output model<\/span>, sometimes also called the Keynesian cross diagram<\/span>, determines the equilibrium level of real GDP by the point where the total or aggregate expenditures in the economy are equal to the amount of output produced. The axes of the Keynesian cross diagram presented in\u00a0Figure B.1\u00a0show real GDP on the horizontal axis as a measure of output and aggregate expenditures on the vertical axis as a measure of spending.<\/p>\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"585\"]![\"The](\"http:\/\/cnx.org\/resources\/9cf8f83473a3025c14842b43bac7e441\/CNX_Econ_C25_011.jpg\")
Figure B.1.<\/strong> The Expenditure-Output Diagram The aggregate expenditure-output model shows aggregate expenditures on the vertical axis and real GDP on the horizontal axis. A vertical line shows potential GDP where full employment occurs. The 45-degree line shows all points where aggregate expenditures and output are equal. The aggregate expenditure schedule shows how total spending or aggregate expenditure increases as output or real GDP rises. The intersection of the aggregate expenditure schedule and the 45-degree line will be the equilibrium. Equilibrium occurs at E0, where aggregate expenditure AE0 is equal to the output level Y0.[\/caption]<\/p>\r\n <\/p>\r\n
Remember that GDP can be thought of in several equivalent ways: it measures both the value of spending on final goods and also the value of the production of final goods. All sales of the final goods and services that make up GDP will eventually end up as income for workers, for managers, and for investors and owners of firms. The sum of all the income received for contributing resources to GDP is called national income<\/span> (Y). At some points in the discussion that follows, it will be useful to refer to real GDP as \u201cnational income.\u201d Both axes are measured in real (inflation-adjusted) terms.<\/p>\r\nTHE POTENTIAL GDP LINE AND THE 45-DEGREE LINE<\/strong><\/h3>\r\nThe Keynesian cross diagram contains two lines that serve as conceptual guideposts to orient the discussion. The first is a vertical line showing the level of potential GDP<\/span>. Potential GDP means the same thing here that it means in the AD\/AS diagrams: it refers to the quantity of output that the economy can produce with full employment of its labor and physical capital.<\/p>\r\nThe second conceptual line on the Keynesian cross diagram is the 45-degree line, which starts at the origin and reaches up and to the right. A line that stretches up at a 45-degree angle represents the set of points (1, 1), (2, 2), (3, 3) and so on, where the measurement on the vertical axis is equal to the measurement on the horizontal axis. In this diagram, the 45-degree line shows the set of points where the level of aggregate expenditure in the economy, measured on the vertical axis, is equal to the level of output or national income in the economy, measured by GDP on the horizontal axis.<\/p>\r\n
When the macroeconomy is in equilibrium, it must be true that the aggregate expenditures in the economy are equal to the real GDP<\/span>\u2014because by definition, GDP is the measure of what is spent on final sales of goods and services in the economy. Thus, the equilibrium calculated with a Keynesian cross diagram will always end up where aggregate expenditure and output are equal\u2014which will only occur along the 45-degree line.<\/p>\r\nTHE AGGREGATE EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE<\/strong><\/h3>\r\nThe final ingredient of the Keynesian cross or expenditure-output diagram is the aggregate expenditure schedule<\/span>, which will show the total expenditures in the economy for each level of real GDP. The intersection of the aggregate expenditure line with the 45-degree line\u2014at point E0<\/sub> in\u00a0Figure B.1\u2014will show the equilibrium for the economy, because it is the point where aggregate expenditure is equal to output or real GDP. After developing an understanding of what the aggregate expenditures schedule means, we will return to this equilibrium and how to interpret it.<\/p>\r\n<\/section>\r\n\r\nBuilding the Aggregate Expenditure Schedule<\/h2>\r\n
Aggregate expenditure is the key to the expenditure-income model. The aggregate expenditure schedule shows, either in the form of a table or a graph, how aggregate expenditures in the economy rise as real GDP or national income rises. Thus, in thinking about the components of the aggregate expenditure line\u2014consumption, investment, government spending, exports and imports\u2014the key question is how expenditures in each category will adjust as national income rises.<\/p>\r\n
CONSUMPTION AS A FUNCTION OF NATIONAL INCOME<\/strong><\/h3>\r\nHow do consumption expenditures increase as national income rises? People can do two things with their income: consume it or save it (for the moment, let\u2019s ignore the need to pay taxes with some of it). Each person who receives an additional dollar faces this choice. The marginal propensity to consume (MPC)<\/span>, is the share of the additional dollar of income a person decides to devote to consumption expenditures. The marginal propensity to save (MPS)<\/span> is the share of the additional dollar a person decides to save. It must always hold true that:<\/p>\r\nMPC\u00a0+\u00a0MPS\u00a0=\u00a01<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
For example, if the marginal propensity to consume out of the marginal amount of income earned is 0.9, then the marginal propensity to save is 0.1.<\/p>\r\n
With this relationship in mind, consider the relationship among income, consumption, and savings shown in Figure B.2. (Note that we use \u201cAggregate Expenditure\u201d on the vertical axis in this and the following figures, because all consumption expenditures are parts of aggregate expenditures.)<\/p>\r\n
An assumption commonly made in this model is that even if income were zero, people would have to consume something. In this example, consumption would be $600 even if income were zero. Then, the MPC is 0.8 and the MPS is 0.2. Thus, when income increases by $1,000, consumption rises by $800 and savings rises by $200. At an income of $4,000, total consumption will be the $600 that would be consumed even without any income, plus $4,000 multiplied by the marginal propensity to consume of 0.8, or $ 3,200, for a total of $ 3,800. The total amount of consumption and saving must always add up to the total amount of income. (Exactly how a situation of zero income and negative savings would work in practice is not important, because even low-income societies are not literally at zero income, so the point is hypothetical.) This relationship between income and consumption, illustrated in Figure B.2\u00a0and\u00a0Table B.1, is called the consumption function<\/span>.<\/p>\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"390\"]![\"The](\"http:\/\/cnx.org\/resources\/478eb8d1d4972116ce5ec601c556b1e3\/CNX_Econ_C25_012.jpg\")
Figure B.2.<\/strong> The Consumption Function. In the expenditure-output model, how does consumption increase with the level of national income? Output on the horizontal axis is conceptually the same as national income, since the value of all final output that is produced and sold must be income to someone, somewhere in the economy. At a national income level of zero, $600 is consumed. Then, each time income rises by $1,000, consumption rises by $800, because in this example, the marginal propensity to consume is 0.8.[\/caption]<\/p>\r\nThe pattern of consumption shown in Table B.1\u00a0is plotted in Figure B.2. To calculate consumption, multiply the income level by 0.8, for the marginal propensity to consume, and add $600, for the amount that would be consumed even if income was zero. Consumption plus savings must be equal to income.<\/p>\r\n
\r\nTable B.1. The Consumption Function<\/span><\/caption>\r\n\r\n\r\n| Income<\/th>\r\n | Consumption<\/th>\r\n | Savings<\/th>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/thead>\r\n |
\r\n\r\n| $0<\/td>\r\n | $600<\/td>\r\n | \u2013$600<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n |
\r\n| $1,000<\/td>\r\n | $1,400<\/td>\r\n | \u2013$400<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n |
\r\n| $2,000<\/td>\r\n | $2,200<\/td>\r\n | \u2013$200<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n |
\r\n| $3,000<\/td>\r\n | $3,000<\/td>\r\n | $0<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n |
\r\n| $4,000<\/td>\r\n | $3,800<\/td>\r\n | $200<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n |
\r\n| $5,000<\/td>\r\n | $4,600<\/td>\r\n | $400<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n |
\r\n| $6,000<\/td>\r\n | $5,400<\/td>\r\n | $600<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n |
\r\n| $7,000<\/td>\r\n | $6,200<\/td>\r\n | $800<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n |
\r\n| $8,000<\/td>\r\n | $7,000<\/td>\r\n | $1,000<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n |
\r\n| $9,000<\/td>\r\n | $7,800<\/td>\r\n | $1,200<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n However, a number of factors other than income can also cause the entire consumption function to shift. These factors were summarized in the earlier discussion of consumption, and listed in Table B.1. When the consumption function moves, it can shift in two ways: either the entire consumption function can move up or down in a parallel manner, or the slope of the consumption function can shift so that it becomes steeper or flatter. For example, if a tax cut leads consumers to spend more, but does not affect their marginal propensity to consume, it would cause an upward shift to a new consumption function that is parallel to the original one. However, a change in household preferences for saving that reduced the marginal propensity to save would cause the slope of the consumption function to become steeper: that is, if the savings rate is lower, then every increase in income leads to a larger rise in consumption.<\/p>\r\n INVESTMENT AS A FUNCTION OF NATIONAL INCOME<\/strong><\/h3>\r\nInvestment decisions are forward-looking, based on expected rates of return. Precisely because investment decisions depend primarily on perceptions about future economic conditions, they do not\u00a0<\/em>depend primarily on the level of GDP in the current year. Thus, on a Keynesian cross diagram, the investment function can be drawn as a horizontal line, at a fixed level of expenditure. Figure B.3\u00a0shows an investment function where the level of investment is, for the sake of concreteness, set at the specific level of 500. Just as a consumption function shows the relationship between consumption levels and real GDP (or national income), the investment function<\/span> shows the relationship between investment levels and real GDP.<\/p>\r\n\r\n![\"The](\"http:\/\/cnx.org\/resources\/ad0858994ae71fbb3d2e9975b14db24d\/CNX_Econ_C25_013.jpg\") <\/dt>\r\n- Figure B.3.<\/strong> The Investment Function. \u00a0The investment function is drawn as a flat line because investment is based on interest rates and expectations about the future, and so it does not change with the level of current national income. In this example, investment expenditures are at a level of 500. However, changes in factors like technological opportunities, expectations about near-term economic growth, and interest rates would all cause the investment function to shift up or down.<\/dd>\r\n<\/dl>\r\n
The appearance of the investment function as a horizontal line does not mean that the level of investment never moves. It means only that in the context of this two-dimensional diagram, the level of investment on the vertical aggregate expenditure axis does not vary according to the current level of real GDP on the horizontal axis. However, all the other factors that vary investment\u2014new technological opportunities, expectations about near-term economic growth, interest rates, the price of key inputs, and tax incentives for investment\u2014can cause the horizontal investment function to shift up or down.<\/p>\r\n GOVERNMENT SPENDING AND TAXES AS A FUNCTION OF NATIONAL INCOME<\/strong><\/h3>\r\nIn the Keynesian cross diagram, government spending appears as a horizontal line, as in Figure B.4, where government spending is set at a level of 1,300. As in the case of investment spending, this horizontal line does not mean that government spending is unchanging. It means only that government spending changes when Congress decides on a change in the budget, rather than shifting in a predictable way with the current size of the real GDP shown on the horizontal axis.<\/p>\r\n [caption id=\"\" align=\"alignnone\" width=\"585\"]![\"The](\"http:\/\/cnx.org\/resources\/2e1ab3d3c97380a8cbadcb577d0a6a31\/CNX_Econ_C25_014.jpg\") Figure B.4.<\/strong> The Government Spending Function. \u00a0The level of government spending is determined by political factors, not by the level of real GDP in a given year. Thus, government spending is drawn as a horizontal line. In this example, government spending is at a level of 1,300. Congressional decisions to increase government spending will cause this horizontal line to shift up, while decisions to reduce spending would cause it to shift down.[\/caption]<\/p>\r\nThe situation of taxes is different because taxes often rise or fall with the volume of economic activity. For example, income taxes are based on the level of income earned and sales taxes are based on the amount of sales made, and both income and sales tend to be higher when the economy is growing and lower when the economy is in a recession. For the purposes of constructing the basic Keynesian cross diagram, it is helpful to view taxes as a proportionate share of GDP. In the United States, for example, taking federal, state, and local taxes together, government typically collects about 30\u201335 % of income as taxes.<\/p>\r\n Table B.2\u00a0revises the earlier table on the consumption function so that it takes taxes into account. The first column shows national income. The second column calculates taxes, which in this example are set at a rate of 30%, or 0.3. The third column shows after-tax income; that is, total income minus taxes. The fourth column then calculates consumption in the same manner as before: multiply after-tax income by 0.8, representing the marginal propensity to consume, and then add $600, for the amount that would be consumed even if income was zero. When taxes are included, the marginal propensity to consume is reduced by the amount of the tax rate, so each additional dollar of income results in a smaller increase in consumption than before taxes. For this reason, the consumption function, with taxes included, is flatter than the consumption function without taxes, as Figure B.5\u00a0shows.<\/p>\r\n [caption id=\"\" align=\"alignnone\" width=\"390\"]![\"The](\"http:\/\/cnx.org\/resources\/15030b4c161ca6edb16348fc5bfca2a1\/CNX_Econ_C25_015.jpg\") Figure B.5.<\/strong> The Consumption Function. Before and After Taxes The upper line repeats the consumption function from Figure B.2. The lower line shows the consumption function if taxes must first be paid on income, and then consumption is based on after-tax income.[\/caption]<\/p>\r\n\u00a0<\/address>\r\n\r\nTable B.2. The Consumption Function Before and After Taxes<\/span><\/caption>\r\n\r\n\r\n| Income<\/th>\r\n | Taxes<\/th>\r\n | After-Tax Income<\/th>\r\n | Consumption<\/th>\r\n | Savings<\/th>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/thead>\r\n | \r\n\r\n| $0<\/td>\r\n | $0<\/td>\r\n | $0<\/td>\r\n | $600<\/td>\r\n | \u2013$600<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n | \r\n| $1,000<\/td>\r\n | $300<\/td>\r\n | $700<\/td>\r\n | $1,160<\/td>\r\n | \u2013$460<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n | \r\n| $2,000<\/td>\r\n | $600<\/td>\r\n | $1,400<\/td>\r\n | $1,720<\/td>\r\n | \u2013$320<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n | \r\n| $3,000<\/td>\r\n | $900<\/td>\r\n | $2,100<\/td>\r\n | $2,280<\/td>\r\n | \u2013$180<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n | \r\n| $4,000<\/td>\r\n | $1,200<\/td>\r\n | $2,800<\/td>\r\n | $2,840<\/td>\r\n | \u2013$40<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n | \r\n| $5,000<\/td>\r\n | $1,500<\/td>\r\n | $3,500<\/td>\r\n | $3,400<\/td>\r\n | $100<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n | \r\n| $6,000<\/td>\r\n | $1,800<\/td>\r\n | $4,200<\/td>\r\n | $3,960<\/td>\r\n | $240<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n | \r\n| $7,000<\/td>\r\n | $2,100<\/td>\r\n | $4,900<\/td>\r\n | $4,520<\/td>\r\n | $380<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n | \r\n| $8,000<\/td>\r\n | $2,400<\/td>\r\n | $5,600<\/td>\r\n | $5,080<\/td>\r\n | $520<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n | \r\n| $9,000<\/td>\r\n | $2,700<\/td>\r\n | $6,300<\/td>\r\n | $5,640<\/td>\r\n | $660<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\nEXPORTS AND IMPORTS AS A FUNCTION OF NATIONAL INCOME<\/strong><\/h3>\r\nThe export function, which shows how exports change with the level of a country\u2019s own real GDP, is drawn as a horizontal line, as in the example in Figure B.6\u00a0(a) where exports are drawn at a level of $840. Again, as in the case of investment spending and government spending, drawing the export function as horizontal does not imply that exports never change. It just means that they do not change because of what is on the horizontal axis\u2014that is, a country\u2019s own level of domestic production\u2014and instead are shaped by the level of aggregate demand in other countries. More demand for exports from other countries would cause the export function to shift up; less demand for exports from other countries would cause it to shift down.<\/p>\r\n [caption id=\"\" align=\"alignnone\" width=\"780\"]![\"The](\"http:\/\/cnx.org\/resources\/60ed28a4e6c584e19cf164895cad4a5e\/CNX_Econ_C25_025.jpg\") Figure B.6.<\/strong> The Export and Import Functions. \u00a0(a) The export function is drawn as a horizontal line because exports are determined by the buying power of other countries and thus do not change with the size of the domestic economy. In this example, exports are set at 840. However, exports can shift up or down, depending on buying patterns in other countries. (b) The import function is drawn in negative territory because expenditures on imported products are a subtraction from expenditures in the domestic economy. In this example, the marginal propensity to import is 0.1, so imports are calculated by multiplying the level of income by \u20130.1.[\/caption]<\/p>\r\n <\/p>\r\n Imports are drawn in the Keynesian cross diagram as a downward-sloping line, with the downward slope determined by the marginal propensity to import (MPI)<\/span>, out of national income. In Figure B.6\u00a0(b), the marginal propensity to import is 0.1. Thus, if real GDP is $5,000, imports are $500; if national income is $6,000, imports are $600, and so on. The import function is drawn as downward sloping and negative, because it represents a subtraction from the aggregate expenditures in the domestic economy. A change in the marginal propensity to import, perhaps as a result of changes in preferences, would alter the slope of the import function.<\/p>\r\n<\/section>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n","rendered":"The Axes of the Expenditure-Output Diagram<\/h2>\nThe fundamental ideas of Keynesian economics were developed before the AD\u2013AS model was popularized. From the 1930s until the 1970s, Keynesian economics was usually explained with a different model, known as the expenditure-output approach. This approach is strongly rooted in the fundamental assumptions of Keynesian economics: it focuses on the total amount of spending in the economy, with no explicit mention of aggregate supply or of the price level (although as you will see, it is possible to draw some inferences about aggregate supply and price levels based on the diagram).<\/p>\n \n \n \nThe expenditure-output model<\/span>, sometimes also called the Keynesian cross diagram<\/span>, determines the equilibrium level of real GDP by the point where the total or aggregate expenditures in the economy are equal to the amount of output produced. The axes of the Keynesian cross diagram presented in\u00a0Figure B.1\u00a0show real GDP on the horizontal axis as a measure of output and aggregate expenditures on the vertical axis as a measure of spending.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Figure B.1.<\/strong> The Expenditure-Output Diagram The aggregate expenditure-output model shows aggregate expenditures on the vertical axis and real GDP on the horizontal axis. A vertical line shows potential GDP where full employment occurs. The 45-degree line shows all points where aggregate expenditures and output are equal. The aggregate expenditure schedule shows how total spending or aggregate expenditure increases as output or real GDP rises. The intersection of the aggregate expenditure schedule and the 45-degree line will be the equilibrium. Equilibrium occurs at E0, where aggregate expenditure AE0 is equal to the output level Y0.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n <\/p>\n Remember that GDP can be thought of in several equivalent ways: it measures both the value of spending on final goods and also the value of the production of final goods. All sales of the final goods and services that make up GDP will eventually end up as income for workers, for managers, and for investors and owners of firms. The sum of all the income received for contributing resources to GDP is called national income<\/span> (Y). At some points in the discussion that follows, it will be useful to refer to real GDP as \u201cnational income.\u201d Both axes are measured in real (inflation-adjusted) terms.<\/p>\nTHE POTENTIAL GDP LINE AND THE 45-DEGREE LINE<\/strong><\/h3>\nThe Keynesian cross diagram contains two lines that serve as conceptual guideposts to orient the discussion. The first is a vertical line showing the level of potential GDP<\/span>. Potential GDP means the same thing here that it means in the AD\/AS diagrams: it refers to the quantity of output that the economy can produce with full employment of its labor and physical capital.<\/p>\nThe second conceptual line on the Keynesian cross diagram is the 45-degree line, which starts at the origin and reaches up and to the right. A line that stretches up at a 45-degree angle represents the set of points (1, 1), (2, 2), (3, 3) and so on, where the measurement on the vertical axis is equal to the measurement on the horizontal axis. In this diagram, the 45-degree line shows the set of points where the level of aggregate expenditure in the economy, measured on the vertical axis, is equal to the level of output or national income in the economy, measured by GDP on the horizontal axis.<\/p>\n When the macroeconomy is in equilibrium, it must be true that the aggregate expenditures in the economy are equal to the real GDP<\/span>\u2014because by definition, GDP is the measure of what is spent on final sales of goods and services in the economy. Thus, the equilibrium calculated with a Keynesian cross diagram will always end up where aggregate expenditure and output are equal\u2014which will only occur along the 45-degree line.<\/p>\n | |