{"id":654,"date":"2015-05-08T04:53:19","date_gmt":"2015-05-08T04:53:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/courses.candelalearning.com\/masterymacro1xngcxmaster\/?post_type=chapter&p=654"},"modified":"2016-07-28T21:11:55","modified_gmt":"2016-07-28T21:11:55","slug":"new-classical-economics-a-focus-on-aggregate-supply","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-hccc-macroeconomics\/chapter\/new-classical-economics-a-focus-on-aggregate-supply\/","title":{"raw":"Reading: New Classical Economics and Rational Expectations","rendered":"Reading: New Classical Economics and Rational Expectations"},"content":{"raw":"

New Classical Economics and Rational Expectations<\/h2>\r\n

Much of the difficulty policy makers encountered during the decade of the 1970s resulted from shifts in aggregate supply. Keynesian economics and, to a lesser degree, monetarism had focused on aggregate demand. As it became clear that an analysis incorporating the supply side was an essential part of the macroeconomic puzzle, some economists turned to an entirely new way of looking at macroeconomic issues.<\/p>\r\n

These economists started with a focus on individuals and their decisions. Keynesian economics employed aggregate analysis and paid little attention to individual choices. Monetarist doctrine was based on the analysis of individuals\u2019 maximizing behavior with respect to money demand, but it did not extend that analysis to decisions that affect aggregate supply. The new approach aimed at an analysis of how individual choices would affect the entire spectrum of economic activity.<\/p>\r\n

These economists rejected the entire framework of conventional macroeconomic analysis. Indeed, they rejected the very term. For them there is no macroeconomics, nor is there something called microeconomics. For them, there is only economics, which they regard as the analysis of behavior based on individual maximization. The analysis of the determination of the price level and real GDP becomes an application of basic economic theory, not a separate body of thought. The approach to macroeconomic analysis built from an analysis of individual maximizing choices is called new classical economics.<\/p>\r\n\r\n

New Classical Economics<\/h3>\r\n

Like classical economic thought, new classical economics focuses on the determination of long-run aggregate supply and the economy\u2019s ability to reach this level of output quickly. But the similarity ends there. Classical economics emerged in large part before economists had developed sophisticated mathematical models of maximizing behavior. The new classical economics puts mathematics to work in an extremely complex way to generalize from individual behavior to aggregate results.<\/p>\r\n

Because the new classical approach suggests that the economy will remain at or near its potential output, it follows that the changes we observe in economic activity result not from changes in aggregate demand but from changes in long-run aggregate supply. New classical economics suggests that economic changes don\u2019t necessarily imply economic problems.<\/p>\r\n

New classical economists pointed to the supply-side shocks of the 1970s, both from changes in oil prices and changes in expectations, as evidence that their emphasis on aggregate supply was on the mark. They argued that the large observed swings in real GDP reflected underlying changes in the economy\u2019s potential output. The recessionary and inflationary gaps that so perplexed policy makers during the 1970s were not gaps at all, the new classical economists insisted. Instead, they reflected changes in the economy\u2019s own potential output.<\/p>\r\n\r\n

Rational Expectations<\/h3>\r\n

Two particularly controversial propositions of new classical theory relate to the impacts of monetary and of fiscal policy. Both are implications of the rational expectations hypothesis, which assumes that individuals form expectations about the future based on the information available to them, and that they act on those expectations.<\/p>\r\n

The rational expectations hypothesis suggests that monetary policy, even though it will affect the aggregate demand curve, might have no effect on real GDP. This possibility, which was suggested by Robert Lucas, is illustrated in Figure 17.9 \"Contractionary Monetary Policy: With and Without Rational Expectations.\"\u00a0Suppose the economy is initially in equilibrium at point 1 in Panel (a). Real GDP equals its potential output, Y<\/em>P<\/sub>. Now suppose a reduction in the money supply causes aggregate demand to fall to AD<\/em>2<\/sub>. In our model, the solution moves to point 2; the price level falls to P<\/em>2<\/sub>, and real GDP falls to Y<\/em>2<\/sub>. There is a recessionary gap. In the long run, the short-run aggregate supply curve shifts to SRAS<\/em>2<\/sub>, the price level falls to P<\/em>3<\/sub>, and the economy returns to its potential output at point 3.<\/p>\r\n\r\n

\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"704\"]\"Two Figure 17.9.<\/strong> Contractionary Monetary Policy: With and Without Rational Expectations. Panels (a) and (b) show an economy operating at potential output (1); a contractionary monetary policy shifts aggregate demand to AD2. Panel (a) shows the kind of response we have studied up to this point; real GDP falls to Y2 in period (2); the recessionary gap is closed in the long run by falling nominal wages that cause an increase in short-run aggregate supply in period (3). Panel (b) shows the rational expectations argument. People anticipate the impact of the contractionary policy when it is undertaken, so that the short-run aggregate supply curve shifts to the right at the same time the aggregate demand curve shifts to the left. The result is a reduction in the price level but no change in real GDP; the solution moves from (1) to (2).[\/caption]\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n

The new classical story is quite different. Consumers and firms observe that the money supply has fallen and anticipate the eventual reduction in the price level to P<\/em>3<\/sub>. They adjust their expectations accordingly. Workers agree to lower nominal wages, and the short-run aggregate supply curve shifts to SRAS<\/em>2<\/sub>. This occurs as aggregate demand falls. As suggested in Panel (b), the price level falls to P<\/em>3<\/sub>, and output remains at potential. The solution moves from (1) to (2) with no loss in real GDP.<\/p>\r\n

In this new classical world, there is only one way for a change in the money supply to affect output, and that is for the change to take people by surprise. An unexpected change cannot affect expectations, so the short-run aggregate supply curve does not shift in the short run, and events play out as in Panel (a). Monetary policy can affect output, but only if it takes people by surprise.<\/p>\r\n

The new classical school offers an even stronger case against the operation of fiscal policy. It argues that fiscal policy does not shift the aggregate demand curve at all! Consider, for example, an expansionary fiscal policy. Such a policy involves an increase in government purchases or transfer payments or a cut in taxes. Any of these policies will increase the deficit or reduce the surplus. New classical economists argue that households, when they observe the government carrying out a policy that increases the debt, will anticipate that they, or their children, or their children\u2019s children, will end up paying more in taxes. And, according to the new classical story, these households will reduce their consumption as a result. This will, the new classical economists argue, cancel any tendency for the expansionary policy to affect aggregate demand.<\/p>\r\n\r\n

Self Check: New Classical Economics and Rational Expectations<\/h2>\r\nAnswer the question(s) below to see how well you understand the topics covered in the previous section. This short quiz does not<\/strong> count toward your grade in the class, and you can retake it an unlimited number of times.\r\n

You\u2019ll have more success on the Self Check if you\u2019ve completed the Reading in this section.<\/span><\/p>\r\nUse this quiz to check your understanding and decide whether to (1) study the previous section further or (2) move on to the next section.\r\n\r\nhttps:\/\/assessments.lumenlearning.com\/assessments\/575","rendered":"

New Classical Economics and Rational Expectations<\/h2>\n

Much of the difficulty policy makers encountered during the decade of the 1970s resulted from shifts in aggregate supply. Keynesian economics and, to a lesser degree, monetarism had focused on aggregate demand. As it became clear that an analysis incorporating the supply side was an essential part of the macroeconomic puzzle, some economists turned to an entirely new way of looking at macroeconomic issues.<\/p>\n

These economists started with a focus on individuals and their decisions. Keynesian economics employed aggregate analysis and paid little attention to individual choices. Monetarist doctrine was based on the analysis of individuals\u2019 maximizing behavior with respect to money demand, but it did not extend that analysis to decisions that affect aggregate supply. The new approach aimed at an analysis of how individual choices would affect the entire spectrum of economic activity.<\/p>\n

These economists rejected the entire framework of conventional macroeconomic analysis. Indeed, they rejected the very term. For them there is no macroeconomics, nor is there something called microeconomics. For them, there is only economics, which they regard as the analysis of behavior based on individual maximization. The analysis of the determination of the price level and real GDP becomes an application of basic economic theory, not a separate body of thought. The approach to macroeconomic analysis built from an analysis of individual maximizing choices is called new classical economics.<\/p>\n

New Classical Economics<\/h3>\n

Like classical economic thought, new classical economics focuses on the determination of long-run aggregate supply and the economy\u2019s ability to reach this level of output quickly. But the similarity ends there. Classical economics emerged in large part before economists had developed sophisticated mathematical models of maximizing behavior. The new classical economics puts mathematics to work in an extremely complex way to generalize from individual behavior to aggregate results.<\/p>\n

Because the new classical approach suggests that the economy will remain at or near its potential output, it follows that the changes we observe in economic activity result not from changes in aggregate demand but from changes in long-run aggregate supply. New classical economics suggests that economic changes don\u2019t necessarily imply economic problems.<\/p>\n

New classical economists pointed to the supply-side shocks of the 1970s, both from changes in oil prices and changes in expectations, as evidence that their emphasis on aggregate supply was on the mark. They argued that the large observed swings in real GDP reflected underlying changes in the economy\u2019s potential output. The recessionary and inflationary gaps that so perplexed policy makers during the 1970s were not gaps at all, the new classical economists insisted. Instead, they reflected changes in the economy\u2019s own potential output.<\/p>\n

Rational Expectations<\/h3>\n

Two particularly controversial propositions of new classical theory relate to the impacts of monetary and of fiscal policy. Both are implications of the rational expectations hypothesis, which assumes that individuals form expectations about the future based on the information available to them, and that they act on those expectations.<\/p>\n

The rational expectations hypothesis suggests that monetary policy, even though it will affect the aggregate demand curve, might have no effect on real GDP. This possibility, which was suggested by Robert Lucas, is illustrated in Figure 17.9 “Contractionary Monetary Policy: With and Without Rational Expectations.”\u00a0Suppose the economy is initially in equilibrium at point 1 in Panel (a). Real GDP equals its potential output, Y<\/em>P<\/sub>. Now suppose a reduction in the money supply causes aggregate demand to fall to AD<\/em>2<\/sub>. In our model, the solution moves to point 2; the price level falls to P<\/em>2<\/sub>, and real GDP falls to Y<\/em>2<\/sub>. There is a recessionary gap. In the long run, the short-run aggregate supply curve shifts to SRAS<\/em>2<\/sub>, the price level falls to P<\/em>3<\/sub>, and the economy returns to its potential output at point 3.<\/p>\n

\n
\"Two<\/p>\n

Figure 17.9.<\/strong> Contractionary Monetary Policy: With and Without Rational Expectations. Panels (a) and (b) show an economy operating at potential output (1); a contractionary monetary policy shifts aggregate demand to AD2. Panel (a) shows the kind of response we have studied up to this point; real GDP falls to Y2 in period (2); the recessionary gap is closed in the long run by falling nominal wages that cause an increase in short-run aggregate supply in period (3). Panel (b) shows the rational expectations argument. People anticipate the impact of the contractionary policy when it is undertaken, so that the short-run aggregate supply curve shifts to the right at the same time the aggregate demand curve shifts to the left. The result is a reduction in the price level but no change in real GDP; the solution moves from (1) to (2).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

The new classical story is quite different. Consumers and firms observe that the money supply has fallen and anticipate the eventual reduction in the price level to P<\/em>3<\/sub>. They adjust their expectations accordingly. Workers agree to lower nominal wages, and the short-run aggregate supply curve shifts to SRAS<\/em>2<\/sub>. This occurs as aggregate demand falls. As suggested in Panel (b), the price level falls to P<\/em>3<\/sub>, and output remains at potential. The solution moves from (1) to (2) with no loss in real GDP.<\/p>\n

In this new classical world, there is only one way for a change in the money supply to affect output, and that is for the change to take people by surprise. An unexpected change cannot affect expectations, so the short-run aggregate supply curve does not shift in the short run, and events play out as in Panel (a). Monetary policy can affect output, but only if it takes people by surprise.<\/p>\n

The new classical school offers an even stronger case against the operation of fiscal policy. It argues that fiscal policy does not shift the aggregate demand curve at all! Consider, for example, an expansionary fiscal policy. Such a policy involves an increase in government purchases or transfer payments or a cut in taxes. Any of these policies will increase the deficit or reduce the surplus. New classical economists argue that households, when they observe the government carrying out a policy that increases the debt, will anticipate that they, or their children, or their children\u2019s children, will end up paying more in taxes. And, according to the new classical story, these households will reduce their consumption as a result. This will, the new classical economists argue, cancel any tendency for the expansionary policy to affect aggregate demand.<\/p>\n

Self Check: New Classical Economics and Rational Expectations<\/h2>\n

Answer the question(s) below to see how well you understand the topics covered in the previous section. This short quiz does not<\/strong> count toward your grade in the class, and you can retake it an unlimited number of times.<\/p>\n

You\u2019ll have more success on the Self Check if you\u2019ve completed the Reading in this section.<\/span><\/p>\n

Use this quiz to check your understanding and decide whether to (1) study the previous section further or (2) move on to the next section.<\/p>\n

\t