{"id":137,"date":"2015-07-21T21:06:06","date_gmt":"2015-07-21T21:06:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/courses.candelalearning.com\/styleforstudents\/?post_type=chapter&p=137"},"modified":"2015-07-21T21:06:06","modified_gmt":"2015-07-21T21:06:06","slug":"faqs-about-citing-sources","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-hccc-styleforstudents-1\/chapter\/faqs-about-citing-sources\/","title":{"raw":"FAQs about Citing Sources","rendered":"FAQs about Citing Sources"},"content":{"raw":"
\r\n
\r\n\r\nQ<\/strong>: Suppose I can\u2019t determine the author of a source, should I just cite \u201cAnonymous\u201d?\r\nA<\/strong>: This is an outmoded practice. If no author is listed but an affiliated organization is given, consider the name of that organization to be the source, both in-text and on the references page.\r\n\r\nQ<\/strong>: What if I can\u2019t find either author or year?\u00a0 May I cite the source in-text just by its title?\r\nA<\/strong>: Typically, yes. Supply the title (or a shortened form of it) in-text in quotation marks, then give fuller bibliographic information on the references page.\r\n\r\nQ<\/strong>: When citing web sources, should I give the URL within the text itself?\r\nA<\/strong>: No\u2014this is non-standard and, frankly, comes off as pretty lame. Provide the URL on the references page, but handle the in-text citation as you would any other, providing author-year or source number. Unless the nature of the source as being web-based is highly relevant to context, the reader in the act of reading should be virtually unaware (no pun intended) that you are using a web source. Never attempt an in-text citation with something as informal and downright silly as \u201cAccording to the internet . . .\u201d\r\n\r\nQ<\/strong>: Suppose a web page has nothing but a title on it, and I have no idea who authored it?\r\nA<\/strong>: Then you would provide only that information available, in particular the URL and the date accessed, on your references page. As always, be sure to carefully assess the page\u2019s quality and credibility too.\r\n\r\nQ<\/strong>: What about information obtained verbally from a credible source?\r\nA<\/strong>: In-text, handle the citation as you normally would, giving author-year or source number; on the references page, follow the person\u2019s name with his or her title or affiliation (you could even supply the party\u2019s mailing address), then the words \u201cpersonal communication.\u201d\r\n\r\nQ<\/strong>: What if I\u2019m citing e-mail, or a newsgroup, or a gopher site, or a CD-ROM? How do I handle this on the references page?\r\nA<\/strong>: For such specialized concerns, you need to consult a more specific style guide. Online, I can recommend online! a reference guide to using internet sources.<\/em><\/a>\r\n\r\nQ<\/strong>: I\u2019m trying to return to a page I visited last week, and I get error messages. How do I find it?\r\nA<\/strong>: After rechecking your typing, try truncating a portion of the URL. Cutting off the end of the address frequently takes you back to the page\u2019s author and you can try relocating from there. Of course, the page might indeed be gone, entirely eliminated from cyberspace.\r\n\r\nQ<\/strong>: How important is a small detail such as punctuation on my references page?\r\nA<\/strong>: Consistency within your document is what matters. Professors rarely deduct points over such small issues, but they do expect you to pay close attention to them and be consistent in your practices.\r\n\r\nQ<\/strong>: Suppose I\u2019m citing an author who cited someone else? Do I cite the original author or just the one I read?\r\nA<\/strong>: You should only formally cite the author that you actually read, although a narrative mention of the other source within an in-text sentence is often appropriate. For example: \u201cKunkle (2001) reports that a 1998 study by Edmund Eberly revealed . . .\u201d Of course, if time permits and the circumstances suggest you should, you might try to track down the original source and interpret it for yourself.\r\n\r\nQ<\/strong>: Are footnotes \u201cin\u201d or \u201cout\u201d?\r\nA<\/strong>: They\u2019re definitely \u201cout.\u201d Try to avoid them. Journals rarely use them, preferring an endnotes page with explanatory notes at the end of the text. Even this practice is rare except in scholarly works, where the author chooses to offer explanatory side discussions.\r\n\r\nQ<\/strong>: What\u2019s the difference between a references page and a bibliography?\r\nA<\/strong>: A references page contains only those references that were directly cited in the text. A bibliography page is more of a reading list\u2014it contains references referred to in the text plus the chief publications that you consulted in a general way. Some people\u2014even some professors\u2014use the two terms loosely and interchangeably, but journals tend to follow the distinction I just provided.\r\n\r\nQ<\/strong>: What if I can\u2019t find a source in the library, but the computer tells me it\u2019s on the shelves?\r\nA<\/strong>: Ask a librarian (this answer applies to questions I haven\u2019t listed here as well). My experience is that most librarians are terribly helpful and kind to serious, respectful students.\r\n\r\nQ<\/strong>: I\u2019m old-fashioned and I still believe in books, so can you recommend some print resources to answer specific questions about citing web sources?\r\nA<\/strong>: Good for you. I highly recommend Electronic Style: A Guide to Citing Electronic Information<\/em><\/a>, by Xia Li and Nancy B. Crane. Also, the most modern library editions of major style guides (The MLA Style Manual and Guide to Scholarly Publishing<\/em><\/a>;\u00a0The Chicago Manual of Style<\/em><\/a>) have thorough information and discussion on citing web sources.\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n
<\/div>\r\n<\/div>","rendered":"
\n
\n

Q<\/strong>: Suppose I can\u2019t determine the author of a source, should I just cite \u201cAnonymous\u201d?
\nA<\/strong>: This is an outmoded practice. If no author is listed but an affiliated organization is given, consider the name of that organization to be the source, both in-text and on the references page.<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong>: What if I can\u2019t find either author or year?\u00a0 May I cite the source in-text just by its title?
\nA<\/strong>: Typically, yes. Supply the title (or a shortened form of it) in-text in quotation marks, then give fuller bibliographic information on the references page.<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong>: When citing web sources, should I give the URL within the text itself?
\nA<\/strong>: No\u2014this is non-standard and, frankly, comes off as pretty lame. Provide the URL on the references page, but handle the in-text citation as you would any other, providing author-year or source number. Unless the nature of the source as being web-based is highly relevant to context, the reader in the act of reading should be virtually unaware (no pun intended) that you are using a web source. Never attempt an in-text citation with something as informal and downright silly as \u201cAccording to the internet . . .\u201d<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong>: Suppose a web page has nothing but a title on it, and I have no idea who authored it?
\nA<\/strong>: Then you would provide only that information available, in particular the URL and the date accessed, on your references page. As always, be sure to carefully assess the page\u2019s quality and credibility too.<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong>: What about information obtained verbally from a credible source?
\nA<\/strong>: In-text, handle the citation as you normally would, giving author-year or source number; on the references page, follow the person\u2019s name with his or her title or affiliation (you could even supply the party\u2019s mailing address), then the words \u201cpersonal communication.\u201d<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong>: What if I\u2019m citing e-mail, or a newsgroup, or a gopher site, or a CD-ROM? How do I handle this on the references page?
\nA<\/strong>: For such specialized concerns, you need to consult a more specific style guide. Online, I can recommend online! a reference guide to using internet sources.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Q<\/strong>: I\u2019m trying to return to a page I visited last week, and I get error messages. How do I find it?
\nA<\/strong>: After rechecking your typing, try truncating a portion of the URL. Cutting off the end of the address frequently takes you back to the page\u2019s author and you can try relocating from there. Of course, the page might indeed be gone, entirely eliminated from cyberspace.<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong>: How important is a small detail such as punctuation on my references page?
\nA<\/strong>: Consistency within your document is what matters. Professors rarely deduct points over such small issues, but they do expect you to pay close attention to them and be consistent in your practices.<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong>: Suppose I\u2019m citing an author who cited someone else? Do I cite the original author or just the one I read?
\nA<\/strong>: You should only formally cite the author that you actually read, although a narrative mention of the other source within an in-text sentence is often appropriate. For example: \u201cKunkle (2001) reports that a 1998 study by Edmund Eberly revealed . . .\u201d Of course, if time permits and the circumstances suggest you should, you might try to track down the original source and interpret it for yourself.<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong>: Are footnotes \u201cin\u201d or \u201cout\u201d?
\nA<\/strong>: They\u2019re definitely \u201cout.\u201d Try to avoid them. Journals rarely use them, preferring an endnotes page with explanatory notes at the end of the text. Even this practice is rare except in scholarly works, where the author chooses to offer explanatory side discussions.<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong>: What\u2019s the difference between a references page and a bibliography?
\nA<\/strong>: A references page contains only those references that were directly cited in the text. A bibliography page is more of a reading list\u2014it contains references referred to in the text plus the chief publications that you consulted in a general way. Some people\u2014even some professors\u2014use the two terms loosely and interchangeably, but journals tend to follow the distinction I just provided.<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong>: What if I can\u2019t find a source in the library, but the computer tells me it\u2019s on the shelves?
\nA<\/strong>: Ask a librarian (this answer applies to questions I haven\u2019t listed here as well). My experience is that most librarians are terribly helpful and kind to serious, respectful students.<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong>: I\u2019m old-fashioned and I still believe in books, so can you recommend some print resources to answer specific questions about citing web sources?
\nA<\/strong>: Good for you. I highly recommend Electronic Style: A Guide to Citing Electronic Information<\/em><\/a>, by Xia Li and Nancy B. Crane. Also, the most modern library editions of major style guides (The MLA Style Manual and Guide to Scholarly Publishing<\/em><\/a>;\u00a0The Chicago Manual of Style<\/em><\/a>) have thorough information and discussion on citing web sources.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Candela Citations<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
CC licensed content, Shared previously<\/div>