{"id":380,"date":"2015-08-21T17:59:30","date_gmt":"2015-08-21T17:59:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/courses.candelalearning.com\/ushistory1os2xmaster\/?post_type=chapter&#038;p=380"},"modified":"2016-08-08T02:06:01","modified_gmt":"2016-08-08T02:06:01","slug":"the-filibuster-and-the-quest-for-new-slave-states","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-hccc-ushistory1os2xmaster\/chapter\/the-filibuster-and-the-quest-for-new-slave-states\/","title":{"raw":"The Filibuster and the Quest for New Slave States","rendered":"The Filibuster and the Quest for New Slave States"},"content":{"raw":"<div class=\"bcc-box bcc-highlight\">\r\n<h3>Learning Objectives<\/h3>\r\nBy the end of this section, you will be able to:\r\n<ul class=\"im_orderedlist\">\r\n \t<li>Explain the expansionist goals of advocates of slavery<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Describe the filibuster expeditions undertaken during the antebellum era<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<p id=\"fs-idp23594224\">Southern expansionists had spearheaded the drive to add more territory to the United States. They applauded the Louisiana Purchase and fervently supported Indian removal, the annexation of Texas, and the Mexican-American War. Drawing inspiration from the annexation of Texas, proslavery expansionists hoped to replicate that feat by bringing Cuba and other territories into the United States and thereby enlarging the American empire of slavery.<\/p>\r\n<p id=\"fs-idp21450032\">In the 1850s, the expansionist drive among white southerners intensified. Among southern imperialists, one way to push for the creation of an American empire of slavery was through the actions of filibusters\u2014men who led unofficial military operations intended to seize land from foreign countries or foment revolution there. These unsanctioned military adventures were not part of the official foreign policy of the United States; American citizens simply formed themselves into private armies to forcefully annex new land without the government\u2019s approval.<\/p>\r\n<p id=\"fs-idp20656832\">An 1818 federal law made it a crime to undertake such adventures, which was an indication of both the reality of efforts at expansion through these illegal expeditions and the government\u2019s effort to create a U.S. foreign policy. Nonetheless, Americans continued to filibuster throughout the nineteenth century. In 1819, an expedition of two hundred Americans invaded Spanish Texas, intent on creating a republic modeled on the United States, only to be driven out by Spanish forces. Using force, taking action, and asserting white supremacy in these militaristic drives were seen by many as an ideal of American male vigor. President Jackson epitomized this military prowess as an officer in the Tennessee militia, where earlier in the century he had played a leading role in ending the Creek War and driving Indian peoples out of Alabama and Georgia. His reputation helped him to win the presidency in 1828 and again in 1832.<\/p>\r\n<p id=\"fs-idp23510912\">Filibustering plots picked up pace in the 1850s as the drive for expansion continued. Slaveholders looked south to the Caribbean, Mexico, and Central America, hoping to add new slave states. Spanish Cuba became the objective of many American slaveholders in the 1850s, as debate over the island dominated the national conversation. Many who urged its annexation believed Cuba had to be made part of the United States to prevent it from going the route of Haiti, with black slaves overthrowing their masters and creating another black republic, a prospect horrifying to many in the United States. Americans also feared that the British, who had an interest in the sugar island, would make the first move and snatch Cuba from the United States. Since Britain had outlawed slavery in its colonies in 1833, blacks on the island of Cuba would then be free.<\/p>\r\n<p id=\"fs-idm95566384\">Narisco L\u00f3pez, a Cuban who wanted to end Spanish control of the island, gained American support. He tried five times to take the island, with his last effort occurring in the summer of 1851 when he led an armed group from New Orleans. Thousands came out to cheer his small force as they set off to wrest Cuba from the Spanish. Unfortunately for L\u00f3pez and his supporters, however, the effort to take Cuba did not produce the hoped-for spontaneous uprising of the Cuban people. Spanish authorities in Cuba captured and executed L\u00f3pez and the American filibusters.<\/p>\r\n<p id=\"fs-idm167189344\">Efforts to take Cuba continued under President Franklin Pierce, who had announced at his inauguration in 1853 his intention to pursue expansion. In 1854, American diplomats met in Ostend, Belgium, to find a way to gain Cuba. They wrote a secret memo, known as the <span data-type=\"term\">Ostend Manifesto<\/span> (thought to be penned by James Buchanan, who was elected president two years later), stating that if Spain refused to sell Cuba to the United States, the United States was justified in taking the island as a national security measure.<\/p>\r\n<p id=\"fs-idm147859376\">The contents of this memo were supposed to remain secret, but details were leaked to the public, leading the House of Representatives to demand a copy. Many in the North were outraged over what appeared to be a southern scheme, orchestrated by what they perceived as the Slave Power\u2014a term they used to describe the disproportionate influence that elite slaveholders wielded\u2014to expand slavery. European powers also reacted with anger. Southern annexationists, however, applauded the effort to take Cuba. The Louisiana legislature in 1854 asked the federal government to take decisive action, and John Quitman, a former Mississippi governor, raised money from slaveholders to fund efforts to take the island.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\">Read an 1860 editorial titled <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/1860\/12\/13\/news\/annexation-of-cuba-made-easy.html\" target=\"_blank\">Annexation of Cuba Made Easy<\/a> from the online archives of <em data-effect=\"italics\">The<\/em> <em data-effect=\"italics\">New York Times<\/em>. Does the author support annexation? Why or why not?<\/div>\r\n<p id=\"fs-idm180233776\">Controversy around the Ostend Manifesto caused President Pierce to step back from the plan to take Cuba. After his election, President Buchanan, despite his earlier expansionist efforts, denounced filibustering as the action of pirates. Filibustering caused an even wider gulf between the North and the South.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<figure id=\"Figure_12_04_Ostend\">[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"390\"]<img src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images-archive-read-only\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2015\/08\/23202532\/CNX_History_12_04_Ostend.jpg\" alt=\"A cartoon entitled The \u201cOstend Doctrine\u201d shows James Buchanan being robbed by four thugs, all of whom use specific phrases from the Ostend Manifesto as they relieve Buchanan of his belongings. For example, one says, \u201cCome let\u2019s have that ticker [watch] or you\u2019ll find that \u2018Considerations exist which render delay\u2019 in doing so \u2018Exceedingly dangerous\u2019 to your head.\u201d\" width=\"390\" height=\"290\" data-media-type=\"image\/jpeg\" \/> The \u201cOstend Doctrine\u201d (1856), by artist Louis Maurer and lithographer Nathaniel Currier, mocks James Buchanan by depicting him being robbed, just as many northerners believed slaveholders were attempting to rob Spain. The thugs robbing Buchanan use specific phrases from the Ostend Manifesto as they relieve him of his belongings.[\/caption]<\/figure>\r\n<p id=\"fs-idm170120560\">Cuba was not the only territory in slaveholders\u2019 expansionist sights: some focused on Mexico and Central America. In 1855, Tennessee-born William Walker, along with an army of no more than sixty mercenaries, gained control of the Central American nation of Nicaragua. Previously, Walker had launched a successful invasion of Mexico, dubbing his conquered land the <span class=\"no-emphasis\" data-type=\"term\">Republic of Sonora<\/span>. In a relatively short period of time, Walker was dislodged from Sonora by Mexican authorities and forced to retreat back to the United States. His conquest of Nicaragua garnered far more attention, catapulting him into national popularity as the heroic embodiment of white supremacy.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<figure id=\"Figure_12_04_Nicaragua\">\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"520\"]<img src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images-archive-read-only\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2015\/08\/23202533\/CNX_History_12_04_Nicaragua.jpg\" alt=\"Photograph (a) is a portrait of William Walker. Photograph (b) is a portrait of Cornelius Vanderbilt.\" width=\"520\" height=\"366\" data-media-type=\"image\/jpeg\" \/> Famed Civil War photographer Mathew Brady took this photograph (a) of \u201cGeneral\u201d William Walker circa 1855\u20131860. Walker led a filibuster expedition and briefly conquered Nicaragua, fulfilling a dream of many pro-expansionist southern slaveholders. Cornelius Vanderbilt (b), the shipping tycoon who controlled much of the traffic across Nicaragua between the Atlantic and the Pacific, clashed with Walker and ultimately supported Costa Rica in its war against him.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n<\/figure>\r\n<p id=\"fs-idp53514272\">Why Nicaragua? Nicaragua presented a tempting target because it provided a quick route from the Caribbean to the Pacific: Only twelve miles of land stood between the Pacific Ocean, the inland Lake Nicaragua, and the river that drained into the Atlantic. Shipping from the East Coast to the West Coast of the United States had to travel either by land across the continent, south around the entire continent of South America, or through Nicaragua. Previously, American tycoon Cornelius Vanderbilt\u00a0had recognized the strategic importance of Nicaragua and worked with the Nicaraguan government to control shipping there. The filibustering of William Walker may have excited expansionist-minded southerners, but it greatly upset Vanderbilt\u2019s business interests in the region.<\/p>\r\n<p id=\"fs-idp60561472\">Walker clung to the racist, expansionist philosophies of the proslavery South. In 1856, Walker made slavery legal in Nicaragua\u2014it had been illegal there for thirty years\u2014in a move to gain the support of the South. He also reopened the slave trade. In 1856, he was elected president of Nicaragua, but in 1857, he was chased from the country. When he returned to Central America in 1860, he was captured by the British and released to Honduran authorities, who executed him by firing squad.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<div class=\"textbox\">\r\n<h1 data-type=\"title\">Section Summary<\/h1>\r\n<p id=\"fs-idm5710528\">The decade of the 1850s witnessed various schemes to expand the American empire of slavery. The Ostend Manifesto articulated the right of the United States to forcefully seize Cuba if Spain would not sell it, while filibuster expeditions attempted to annex new slave states without the benefit of governmental approval. Those who pursued the goal of expanding American slavery believed they embodied the true spirit of white racial superiority.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\nhttps:\/\/www.openassessments.org\/assessments\/985<\/section>\r\n\r\n<div class=\"bcc-box bcc-info\">\r\n<h3>Review Question<\/h3>\r\n<section>\r\n<ol>\r\n \t<li>Why did expansionists set their sights on the annexation of Spanish Cuba?<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<\/section><\/div>\r\n<div class=\"bcc-box bcc-info\">\r\n<h3>Answer to Review Question<\/h3>\r\n<section>\r\n<ol>\r\n \t<li>Many slaveholding expansionists believed that the events of the Haitian Revolution could repeat themselves in Cuba, leading to the overthrow of slavery on the island and the creation of an independent black republic. Americans also feared that the British would seize Cuba\u2014which, since Britain had outlawed slavery in its colonies in 1833, would render all slaves on the island free.<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<\/section><\/div>\r\n<div class=\"bcc-box bcc-info\">\r\n<h3>Critical Thinking Questions<\/h3>\r\n<section>\r\n<ol>\r\n \t<li>Compare and contrast the steamboats of the antebellum years with technologies today. In your estimation, what modern technology compares to steamboats in its transformative power?<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Does the history of the cotton kingdom support or undermine the Jeffersonian vision of white farmers on self-sufficient farms? Explain your answer.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Based on your reading of William J. Anderson\u2019s and John Brown\u2019s accounts, what types of traumas did slaves experience? How were the experiences of black women and men similar and different?<\/li>\r\n \t<li>What strategies did slaves employ to resist, revolt, and sustain their own independent communities and cultures? How did slaves use white southerners\u2019 own philosophies\u2014paternalism and Christianity, for example\u2014to their advantage in these efforts?<\/li>\r\n \t<li>What are the major arguments put forward by proslavery advocates? How would you argue against their statements?<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Consider filibustering from the point of view of the Cuban or Nicaraguan people. If you lived in Cuba or Nicaragua, would you support filibustering? Why or why not?<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<\/section><\/div>\r\n<div class=\"bcc-box bcc-success\"><section>\r\n<h3>Glossary<\/h3>\r\n<strong>Ostend Manifesto\u00a0<\/strong>the secret diplomatic memo stating that if Spain refused to sell Cuba to the United States, the United States was justified in taking the island as a national security measure\r\n\r\n<\/section><\/div>","rendered":"<div class=\"bcc-box bcc-highlight\">\n<h3>Learning Objectives<\/h3>\n<p>By the end of this section, you will be able to:<\/p>\n<ul class=\"im_orderedlist\">\n<li>Explain the expansionist goals of advocates of slavery<\/li>\n<li>Describe the filibuster expeditions undertaken during the antebellum era<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<p id=\"fs-idp23594224\">Southern expansionists had spearheaded the drive to add more territory to the United States. They applauded the Louisiana Purchase and fervently supported Indian removal, the annexation of Texas, and the Mexican-American War. Drawing inspiration from the annexation of Texas, proslavery expansionists hoped to replicate that feat by bringing Cuba and other territories into the United States and thereby enlarging the American empire of slavery.<\/p>\n<p id=\"fs-idp21450032\">In the 1850s, the expansionist drive among white southerners intensified. Among southern imperialists, one way to push for the creation of an American empire of slavery was through the actions of filibusters\u2014men who led unofficial military operations intended to seize land from foreign countries or foment revolution there. These unsanctioned military adventures were not part of the official foreign policy of the United States; American citizens simply formed themselves into private armies to forcefully annex new land without the government\u2019s approval.<\/p>\n<p id=\"fs-idp20656832\">An 1818 federal law made it a crime to undertake such adventures, which was an indication of both the reality of efforts at expansion through these illegal expeditions and the government\u2019s effort to create a U.S. foreign policy. Nonetheless, Americans continued to filibuster throughout the nineteenth century. In 1819, an expedition of two hundred Americans invaded Spanish Texas, intent on creating a republic modeled on the United States, only to be driven out by Spanish forces. Using force, taking action, and asserting white supremacy in these militaristic drives were seen by many as an ideal of American male vigor. President Jackson epitomized this military prowess as an officer in the Tennessee militia, where earlier in the century he had played a leading role in ending the Creek War and driving Indian peoples out of Alabama and Georgia. His reputation helped him to win the presidency in 1828 and again in 1832.<\/p>\n<p id=\"fs-idp23510912\">Filibustering plots picked up pace in the 1850s as the drive for expansion continued. Slaveholders looked south to the Caribbean, Mexico, and Central America, hoping to add new slave states. Spanish Cuba became the objective of many American slaveholders in the 1850s, as debate over the island dominated the national conversation. Many who urged its annexation believed Cuba had to be made part of the United States to prevent it from going the route of Haiti, with black slaves overthrowing their masters and creating another black republic, a prospect horrifying to many in the United States. Americans also feared that the British, who had an interest in the sugar island, would make the first move and snatch Cuba from the United States. Since Britain had outlawed slavery in its colonies in 1833, blacks on the island of Cuba would then be free.<\/p>\n<p id=\"fs-idm95566384\">Narisco L\u00f3pez, a Cuban who wanted to end Spanish control of the island, gained American support. He tried five times to take the island, with his last effort occurring in the summer of 1851 when he led an armed group from New Orleans. Thousands came out to cheer his small force as they set off to wrest Cuba from the Spanish. Unfortunately for L\u00f3pez and his supporters, however, the effort to take Cuba did not produce the hoped-for spontaneous uprising of the Cuban people. Spanish authorities in Cuba captured and executed L\u00f3pez and the American filibusters.<\/p>\n<p id=\"fs-idm167189344\">Efforts to take Cuba continued under President Franklin Pierce, who had announced at his inauguration in 1853 his intention to pursue expansion. In 1854, American diplomats met in Ostend, Belgium, to find a way to gain Cuba. They wrote a secret memo, known as the <span data-type=\"term\">Ostend Manifesto<\/span> (thought to be penned by James Buchanan, who was elected president two years later), stating that if Spain refused to sell Cuba to the United States, the United States was justified in taking the island as a national security measure.<\/p>\n<p id=\"fs-idm147859376\">The contents of this memo were supposed to remain secret, but details were leaked to the public, leading the House of Representatives to demand a copy. Many in the North were outraged over what appeared to be a southern scheme, orchestrated by what they perceived as the Slave Power\u2014a term they used to describe the disproportionate influence that elite slaveholders wielded\u2014to expand slavery. European powers also reacted with anger. Southern annexationists, however, applauded the effort to take Cuba. The Louisiana legislature in 1854 asked the federal government to take decisive action, and John Quitman, a former Mississippi governor, raised money from slaveholders to fund efforts to take the island.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\">Read an 1860 editorial titled <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/1860\/12\/13\/news\/annexation-of-cuba-made-easy.html\" target=\"_blank\">Annexation of Cuba Made Easy<\/a> from the online archives of <em data-effect=\"italics\">The<\/em> <em data-effect=\"italics\">New York Times<\/em>. Does the author support annexation? Why or why not?<\/div>\n<p id=\"fs-idm180233776\">Controversy around the Ostend Manifesto caused President Pierce to step back from the plan to take Cuba. After his election, President Buchanan, despite his earlier expansionist efforts, denounced filibustering as the action of pirates. Filibustering caused an even wider gulf between the North and the South.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"Figure_12_04_Ostend\">\n<div style=\"width: 400px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images-archive-read-only\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2015\/08\/23202532\/CNX_History_12_04_Ostend.jpg\" alt=\"A cartoon entitled The \u201cOstend Doctrine\u201d shows James Buchanan being robbed by four thugs, all of whom use specific phrases from the Ostend Manifesto as they relieve Buchanan of his belongings. For example, one says, \u201cCome let\u2019s have that ticker [watch] or you\u2019ll find that \u2018Considerations exist which render delay\u2019 in doing so \u2018Exceedingly dangerous\u2019 to your head.\u201d\" width=\"390\" height=\"290\" data-media-type=\"image\/jpeg\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-caption-text\">The \u201cOstend Doctrine\u201d (1856), by artist Louis Maurer and lithographer Nathaniel Currier, mocks James Buchanan by depicting him being robbed, just as many northerners believed slaveholders were attempting to rob Spain. The thugs robbing Buchanan use specific phrases from the Ostend Manifesto as they relieve him of his belongings.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<p id=\"fs-idm170120560\">Cuba was not the only territory in slaveholders\u2019 expansionist sights: some focused on Mexico and Central America. In 1855, Tennessee-born William Walker, along with an army of no more than sixty mercenaries, gained control of the Central American nation of Nicaragua. Previously, Walker had launched a successful invasion of Mexico, dubbing his conquered land the <span class=\"no-emphasis\" data-type=\"term\">Republic of Sonora<\/span>. In a relatively short period of time, Walker was dislodged from Sonora by Mexican authorities and forced to retreat back to the United States. His conquest of Nicaragua garnered far more attention, catapulting him into national popularity as the heroic embodiment of white supremacy.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"Figure_12_04_Nicaragua\">\n<div style=\"width: 530px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images-archive-read-only\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/883\/2015\/08\/23202533\/CNX_History_12_04_Nicaragua.jpg\" alt=\"Photograph (a) is a portrait of William Walker. Photograph (b) is a portrait of Cornelius Vanderbilt.\" width=\"520\" height=\"366\" data-media-type=\"image\/jpeg\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Famed Civil War photographer Mathew Brady took this photograph (a) of \u201cGeneral\u201d William Walker circa 1855\u20131860. Walker led a filibuster expedition and briefly conquered Nicaragua, fulfilling a dream of many pro-expansionist southern slaveholders. Cornelius Vanderbilt (b), the shipping tycoon who controlled much of the traffic across Nicaragua between the Atlantic and the Pacific, clashed with Walker and ultimately supported Costa Rica in its war against him.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<p id=\"fs-idp53514272\">Why Nicaragua? Nicaragua presented a tempting target because it provided a quick route from the Caribbean to the Pacific: Only twelve miles of land stood between the Pacific Ocean, the inland Lake Nicaragua, and the river that drained into the Atlantic. Shipping from the East Coast to the West Coast of the United States had to travel either by land across the continent, south around the entire continent of South America, or through Nicaragua. Previously, American tycoon Cornelius Vanderbilt\u00a0had recognized the strategic importance of Nicaragua and worked with the Nicaraguan government to control shipping there. The filibustering of William Walker may have excited expansionist-minded southerners, but it greatly upset Vanderbilt\u2019s business interests in the region.<\/p>\n<p id=\"fs-idp60561472\">Walker clung to the racist, expansionist philosophies of the proslavery South. In 1856, Walker made slavery legal in Nicaragua\u2014it had been illegal there for thirty years\u2014in a move to gain the support of the South. He also reopened the slave trade. In 1856, he was elected president of Nicaragua, but in 1857, he was chased from the country. When he returned to Central America in 1860, he was captured by the British and released to Honduran authorities, who executed him by firing squad.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox\">\n<h1 data-type=\"title\">Section Summary<\/h1>\n<p id=\"fs-idm5710528\">The decade of the 1850s witnessed various schemes to expand the American empire of slavery. The Ostend Manifesto articulated the right of the United States to forcefully seize Cuba if Spain would not sell it, while filibuster expeditions attempted to annex new slave states without the benefit of governmental approval. Those who pursued the goal of expanding American slavery believed they embodied the true spirit of white racial superiority.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>https:\/\/www.openassessments.org\/assessments\/985<\/p>\n<div class=\"bcc-box bcc-info\">\n<h3>Review Question<\/h3>\n<section>\n<ol>\n<li>Why did expansionists set their sights on the annexation of Spanish Cuba?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"bcc-box bcc-info\">\n<h3>Answer to Review Question<\/h3>\n<section>\n<ol>\n<li>Many slaveholding expansionists believed that the events of the Haitian Revolution could repeat themselves in Cuba, leading to the overthrow of slavery on the island and the creation of an independent black republic. Americans also feared that the British would seize Cuba\u2014which, since Britain had outlawed slavery in its colonies in 1833, would render all slaves on the island free.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"bcc-box bcc-info\">\n<h3>Critical Thinking Questions<\/h3>\n<section>\n<ol>\n<li>Compare and contrast the steamboats of the antebellum years with technologies today. In your estimation, what modern technology compares to steamboats in its transformative power?<\/li>\n<li>Does the history of the cotton kingdom support or undermine the Jeffersonian vision of white farmers on self-sufficient farms? Explain your answer.<\/li>\n<li>Based on your reading of William J. Anderson\u2019s and John Brown\u2019s accounts, what types of traumas did slaves experience? How were the experiences of black women and men similar and different?<\/li>\n<li>What strategies did slaves employ to resist, revolt, and sustain their own independent communities and cultures? How did slaves use white southerners\u2019 own philosophies\u2014paternalism and Christianity, for example\u2014to their advantage in these efforts?<\/li>\n<li>What are the major arguments put forward by proslavery advocates? How would you argue against their statements?<\/li>\n<li>Consider filibustering from the point of view of the Cuban or Nicaraguan people. If you lived in Cuba or Nicaragua, would you support filibustering? Why or why not?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"bcc-box bcc-success\">\n<section>\n<h3>Glossary<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Ostend Manifesto\u00a0<\/strong>the secret diplomatic memo stating that if Spain refused to sell Cuba to the United States, the United States was justified in taking the island as a national security measure<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t <section class=\"citations-section\" role=\"contentinfo\">\n\t\t\t <h3>Candela Citations<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t <div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t <div id=\"citation-list-380\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <div class=\"licensing\"><div class=\"license-attribution-dropdown-subheading\">CC licensed content, Shared previously<\/div><ul class=\"citation-list\"><li>US History. <strong>Authored by<\/strong>: P. Scott Corbett, Volker  Janssen, John M. Lund,  Todd Pfannestiel, Paul Vickery, and Sylvie Waskiewicz. <strong>Provided by<\/strong>: OpenStax College. <strong>Located at<\/strong>: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/openstaxcollege.org\/textbooks\/us-history\">http:\/\/openstaxcollege.org\/textbooks\/us-history<\/a>. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"license\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/\">CC BY: Attribution<\/a><\/em>. <strong>License Terms<\/strong>: Download for free at http:\/\/cnx.org\/content\/col11740\/latest\/<\/li><\/ul><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t <\/section>","protected":false},"author":969,"menu_order":6,"template":"","meta":{"_candela_citation":"[{\"type\":\"cc\",\"description\":\"US History\",\"author\":\"P. Scott Corbett, Volker  Janssen, John M. Lund,  Todd Pfannestiel, Paul Vickery, and Sylvie Waskiewicz\",\"organization\":\"OpenStax College\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/openstaxcollege.org\/textbooks\/us-history\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"cc-by\",\"license_terms\":\"Download for free at http:\/\/cnx.org\/content\/col11740\/latest\/\"}]","CANDELA_OUTCOMES_GUID":"","pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-380","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry"],"part":355,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-hccc-ushistory1os2xmaster\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/380","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-hccc-ushistory1os2xmaster\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-hccc-ushistory1os2xmaster\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-hccc-ushistory1os2xmaster\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/969"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-hccc-ushistory1os2xmaster\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/380\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":895,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-hccc-ushistory1os2xmaster\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/380\/revisions\/895"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-hccc-ushistory1os2xmaster\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/355"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-hccc-ushistory1os2xmaster\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/380\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-hccc-ushistory1os2xmaster\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=380"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-hccc-ushistory1os2xmaster\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=380"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-hccc-ushistory1os2xmaster\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=380"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-hccc-ushistory1os2xmaster\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=380"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}