{"id":716,"date":"2017-10-10T16:54:07","date_gmt":"2017-10-10T16:54:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-jeffersoncc-englishcomp2kscopexmaster\/?post_type=chapter&p=716"},"modified":"2020-03-18T11:33:05","modified_gmt":"2020-03-18T11:33:05","slug":"sample-eng-101-grading-rubric","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-jefferson-collegecomposition\/chapter\/sample-eng-101-grading-rubric\/","title":{"raw":"Sample ENG 100 Grading Rubric","rendered":"Sample ENG 100 Grading Rubric"},"content":{"raw":"\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n
Exceeding Standards<\/strong>\r\n\r\n\u00a0A<\/strong><\/td>\r\nExceeding Standards<\/strong>\r\n\r\n\u00a0B<\/strong><\/td>\r\nMeeting <\/strong>\r\n\r\nStandards<\/strong>\r\n\r\n\u00a0C<\/strong><\/td>\r\nApproaching Standards<\/strong>\r\n\r\n\u00a0D<\/strong><\/td>\r\nNot Meeting Standards<\/strong>\r\n\r\n\u00a0F<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
 \r\n\r\nEnglish 100 papers must fulfill terms of individual instructor\u2019s assignment and exhibit no evidence of plagiarism.\r\n\r\n <\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Strong thesis that guides essay development<\/td>\r\nClear thesis<\/td>\r\nRecognizable thesis<\/td>\r\nBroken or abandoned thesis<\/td>\r\nNo thesis<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Strong organization, suited to topic, purpose, and audience<\/td>\r\nOrganization suited to topic, purpose, and audience<\/td>\r\nOrganizational pattern observed in majority of the essay<\/td>\r\nBroken or inadequate organization<\/td>\r\nNo organization<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Strong, coherent, and clearly relevant development with explanations and connections to thesis<\/td>\r\nGood relevant and coherent development with explanations and connections to thesis<\/td>\r\nRelevant and mostly coherent development of supporting points with some explanations and connections to thesis<\/td>\r\nBroken or irrelevant development and poor coherence with few or weak explanations<\/td>\r\nInadequate or no development and\/or weak coherence with no or inadequate explanations<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Integrated, varied and accurate research, if required<\/td>\r\nVaried and accurate research, if required<\/td>\r\nAdequate research, if required<\/td>\r\nFaulty and\/or incorrectly interpreted or applied research, if required<\/td>\r\nNo or inadequate research when research called for and\/or undocumented research<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Correct MLA documentation and paper format<\/td>\r\nCorrect MLA documentation and paper format<\/td>\r\nFew errors in MLA documentation and paper format<\/td>\r\nError-ridden MLA documentation and paper format<\/td>\r\nMany serious MLA documentation errors\r\n\r\n <\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Strong diction for subject, audience, and purpose<\/td>\r\nAppropriate diction for subject, audience, and purpose<\/td>\r\nFew errors in diction\r\n\r\n \r\n\r\n <\/td>\r\nMany errors in diction<\/td>\r\nSubstantial errors in diction<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Strong and logical transitions<\/td>\r\nLogical transitions<\/td>\r\nTransitions<\/td>\r\nWeak or inappropriate transitions<\/td>\r\nNo transitions<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
No grammatical errors<\/td>\r\nNo serious grammatical errors<\/td>\r\nSome grammatical errors, meaning clear<\/td>\r\nSerious grammatical errors, obscuring meaning<\/td>\r\nMany serious grammatical errors, obscuring meaning<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Strong evidence of effective revision\r\n\r\n <\/td>\r\nGood evidence of effective revision<\/td>\r\nSome evidence of effective revision<\/td>\r\nLittle or poor evidence of effective revision<\/td>\r\nNo evidence of effective revision<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>","rendered":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Exceeding Standards<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0A<\/strong><\/td>\n

Exceeding Standards<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0B<\/strong><\/td>\n

Meeting <\/strong><\/p>\n

Standards<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0C<\/strong><\/td>\n

Approaching Standards<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0D<\/strong><\/td>\n

Not Meeting Standards<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0F<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

 <\/p>\n

English 100 papers must fulfill terms of individual instructor\u2019s assignment and exhibit no evidence of plagiarism.<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Strong thesis that guides essay development<\/td>\nClear thesis<\/td>\nRecognizable thesis<\/td>\nBroken or abandoned thesis<\/td>\nNo thesis<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Strong organization, suited to topic, purpose, and audience<\/td>\nOrganization suited to topic, purpose, and audience<\/td>\nOrganizational pattern observed in majority of the essay<\/td>\nBroken or inadequate organization<\/td>\nNo organization<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Strong, coherent, and clearly relevant development with explanations and connections to thesis<\/td>\nGood relevant and coherent development with explanations and connections to thesis<\/td>\nRelevant and mostly coherent development of supporting points with some explanations and connections to thesis<\/td>\nBroken or irrelevant development and poor coherence with few or weak explanations<\/td>\nInadequate or no development and\/or weak coherence with no or inadequate explanations<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Integrated, varied and accurate research, if required<\/td>\nVaried and accurate research, if required<\/td>\nAdequate research, if required<\/td>\nFaulty and\/or incorrectly interpreted or applied research, if required<\/td>\nNo or inadequate research when research called for and\/or undocumented research<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Correct MLA documentation and paper format<\/td>\nCorrect MLA documentation and paper format<\/td>\nFew errors in MLA documentation and paper format<\/td>\nError-ridden MLA documentation and paper format<\/td>\nMany serious MLA documentation errors<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Strong diction for subject, audience, and purpose<\/td>\nAppropriate diction for subject, audience, and purpose<\/td>\nFew errors in diction<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Many errors in diction<\/td>\nSubstantial errors in diction<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Strong and logical transitions<\/td>\nLogical transitions<\/td>\nTransitions<\/td>\nWeak or inappropriate transitions<\/td>\nNo transitions<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
No grammatical errors<\/td>\nNo serious grammatical errors<\/td>\nSome grammatical errors, meaning clear<\/td>\nSerious grammatical errors, obscuring meaning<\/td>\nMany serious grammatical errors, obscuring meaning<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Strong evidence of effective revision<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Good evidence of effective revision<\/td>\nSome evidence of effective revision<\/td>\nLittle or poor evidence of effective revision<\/td>\nNo evidence of effective revision<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Candela Citations<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
CC licensed content, Shared previously<\/div>