{"id":549,"date":"2017-10-20T15:36:04","date_gmt":"2017-10-20T15:36:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-jeffersoncc-americanlit1\/?post_type=chapter&p=549"},"modified":"2019-12-12T18:46:25","modified_gmt":"2019-12-12T18:46:25","slug":"grading-rubric","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-jeffersoncc-americanlit1\/chapter\/grading-rubric\/","title":{"raw":"Grading Rubric","rendered":"Grading Rubric"},"content":{"raw":"

Grading Rubric<\/strong><\/h2>\r\nLiterary analysis papers must fulfill terms of the individual instructor\u2019s assignment and exhibit no evidence of plagiarism.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n
Exceeding Standards<\/strong><\/td>\r\nMeeting Standards<\/strong><\/td>\r\nApproaching Standards<\/strong><\/td>\r\nNot Meeting Standards<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n
\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n
Mastery of literary terminology\r\n\r\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\r\nAcceptable to good use of literary terminology<\/td>\r\nInadequate use of literary terminology\r\n\r\n <\/td>\r\nLittle or no use of literary terminology\r\n\r\n <\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Strong thesis statement\r\n\r\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\r\nAdequate to good thesis statement<\/td>\r\nRecognizable thesis with serious flaws\r\n\r\n <\/td>\r\nNo thesis<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Strong organization, development, and textual references and explanations<\/td>\r\nAdequate to good organization, development, and textual references and explanations\r\n\r\n <\/td>\r\nEvidence of effort, but\r\n\r\npoor organization, development, and \/or textual references and explanations\r\n\r\n <\/td>\r\nLittle or no \u00a0development,\r\n\r\norganization, and\/or textual references and explanations<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Strong understanding of genre\u2019s conventions<\/td>\r\nBasic to good understanding of genre\u2019s conventions<\/td>\r\nLittle evidence of understanding of genre\u2019s conventions<\/td>\r\nSerious errors in and\/or no understanding of genre\u2019s conventions<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Strong analytical skills demonstrated by clarity, insights, and depth of thought in literary interpretation<\/td>\r\nAdequate to good analytical skills and evidence of critical thinking in literary interpretation<\/td>\r\nEvidence of effort, but irrelevant and\/or confused thinking, faulty logic\r\n\r\n <\/td>\r\nSubstantial errors in expression of thought, meaning obscured, little or no explanation\r\n\r\n <\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Diverse and well-integrated scholarly research when required<\/td>\r\nAdequate to good scholarly research when required<\/td>\r\nInadequate or incorrectly applied research when required<\/td>\r\nLittle or no research when required<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Skillful and correct use of MLA documentation and paper format<\/td>\r\nFew to some errors in MLA documentation and\u00a0 paper format<\/td>\r\nConsistent errors in MLA documentation and paper format<\/td>\r\nConsistent and substantial errors in MLA documentation and paper format<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Highly correct grammar, sentence structure, and style\r\n\r\n <\/td>\r\nFew to some grammatical errors, meaning clear; serviceable to good sentence structure and style<\/td>\r\nSerious grammatical errors, obscuring meaning; weak sentence structure and weak sense of style<\/td>\r\nMany egregious grammatical errors, obscuring meaning; poor sentence structure and little or no sense of style<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n<\/div>","rendered":"

Grading Rubric<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Literary analysis papers must fulfill terms of the individual instructor\u2019s assignment and exhibit no evidence of plagiarism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Exceeding Standards<\/strong><\/td>\nMeeting Standards<\/strong><\/td>\nApproaching Standards<\/strong><\/td>\nNot Meeting Standards<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Mastery of literary terminology<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n

Acceptable to good use of literary terminology<\/td>\nInadequate use of literary terminology<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Little or no use of literary terminology<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Strong thesis statement<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n

Adequate to good thesis statement<\/td>\nRecognizable thesis with serious flaws<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

No thesis<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Strong organization, development, and textual references and explanations<\/td>\nAdequate to good organization, development, and textual references and explanations<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Evidence of effort, but<\/p>\n

poor organization, development, and \/or textual references and explanations<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Little or no \u00a0development,<\/p>\n

organization, and\/or textual references and explanations<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Strong understanding of genre\u2019s conventions<\/td>\nBasic to good understanding of genre\u2019s conventions<\/td>\nLittle evidence of understanding of genre\u2019s conventions<\/td>\nSerious errors in and\/or no understanding of genre\u2019s conventions<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Strong analytical skills demonstrated by clarity, insights, and depth of thought in literary interpretation<\/td>\nAdequate to good analytical skills and evidence of critical thinking in literary interpretation<\/td>\nEvidence of effort, but irrelevant and\/or confused thinking, faulty logic<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Substantial errors in expression of thought, meaning obscured, little or no explanation<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Diverse and well-integrated scholarly research when required<\/td>\nAdequate to good scholarly research when required<\/td>\nInadequate or incorrectly applied research when required<\/td>\nLittle or no research when required<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Skillful and correct use of MLA documentation and paper format<\/td>\nFew to some errors in MLA documentation and\u00a0 paper format<\/td>\nConsistent errors in MLA documentation and paper format<\/td>\nConsistent and substantial errors in MLA documentation and paper format<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Highly correct grammar, sentence structure, and style<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Few to some grammatical errors, meaning clear; serviceable to good sentence structure and style<\/td>\nSerious grammatical errors, obscuring meaning; weak sentence structure and weak sense of style<\/td>\nMany egregious grammatical errors, obscuring meaning; poor sentence structure and little or no sense of style<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Candela Citations<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
CC licensed content, Original<\/div>