![\"This](\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images-archive-read-only\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1295\/2015\/07\/03182256\/34-2-free-trade-of-sugar.png\")
<\/a> Figure 2. Free trade results in gains from trade. Total surplus increases in both countries. However, there are clear income distribution effects.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n \r\n\r\nIf international trade between Brazil and the United States now becomes possible, profit-seeking firms will spot an opportunity: buy sugar cheaply in Brazil, and sell it at a higher price in the United States. As sugar is shipped from Brazil to the United States, the quantity of sugar produced in Brazil will be greater than Brazilian consumption (with the extra production being exported), and the amount produced in the United States will be less than the amount of U.S. consumption (with the extra consumption being imported). Exports to the United States will reduce the supply of sugar in Brazil, raising its price. Imports into the United States will increase the supply of sugar, lowering its price. When the price of sugar is the same in both countries, there is no incentive to trade further. As Figure 34.2 shows, the equilibrium with trade occurs at a price of 16 cents per pound. At that price, the sugar farmers of Brazil supply a quantity of 40 tons, while the consumers of Brazil buy only 25 tons.\r\n\r\nThe extra 15 tons of sugar production, shown by the horizontal gap between the demand curve and the supply curve in Brazil, is exported to the United States. In the United States, at a price of 16 cents, the farmers produce a quantity of 72 tons and consumers demand a quantity of 87 tons. The excess demand of 15 tons by American consumers, shown by the horizontal gap between demand and domestic supply at the price of 16 cents, is supplied by imported sugar.\r\n\r\nFree trade typically results in income distribution effects, but the key is to recognize the overall gains from trade, as shown in Figure 34.3. Building on the concepts outlined in Demand and Supply and Demand, Supply, and Efficiency (http:\/\/cnx.org\/content\/m48832\/latest\/) in terms of consumer and producer surplus, Figure 34.3 (a) shows that producers in Brazil gain by selling more sugar at a higher price, while Figure 34.3 (b) shows consumers in the United States benefit from the lower price and greater availability of sugar. Consumers in Brazil are worse off (compare their no- trade consumer surplus with the free-trade consumer surplus) and U.S. producers of sugar are worse off. There are gains from trade\u2014an increase in social surplus in each country. That is, both the United States and Brazil are better off than they would be without trade.\r\n\r\n \r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_3380\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"390\"]![\"The](\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images-archive-read-only\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1295\/2015\/07\/03182257\/34-3-us-sugar-supply-and-demand.png\")
<\/a> Figure 3. When there is free trade, the equilibrium is at point A. When there is no trade, the equilibrium is at point E.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n \r\n\r\nThe fact that there are distributional consequences to trade is exactly the reason why workers and business lobby government for trade restrictions and protectionist regulations.\r\nSelf Check: Impact of International Trade<\/h2>\r\nAnswer the question(s) below to see how well you understand the topics covered in the previous section. This short quiz does not<\/strong> count toward your grade in the class, and you can retake it an unlimited number of times.\r\nYou\u2019ll have more success on the Self Check if you\u2019ve completed the Reading in this section.<\/span><\/p>\r\nUse this quiz to check your understanding and decide whether to (1) study the previous section further or (2) move on to the next section.\r\n\r\nhttps:\/\/assessments.lumenlearning.com\/assessments\/693","rendered":"Demand and Supply Analysis of International Trade<\/h2>\n
The theories of comparative advantage and absolute advantage show us that there are overall gains from trade. Trade does have distributional impacts however. These distributional impacts are easier to see if one was to represent free trade in a standard demand and supply framework.<\/p>\n
Consider two countries, Brazil and the United States, who produce sugar. Each country has a domestic supply and demand for sugar, as detailed in Table 1 and illustrated in Figure 2. In Brazil, without trade, the equilibrium price of sugar is 12 cents per pound and the equilibrium output is 30 tons. When there is no trade in the United States, the equilibrium price of sugar is 24 cents per pound and the equilibrium quantity is 80 tons. These equilibrium points are labeled with the point E. Notice that in this set-up, Brazil is the low-cost provider of sugar and has the cost-advantage.<\/p>\n
Table 1. The Sugar Trade between Brazil and the United States<\/p>\n
\n\n\nPrice<\/th>\n Brazil: Quantity Supplied (tons)<\/th>\n Brazil: Quantity Demanded (tons)<\/th>\n U.S.: Quantity Supplied (tons)<\/th>\n U.S.: Quantity Demanded (tons)<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n \n\n8 cents<\/td>\n 20<\/td>\n 35<\/td>\n 60<\/td>\n 100<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n12 cents<\/td>\n 30<\/td>\n 30<\/td>\n 66<\/td>\n 93<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n14 cents<\/td>\n 35<\/td>\n 28<\/td>\n 69<\/td>\n 90<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n16 cents<\/td>\n 40<\/td>\n 25<\/td>\n 72<\/td>\n 87<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n20 cents<\/td>\n 45<\/td>\n 21<\/td>\n 76<\/td>\n 83<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n24 cents<\/td>\n 50<\/td>\n 18<\/td>\n 80<\/td>\n 80<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n28 cents<\/td>\n 55<\/td>\n 15<\/td>\n 82<\/td>\n 78<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n <\/p>\n
Demand and Supply Analysis of International Trade<\/h2>\n
The theories of comparative advantage and absolute advantage show us that there are overall gains from trade. Trade does have distributional impacts however. These distributional impacts are easier to see if one was to represent free trade in a standard demand and supply framework.<\/p>\n
Consider two countries, Brazil and the United States, who produce sugar. Each country has a domestic supply and demand for sugar, as detailed in Table 1 and illustrated in Figure 2. In Brazil, without trade, the equilibrium price of sugar is 12 cents per pound and the equilibrium output is 30 tons. When there is no trade in the United States, the equilibrium price of sugar is 24 cents per pound and the equilibrium quantity is 80 tons. These equilibrium points are labeled with the point E. Notice that in this set-up, Brazil is the low-cost provider of sugar and has the cost-advantage.<\/p>\n
Table 1. The Sugar Trade between Brazil and the United States<\/p>\n
| Price<\/th>\n | Brazil: Quantity Supplied (tons)<\/th>\n | Brazil: Quantity Demanded (tons)<\/th>\n | U.S.: Quantity Supplied (tons)<\/th>\n | U.S.: Quantity Demanded (tons)<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 cents<\/td>\n | 20<\/td>\n | 35<\/td>\n | 60<\/td>\n | 100<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n |
| 12 cents<\/td>\n | 30<\/td>\n | 30<\/td>\n | 66<\/td>\n | 93<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n |
| 14 cents<\/td>\n | 35<\/td>\n | 28<\/td>\n | 69<\/td>\n | 90<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n |
| 16 cents<\/td>\n | 40<\/td>\n | 25<\/td>\n | 72<\/td>\n | 87<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n |
| 20 cents<\/td>\n | 45<\/td>\n | 21<\/td>\n | 76<\/td>\n | 83<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n |
| 24 cents<\/td>\n | 50<\/td>\n | 18<\/td>\n | 80<\/td>\n | 80<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n |
| 28 cents<\/td>\n | 55<\/td>\n | 15<\/td>\n | 82<\/td>\n | 78<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n <\/p>\n |