{"id":1917,"date":"2017-07-19T22:46:56","date_gmt":"2017-07-19T22:46:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-ncc-zeliart\/?post_type=chapter&p=1917"},"modified":"2018-08-22T13:02:20","modified_gmt":"2018-08-22T13:02:20","slug":"early-empire-column-of-trajan-2","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-ncc-zeliart\/chapter\/early-empire-column-of-trajan-2\/","title":{"raw":"Early Empire: Column of Trajan","rendered":"Early Empire: Column of Trajan"},"content":{"raw":"
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
<\/div>\r\n\"\"\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n

Column of Trajan (as seen through the ruins of the Basilica Ulpia in the Forum of Trajan), Carrara marble, completed 113 C.E., Rome, dedicated to Emperor Trajan (Marcus Ulpius Nerva Traianus b. 53 , d. 117 C.E.) in honor of his victory over Dacia (now Romania) 101-02 and 105-06 C.E. (photo:\u00a0Steven Zucker<\/a>\u00a0CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)<\/h4>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n

The Triumph<\/h2>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
The Triumph was a riotous military ritual celebrated by the Romans over the course of centuries\u2014whenever their commander had won a spectacular victory. On the appointed day (or days) the city would be overflowing with crowds, pageantry, spoils, prisoners, depictions and souvenirs of foreign lands\u2014but then, just as quickly as it began, the glorious tumult was over. The spectacles and the echoes of glory entrusted to the memory of those who had witnessed the event. Was the parade and its giant city-wide party enough to commemorate the glorious deeds of Rome\u2019s armies? Or should a more permanent form of commemoration be adopted? Being pragmatists, the Romans enlisted both means of commemoration\u2014the ephemeral and the permanent. The Column of Trajan (dedicated in May of 113 C.E.) might be the crowning example of the inborn need to commemorate\u2014in more permanent form\u2014historical deeds that dominate the psyche of Roman art and artists.<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n

Returning from Dacia triumphant\u2014100 days of celebrations<\/h2>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
The emperor Trajan, who reigned from 98 - 117 C.E., fought a series of campaigns known as the Dacian Wars. Dacia (modern Romania), was seen as a troublesome neighbor by the Romans and the Dacians were seen to pose a threat to the province of Moesia, along the Danube frontier. In addition Dacia was rich in natural resources (including gold), that were attractive to the Romans. The first campaign saw Trajan defeat the Dacian leader Decebalus in 101 C.E., after which the Dacians sought terms from the Romans. Renewed Dacian hostilities brought about the second Dacian War that concluded in 106 C.E. Trajan\u2019s victory was a substantial one\u2014he declared over 100 days of official celebrations and the Romans exploited Dacia\u2019s natural wealth, while incorporating Dacia as an imperial province.<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
<\/div>\r\n\"\"\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n

Denarius (Roman coin), obverse: Trajan in profile; reverse: Dacian seated right on pile of arms, his hands bound behind him, silver, c. 103-11 (Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge,\u00a0CM.BU.240-R<\/a>)<\/h4>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
After the first Dacian war Trajan earned the honorary epithet \u201cDacicus Maximus\u201d (greatest Dacian) and a victory monument known as the\u00a0Tropaeum Traiani<\/em>\u00a0(Trophy of Trajan) was built at\u00a0Civitas Tropaensium<\/em>\u00a0(modern Adamclisi, Romania). Coins issued during Trajan\u2019s reign (as in the image above) depicted the defeated Dacia.<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n

Iconography and themes<\/h3>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
The iconographic scheme of the column illustrates Trajan\u2019s wars in Dacia. The lower half of the column corresponds to the first Dacian War (c. 101-102 C.E.), while the top half depicts the second Dacian War (c. 105-106 C.E.). The first narrative event shows Roman soldiers marching off to Dacia, while the final sequence of events portrays the suicide of the enemy leader, Decebalus, and the mopping up of Dacian prisoners by the Romans.<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
<\/div>\r\n\"\"\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n

The crossing of the Roman Army over the Danube River in the first Dacian War (the large figure is a personification of the Danube) (detail), Column of Trajan, dedicated 113 C.E., Rome (photo:\u00a0Steven Zucker<\/a>, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)<\/h4>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
The execution of the frieze is meticulous and the level of detail achieved is astonishing. While the column does not carry applied paint now, many scholars believe the frieze was initially painted. The sculptors took great care to provide settings for the scenes, including natural backgrounds, and mixed perspectival views to offer the maximum level of detail. Sometimes multiple perspectives are evident within a single scene. The overall, unifying theme is that of the Roman military campaigns in Dacia, but the details reveal additional, more subtle narrative threads.<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
One of the clear themes is the triumph of civilization (represented by the Romans) over its antithesis, the barbarian state (represented here by the Dacians). The Romans are orderly and uniform, the Dacians less so. The Romans are clean shaven, the Dacians are shaggy. The Romans avoid leggings, the Dacians wear leggings (like all good barbarians did\u2014at least those depicted by the Romans).<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
<\/div>\r\n\"\"\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n
<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n

\u201cScene from the second Dacian War, the Dacians plan a new offensive and attack a Roman Fort and engage with Roman troops. Many Dacians, however, fall in the wake of a strong Roman counteroffensive,\u201d (detail), Column of Trajan, dedicated 113 C.E., Rome (source for image and caption:\u00a0Trajan\u2019s Column Website<\/a>, Professor Roger B. Ulrich, Dartmouth College)<\/h4>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
Combat scenes are frequent in the frieze. The detailed rendering provides a nearly unparalleled visual resource for studying the iconography of the Roman military, as well as for studying the actual equipment, weapons, and tactics. There is clear ethnic typing as well, as the Roman soldiers cannot be confused for Dacian soldiers, and vice versa.<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
<\/div>\r\n\"\"\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n

The Emperor (fourth from the lower right) oversees construction (detail), Column of Trajan, dedicated 113 C.E., (photo:\u00a0Steven Zucker<\/a>, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)<\/h4>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
The viewer also sees the Roman army doing other chores while not fighting. One notable activity is building. In numerous scenes the soldiers may be seen building and fortifying camps. All of the Roman edifices depicted are solid, regular, and well designed\u2014in stark contrast to the humble buildings of the Dacian world. Roman propaganda at work.<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
<\/div>\r\n\"\"\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n

Trajan and his fleet depart for Second Dacian War\u2014Trajan can be seen at the far left (detail), Column of Trajan, dedicated 113 C.E., detail, Column of Trajan, dedicated 113 C.E. (photo:\u00a0Peter Reed<\/a>, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)<\/h4>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
The emperor Trajan figures prominently in the frieze. Each time he appears, his position is commanding and the iconographic focus on his person is made clear. We see Trajan in various scenarios, including addressing his troops (ad locutio<\/em>) and performing sacrifices. The fact that the figures in the scenes are focused on the figure of the emperor helps to draw the viewer\u2019s attention to him.<\/div>\r\n
<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
The base of the column eventually served as a tomb for Trajan\u2019s ashes. He died while returning from foreign campaigns in 117 C.E. and was granted this unusual honor, in keeping with the estimation of the Roman people who deemed him\u00a0optimus princeps<\/em>\u00a0or \u201cthe best first citizen\u201d.<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n

Specifications of the Column and Construction<\/h3>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
<\/div>\r\n\"\"\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n

Column of Trajan, dedicated 113 C.E., plan, elevation, and section<\/h4>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
The column itself is made from fine-grained Luna marble and stands to a height of 38.4 meters (c. 98 feet) atop a tall pedestal. The shaft of the column is composed of 19 drums of marble measuring c. 3.7 meters (11 feet) in diameter, weighing a total of c. 1,110 tons. The topmost drum weighs some 53 tons. A spiral staircase of 185 steps leads to the viewing platform atop the column. The helical sculptural frieze measures 190 meters in length (c. 625 feet) and wraps around the column 23 times. A total of 2,662 figures appear in the 155 scenes of the frieze, with Trajan himself featured in 58 scenes.<\/div>\r\n
<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
The construction of the Column of Trajan was a complex exercise of architectural design and engineering. As reconstructed by Lynne Lancaster, the execution of the column itself was an immense engineering challenge that required complex lifting devices and, no doubt, careful planning to execute successfully. Materials had to be acquired and transported to Rome, some across long distances. With the appropriate technology in place, the adept Roman architects could carry out the project. The successful completion of the column demonstrates the complex tasks that Roman architects could successfully complete.<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n

Significance and Influence<\/h3>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
The Column of Trajan may be contextualized in a long line of Roman victory monuments, some of which honored specific military victories and thus may be termed \u201ctriumphal monuments\u201d and others that generally honor a public career and are thus \u201chonorific monuments.\u201d Among the earliest examples of such permanent monuments at Rome is the rostrate column (column rostrata<\/em>) that was erected in honor of a naval victory celebrated by Caius Duilius after the battle of Mylae in 260 B.C.E. (this column does not survive). During the Republican period, a rich tradition of celebratory monuments developed, best known through the\u00a0fornices<\/em>\u00a0(honorific arches) and triumphal arches. This tradition was continued in the imperial period, with both triumphal and honorific arches being erected at Rome and in the the provinces.<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
<\/div>\r\n\"\"\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n

Gold aureus showing Trajan's Column, Roman, early 2nd century C.E. (The British Museum)<\/h4>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
The idea of the honorific column was carried forward by other victorious leaders\u2014both in the ancient and modern eras. In the Roman world immediate, derivative monuments that draw inspiration from the Column of Trajan include the Column of Marcus Aurelius (c. 193 C.E.) in Rome\u2019s Piazza Colonna, as well as monuments like the now-lost Column of Arcadius (c. 401 C.E.) and the Column of Justinian at Constantinople (c. 543 C.E.). The idea of the narrative frieze applied to the Column of Trajan proved influential in these other instances.<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
<\/div>\r\n\"\"\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n

Aegidius Sadeler, view of the column of Trajan, shown with its pedestal dug out from the earth, surrounded by buildings at the base of the Quirinal Hill, Rome, from the series \u201cRuins of the antiquity of Rome, Tivoli, Pozzuoli, and other places,\u201d 1606, etching and engraving, plate 31 (The Metropolitan Museum of Art)<\/h4>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
Honorific or triumphal columns inspired by that of Trajan were also created in honor of more recent victories. The column honoring Admiral Horatio Nelson in London\u2019s Trafalgar Square (c. 1843) draws on the Roman tradition that included the Column of Trajan along with earlier, Republican monuments like the columna rostrata of Caius Duilius. The column dedicated to Napoleon I erected in the Place Vend\u00f4me in Paris (c. 1810) and the Washington Monument of Baltimore, Maryland (1829) both were directly inspired by the Column of Trajan.<\/div>\r\n
<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
Essay by Dr. Jeffrey Becker<\/div>\r\n<\/div>","rendered":"
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n

Column of Trajan (as seen through the ruins of the Basilica Ulpia in the Forum of Trajan), Carrara marble, completed 113 C.E., Rome, dedicated to Emperor Trajan (Marcus Ulpius Nerva Traianus b. 53 , d. 117 C.E.) in honor of his victory over Dacia (now Romania) 101-02 and 105-06 C.E. (photo:\u00a0Steven Zucker<\/a>\u00a0CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)<\/h4>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

The Triumph<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n
\n
The Triumph was a riotous military ritual celebrated by the Romans over the course of centuries\u2014whenever their commander had won a spectacular victory. On the appointed day (or days) the city would be overflowing with crowds, pageantry, spoils, prisoners, depictions and souvenirs of foreign lands\u2014but then, just as quickly as it began, the glorious tumult was over. The spectacles and the echoes of glory entrusted to the memory of those who had witnessed the event. Was the parade and its giant city-wide party enough to commemorate the glorious deeds of Rome\u2019s armies? Or should a more permanent form of commemoration be adopted? Being pragmatists, the Romans enlisted both means of commemoration\u2014the ephemeral and the permanent. The Column of Trajan (dedicated in May of 113 C.E.) might be the crowning example of the inborn need to commemorate\u2014in more permanent form\u2014historical deeds that dominate the psyche of Roman art and artists.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Returning from Dacia triumphant\u2014100 days of celebrations<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n
\n
The emperor Trajan, who reigned from 98 – 117 C.E., fought a series of campaigns known as the Dacian Wars. Dacia (modern Romania), was seen as a troublesome neighbor by the Romans and the Dacians were seen to pose a threat to the province of Moesia, along the Danube frontier. In addition Dacia was rich in natural resources (including gold), that were attractive to the Romans. The first campaign saw Trajan defeat the Dacian leader Decebalus in 101 C.E., after which the Dacians sought terms from the Romans. Renewed Dacian hostilities brought about the second Dacian War that concluded in 106 C.E. Trajan\u2019s victory was a substantial one\u2014he declared over 100 days of official celebrations and the Romans exploited Dacia\u2019s natural wealth, while incorporating Dacia as an imperial province.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n

Denarius (Roman coin), obverse: Trajan in profile; reverse: Dacian seated right on pile of arms, his hands bound behind him, silver, c. 103-11 (Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge,\u00a0CM.BU.240-R<\/a>)<\/h4>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
After the first Dacian war Trajan earned the honorary epithet \u201cDacicus Maximus\u201d (greatest Dacian) and a victory monument known as the\u00a0Tropaeum Traiani<\/em>\u00a0(Trophy of Trajan) was built at\u00a0Civitas Tropaensium<\/em>\u00a0(modern Adamclisi, Romania). Coins issued during Trajan\u2019s reign (as in the image above) depicted the defeated Dacia.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Iconography and themes<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n
The iconographic scheme of the column illustrates Trajan\u2019s wars in Dacia. The lower half of the column corresponds to the first Dacian War (c. 101-102 C.E.), while the top half depicts the second Dacian War (c. 105-106 C.E.). The first narrative event shows Roman soldiers marching off to Dacia, while the final sequence of events portrays the suicide of the enemy leader, Decebalus, and the mopping up of Dacian prisoners by the Romans.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n

The crossing of the Roman Army over the Danube River in the first Dacian War (the large figure is a personification of the Danube) (detail), Column of Trajan, dedicated 113 C.E., Rome (photo:\u00a0Steven Zucker<\/a>, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)<\/h4>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
The execution of the frieze is meticulous and the level of detail achieved is astonishing. While the column does not carry applied paint now, many scholars believe the frieze was initially painted. The sculptors took great care to provide settings for the scenes, including natural backgrounds, and mixed perspectival views to offer the maximum level of detail. Sometimes multiple perspectives are evident within a single scene. The overall, unifying theme is that of the Roman military campaigns in Dacia, but the details reveal additional, more subtle narrative threads.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
One of the clear themes is the triumph of civilization (represented by the Romans) over its antithesis, the barbarian state (represented here by the Dacians). The Romans are orderly and uniform, the Dacians less so. The Romans are clean shaven, the Dacians are shaggy. The Romans avoid leggings, the Dacians wear leggings (like all good barbarians did\u2014at least those depicted by the Romans).<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n

\u201cScene from the second Dacian War, the Dacians plan a new offensive and attack a Roman Fort and engage with Roman troops. Many Dacians, however, fall in the wake of a strong Roman counteroffensive,\u201d (detail), Column of Trajan, dedicated 113 C.E., Rome (source for image and caption:\u00a0Trajan\u2019s Column Website<\/a>, Professor Roger B. Ulrich, Dartmouth College)<\/h4>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
Combat scenes are frequent in the frieze. The detailed rendering provides a nearly unparalleled visual resource for studying the iconography of the Roman military, as well as for studying the actual equipment, weapons, and tactics. There is clear ethnic typing as well, as the Roman soldiers cannot be confused for Dacian soldiers, and vice versa.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n

The Emperor (fourth from the lower right) oversees construction (detail), Column of Trajan, dedicated 113 C.E., (photo:\u00a0Steven Zucker<\/a>, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)<\/h4>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
The viewer also sees the Roman army doing other chores while not fighting. One notable activity is building. In numerous scenes the soldiers may be seen building and fortifying camps. All of the Roman edifices depicted are solid, regular, and well designed\u2014in stark contrast to the humble buildings of the Dacian world. Roman propaganda at work.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n

Trajan and his fleet depart for Second Dacian War\u2014Trajan can be seen at the far left (detail), Column of Trajan, dedicated 113 C.E., detail, Column of Trajan, dedicated 113 C.E. (photo:\u00a0Peter Reed<\/a>, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)<\/h4>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
The emperor Trajan figures prominently in the frieze. Each time he appears, his position is commanding and the iconographic focus on his person is made clear. We see Trajan in various scenarios, including addressing his troops (ad locutio<\/em>) and performing sacrifices. The fact that the figures in the scenes are focused on the figure of the emperor helps to draw the viewer\u2019s attention to him.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
The base of the column eventually served as a tomb for Trajan\u2019s ashes. He died while returning from foreign campaigns in 117 C.E. and was granted this unusual honor, in keeping with the estimation of the Roman people who deemed him\u00a0optimus princeps<\/em>\u00a0or \u201cthe best first citizen\u201d.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Specifications of the Column and Construction<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n

Column of Trajan, dedicated 113 C.E., plan, elevation, and section<\/h4>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
The column itself is made from fine-grained Luna marble and stands to a height of 38.4 meters (c. 98 feet) atop a tall pedestal. The shaft of the column is composed of 19 drums of marble measuring c. 3.7 meters (11 feet) in diameter, weighing a total of c. 1,110 tons. The topmost drum weighs some 53 tons. A spiral staircase of 185 steps leads to the viewing platform atop the column. The helical sculptural frieze measures 190 meters in length (c. 625 feet) and wraps around the column 23 times. A total of 2,662 figures appear in the 155 scenes of the frieze, with Trajan himself featured in 58 scenes.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
The construction of the Column of Trajan was a complex exercise of architectural design and engineering. As reconstructed by Lynne Lancaster, the execution of the column itself was an immense engineering challenge that required complex lifting devices and, no doubt, careful planning to execute successfully. Materials had to be acquired and transported to Rome, some across long distances. With the appropriate technology in place, the adept Roman architects could carry out the project. The successful completion of the column demonstrates the complex tasks that Roman architects could successfully complete.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Significance and Influence<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n
The Column of Trajan may be contextualized in a long line of Roman victory monuments, some of which honored specific military victories and thus may be termed \u201ctriumphal monuments\u201d and others that generally honor a public career and are thus \u201chonorific monuments.\u201d Among the earliest examples of such permanent monuments at Rome is the rostrate column (column rostrata<\/em>) that was erected in honor of a naval victory celebrated by Caius Duilius after the battle of Mylae in 260 B.C.E. (this column does not survive). During the Republican period, a rich tradition of celebratory monuments developed, best known through the\u00a0fornices<\/em>\u00a0(honorific arches) and triumphal arches. This tradition was continued in the imperial period, with both triumphal and honorific arches being erected at Rome and in the the provinces.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n

Gold aureus showing Trajan’s Column, Roman, early 2nd century C.E. (The British Museum)<\/h4>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
The idea of the honorific column was carried forward by other victorious leaders\u2014both in the ancient and modern eras. In the Roman world immediate, derivative monuments that draw inspiration from the Column of Trajan include the Column of Marcus Aurelius (c. 193 C.E.) in Rome\u2019s Piazza Colonna, as well as monuments like the now-lost Column of Arcadius (c. 401 C.E.) and the Column of Justinian at Constantinople (c. 543 C.E.). The idea of the narrative frieze applied to the Column of Trajan proved influential in these other instances.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n

Aegidius Sadeler, view of the column of Trajan, shown with its pedestal dug out from the earth, surrounded by buildings at the base of the Quirinal Hill, Rome, from the series \u201cRuins of the antiquity of Rome, Tivoli, Pozzuoli, and other places,\u201d 1606, etching and engraving, plate 31 (The Metropolitan Museum of Art)<\/h4>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
Honorific or triumphal columns inspired by that of Trajan were also created in honor of more recent victories. The column honoring Admiral Horatio Nelson in London\u2019s Trafalgar Square (c. 1843) draws on the Roman tradition that included the Column of Trajan along with earlier, Republican monuments like the columna rostrata of Caius Duilius. The column dedicated to Napoleon I erected in the Place Vend\u00f4me in Paris (c. 1810) and the Washington Monument of Baltimore, Maryland (1829) both were directly inspired by the Column of Trajan.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
Essay by Dr. Jeffrey Becker<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Candela Citations<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
CC licensed content, Shared previously<\/div>