{"id":174,"date":"2019-01-16T00:14:49","date_gmt":"2019-01-16T00:14:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-oneonta-communication\/chapter\/5-1-understanding-how-and-why-we-listen\/"},"modified":"2019-01-16T00:14:49","modified_gmt":"2019-01-16T00:14:49","slug":"5-1-understanding-how-and-why-we-listen","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-oneonta-communication\/chapter\/5-1-understanding-how-and-why-we-listen\/","title":{"raw":"5.1 Understanding How and Why We Listen","rendered":"5.1 Understanding How and Why We Listen"},"content":{"raw":"\n
\n

Learning Objectives<\/h3>\n
    \n
  1. Describe the stages of the listening process.<\/li>\n
  2. Discuss the four main types of listening.<\/li>\n
  3. Compare and contrast the four main listening styles.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n

    Listening<\/a><\/span> is the learned process of receiving, interpreting, recalling, evaluating, and responding to verbal and nonverbal messages. We begin to engage with the listening process long before we engage in any recognizable verbal or nonverbal communication. It is only after listening for months as infants that we begin to consciously practice our own forms of expression. In this section we will learn more about each stage of the listening process, the main types of listening, and the main listening styles.<\/p>\n

    \n

    The Listening Process<\/h2>\n

    Listening is a process and as such doesn\u2019t have a defined start and finish. Like the communication process, listening has cognitive, behavioral, and relational elements and doesn\u2019t unfold in a linear, step-by-step fashion. Models of processes are informative in that they help us visualize specific components, but keep in mind that they do not capture the speed, overlapping nature, or overall complexity of the actual process in action. The stages of the listening process are receiving, interpreting, recalling, evaluating, and responding.<\/p>\n

    \n

    Receiving<\/h2>\n

    Before we can engage other steps in the listening process, we must take in stimuli through our senses. In any given communication encounter, it is likely that we will return to the receiving stage many times as we process incoming feedback and new messages. This part of the listening process is more physiological than other parts, which include cognitive and relational elements. We primarily take in information needed for listening through auditory and visual channels. Although we don\u2019t often think about visual cues as a part of listening, they influence how we interpret messages. For example, seeing a person\u2019s face when we hear their voice allows us to take in nonverbal cues from facial expressions and eye contact. The fact that these visual cues are missing in e-mail, text, and phone interactions presents some difficulties for reading contextual clues into meaning received through only auditory channels.<\/p>\n

    <\/p>

    \n
    \n
    \n \"5-1-0n\"<\/a>\n

    The first stage of the listening process is receiving stimuli through auditory and visual channels.<\/p>\n

    \n

    Britt Reints - LISTEN<\/a> - CC BY 2.0.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    <\/p><\/div>\n

    Our chapter on perception discusses some of the ways in which incoming stimuli are filtered. These perceptual filters also play a role in listening. Some stimuli never make it in, some are filtered into subconsciousness, and others are filtered into various levels of consciousness based on their salience. Recall that salience is the degree to which something attracts our attention in a particular context and that we tend to find salient things that are visually or audibly stimulating and things that meet our needs or interests. Think about how it\u2019s much easier to listen to a lecture on a subject that you find very interesting.<\/p>\n

    It is important to consider noise as a factor that influences how we receive messages. Some noise interferes primarily with hearing, which is the physical process of receiving stimuli through internal and external components of the ears and eyes, and some interferes with listening, which is the cognitive process of processing the stimuli taken in during hearing. While hearing leads to listening, they are not the same thing. Environmental noise such as other people talking, the sounds of traffic, and music interfere with the physiological aspects of hearing. Psychological noise like stress and anger interfere primarily with the cognitive processes of listening. We can enhance our ability to receive, and in turn listen, by trying to minimize noise.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

    \n

    Interpreting<\/h2>\n

    During the interpreting stage of listening, we combine the visual and auditory information we receive and try to make meaning out of that information using schemata. The interpreting stage engages cognitive and relational processing as we take in informational, contextual, and relational cues and try to connect them in meaningful ways to previous experiences. It is through the interpreting stage that we may begin to understand the stimuli we have received. When we understand something, we are able to attach meaning by connecting information to previous experiences. Through the process of comparing new information with old information, we may also update or revise particular schemata if we find the new information relevant and credible. If we have difficulty interpreting information, meaning we don\u2019t have previous experience or information in our existing schemata to make sense of it, then it is difficult to transfer the information into our long-term memory for later recall. In situations where understanding the information we receive isn\u2019t important or isn\u2019t a goal, this stage may be fairly short or even skipped. After all, we can move something to our long-term memory by repetition and then later recall it without ever having understood it. I remember earning perfect scores on exams in my anatomy class in college because I was able to memorize and recall, for example, all the organs in the digestive system. In fact, I might still be able to do that now over a decade later. But neither then nor now could I tell you the significance or function of most of those organs, meaning I didn\u2019t really get to a level of understanding but simply stored the information for later recall.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

    \n

    Recalling<\/h2>\n

    Our ability to recall information is dependent on some of the physiological limits of how memory works. Overall, our memories are known to be fallible. We forget about half of what we hear immediately after hearing it, recall 35 percent after eight hours, and recall 20 percent after a day (Hargie, 2011). Our memory consists of multiple \u201cstorage units,\u201d including sensory storage, short-term memory, working memory, and long-term memory (Hargie, 2011).<\/p>\n

    Our sensory storage is very large in terms of capacity but limited in terms of length of storage. We can hold large amounts of unsorted visual information but only for about a tenth of a second. By comparison, we can hold large amounts of unsorted auditory information for longer\u2014up to four seconds. This initial memory storage unit doesn\u2019t provide much use for our study of communication, as these large but quickly expiring chunks of sensory data are primarily used in reactionary and instinctual ways.<\/p>\n

    As stimuli are organized and interpreted, they make their way to short-term memory where they either expire and are forgotten or are transferred to long-term memory. Short-term memory<\/a><\/span> is a mental storage capability that can retain stimuli for twenty seconds to one minute. Long-term memory<\/a><\/span> is a mental storage capability to which stimuli in short-term memory can be transferred if they are connected to existing schema and in which information can be stored indefinitely (Hargie, 2011). Working memory is a temporarily accessed memory storage space that is activated during times of high cognitive demand. When using working memory, we can temporarily store information and process and use it at the same time. This is different from our typical memory function in that information usually has to make it to long-term memory before we can call it back up to apply to a current situation. People with good working memories are able to keep recent information in mind and process it and apply it to other incoming information. This can be very useful during high-stress situations. A person in control of a command center like the White House Situation Room should have a good working memory in order to take in, organize, evaluate, and then immediately use new information instead of having to wait for that information to make it to long-term memory and then be retrieved and used.<\/p>\n

    Although recall is an important part of the listening process, there isn\u2019t a direct correlation between being good at recalling information and being a good listener. Some people have excellent memories and recall abilities and can tell you a very accurate story from many years earlier during a situation in which they should actually be listening and not showing off their recall abilities. Recall is an important part of the listening process because it is most often used to assess listening abilities and effectiveness. Many quizzes and tests in school are based on recall and are often used to assess how well students comprehended information presented in class, which is seen as an indication of how well they listened. When recall is our only goal, we excel at it. Experiments have found that people can memorize and later recall a set of faces and names with near 100 percent recall when sitting in a quiet lab and asked to do so. But throw in external noise, more visual stimuli, and multiple contextual influences, and we can\u2019t remember the name of the person we were just introduced to one minute earlier. Even in interpersonal encounters, we rely on recall to test whether or not someone was listening. Imagine that Azam is talking to his friend Belle, who is sitting across from him in a restaurant booth. Azam, annoyed that Belle keeps checking her phone, stops and asks, \u201cAre you listening?\u201d Belle inevitably replies, \u201cYes,\u201d since we rarely fess up to our poor listening habits, and Azam replies, \u201cWell, what did I just say?\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

    \n

    Evaluating<\/h2>\n

    When we evaluate something, we make judgments about its credibility, completeness, and worth. In terms of credibility, we try to determine the degree to which we believe a speaker\u2019s statements are correct and\/or true. In terms of completeness, we try to \u201cread between the lines\u201d and evaluate the message in relation to what we know about the topic or situation being discussed. We evaluate the worth of a message by making a value judgment about whether we think the message or idea is good\/bad, right\/wrong, or desirable\/undesirable. All these aspects of evaluating require critical thinking skills, which we aren\u2019t born with but must develop over time through our own personal and intellectual development.<\/p>\n

    Studying communication is a great way to build your critical thinking skills, because you learn much more about the taken-for-granted aspects of how communication works, which gives you tools to analyze and critique messages, senders, and contexts. Critical thinking and listening skills also help you take a more proactive role in the communication process rather than being a passive receiver of messages that may not be credible, complete, or worthwhile. One danger within the evaluation stage of listening is to focus your evaluative lenses more on the speaker than the message. This can quickly become a barrier to effective listening if we begin to prejudge a speaker based on his or her identity or characteristics rather than on the content of his or her message. We will learn more about how to avoid slipping into a person-centered rather than message-centered evaluative stance later in the chapter.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

    \n

    Responding<\/h2>\n

    Responding entails sending verbal and nonverbal messages that indicate attentiveness and understanding or a lack thereof. From our earlier discussion of the communication model, you may be able to connect this part of the listening process to feedback. Later, we will learn more specifics about how to encode and decode the verbal and nonverbal cues sent during the responding stage, but we all know from experience some signs that indicate whether a person is paying attention and understanding a message or not.<\/p>\n

    We send verbal and nonverbal feedback while another person is talking and after they are done. Back-channel cues<\/a><\/span> are the verbal and nonverbal signals we send while someone is talking and can consist of verbal cues like \u201cuh-huh,\u201d \u201coh,\u201d and \u201cright,\u201d and\/or nonverbal cues like direct eye contact, head nods, and leaning forward. Back-channel cues are generally a form of positive feedback that indicates others are actively listening. People also send cues intentionally and unintentionally that indicate they aren\u2019t listening. If another person is looking away, fidgeting, texting, or turned away, we will likely interpret those responses negatively.<\/p>\n

    <\/p>

    \n
    \n
    \n \"5-1-1n\"<\/a>\n

    Listeners respond to speakers nonverbally during a message using back-channel cues and verbally after a message using paraphrasing and clarifying questions.<\/p>\n

    \n

    Duane Storey - Listening<\/a> - CC BY-NC-ND 2.0.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    <\/p><\/div>\n

    Paraphrasing is a responding behavior that can also show that you understand what was communicated. When you paraphrase<\/a><\/span> information, you rephrase the message into your own words. For example, you might say the following to start off a paraphrased response: \u201cWhat I heard you say was\u2026\u201d or \u201cIt seems like you\u2019re saying\u2026\u201d You can also ask clarifying questions to get more information. It is often a good idea to pair a paraphrase with a question to keep a conversation flowing. For example, you might pose the following paraphrase and question pair: \u201cIt seems like you believe you were treated unfairly. Is that right?\u201d Or you might ask a standalone question like \u201cWhat did your boss do that made you think he was \u2018playing favorites?\u2019\u201d Make sure to paraphrase and\/or ask questions once a person\u2019s turn is over, because interrupting can also be interpreted as a sign of not listening. Paraphrasing is also a good tool to use in computer-mediated communication, especially since miscommunication can occur due to a lack of nonverbal and other contextual cues.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    \n

    The Importance of Listening<\/h2>\n

    Understanding how listening works provides the foundation we need to explore why we listen, including various types and styles of listening. In general, listening helps us achieve all the communication goals (physical, instrumental, relational, and identity) that we learned about in Chapter 1 \"Introduction to Communication Studies\"<\/a>. Listening is also important in academic, professional, and personal contexts.<\/p>\n

    In terms of academics, poor listening skills were shown to contribute significantly to failure in a person\u2019s first year of college (Zabava & Wolvin, 1993). In general, students with high scores for listening ability have greater academic achievement. Interpersonal communication skills including listening are also highly sought after by potential employers, consistently ranking in the top ten in national surveys (National Association of Colleges and Employers, 2010).<\/p>\n

    Poor listening skills, lack of conciseness, and inability to give constructive feedback have been identified as potential communication challenges in professional contexts. Even though listening education is lacking in our society, research has shown that introductory communication courses provide important skills necessary for functioning in entry-level jobs, including listening, writing, motivating\/persuading, interpersonal skills, informational interviewing, and small-group problem solving (DiSalvo, 1980). Training and improvements in listening will continue to pay off, as employers desire employees with good communication skills, and employees who have good listening skills are more likely to get promoted.<\/p>\n

    Listening also has implications for our personal lives and relationships. We shouldn\u2019t underestimate the power of listening to make someone else feel better and to open our perceptual field to new sources of information. Empathetic listening can help us expand our self and social awareness by learning from other people\u2019s experiences and by helping us take on different perspectives. Emotional support in the form of empathetic listening and validation during times of conflict can help relational partners manage common stressors of relationships that may otherwise lead a partnership to deteriorate (Milardo & Helms-Erikson, 2000). The following list reviews some of the main functions of listening that are relevant in multiple contexts.<\/p>\n

    The main purposes of listening are<\/strong> (Hargie, 2011)<\/p>\n