{"id":807,"date":"2022-04-06T17:26:34","date_gmt":"2022-04-06T17:26:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-oswego-businesscommunicationmgrs2\/?post_type=chapter&#038;p=807"},"modified":"2023-04-28T16:51:00","modified_gmt":"2023-04-28T16:51:00","slug":"8-4-negative-messages","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-oswego-businesscommunicationmgrs2\/chapter\/8-4-negative-messages\/","title":{"raw":"8.4 Negative Messages","rendered":"8.4 Negative Messages"},"content":{"raw":"<div class=\"textbox learning-objectives\">\r\n<h3>LEARNING OBJECTIVES<\/h3>\r\n3. Organize and write negative messages\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\nJust as in life, the workplace isn\u2019t always a bowl of cherries. Sometimes things don\u2019t go according to plan, and it\u2019s your job to communicate about them in a way that doesn\u2019t ruin your relationships with customers, coworkers, managers, the public, and other stakeholders. When doing damage control, bad-news messages require care and skillful language because your main point will meet resistance. Rarely are people okay being told that they\u2019re laid off, their application has been rejected, their shipment got lost en route, prices or rates are increasing, their appointment has to be moved back several months, or they\u2019re losing their benefits. Though some people prefer that the messenger be blunt about it, in most cases you can assume that the receiver will appreciate or even benefit by a more tactful, indirect approach. Keep in mind the following advice whenever required to deliver unwelcome news.\u00a0<b><\/b>\r\n<h1 id=\"chapter-420-section-1\" class=\"section-header\">THE SEVEN GOALS OF BAD-NEWS MESSAGES<\/h1>\r\nYour ability to manage, clarify, and guide understanding is key to addressing challenging situations while maintaining trust and integrity with customers, coworkers, managers, the public, and other stakeholders. Keep in mind these seven goals when delivering bad news in person or in writing:\r\n<ol>\r\n \t<li>Be clear and concise to avoid being asked for additional clarification.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Help the receiver understand and accept the news.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Reduce the anxiety associated with the bad news as much as possible by expressing sympathy or empathy.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Maintain trust and respect between you and your audience to ensure the possibility of good future relations.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Deliver the bad news in a timely fashion in the appropriate channel(s).<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Avoid the legal liability that comes with admitting negligence or guilt.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Achieve the designated business outcome.<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\nLet\u2019s look at how we can achieve these goals in examples of the tricky situations in which we might find ourselves in the workplace.\r\n\r\nLet\u2019s say you are a supervisor and your manager has tasked you with getting Chris, an employee who is usually late for work and has been arriving even later recently, to start arriving on time. Chris\u2019s tardiness is impairing not only his performance but also that of the entire team that depends on his work. You figure there are four ways you can handle this:\r\n<ol>\r\n \t<li>Stop by Chris\u2019s cubicle and simply say, \u201cGet to work on time or you\u2019re out\u201d<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Invite Chris out to a nice lunch and let him have it<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Write Chris a stern email<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Ask Chris to come to your office and discuss the behaviour with him in private<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\nLet\u2019s see how each of these alternatives meets our seven goals in delivering bad news.\r\n\r\nFirst, if you approach Chris with a blunt ultimatum at his desk, you can get right to the point there but risk straining the supervisor-employee relationship by putting him in his place in front of everyone. The aggressive approach might prompt Chris to demand clarification, make defensive excuses, or throw hostile counter-offensives right back\u2014none of which are desired outcomes. For that matter, the disrespectful approach doesn\u2019t formally confirm that the tardiness will end. The lack of tact in the approach may reflect poorly on you as the supervisor, not only with Chris but with your manager as well.\r\n\r\nWhen you need to speak to an employee about a personnel concern, it is always best to do so in private. Give thought and concern to the conversation before it occurs and make a list of points to cover with specific information, including grievances. Like any other speech, you may need to rehearse, particularly if this type of meeting is new to you. When it comes time to have the discussion, issue the warning, back it up in writing with documentation, and don\u2019t give the impression that you might change your decision. Whether the issue at hand is a simple caution about tardiness or a more serious conversation, you need to be fair and respectful, even if the other person has been less than professional. Let\u2019s examine the next alternative.\r\n\r\nLet\u2019s say you invite Chris to lunch at a nice restaurant. He sees the fine linen on the table, silverware for more than the main course, and water glasses with stems. The luxurious environment says \u201cgood job,\u201d but your serious talk will contradict this nonverbal signage, which will probably be an obstacle to Chris\u2019s ability to listen. If Chris doesn\u2019t understand and accept the message, requiring him to seek clarification, your approach has failed. Furthermore, the ambush fails to build trust, so you don\u2019t know whether Chris is going to make the extra effort to arrive early or just put in his time there doing the bare minimum while looking for another job.\r\n\r\nLet\u2019s say instead that you\u2019ve written Chris a stern email. You\u2019ve included a list of all the recent dates when he was late and made several statements about the quality of his work. You clearly say he needs to improve and stop being late, or else. But was your email harassment? Could it be considered beyond the scope of supervision and interpreted as mean or cruel? And do you even know if Chris has received it? If there was no reply, do you know whether it achieved its desired business outcome? A written message may certainly be part of the desired approach, but how it is presented and delivered is as important as what it says. Let\u2019s examine our fourth approach to this scenario.\r\n\r\nYou ask Chris to join you in a private conversation. You start by expressing concern and asking an open-ended question: \u201cChris, I\u2019ve been concerned about your work lately. Is everything all right?\u201d As Chris answers, you may demonstrate that you are listening by nodding your head and possibly taking notes. You may learn that Chris has been having problems sleeping or that his living situation has changed. Or Chris may decline to share any issues, deny that anything is wrong, and ask why you are concerned. You may then state that you\u2019ve observed the chronic tardiness and name one or more specific mistakes you have found in Chris\u2019s work, ending by repeating your concern. Because showing your concern makes Chris feel valued, he opens up about his situation so that you understand where he\u2019s coming from. It may turn out that he has to drop his kids off for school at 8am and then contend with Queensway traffic for the next hour to get to the office, consistently making him a half hour late. You can then both agree that he\u2019ll stay a little later or put in the missing hours at home, then write up that agreement in an email with your manager Cc\u2019d.\r\n\r\nRegardless of how well or poorly the conversation goes, if Chris tells other employees about it, they will take note of how you handled the situation, and it will contribute to their perception of you. It guides their expectations of how you operate and how to communicate with you as this interaction is not only about you and Chris. You represent the company and its reputation, and your professional display of concern as you try to learn more sends a positive message. While the private, respectful meeting may not be the perfect solution, it is preferable to the other approaches considered above.\r\n\r\nOne additional point to consider as you document this interaction is the need to present the warning in writing. You may elect to prepare a memo that outlines the information concerning Chris\u2019s performance and tardiness and have it ready should you want to present it. If the session goes well, and you have the discretion to make a judgment call, you may elect to give him another week to resolve the issue. Even if it goes well, you may want to present the memo, as it documents the interaction and serves as evidence of due process should Chris\u2019s behaviour fail to change, eventually resulting in the need for termination. This combined approach of a verbal and written message is increasingly the norm in business communication\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/open.lib.umn.edu\/businesscommunication\/chapter\/17-1-delivering-a-negative-news-message\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(Business Communication for Success, 2015, 17.1)<\/a>.\r\n<h1 id=\"chapter-420-section-2\" class=\"section-header\">INDIRECT BAD-NEWS MESSAGE ORGANIZATION<\/h1>\r\nKey to achieving Goal #2 of delivering bad news\u2014i.e., helping the receiver understand and accept information they don\u2019t want to hear or read\u2014is organizing the message using the indirect approach described in\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/communicationatwork\/chapter\/4-1-choosing-an-organizational-pattern#412\/\">\u00a74.1.2<\/a>. If you tactlessly hit your audience over the head with really bad news, you run the risk of them rejecting or misunderstanding it because they may be reeling from the blow and be too distracted with anger or sadness to rationally process the explanation or instructions for what to do about the bad news. A doctor never delivers a really serious diagnosis by coming right out and saying \u201cYou have cancer!\u201d first thing. Instead, they try to put a positive spin on the results (\u201cIt could be worse\u201d), discuss test results in detail, talk about treatment options, and only then come around to telling the patient the bad news. At that point, being clear about the bad news ensures that the receiver understands the gravity of the situation and is therefore motivated to follow through on the therapeutic recommendations given earlier. Key to avoiding misunderstandings when delivering bad news, then, is the following four-part organization:\r\n<ol>\r\n \t<li>Buffer<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Justification<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Bad news + redirection<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Positive action closing<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\nThis is much like the three-part structure,\u00a0only the body is now divided into two distinct parts where the order really matters, as we see in Table 8.10 and the explanation for each part below it.\r\n<h2><a id=\"t832\"><\/a>TABLE 8.10 BAD NEWS MESSAGE OUTLINE AND EXAMPLE MESSAGE<\/h2>\r\n<table>\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<th>Part<\/th>\r\n<th>Example Message<\/th>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>1. Buffer<\/td>\r\n<td>Thank you for your order. We appreciate your interest in our product and are confident you will love it.<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>2.\u00a0Explanation<\/td>\r\n<td>We are writing to let you know that this product has been unexpectedly popular with over 10,000 orders submitted on the day you placed yours.<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>3. Bad news + redirect<\/td>\r\n<td>This unexpected increase in demand has resulted in a temporary out-of-stock\/backorder situation. Despite a delay of 2-3 weeks, we will definitely fulfill your order as it was received at 11:57pm on October 9, 2018, as well as gift you a $5 coupon towards your next purchase.<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>4. Positive action closing<\/td>\r\n<td>While you wait for your product to ship, we encourage you to use the enclosed $5 coupon toward the purchase of any product in our online catalog. We appreciate your continued business and want you to know that our highest priority is your satisfaction.<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/open.lib.umn.edu\/businesscommunication\/chapter\/17-1-delivering-a-negative-news-message\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(Business Communication for Success, 2015, 17.1)<\/a>\r\n<h2>BAD-NEWS MESSAGE BUFFER<\/h2>\r\nBegin with neutral or positive statements that set a welcoming tone and serve as a\u00a0<strong>buffer<\/strong>\u00a0for the information to come. A buffer softens the blow of bad news like the airbag in a car softens the driver\u2019s collision with the steering wheel in a high-speed car accident. If there are any silver linings that can calm the poor person about to be pummeled by the dark thunder clouds of bad news, here at the beginning would be a good time to point them out. The following are some possible buffer strategies:\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><strong>Good news<\/strong>: If there\u2019s good news and bad news, start with the good news.<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Compliment<\/strong>: If you\u2019re rejecting someone\u2019s application, for instance, start by complimenting them on their efforts and other specific accomplishments you were impressed by in their application.<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Gratitude<\/strong>: Say thanks for whatever positive things the recipient has done in your dealings with them. If they\u2019ve submitted a claim that doesn\u2019t qualify for an adjustment, for instance, thank them for choosing your company.<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Agreement<\/strong>: Before delivering bad news that you\u2019re sure the recipient is going to disagree with and oppose, start with something you\u2019re sure you both agree on. Start on common ground by saying, \u201cWe can all agree that . . . .\u201d<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Facts<\/strong>: If positives are hard to come by in a situation, getting started on the next section\u2019s explanation, starting with cold, hard facts, is the next best thing.<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Understanding<\/strong>: Again, if there are no silver linings to point to, showing you care by expressing sympathy and understanding is a possible alternative (Guffey et al. 2016, p. 194)<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Apology<\/strong>: If you\u2019re at fault for any aspect of a bad news message, an apology is appropriate as long as it won\u2019t leave you at a disadvantage in legal proceedings that may follow as a result of admitting wrongdoing. (See\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/communicationatwork\/chapter\/8-2-complaints-and-claims#8222\/\">\u00a78.2.2.2<\/a>\u00a0for more on effective strategies for apologizing.)<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\nThe idea here is not to fool the audience into thinking that only good news is coming but to put them in a receptive frame of mind for understanding the explanation that follows. If you raise the expectation that they\u2019re going to hear the good news that they\u2019re getting what they want only, to let them down near the end, they\u2019re going to be even more disappointed for being led on. If you hit them over the head with bad news right away, however, they may be more distracted with emotion to rationally process the explanation or instructions for what to do about the bad news.<b><\/b>\r\n<h2>BAD-NEWS JUSTIFICATION<\/h2>\r\nThe<strong>\u00a0justification<\/strong>\u00a0explains the background or context for the bad news before delivering the bad news itself. Let\u2019s say that you must reject an application, claim for a refund, or request for information. In such cases, the explanation could describe the strict acceptance criteria and high quality of applications received in the competition, the company policy on refunds, or its policy on allowable disclosures and the legalities of contractually obligated confidentiality, respectively. Your goal with the explanation is to be convincing so that the reader says, \u201cThat sounds reasonable\u201d and similarly accepts the bad news as inevitable given the situation you describe. On the other hand, if you make the bad news seem like mysterious and arbitrary decision-making, your audience will probably feel like they\u2019ve been treated unfairly and might even escalate further with legal action or \u201cyelptribution\u201d\u2014avenging the wrong in social media. While an explanation is ethically necessary, never admit or imply responsibility without written authorization from your company cleared by legal counsel if there\u2019s any way that the justification might be seen as actionable (i.e., the offended party can sue for damages).\r\n\r\nUse additional strategies to make the justification more agreeable such as focusing on benefits. If you\u2019re informing employees that they will have to pay double for parking passes next year in an attempt to reduce the number of cars filling up the parking lot, you could sell them on the health benefits of cycling to work or the environmental benefit of fewer cars polluting the atmosphere. If you\u2019re informing a customer asking why a product or service can\u2019t include additional features, you could say that adding those features would drive the cost up and you would rather respect your customer\u2019s pocketbooks by keeping the product or service more affordable. In any case, try to pitch an agreeable, pro-social or progressive benefit rather than saying that you\u2019re merely trying to maximize company or shareholder profits.\r\n<h2>THE BAD NEWS ITSELF AND REDIRECTION<\/h2>\r\nBurying the bad news itself in the message is a defining characteristic of the indirect approach. It\u2019s akin to the \u201cpoop sandwich\u201d organization of constructive criticism sandwiched between statements of praise (see\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/communicationatwork\/chapter\/11-1-teamwork#11142\/\">\u00a711.1.4.2<\/a>). Far from intending to hide the bad news, the indirect approach frames the bad news so that it can be properly understood and its negative (depressing or anger-arousing) impact minimized.\r\n\r\nThe goal is also to be clear in expressing the bad news so that it isn\u2019t misunderstood while also being sensitive to your reader\u2019s feelings. If you\u2019re rejecting a job applicant, for instance, you can be clear that they didn\u2019t get the job without bluntly saying \u201cYou failed to meet our criteria\u201d or \u201cYou won\u2019t be working for us anytime soon.\u201d Instead, you can clearly imply it by putting the bad news in a subordinate clause in the passive voice:\r\n\r\n<em>Though another candidate was hired for the position, . . .<\/em>\r\n\r\nThe passive voice (see\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/communicationatwork\/chapter\/4-3-forming-effective-sentences#434\/\">\u00a74.3.4<\/a>\u00a0) enables you to draw attention away from your own role in rejecting the applicant, as well as away from the rejected applicant in the context of the competition itself. Instead, you focus on the positive of someone getting hired. While the rejected applicant probably won\u2019t be throwing a celebration party for the winning candidate, the subordinate clause here allows for speedy redirection to a consolation prize.\r\n\r\nRedirection is key to this type of bad news\u2019 effectiveness because it quickly shifts the reader\u2019s attention to an alternative to what they were seeking in the first place. Some kind of consolation prize (e.g., a coupon or store credit) helps soothe the pain and will be appreciated as being better than nothing, at least. Even if you\u2019re not able to offer the reader anything of value, you could at least say something nice. In that case, completing the sentence in the previous paragraph with an active-voice main clause could go as follows:\r\n\r\n<em>. . . we wish you success in your continued search for employment.<\/em>\r\n\r\nThis way, you avoid saying anything negative while still clearly rejecting the applicant.<b><\/b>\r\n<h2>POSITIVE ACTION CLOSING<\/h2>\r\nAs we\u2019ve seen in previous explorations of message organization (e.g.,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/communicationatwork\/chapter\/6-1-1-email-address#617\/\">\u00a76.1.7<\/a>\u00a0on email), the closing here involves action information. If your redirection involves some alternative, such as a recommendation to apply elsewhere, some follow-up details here would help the reader focus on the future elsewhere rather than getting hung up on you and your company\u2019s decision. Your goals here are the following\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>Ensure that the reader understands the bad news without rehashing it<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Remain courteous, positive, and forward-looking<\/li>\r\n \t<li>End the conversation in such a way that you don\u2019t invite further correspondence<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\nThe first and last goals are important because you don\u2019t want the reader to respond asking you to clarify anything. The second goal is important because you ultimately want to appear respectable and avoid giving the reader a reason to smear your reputation in social media or proceed with legal action against you.\r\n<h1 id=\"chapter-420-section-3\" class=\"section-header\">AVOIDING DISASTER IN BAD-NEWS MESSAGES<\/h1>\r\nDelivering bad news can be dangerous if it angers the reader so much that they are motivated to fight back. If you\u2019re not careful with what you say, that message can be used as evidence in a court case that, when read by a judge or jury, could compromise your position. You can lower the risk of being litigated against by following the general principles given below when delivering bad news.\r\n<h2>AVOID NEGATIVE OR ABUSIVE LANGUAGE<\/h2>\r\nSarcasm, profanity, harsh accusations, and abusive or insulting language may feel good to write in a fit of anger but, in the end, make everyone\u2019s lives more difficult. When someone sends an inflammatory message and it\u2019s interpreted by the reader as harmful to their reputation, it could legally qualify as libel that is legitimately actionable. Even if you write critically about a rival company\u2019s product or service by stating (as if factually) that it\u2019s dangerous, whereas your version of the product or service is safer and better, this can be considered defamation or libel. If said aloud and recorded, perhaps on a smart phone\u2019s voice recorder, it is slander and can likewise be litigated. It\u2019s much better to always write courteously and maturely, even under difficult circumstances, to avoid fallout that involves expensive court proceedings.\r\n<h2>AVOID OVERSHARING BUT TELL THE TRUTH<\/h2>\r\nWhen your job is to provide a convincing rationale that might make the recipient of bad news accept it as reasonable, be careful with what details you disclose. When rejecting a job applicant, for instance, you must be especially careful not to lay all your cards on the table by sharing the scoring sheets of the winning and rejected candidates, nor even summarize them. Though that would give them full picture, it would open you up to a flood of complaints and legal or human-rights challenges picking apart every little note. Instead, you would simply wish the rejected candidate luck in their ongoing job search. When you must provide detail, avoid saying anything bad about anyone so that you can\u2019t be accused of libel and taken to court for it. Provide only as much information as is necessary to provide a convincing rationale.\r\n\r\nAt the same, it\u2019s important that you tell the truth so that you can\u2019t be challenged on the details. If you are inconsistent or contradictory in your explanation, it may invite scrutiny and accusations of lying. Even making false claims by exaggerating may give the reader the wrong impression, which can lead to serious consequences if acted upon. Though some might say that omitting the truth is a form of lying, telling the truth selectively is the necessary compromise of a professional constrained by competing obligations to both the organization they represent and the reader who they don\u2019t want to anger or severely disappoint.\r\n<h2>RESPECT THE RECIPIENT\u2019S PRIVACY<\/h2>\r\nCriticizing an employee in a group email or memo\u2014even if the criticism is fair\u2014is mean, unprofessional, and an excellent way of opening yourself to a world of trouble. People who call out others in front of a group create a chilly climate in the workplace, one that leads to fear, loathing, and a loss of productivity among employees, not to mention legal challenges for possible libel. Called-out employees may even resort to sabotaging the office with misbehavior such as vandalism, cyberattacks, or theft to get even. Always maintain respect and privacy when communicating bad news as a matter of proper professionalism\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/open.lib.umn.edu\/businesscommunication\/chapter\/17-1-delivering-a-negative-news-message\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(Business Communication for Success, 2015, 17.1)<\/a>.\r\n\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/communicationatwork\/chapter\/8-3-negative-messages\/#menu\">Return to the Negative Messages Topics menu<\/a>\r\n<h1 id=\"chapter-420-section-4\" class=\"section-header\">CRISIS COMMUNICATIONS<\/h1>\r\nA rumor that the CEO is ill pulls down the stock price. A plant explosion kills several workers and requires evacuating residents in several surrounding city blocks. Risk management seeks to address such risks, including prevention as well as liability, but emergency and crisis situations happen anyway. Employees also make errors in judgment that can damage the public perception of a company. The mainstream media does not lack stories involving infidelity, addiction, or abuse that require a clear response from a company\u2019s standpoint. In this chapter we address the basics of a crisis communication plan, focusing on key types of information during an emergency:\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>What is happening?<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Is anyone in danger?<\/li>\r\n \t<li>How big is the problem?<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Who reported the problem?<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Where is the problem?<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Has a response started?<\/li>\r\n \t<li>What resources are on-scene?<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Who is responding so far?<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Is everyone\u2019s location known? (Mallet, Vaught, &amp; Brinch, 1999)<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\nYou will be receiving information from the moment you know a crisis has occurred, but without a framework or communication plan to guide you, valuable information may be ignored or lost. These questions help you quickly focus on the basics of \u201cwho, what, and where\u201d in the crisis situation.\r\n\r\nA crisis communication plan is the prepared scenario document that organizes information into responsibilities and lines of communication prior to an event. If an emergency arises when you already have a plan in place, each person knows his or her role and responsibilities from a common reference document. Overall effectiveness can be enhanced with a clear understanding of roles and responsibilities for an effective and swift response. The plan should include four elements:\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>Crisis communication team members with contact information<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Designated spokesperson<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Meeting place\/location<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Media plan with procedures<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\nA crisis communication team includes people who can decide what actions to take, carry out those actions, and offer expertise or education in the relevant areas.\r\n\r\nBy designating a spokesperson prior to an actual emergency, your team addresses the inevitable need for information in a proactive manner. People will want to know what happened and where to get further details about the crisis. Lack of information breeds rumours that can make a bad situation worse. The designated spokesperson should be knowledgeable about the organization and its values; be comfortable in front of a microphone, camera, and media lights; and be able to stay calm under pressure.\r\n\r\nPart of your communication crisis plan should focus on where you will meet to coordinate communicate and activities. In case of a fire in your house, you might meet in the front yard. In an organization, a designated contingency building or office some distance away from your usual place of business might serve as a central place for communication in an emergency that requires evacuating your building. Depending on the size of your organization and its facilities, the emergency plan may include exit routes, hazardous materials procedures (WHMIS), and policies for handling bomb threats, for example. Safety is of course the priority, but in terms of communication, the goal is to eliminate confusion about where people are, where they need to be, and where information is coming from.\r\n\r\nWhether or not evacuation is necessary when a crisis occurs, your designated spokesperson will gather information and carry out your media plan. They will need to make quick judgments about which information to share, how to phrase it, and whether certain individuals need to be notified of facts before they become public. The media and public will want to get reliable information, which is preferable to mere spin or speculation. Official responses help clarify the situation for the public, but an unofficial interview can make the tragedy personal and attract unwanted attention. Remind employees to direct all inquiries to the official spokesperson and to never speak anonymously or \u201coff the record.\u201d\r\n\r\nEnable your spokesperson to have access to the place you indicated as your crisis contingency location to coordinate communication and activities, and allow them to prepare and respond to inquiries. When crisis communication is handled in a professional manner, it seeks not to withhold information or mislead, but to minimize the \u201cspin damage\u201d from the incident by providing necessary facts even if they are unpleasant or even tragic\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/open.lib.umn.edu\/businesscommunication\/chapter\/17-3-crisis-communication-plan\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(Business Communication for Success, 2015, 17.3)<\/a>.\r\n<h1 id=\"chapter-420-section-5\" class=\"section-header\">DIRECT-APPROACH BAD-NEWS MESSAGES<\/h1>\r\nWe\u2019ve so far looked at expressing bad news using the indirect approach, but is it ever right to deliver bad news using the direct approach? Are there occasions where you can or should be upfront about the bad news? In the following situations, yes, it\u2019s certainly appropriate to deliver bad news by getting right to the point:\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><strong>When the bad news isn\u2019t\u00a0<em>that<\/em>\u00a0bad:<\/strong>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>In the case of small price or rate increases, customers won\u2019t be devastated by having to pay more. Indeed, inflation makes such increases an expected fact of life.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>If your job involves routinely delivering criticism because you\u2019re a Quality Assurance specialist, the people who are used to receiving recommendations to improve their work will appreciate the direct approach. Some organizations even require direct-approach communications for bad news as a policy because it is more time-efficient.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>When you know that the recipient prefers or requires the direct approach:<\/strong>\u00a0Though the indirect approach is intended as a nice way to deliver bad news, some people would rather you be blunt. \u201cGive it to me straight, doc. I\u2019m a grown-up. I can take it,\u201d they might say. Since a message must always be tailored to the audience, getting permission for taking the direct approach is your cue to follow through with exactly that. Not doing so will arouse the angry response you would have expected otherwise.<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>When you\u2019re short on time or space:<\/strong>\u00a0One of the hallmarks of the indirect approach is that it takes more words than a direct-approach message.\u00a0If time is limited or you\u2019re constrained in how much space you have to write, taking the direct approach is justifiable.<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>When the indirect approach hasn\u2019t worked:<\/strong>\u00a0If this is the third time you\u2019ve had to tell a client to pay their invoice and the first two were nicely-worded indirect messages that the recipient ignored, take the kid-gloves off and issue a stern warning of the consequences of not paying. You may need to threaten legal action or say you\u2019ll refer the account to a collection agency, and you may need to put it in bold so that you\u2019re sure the reader won\u2019t miss it.<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>When the reader may miss the bad news:<\/strong>\u00a0You may determine from profiling your audience and their literacy level that they might not understand indirect-approach bad news. If your reader doesn\u2019t have a strong command of English vocabulary and misses words here and there, they may not pick up on the buried bad news past the mid-point of a challenging message.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\nIn the above situations, structure your message following the same three-part organization we\u2019ve seen elsewhere (e.g.,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/communicationatwork\/chapter\/6-1-1-email-address#615\/\">\u00a76.1.5<\/a>\u00a0\u2013\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/communicationatwork\/chapter\/6-1-1-email-address#617\/\">\u00a76.1.7<\/a>\u00a0on email parts):\r\n<ol>\r\n \t<li><strong>Opening:<\/strong>\u00a0State the bad news right up front.<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Body:<\/strong>\u00a0Briefly explain why the bad news happened.<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Closing:<\/strong>\u00a0Express confidence in continued business relations with a goodwill statement and provide any action information such as contact instructions should the recipient require further information.<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\nOf course, clarity and brevity in such messages is vital to maintaining friendly relations with your audiences (Guffey et al., 2016, p. 190).\r\n<div class=\"textbox exercises\">\r\n<h3>EXERCISES<\/h3>\r\n<img class=\"alignleft wp-image-29\" src=\"https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/app\/uploads\/sites\/103\/2018\/03\/writing.png\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/app\/uploads\/sites\/103\/2018\/03\/writing.png 150w, https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/app\/uploads\/sites\/103\/2018\/03\/writing-65x65.png 65w\" alt=\"\" width=\"70\" height=\"70\" \/>1. Think of a time when you were given bad news by email or letter, such as when you were told that a warranty couldn\u2019t be honoured for the type of damage inflicted on your product or your application was rejected. How well did it fulfill or fail to fulfill the seven goals of delivering bad news (see\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/communicationatwork\/chapter\/8-3-negative-messages\/#831\">\u00a78.3.1<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/communicationatwork\/chapter\/8-3-negative-messages\/#833\">\u00a78.3.3<\/a>)?\r\n\r\n2. Sales have decreased for two consecutive quarters at your business. You must inform your sales team that their hours and base pay will be reduced by 20 percent if the company is to break even this quarter. While you may have a few members of your sales team that are underperforming, you can\u2019t afford to be short-staffed now, so you must keep the entire team for the time being. Write negative news messages in both the direct and indirect approach informing your sales team of the news following the advice in\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/communicationatwork\/chapter\/8-3-negative-messages\/#832\">\u00a78.3.2<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/communicationatwork\/chapter\/8-3-negative-messages\/#835\">\u00a78.3.5<\/a>\u00a0above.\r\n\r\n3. Research a crisis in your area of training or career field. What communication issues were present and how did they affect the response to the crisis? If the situation was handled well, what are the major takeaways? If handled poorly, what do you think you would have done differently following the general guidelines in\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/communicationatwork\/chapter\/8-3-negative-messages\/#834\">\u00a78.3.4<\/a>\u00a0above?\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<h2>REFERENCES<\/h2>\r\n<p class=\"hangingindent\">Guffey, M. E., Loewy, D., Almonte, R. (2016).\u00a0<em>Essentials of business communication<\/em>\u00a0(8th Can. Ed.). Toronto: Nelson.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hangingindent\">Lehman, C. M., DuFrene, D, &amp; Murphy, R. (2013).\u00a0<em>BCOM<\/em>\u00a0(1st Can. Ed.). Toronto: Nelson Education.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hangingindent\">Mallet, L., Vaught, C., &amp; Brinch, M. (1999).\u00a0<em>The emergency communication triangle<\/em>. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh Research Laboratory.<\/p>","rendered":"<div class=\"textbox learning-objectives\">\n<h3>LEARNING OBJECTIVES<\/h3>\n<p>3. Organize and write negative messages<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>Just as in life, the workplace isn\u2019t always a bowl of cherries. Sometimes things don\u2019t go according to plan, and it\u2019s your job to communicate about them in a way that doesn\u2019t ruin your relationships with customers, coworkers, managers, the public, and other stakeholders. When doing damage control, bad-news messages require care and skillful language because your main point will meet resistance. Rarely are people okay being told that they\u2019re laid off, their application has been rejected, their shipment got lost en route, prices or rates are increasing, their appointment has to be moved back several months, or they\u2019re losing their benefits. Though some people prefer that the messenger be blunt about it, in most cases you can assume that the receiver will appreciate or even benefit by a more tactful, indirect approach. Keep in mind the following advice whenever required to deliver unwelcome news.\u00a0<b><\/b><\/p>\n<h1 id=\"chapter-420-section-1\" class=\"section-header\">THE SEVEN GOALS OF BAD-NEWS MESSAGES<\/h1>\n<p>Your ability to manage, clarify, and guide understanding is key to addressing challenging situations while maintaining trust and integrity with customers, coworkers, managers, the public, and other stakeholders. Keep in mind these seven goals when delivering bad news in person or in writing:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Be clear and concise to avoid being asked for additional clarification.<\/li>\n<li>Help the receiver understand and accept the news.<\/li>\n<li>Reduce the anxiety associated with the bad news as much as possible by expressing sympathy or empathy.<\/li>\n<li>Maintain trust and respect between you and your audience to ensure the possibility of good future relations.<\/li>\n<li>Deliver the bad news in a timely fashion in the appropriate channel(s).<\/li>\n<li>Avoid the legal liability that comes with admitting negligence or guilt.<\/li>\n<li>Achieve the designated business outcome.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Let\u2019s look at how we can achieve these goals in examples of the tricky situations in which we might find ourselves in the workplace.<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s say you are a supervisor and your manager has tasked you with getting Chris, an employee who is usually late for work and has been arriving even later recently, to start arriving on time. Chris\u2019s tardiness is impairing not only his performance but also that of the entire team that depends on his work. You figure there are four ways you can handle this:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Stop by Chris\u2019s cubicle and simply say, \u201cGet to work on time or you\u2019re out\u201d<\/li>\n<li>Invite Chris out to a nice lunch and let him have it<\/li>\n<li>Write Chris a stern email<\/li>\n<li>Ask Chris to come to your office and discuss the behaviour with him in private<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Let\u2019s see how each of these alternatives meets our seven goals in delivering bad news.<\/p>\n<p>First, if you approach Chris with a blunt ultimatum at his desk, you can get right to the point there but risk straining the supervisor-employee relationship by putting him in his place in front of everyone. The aggressive approach might prompt Chris to demand clarification, make defensive excuses, or throw hostile counter-offensives right back\u2014none of which are desired outcomes. For that matter, the disrespectful approach doesn\u2019t formally confirm that the tardiness will end. The lack of tact in the approach may reflect poorly on you as the supervisor, not only with Chris but with your manager as well.<\/p>\n<p>When you need to speak to an employee about a personnel concern, it is always best to do so in private. Give thought and concern to the conversation before it occurs and make a list of points to cover with specific information, including grievances. Like any other speech, you may need to rehearse, particularly if this type of meeting is new to you. When it comes time to have the discussion, issue the warning, back it up in writing with documentation, and don\u2019t give the impression that you might change your decision. Whether the issue at hand is a simple caution about tardiness or a more serious conversation, you need to be fair and respectful, even if the other person has been less than professional. Let\u2019s examine the next alternative.<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s say you invite Chris to lunch at a nice restaurant. He sees the fine linen on the table, silverware for more than the main course, and water glasses with stems. The luxurious environment says \u201cgood job,\u201d but your serious talk will contradict this nonverbal signage, which will probably be an obstacle to Chris\u2019s ability to listen. If Chris doesn\u2019t understand and accept the message, requiring him to seek clarification, your approach has failed. Furthermore, the ambush fails to build trust, so you don\u2019t know whether Chris is going to make the extra effort to arrive early or just put in his time there doing the bare minimum while looking for another job.<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s say instead that you\u2019ve written Chris a stern email. You\u2019ve included a list of all the recent dates when he was late and made several statements about the quality of his work. You clearly say he needs to improve and stop being late, or else. But was your email harassment? Could it be considered beyond the scope of supervision and interpreted as mean or cruel? And do you even know if Chris has received it? If there was no reply, do you know whether it achieved its desired business outcome? A written message may certainly be part of the desired approach, but how it is presented and delivered is as important as what it says. Let\u2019s examine our fourth approach to this scenario.<\/p>\n<p>You ask Chris to join you in a private conversation. You start by expressing concern and asking an open-ended question: \u201cChris, I\u2019ve been concerned about your work lately. Is everything all right?\u201d As Chris answers, you may demonstrate that you are listening by nodding your head and possibly taking notes. You may learn that Chris has been having problems sleeping or that his living situation has changed. Or Chris may decline to share any issues, deny that anything is wrong, and ask why you are concerned. You may then state that you\u2019ve observed the chronic tardiness and name one or more specific mistakes you have found in Chris\u2019s work, ending by repeating your concern. Because showing your concern makes Chris feel valued, he opens up about his situation so that you understand where he\u2019s coming from. It may turn out that he has to drop his kids off for school at 8am and then contend with Queensway traffic for the next hour to get to the office, consistently making him a half hour late. You can then both agree that he\u2019ll stay a little later or put in the missing hours at home, then write up that agreement in an email with your manager Cc\u2019d.<\/p>\n<p>Regardless of how well or poorly the conversation goes, if Chris tells other employees about it, they will take note of how you handled the situation, and it will contribute to their perception of you. It guides their expectations of how you operate and how to communicate with you as this interaction is not only about you and Chris. You represent the company and its reputation, and your professional display of concern as you try to learn more sends a positive message. While the private, respectful meeting may not be the perfect solution, it is preferable to the other approaches considered above.<\/p>\n<p>One additional point to consider as you document this interaction is the need to present the warning in writing. You may elect to prepare a memo that outlines the information concerning Chris\u2019s performance and tardiness and have it ready should you want to present it. If the session goes well, and you have the discretion to make a judgment call, you may elect to give him another week to resolve the issue. Even if it goes well, you may want to present the memo, as it documents the interaction and serves as evidence of due process should Chris\u2019s behaviour fail to change, eventually resulting in the need for termination. This combined approach of a verbal and written message is increasingly the norm in business communication\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/open.lib.umn.edu\/businesscommunication\/chapter\/17-1-delivering-a-negative-news-message\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(Business Communication for Success, 2015, 17.1)<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h1 id=\"chapter-420-section-2\" class=\"section-header\">INDIRECT BAD-NEWS MESSAGE ORGANIZATION<\/h1>\n<p>Key to achieving Goal #2 of delivering bad news\u2014i.e., helping the receiver understand and accept information they don\u2019t want to hear or read\u2014is organizing the message using the indirect approach described in\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/communicationatwork\/chapter\/4-1-choosing-an-organizational-pattern#412\/\">\u00a74.1.2<\/a>. If you tactlessly hit your audience over the head with really bad news, you run the risk of them rejecting or misunderstanding it because they may be reeling from the blow and be too distracted with anger or sadness to rationally process the explanation or instructions for what to do about the bad news. A doctor never delivers a really serious diagnosis by coming right out and saying \u201cYou have cancer!\u201d first thing. Instead, they try to put a positive spin on the results (\u201cIt could be worse\u201d), discuss test results in detail, talk about treatment options, and only then come around to telling the patient the bad news. At that point, being clear about the bad news ensures that the receiver understands the gravity of the situation and is therefore motivated to follow through on the therapeutic recommendations given earlier. Key to avoiding misunderstandings when delivering bad news, then, is the following four-part organization:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Buffer<\/li>\n<li>Justification<\/li>\n<li>Bad news + redirection<\/li>\n<li>Positive action closing<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>This is much like the three-part structure,\u00a0only the body is now divided into two distinct parts where the order really matters, as we see in Table 8.10 and the explanation for each part below it.<\/p>\n<h2><a id=\"t832\"><\/a>TABLE 8.10 BAD NEWS MESSAGE OUTLINE AND EXAMPLE MESSAGE<\/h2>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Part<\/th>\n<th>Example Message<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>1. Buffer<\/td>\n<td>Thank you for your order. We appreciate your interest in our product and are confident you will love it.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2.\u00a0Explanation<\/td>\n<td>We are writing to let you know that this product has been unexpectedly popular with over 10,000 orders submitted on the day you placed yours.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>3. Bad news + redirect<\/td>\n<td>This unexpected increase in demand has resulted in a temporary out-of-stock\/backorder situation. Despite a delay of 2-3 weeks, we will definitely fulfill your order as it was received at 11:57pm on October 9, 2018, as well as gift you a $5 coupon towards your next purchase.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>4. Positive action closing<\/td>\n<td>While you wait for your product to ship, we encourage you to use the enclosed $5 coupon toward the purchase of any product in our online catalog. We appreciate your continued business and want you to know that our highest priority is your satisfaction.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/open.lib.umn.edu\/businesscommunication\/chapter\/17-1-delivering-a-negative-news-message\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(Business Communication for Success, 2015, 17.1)<\/a><\/p>\n<h2>BAD-NEWS MESSAGE BUFFER<\/h2>\n<p>Begin with neutral or positive statements that set a welcoming tone and serve as a\u00a0<strong>buffer<\/strong>\u00a0for the information to come. A buffer softens the blow of bad news like the airbag in a car softens the driver\u2019s collision with the steering wheel in a high-speed car accident. If there are any silver linings that can calm the poor person about to be pummeled by the dark thunder clouds of bad news, here at the beginning would be a good time to point them out. The following are some possible buffer strategies:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Good news<\/strong>: If there\u2019s good news and bad news, start with the good news.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Compliment<\/strong>: If you\u2019re rejecting someone\u2019s application, for instance, start by complimenting them on their efforts and other specific accomplishments you were impressed by in their application.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Gratitude<\/strong>: Say thanks for whatever positive things the recipient has done in your dealings with them. If they\u2019ve submitted a claim that doesn\u2019t qualify for an adjustment, for instance, thank them for choosing your company.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Agreement<\/strong>: Before delivering bad news that you\u2019re sure the recipient is going to disagree with and oppose, start with something you\u2019re sure you both agree on. Start on common ground by saying, \u201cWe can all agree that . . . .\u201d<\/li>\n<li><strong>Facts<\/strong>: If positives are hard to come by in a situation, getting started on the next section\u2019s explanation, starting with cold, hard facts, is the next best thing.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Understanding<\/strong>: Again, if there are no silver linings to point to, showing you care by expressing sympathy and understanding is a possible alternative (Guffey et al. 2016, p. 194)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Apology<\/strong>: If you\u2019re at fault for any aspect of a bad news message, an apology is appropriate as long as it won\u2019t leave you at a disadvantage in legal proceedings that may follow as a result of admitting wrongdoing. (See\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/communicationatwork\/chapter\/8-2-complaints-and-claims#8222\/\">\u00a78.2.2.2<\/a>\u00a0for more on effective strategies for apologizing.)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The idea here is not to fool the audience into thinking that only good news is coming but to put them in a receptive frame of mind for understanding the explanation that follows. If you raise the expectation that they\u2019re going to hear the good news that they\u2019re getting what they want only, to let them down near the end, they\u2019re going to be even more disappointed for being led on. If you hit them over the head with bad news right away, however, they may be more distracted with emotion to rationally process the explanation or instructions for what to do about the bad news.<b><\/b><\/p>\n<h2>BAD-NEWS JUSTIFICATION<\/h2>\n<p>The<strong>\u00a0justification<\/strong>\u00a0explains the background or context for the bad news before delivering the bad news itself. Let\u2019s say that you must reject an application, claim for a refund, or request for information. In such cases, the explanation could describe the strict acceptance criteria and high quality of applications received in the competition, the company policy on refunds, or its policy on allowable disclosures and the legalities of contractually obligated confidentiality, respectively. Your goal with the explanation is to be convincing so that the reader says, \u201cThat sounds reasonable\u201d and similarly accepts the bad news as inevitable given the situation you describe. On the other hand, if you make the bad news seem like mysterious and arbitrary decision-making, your audience will probably feel like they\u2019ve been treated unfairly and might even escalate further with legal action or \u201cyelptribution\u201d\u2014avenging the wrong in social media. While an explanation is ethically necessary, never admit or imply responsibility without written authorization from your company cleared by legal counsel if there\u2019s any way that the justification might be seen as actionable (i.e., the offended party can sue for damages).<\/p>\n<p>Use additional strategies to make the justification more agreeable such as focusing on benefits. If you\u2019re informing employees that they will have to pay double for parking passes next year in an attempt to reduce the number of cars filling up the parking lot, you could sell them on the health benefits of cycling to work or the environmental benefit of fewer cars polluting the atmosphere. If you\u2019re informing a customer asking why a product or service can\u2019t include additional features, you could say that adding those features would drive the cost up and you would rather respect your customer\u2019s pocketbooks by keeping the product or service more affordable. In any case, try to pitch an agreeable, pro-social or progressive benefit rather than saying that you\u2019re merely trying to maximize company or shareholder profits.<\/p>\n<h2>THE BAD NEWS ITSELF AND REDIRECTION<\/h2>\n<p>Burying the bad news itself in the message is a defining characteristic of the indirect approach. It\u2019s akin to the \u201cpoop sandwich\u201d organization of constructive criticism sandwiched between statements of praise (see\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/communicationatwork\/chapter\/11-1-teamwork#11142\/\">\u00a711.1.4.2<\/a>). Far from intending to hide the bad news, the indirect approach frames the bad news so that it can be properly understood and its negative (depressing or anger-arousing) impact minimized.<\/p>\n<p>The goal is also to be clear in expressing the bad news so that it isn\u2019t misunderstood while also being sensitive to your reader\u2019s feelings. If you\u2019re rejecting a job applicant, for instance, you can be clear that they didn\u2019t get the job without bluntly saying \u201cYou failed to meet our criteria\u201d or \u201cYou won\u2019t be working for us anytime soon.\u201d Instead, you can clearly imply it by putting the bad news in a subordinate clause in the passive voice:<\/p>\n<p><em>Though another candidate was hired for the position, . . .<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The passive voice (see\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/communicationatwork\/chapter\/4-3-forming-effective-sentences#434\/\">\u00a74.3.4<\/a>\u00a0) enables you to draw attention away from your own role in rejecting the applicant, as well as away from the rejected applicant in the context of the competition itself. Instead, you focus on the positive of someone getting hired. While the rejected applicant probably won\u2019t be throwing a celebration party for the winning candidate, the subordinate clause here allows for speedy redirection to a consolation prize.<\/p>\n<p>Redirection is key to this type of bad news\u2019 effectiveness because it quickly shifts the reader\u2019s attention to an alternative to what they were seeking in the first place. Some kind of consolation prize (e.g., a coupon or store credit) helps soothe the pain and will be appreciated as being better than nothing, at least. Even if you\u2019re not able to offer the reader anything of value, you could at least say something nice. In that case, completing the sentence in the previous paragraph with an active-voice main clause could go as follows:<\/p>\n<p><em>. . . we wish you success in your continued search for employment.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>This way, you avoid saying anything negative while still clearly rejecting the applicant.<b><\/b><\/p>\n<h2>POSITIVE ACTION CLOSING<\/h2>\n<p>As we\u2019ve seen in previous explorations of message organization (e.g.,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/communicationatwork\/chapter\/6-1-1-email-address#617\/\">\u00a76.1.7<\/a>\u00a0on email), the closing here involves action information. If your redirection involves some alternative, such as a recommendation to apply elsewhere, some follow-up details here would help the reader focus on the future elsewhere rather than getting hung up on you and your company\u2019s decision. Your goals here are the following<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Ensure that the reader understands the bad news without rehashing it<\/li>\n<li>Remain courteous, positive, and forward-looking<\/li>\n<li>End the conversation in such a way that you don\u2019t invite further correspondence<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The first and last goals are important because you don\u2019t want the reader to respond asking you to clarify anything. The second goal is important because you ultimately want to appear respectable and avoid giving the reader a reason to smear your reputation in social media or proceed with legal action against you.<\/p>\n<h1 id=\"chapter-420-section-3\" class=\"section-header\">AVOIDING DISASTER IN BAD-NEWS MESSAGES<\/h1>\n<p>Delivering bad news can be dangerous if it angers the reader so much that they are motivated to fight back. If you\u2019re not careful with what you say, that message can be used as evidence in a court case that, when read by a judge or jury, could compromise your position. You can lower the risk of being litigated against by following the general principles given below when delivering bad news.<\/p>\n<h2>AVOID NEGATIVE OR ABUSIVE LANGUAGE<\/h2>\n<p>Sarcasm, profanity, harsh accusations, and abusive or insulting language may feel good to write in a fit of anger but, in the end, make everyone\u2019s lives more difficult. When someone sends an inflammatory message and it\u2019s interpreted by the reader as harmful to their reputation, it could legally qualify as libel that is legitimately actionable. Even if you write critically about a rival company\u2019s product or service by stating (as if factually) that it\u2019s dangerous, whereas your version of the product or service is safer and better, this can be considered defamation or libel. If said aloud and recorded, perhaps on a smart phone\u2019s voice recorder, it is slander and can likewise be litigated. It\u2019s much better to always write courteously and maturely, even under difficult circumstances, to avoid fallout that involves expensive court proceedings.<\/p>\n<h2>AVOID OVERSHARING BUT TELL THE TRUTH<\/h2>\n<p>When your job is to provide a convincing rationale that might make the recipient of bad news accept it as reasonable, be careful with what details you disclose. When rejecting a job applicant, for instance, you must be especially careful not to lay all your cards on the table by sharing the scoring sheets of the winning and rejected candidates, nor even summarize them. Though that would give them full picture, it would open you up to a flood of complaints and legal or human-rights challenges picking apart every little note. Instead, you would simply wish the rejected candidate luck in their ongoing job search. When you must provide detail, avoid saying anything bad about anyone so that you can\u2019t be accused of libel and taken to court for it. Provide only as much information as is necessary to provide a convincing rationale.<\/p>\n<p>At the same, it\u2019s important that you tell the truth so that you can\u2019t be challenged on the details. If you are inconsistent or contradictory in your explanation, it may invite scrutiny and accusations of lying. Even making false claims by exaggerating may give the reader the wrong impression, which can lead to serious consequences if acted upon. Though some might say that omitting the truth is a form of lying, telling the truth selectively is the necessary compromise of a professional constrained by competing obligations to both the organization they represent and the reader who they don\u2019t want to anger or severely disappoint.<\/p>\n<h2>RESPECT THE RECIPIENT\u2019S PRIVACY<\/h2>\n<p>Criticizing an employee in a group email or memo\u2014even if the criticism is fair\u2014is mean, unprofessional, and an excellent way of opening yourself to a world of trouble. People who call out others in front of a group create a chilly climate in the workplace, one that leads to fear, loathing, and a loss of productivity among employees, not to mention legal challenges for possible libel. Called-out employees may even resort to sabotaging the office with misbehavior such as vandalism, cyberattacks, or theft to get even. Always maintain respect and privacy when communicating bad news as a matter of proper professionalism\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/open.lib.umn.edu\/businesscommunication\/chapter\/17-1-delivering-a-negative-news-message\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(Business Communication for Success, 2015, 17.1)<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/communicationatwork\/chapter\/8-3-negative-messages\/#menu\">Return to the Negative Messages Topics menu<\/a><\/p>\n<h1 id=\"chapter-420-section-4\" class=\"section-header\">CRISIS COMMUNICATIONS<\/h1>\n<p>A rumor that the CEO is ill pulls down the stock price. A plant explosion kills several workers and requires evacuating residents in several surrounding city blocks. Risk management seeks to address such risks, including prevention as well as liability, but emergency and crisis situations happen anyway. Employees also make errors in judgment that can damage the public perception of a company. The mainstream media does not lack stories involving infidelity, addiction, or abuse that require a clear response from a company\u2019s standpoint. In this chapter we address the basics of a crisis communication plan, focusing on key types of information during an emergency:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What is happening?<\/li>\n<li>Is anyone in danger?<\/li>\n<li>How big is the problem?<\/li>\n<li>Who reported the problem?<\/li>\n<li>Where is the problem?<\/li>\n<li>Has a response started?<\/li>\n<li>What resources are on-scene?<\/li>\n<li>Who is responding so far?<\/li>\n<li>Is everyone\u2019s location known? (Mallet, Vaught, &amp; Brinch, 1999)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>You will be receiving information from the moment you know a crisis has occurred, but without a framework or communication plan to guide you, valuable information may be ignored or lost. These questions help you quickly focus on the basics of \u201cwho, what, and where\u201d in the crisis situation.<\/p>\n<p>A crisis communication plan is the prepared scenario document that organizes information into responsibilities and lines of communication prior to an event. If an emergency arises when you already have a plan in place, each person knows his or her role and responsibilities from a common reference document. Overall effectiveness can be enhanced with a clear understanding of roles and responsibilities for an effective and swift response. The plan should include four elements:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Crisis communication team members with contact information<\/li>\n<li>Designated spokesperson<\/li>\n<li>Meeting place\/location<\/li>\n<li>Media plan with procedures<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>A crisis communication team includes people who can decide what actions to take, carry out those actions, and offer expertise or education in the relevant areas.<\/p>\n<p>By designating a spokesperson prior to an actual emergency, your team addresses the inevitable need for information in a proactive manner. People will want to know what happened and where to get further details about the crisis. Lack of information breeds rumours that can make a bad situation worse. The designated spokesperson should be knowledgeable about the organization and its values; be comfortable in front of a microphone, camera, and media lights; and be able to stay calm under pressure.<\/p>\n<p>Part of your communication crisis plan should focus on where you will meet to coordinate communicate and activities. In case of a fire in your house, you might meet in the front yard. In an organization, a designated contingency building or office some distance away from your usual place of business might serve as a central place for communication in an emergency that requires evacuating your building. Depending on the size of your organization and its facilities, the emergency plan may include exit routes, hazardous materials procedures (WHMIS), and policies for handling bomb threats, for example. Safety is of course the priority, but in terms of communication, the goal is to eliminate confusion about where people are, where they need to be, and where information is coming from.<\/p>\n<p>Whether or not evacuation is necessary when a crisis occurs, your designated spokesperson will gather information and carry out your media plan. They will need to make quick judgments about which information to share, how to phrase it, and whether certain individuals need to be notified of facts before they become public. The media and public will want to get reliable information, which is preferable to mere spin or speculation. Official responses help clarify the situation for the public, but an unofficial interview can make the tragedy personal and attract unwanted attention. Remind employees to direct all inquiries to the official spokesperson and to never speak anonymously or \u201coff the record.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Enable your spokesperson to have access to the place you indicated as your crisis contingency location to coordinate communication and activities, and allow them to prepare and respond to inquiries. When crisis communication is handled in a professional manner, it seeks not to withhold information or mislead, but to minimize the \u201cspin damage\u201d from the incident by providing necessary facts even if they are unpleasant or even tragic\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/open.lib.umn.edu\/businesscommunication\/chapter\/17-3-crisis-communication-plan\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(Business Communication for Success, 2015, 17.3)<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h1 id=\"chapter-420-section-5\" class=\"section-header\">DIRECT-APPROACH BAD-NEWS MESSAGES<\/h1>\n<p>We\u2019ve so far looked at expressing bad news using the indirect approach, but is it ever right to deliver bad news using the direct approach? Are there occasions where you can or should be upfront about the bad news? In the following situations, yes, it\u2019s certainly appropriate to deliver bad news by getting right to the point:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>When the bad news isn\u2019t\u00a0<em>that<\/em>\u00a0bad:<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>In the case of small price or rate increases, customers won\u2019t be devastated by having to pay more. Indeed, inflation makes such increases an expected fact of life.<\/li>\n<li>If your job involves routinely delivering criticism because you\u2019re a Quality Assurance specialist, the people who are used to receiving recommendations to improve their work will appreciate the direct approach. Some organizations even require direct-approach communications for bad news as a policy because it is more time-efficient.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>When you know that the recipient prefers or requires the direct approach:<\/strong>\u00a0Though the indirect approach is intended as a nice way to deliver bad news, some people would rather you be blunt. \u201cGive it to me straight, doc. I\u2019m a grown-up. I can take it,\u201d they might say. Since a message must always be tailored to the audience, getting permission for taking the direct approach is your cue to follow through with exactly that. Not doing so will arouse the angry response you would have expected otherwise.<\/li>\n<li><strong>When you\u2019re short on time or space:<\/strong>\u00a0One of the hallmarks of the indirect approach is that it takes more words than a direct-approach message.\u00a0If time is limited or you\u2019re constrained in how much space you have to write, taking the direct approach is justifiable.<\/li>\n<li><strong>When the indirect approach hasn\u2019t worked:<\/strong>\u00a0If this is the third time you\u2019ve had to tell a client to pay their invoice and the first two were nicely-worded indirect messages that the recipient ignored, take the kid-gloves off and issue a stern warning of the consequences of not paying. You may need to threaten legal action or say you\u2019ll refer the account to a collection agency, and you may need to put it in bold so that you\u2019re sure the reader won\u2019t miss it.<\/li>\n<li><strong>When the reader may miss the bad news:<\/strong>\u00a0You may determine from profiling your audience and their literacy level that they might not understand indirect-approach bad news. If your reader doesn\u2019t have a strong command of English vocabulary and misses words here and there, they may not pick up on the buried bad news past the mid-point of a challenging message.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>In the above situations, structure your message following the same three-part organization we\u2019ve seen elsewhere (e.g.,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/communicationatwork\/chapter\/6-1-1-email-address#615\/\">\u00a76.1.5<\/a>\u00a0\u2013\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/communicationatwork\/chapter\/6-1-1-email-address#617\/\">\u00a76.1.7<\/a>\u00a0on email parts):<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Opening:<\/strong>\u00a0State the bad news right up front.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Body:<\/strong>\u00a0Briefly explain why the bad news happened.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Closing:<\/strong>\u00a0Express confidence in continued business relations with a goodwill statement and provide any action information such as contact instructions should the recipient require further information.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Of course, clarity and brevity in such messages is vital to maintaining friendly relations with your audiences (Guffey et al., 2016, p. 190).<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox exercises\">\n<h3>EXERCISES<\/h3>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft wp-image-29\" src=\"https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/app\/uploads\/sites\/103\/2018\/03\/writing.png\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/app\/uploads\/sites\/103\/2018\/03\/writing.png 150w, https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/app\/uploads\/sites\/103\/2018\/03\/writing-65x65.png 65w\" alt=\"\" width=\"70\" height=\"70\" \/>1. Think of a time when you were given bad news by email or letter, such as when you were told that a warranty couldn\u2019t be honoured for the type of damage inflicted on your product or your application was rejected. How well did it fulfill or fail to fulfill the seven goals of delivering bad news (see\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/communicationatwork\/chapter\/8-3-negative-messages\/#831\">\u00a78.3.1<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/communicationatwork\/chapter\/8-3-negative-messages\/#833\">\u00a78.3.3<\/a>)?<\/p>\n<p>2. Sales have decreased for two consecutive quarters at your business. You must inform your sales team that their hours and base pay will be reduced by 20 percent if the company is to break even this quarter. While you may have a few members of your sales team that are underperforming, you can\u2019t afford to be short-staffed now, so you must keep the entire team for the time being. Write negative news messages in both the direct and indirect approach informing your sales team of the news following the advice in\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/communicationatwork\/chapter\/8-3-negative-messages\/#832\">\u00a78.3.2<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/communicationatwork\/chapter\/8-3-negative-messages\/#835\">\u00a78.3.5<\/a>\u00a0above.<\/p>\n<p>3. Research a crisis in your area of training or career field. What communication issues were present and how did they affect the response to the crisis? If the situation was handled well, what are the major takeaways? If handled poorly, what do you think you would have done differently following the general guidelines in\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/communicationatwork\/chapter\/8-3-negative-messages\/#834\">\u00a78.3.4<\/a>\u00a0above?<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2>REFERENCES<\/h2>\n<p class=\"hangingindent\">Guffey, M. E., Loewy, D., Almonte, R. (2016).\u00a0<em>Essentials of business communication<\/em>\u00a0(8th Can. Ed.). Toronto: Nelson.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hangingindent\">Lehman, C. M., DuFrene, D, &amp; Murphy, R. (2013).\u00a0<em>BCOM<\/em>\u00a0(1st Can. Ed.). Toronto: Nelson Education.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hangingindent\">Mallet, L., Vaught, C., &amp; Brinch, M. (1999).\u00a0<em>The emergency communication triangle<\/em>. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh Research Laboratory.<\/p>\n\n\t\t\t <section class=\"citations-section\" role=\"contentinfo\">\n\t\t\t <h3>Candela Citations<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t <div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t <div id=\"citation-list-807\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <div class=\"licensing\"><div class=\"license-attribution-dropdown-subheading\">CC licensed content, Original<\/div><ul class=\"citation-list\"><li>Communication at Work. <strong>Authored by<\/strong>: Jordan Smith. <strong>Provided by<\/strong>: Pressbooks - Algonquin College. <strong>Located at<\/strong>: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/communicationatwork\/chapter\/8-3-negative-messages\/\">https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/communicationatwork\/chapter\/8-3-negative-messages\/<\/a>. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"license\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/\">CC BY: Attribution<\/a><\/em><\/li><\/ul><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t <\/section>","protected":false},"author":545042,"menu_order":4,"template":"","meta":{"_candela_citation":"[{\"type\":\"original\",\"description\":\"Communication at Work\",\"author\":\"Jordan Smith\",\"organization\":\"Pressbooks - Algonquin College\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub\/communicationatwork\/chapter\/8-3-negative-messages\/\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"cc-by\",\"license_terms\":\"\"}]","CANDELA_OUTCOMES_GUID":"","pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-807","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry"],"part":761,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-oswego-businesscommunicationmgrs2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/807","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-oswego-businesscommunicationmgrs2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-oswego-businesscommunicationmgrs2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-oswego-businesscommunicationmgrs2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/545042"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-oswego-businesscommunicationmgrs2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/807\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1836,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-oswego-businesscommunicationmgrs2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/807\/revisions\/1836"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-oswego-businesscommunicationmgrs2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/761"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-oswego-businesscommunicationmgrs2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/807\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-oswego-businesscommunicationmgrs2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=807"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-oswego-businesscommunicationmgrs2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=807"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-oswego-businesscommunicationmgrs2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=807"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-oswego-businesscommunicationmgrs2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=807"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}