{"id":3286,"date":"2018-07-03T21:18:29","date_gmt":"2018-07-03T21:18:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-potsdam-organicchemistry\/?post_type=chapter&#038;p=3286"},"modified":"2020-06-23T22:26:51","modified_gmt":"2020-06-23T22:26:51","slug":"8-5-elimination-reactions","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-potsdam-organicchemistry\/chapter\/8-5-elimination-reactions\/","title":{"raw":"8.5. Elimination reactions","rendered":"8.5. Elimination reactions"},"content":{"raw":"Alkyl halides undergo elimination via two common mechanisms, known as E2 and E1, which show some similarities to S<sub>N<\/sub>2 and S<sub>N<\/sub>1, respectively.\u00a0 In E2, elimination shows a second order rate law, and occurs in a single concerted step (proton abstraction at C<sub>\u03b1 <\/sub><span style=\"font-size: 16px\">occurring at the same time as C<\/span><sub>\u03b2<\/sub><span style=\"font-size: 16px\">-X bond cleavage).\u00a0 In E1, elimination goes via a first order rate law, in two steps (C<\/span><sub>\u03b2<\/sub><span style=\"font-size: 16px\">-X bond cleavage occurring first to form a carbocation intermediate, which is then 'quenched' by proton abstraction at the alpha-carbon).\u00a0<\/span>\r\n\r\n<section class=\"mt-content-container\"><img class=\"internal default aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/06\/22200454\/image068.png\" alt=\"Fileimage034.png\" width=\"511\" height=\"235\" \/>These mechanisms are important in laboratory organic chemistry.\u00a0 As explained below, which mechanism actually occurs in a laboratory reaction will depend on the\u00a0 identity of the R groups (ie., whether the alkyl halide is primary, secondary, tertiary, etc.) as well as on the characteristics of the base.\r\n<div class=\"mt-section\">\r\n<h3 class=\"editable\">E1 and E2 reactions in the laboratory<\/h3>\r\nE2 elimination reactions in the laboratory are carried out with relatively strong bases, such as alkoxides (deprotonated alcohols, <sup>-<\/sup>OR).\u00a0 2-Bromopropane will react with ethoxide, for example, to give propene.\r\n\r\n<img class=\"internal default aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/06\/22200456\/image070.png\" alt=\"Fileimage035.png\" width=\"350\" height=\"129\" \/>\r\n\r\nPropene is not the only product of this reaction, however - the ethoxide will also to some extent act as a nucleophile in an S<sub>N<\/sub>2 reaction.\r\n\r\n<img class=\"internal default aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/06\/22200459\/image072.png\" alt=\"Fileimage036.png\" width=\"347\" height=\"107\" \/>\r\n\r\nChemists carrying out laboratory nucleophilic substitution or elimination reactions always have to be aware of the competition between the two mechanisms, because bases can also be nucleophiles, and vice-versa.\u00a0 However, a chemist can tip the scales in one direction or another by carefully choosing reagents.\u00a0 Primary carbon electrophiles like 1-bromopropane, for example, are much more likely to undergo substitution (by the S<sub>N<\/sub>2 mechanism) than elimination (by the E2 mechanism) \u2013 this is because the electrophilic carbon is unhindered and a good target for a nucleophile.\r\n\r\n<img class=\"internal default aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/06\/22200503\/image074.png\" alt=\"Fileimage037.png\" width=\"442\" height=\"140\" \/>\r\n\r\nS<sub>N<\/sub>1 and E1 mechanisms are unlikely with such compounds because of the relative instability of primary carbocations.\r\n\r\nThe nature of the electron-rich species is also critical.\u00a0 Acetate, for example, is a weak base but a reasonably good nucleophile, and will react with 2-bromopropane mainly as a nucleophile.\r\n\r\n<img class=\"internal default aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/06\/22200506\/image076.png\" alt=\"Fileimage038.png\" width=\"392\" height=\"148\" \/>\r\n\r\nIn order to direct the reaction towards elimination rather than substitution, heat is often used. This is because elimination leads to an increase in the number of molecules (from two to three in the above example), and thus an increase in entropy.\u00a0 High temperatures favor reactions of this sort, where there is a large increase in entropy.\u00a0 Substitution does not usually involve a large entropy change, so if S<sub>N<\/sub>2 is desired, the reaction should be done at the lowest temperature that allows substitution to occur at a reasonable rate.\r\n\r\nAlso, a strong <em>hindered<\/em> base such as <em>tert<\/em>-butoxide can be used.\u00a0 The bulkiness of <em>tert<\/em>-butoxide makes it difficult for the oxygen to reach the carbon (in other words, to act as a nucleophile).\u00a0 It is more likely to pluck off a proton, which is much more accessible than the electrophilic carbon).\r\n\r\n<img class=\"internal default aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/06\/22200509\/image078-1.png\" alt=\"Fileimage039.png\" width=\"561\" height=\"157\" \/>\r\n\r\nE1 reactions occur by the same kinds of carbocation-favoring conditions that have already been described for S<sub>N<\/sub>1 reactions (<a class=\"mt-disabled\" title=\"section 9.4\" href=\"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-potsdam-organicchemistry\/chapter\/8-3-factors-affecting-rate-of-nucleophilic-substitution-reactions\/\" rel=\"broken\">section 8.3.<\/a>):\u00a0 a secondary or tertiary substrate, a protic solvent, and a relatively weak base\/nucleophile.\u00a0 In fact, E1 and S<sub>N<\/sub>1 reactions generally occur simultaneously, giving a mixture of substitution and elimination products after formation of a common carbocation intermediate.\u00a0 When tert-butyl chloride is stirred in a mixture of ethanol and water, for example, a mixture of\u00a0 S<sub>N<\/sub>1 products (2-methylpropan-2-ol and tert-butyl ethyl ether) and E1 product (2-methylpropene) results.\u00a0 Heat is used if elimination is desired, but mixtures are still likely.\r\n\r\n<img class=\"internal default aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/06\/22200512\/image080.png\" alt=\"Fileimage040.png\" width=\"433\" height=\"228\" \/>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div class=\"textbox exercises\">\r\n<h3>Exercise<\/h3>\r\n<div>A straightforward functional group conversion that is often carried out in the undergraduate organic lab is the phosphoric acid-catalyzed dehydration of cyclohexanol to form cyclohexene.\u00a0 No solvent is necessary in this reaction - pure liquid cyclohexanol is simply stirred together with a few drops of concentrated phosphoric acid. In order to drive the equilibrium of this reversible reaction towards the desired product, cyclohexene is distilled out of the reaction mixture as it forms (the boiling point of cyclohexene is 83 <sup>o<\/sup>C, significantly lower than that of anything else in the reaction solution). Any cyclohexyl phosphate that might form from the competing S<sub>N<\/sub>1 reaction remains in the flask, and is eventually converted to cyclohexene over time. Draw a mechanism for the cyclohexene synthesis reaction described above.\u00a0 Also, draw a mechanism showing how the undesired cyclohexyl phosphate could form.<\/div>\r\n[reveal-answer q=\"673235\"]Show Solution[\/reveal-answer]\r\n[hidden-answer a=\"673235\"]\r\n<p align=\"center\"><img class=\"internal default\" src=\"https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/@api\/deki\/files\/6964\/image757.png?revision=1\" alt=\"image750.png\" width=\"655\" height=\"234\" \/><\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\nThe cyclohexyl phosphate could form if the phosphate attacked the carbocation intermediate as a nucleophile rather than as a base:\r\n\r\n<img class=\"internal default\" src=\"https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/@api\/deki\/files\/6966\/image759.png?revision=1\" alt=\"image752.png\" width=\"394\" height=\"131\" \/>\r\n\r\n[\/hidden-answer]\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\nNext, let\u2019s put aside the issue of competition between nucleophilic substitution and elimination, and focus on the regioselectivity of elimination reactions.\u00a0 In many cases an elimination reaction can result in more than one constitutional isomer or stereoisomer.\u00a0 The elimination products of 2-chloropentane provide a good example:\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<img class=\"internal default aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/06\/22200516\/image082.png\" alt=\"Fileimage041.png\" width=\"551\" height=\"317\" \/>\r\n\r\nThis reaction is both regiospecific and stereospecific. In general<strong><em>, <\/em><\/strong><em>more substituted alkenes are more stable<\/em>, and as a result, the product mixture will contain less 1-butene than 2-butene (this is the regiochemical aspect of the outcome, and is often referred to as <strong>Zaitsev's rule<\/strong>). In addition, <em>trans<\/em><em>-<\/em>alkenes are generally more stable than <em>cis<\/em>-alkenes, so we can predict that more of the <em>trans<\/em> product will form compared to the <em>cis <\/em>product.\r\n\r\nHowever, certain other eliminations (which we will not be studying) favor the <em>least<\/em> substituted alkene as the predominant product, due to steric factors. \u00a0 Such a product is known as the Hoffmann product, and it is usually the opposite of the product predicted by Zaitsev's Rule.\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/section>\r\n<h1>E2 eliminations<\/h1>\r\nE2, bimolecular elimination, was proposed in the 1920s by British chemist Christopher Kelk Ingold. Unlike <a class=\"internal\" title=\"Organic Chemistry\/Reactions\/E1 Reaction\" href=\"https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/Core\/Organic_Chemistry\/Reactions\/Elimination_Reactions\/E1_Reactions\" rel=\"internal\">E1<\/a> reactions, E2 reactions remove two substituents with the addition of a strong base, resulting in an alkene.\r\n<div class=\"mt-section\">\r\n<h3 class=\"editable\">Introduction<\/h3>\r\nE2 reactions are typically seen with secondary and tertiary alkyl halides, but a hindered base is necessary with a primary halide. The mechanism by which it occurs is a single step <strong>concerted <\/strong>reaction with one transition state. The rate at which this mechanism occurs is second order kinetics, and depends on both the base and alkyl halide. A good leaving group is required because it is involved in the rate determining step. The leaving groups must be coplanar in order to form a pi bond; carbons go from sp<sup>3<\/sup> to sp<sup>2 <\/sup>hybridization states.\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"mt-section\">\r\n<h3 class=\"editable\">General Reaction<\/h3>\r\n<img class=\"wp-image-5107 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/07\/23181554\/E2FullMechanism.png\" alt=\"A base B- attacks the beta hydrogen of an alkyl halide, forming a double bond and expelling the leaving group\" width=\"644\" height=\"170\" \/>\r\n\r\nIn this reaction B\u00af represents the base and X represents a leaving group, typically a halogen. There is one transition state that shows the single step (concerted) reaction.\u00a0 The base is forming a bond to the hydrogen, the pi bond is forming, and the C-X bond is beginning to break. In most reactions this requires everything to be in the same plane, and the leaving group 180<sup>o<\/sup> to the H that leaves; the H and the X are said to be \"antiperiplanar\".\r\n\r\nIn summary, An E2 reaction has certain requirements to proceed:\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>A strong base is necessary especially necessary for primary alkyl halides. Secondary and tertiary primary halides will procede with\u00a0E2 in the presence of a base (OH-, RO-, R<sub>2<\/sub>N-)<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Both leaving groups (the H and the X) should be on the same plane, this allows the double bond to form in the reaction. In the reaction above you can see both leaving groups are in the plane of the carbons.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Follows <a class=\"mt-disabled\" title=\"Zaitsev's Rule\" rel=\"broken\">Zaitsev's rule,<\/a> the most substituted alkene is usually the major product.<\/li>\r\n \t<li><a title=\"Hofmann\u2019s Rule and Zaitsev\u2019s Rule\" href=\"https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/Textbook_Maps\/Organic_Chemistry\/Book%3A_Logic_of_Organic_Synthesis_(Rao)\/02._Rules_and_Guidelines_Governing_Organic_Synthesis\/Hofmann%E2%80%99s_Rule_and_Zaitsev%E2%80%99s_Rule\" rel=\"internal\">Hoffman Rule<\/a>, if a sterically hindered base will result in the least substituted product.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\nThe reaction coordinate free energy diagram for an E2 reaction shows a concerted reaction:\r\n\r\n<img class=\"wp-image-5106 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/07\/23181303\/E2GenericReactionCoordinateFreeEnergyDiagram.png\" alt=\"Free energy diagram for an E2 rxn, showing a rise to form the transition state then a fall to the products\" width=\"492\" height=\"331\" \/>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"mt-section\">\r\n<div class=\"textbox key-takeaways\">\r\n<h3>Key features of the E2 elimination<\/h3>\r\nThe main features of the E2 elimination are:\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>It usually uses a strong base (often <sup>-<\/sup>OH or <sup>-<\/sup>OR) with an alkyl halide<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Primary, secondary or tertiary alkyl halides are all effective reactants, with tertiary reacting most easily.\u00a0 With primary alkyl halides, a substituted base such as KO<sup>t<\/sup>Bu and heat are often used to minimize competition from S<sub>N<\/sub>2.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>The H and the leaving group should normally be antiperiplanar (180<sup>o<\/sup>) to one another.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Zaitsev's Rule applies, unless a very hindered base such as KO<sup>t<\/sup>Bu is used, so the more substituted alkene is usually major.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"textbox examples\">\r\n<h3>Further Reading<\/h3>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Elimination_reaction\">Wikipedia-Elimination reaction<\/a><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<img class=\"size-thumbnail wp-image-4654 alignnone\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/07\/01163345\/static_qr_code_without_logo1-150x150.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" \/>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.chemhelper.com\/e2.html\">http:\/\/www.chemhelper.com\/e2.html<\/a><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<img class=\"size-thumbnail wp-image-4655 alignnone\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/07\/01163722\/static_qr_code_without_logo2-150x150.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" \/>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"mt-section\">\r\n<h3 class=\"editable\">References<\/h3>\r\n<ol>\r\n \t<li>Vollhardt, K. Peter C., and Neil E. Schore. <u>Organic Chemistry Structure and Function<\/u>. New York: W. H. Freeman, 2007.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Organic chemistry, b<span class=\"addmd\">y Marye Anne Fox, James K. Whitesell<\/span><\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"mt-section\">\r\n<h1>E1 Reactions<\/h1>\r\nUnimolecular elimination (E1) is a reaction in which the removal of an HX substituent results in the formation of a double bond. It is similar to a <a href=\"https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/Core\/Organic_Chemistry\/Reactions\/Substitution_Reactions\/SN1\">unimolecular nucleophilic substitution reaction (SN1)<\/a> in particular because the rate determining step involves heterolysis (losing the leaving group) to form a carbocation intermediate. Because the rate determining (slow) step involves only one reactant, the reaction is unimolecular with a first order rate law.\u00a0 Since these two reactions behave similarly, they compete against each other. Many times, both will occur simultaneously to form different products from a single reaction. However, one can be favored over the other by using hot or cold conditions.\r\n<div>\r\n<h3>General reaction<\/h3>\r\nAn E1 reaction involves the deprotonation of a hydrogen nearby (usually one carbon away, or the beta position) the carbocation resulting in the formation of an alkene product. In order to accomplish this, a base\u00a0is required. For a simplified model, we\u2019ll take B to be a base, and LG to be a halogen leaving group.\r\n\r\n<img class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/@api\/deki\/files\/41188\/E1_mechanism_2.gif?revision=1\" \/>\r\n\r\nAs can be seen above, the preliminary step is the leaving group (LG) leaving on its own. Because it takes the electrons in the bond along with it, the carbon that was attached to it loses its electron, making it a carbocation. Once it becomes a carbocation, a base ($$B^-$$)\u00a0deprotonates the intermediate carbocation at the beta position, which then donates its electrons to the neighboring C-C bond, forming a double bond. Unlike E2 reactions, which require the proton to be <em>anti <\/em>to the leaving group, E1 reactions only require a neighboring hydrogen. This is due to the fact that the leaving group has already left the molecule. The final product is an alkene along with the HB byproduct.\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div>\r\n<h3>Reactivity<\/h3>\r\nDue to the fact that E1 reactions create a carbocation intermediate, rules present in $$S_N1$$ reactions still apply.\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"mt-section\">\r\n<div>\r\n\r\n<img class=\"wp-image-5096 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/06\/23043929\/Carbocations.png\" alt=\"Structures of tertiary, secondary, primary and methyl carbocations\" width=\"612\" height=\"113\" \/>\r\n\r\nAs expected, tertiary carbocations are favored over secondary, primary and methyls.\u00a0 In general, primary and methyl carbocations do not proceed through the E1 pathway for this reason, unless there is a means of carbocation rearrangement to move the positive charge to a nearby carbon. Secondary and tertiary carbons form more stable carbocations, thus this formation occurs quite rapidly.\r\n\r\nSecondary carbocations can be subject to the E2 reaction pathway, but this generally occurs in the presence of a good \/ strong base. Adding a weak base to the reaction disfavors E2, essentially pushing towards the E1 pathway. In many instances, solvolysis occurs rather than using a base to deprotonate. This means heat is added to the solution, and the solvent itself deprotonates a hydrogen. The medium can affect the pathway of the reaction as well. Polar protic solvents may be used to hinder nucleophiles, thus disfavoring E2 \/ S<sub>N<\/sub>2 from occurring.\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div>\r\n<h3><strong>Acid catalyzed dehydration of secondary \/ tertiary alcohols<\/strong><\/h3>\r\nWe\u2019ll take a look at a mechanism involving solvolysis during an E1 reaction of cyclohexanol in sulfuric Acid.\r\n\r\n<img class=\"size-full wp-image-4851 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/07\/06144604\/CyclohexanolDehydration1.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"459\" height=\"227\" \/>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>Step 1: The OH group on the cyclohexanol is hydrated by H<sub>2<\/sub>SO<sub>4<\/sub>, represented as H<sup>+<\/sup>. This allows the OH to become an H<sub>2<\/sub>O, which is\u00a0a better leaving group.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Step 2: Once the OH has been protonated, the H<sub>2<\/sub>O molecule leaves via a heterolysis step, taking its electrons with it. This creates a carbocation intermediate on the attached carbon.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Step 3: Another\u00a0H<sub>2<\/sub>O molecule comes in to deprotonate\u00a0the beta carbon, which then donates its electrons to the neighboring C-C bond. The carbons are rehybridized from sp<sup>3<\/sup> to sp<sup>2<\/sup>, and thus a pi bond is formed between them.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div>\r\n<h3>Mechanism for Alkyl Halides<\/h3>\r\nThis mechanism is a common application of E1 reactions in the synthesis of an alkene.\r\n\r\n<img class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/4\/46\/E1EliminationReaction.png\" width=\"576\" height=\"135\" \/>\r\n\r\nOnce again, we see the basic 2 steps of the E1 mechanism.\r\n<ol>\r\n \t<li>The leaving group leaves along with its electrons to form a carbocation intermediate.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>A base deprotonates a beta carbon to form a pi bond.<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div>\r\n<h3>How are regiochemistry &amp; stereochemistry involved?<\/h3>\r\nIn some cases we see a mixture of products rather than one discrete one. This can happen whenthe carbocation has two or more nearby carbons that are capable of being deprotonated.\u00a0 In many cases one major product will be formed, the most stable alkene.\u00a0 In terms of regiochemistry, Zaitsev's rule states that when more than one product can be formed, the more substituted alkene is the major product.\r\n\r\nUnlike E2 reactions, E1 is not stereospecific. Thus, a hydrogen is not required to be anti-periplanar to the leaving group.\r\n\r\n<img class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/@api\/deki\/files\/7306\/zaitsev_mechanism_img.bmp?revision=1&amp;size=bestfit&amp;width=716&amp;height=314\" alt=\"zaitsev mechanism img.bmp\" \/>\r\n\r\nIn this example, we can see two possible pathways for the reaction. One in which the methyl on the right is deprotonated, and another in which the CH2 on the left is deprotonated. Either pathway leads to a plausible product, but it turns out that pent-2-ene is the major product. As stated by <a href=\"https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/Core\/Organic_Chemistry\/Alkenes\/Synthesis_of_Alkenes\/Zaitsev's_Rule\"><strong>Zaitsev's rule<\/strong><\/a>, deprotonation will mainly happen at the most substituted carbon to form the more substituted (and more stable) alkene. In practice, the pent-2-ene product will be formed as a mixture of <em>cis<\/em> and <em>trans<\/em> alkenes, with the <em>trans<\/em> being the major isomer since it is more stable; only the <em>trans<\/em> is shown in the figure above.\r\n<div class=\"mt-section\">\r\n<div class=\"textbox key-takeaways\">\r\n<h3>Key features of the E1 elimination<\/h3>\r\nThe main features of the E1 elimination are:\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>It usually uses a weak base (often ROH) with an alkyl halide, or it uses an alcohol in the presence of H<sub>2<\/sub>SO<sub>4<\/sub> or H<sub>3<\/sub>PO<sub>4<\/sub>.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Only secondary or tertiary alkyl halides are effective reactants, with tertiary reacting most easily.\u00a0 Heat is often used to minimize competition from S<sub>N<\/sub>1.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>The reaction is not stereoselective, so cis\/trans mixtures are usual.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Zaitsev's Rule applies, so the more substituted alkene is usually major.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<h3 class=\"editable\">Outside links<\/h3>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div>\r\n<h3>Khan Academy video on E1<\/h3>\r\n<img class=\"alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-4656\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/07\/01163931\/static_qr_code_without_logo3-150x150.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" \/>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div><\/div>\r\n<div>\r\n<div class=\"textbox exercises\">\r\n<div>\r\n<h3>Problems<\/h3>\r\n1)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 3-Bromo-2-methylbutane is heated with methanol and an E1 elimination is observed.\r\n\r\n(a) Which of these steps is the rate determining step (step 1 or step 2)?\r\n\r\n(b) Which alkene is the major product formed (A or B)?\r\n\r\n<img class=\"alignnone  wp-image-5113\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/07\/23221057\/E1Q1.png\" alt=\"A carbocation forms, leading to either alkene A (2-methylbut-2-ene) or B (3-methylbut-1-ene)\" width=\"526\" height=\"97\" \/>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n2) In order to produce the most stable alkene product, from which carbon should the base deprotonate (A, B, or C)?\r\n\r\nIf the carbocation were to rearrange, on which carbon would the positive charge go onto without sacrificing stability (A, B, or C)?\r\n\r\n<img src=\"https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/@api\/deki\/files\/7303\/problem_2.bmp?revision=1\" alt=\"problem 2.bmp\" \/>\r\n\r\n3) Predict the major product of the following reaction.\r\n\r\n<img class=\"alignnone  wp-image-5115\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/07\/23222505\/E1Q3.png\" alt=\"3-bromo-2,2,3-trimethylhexane is heated with butanol to produce what alkene?\" width=\"264\" height=\"111\" \/>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n4) (True or False) \u2013 There is no way of controlling the product ratio of E1 \/ Sn1 reactions.\r\n\r\n5) Explain why the presence of a weak base \/ nucleophile favors E1 reactions over E2.\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div>\r\n<h3><strong>Answers<\/strong><\/h3>\r\n[reveal-answer q=\"231323\"]Show Answer[\/reveal-answer]\r\n[hidden-answer a=\"231323\"]\r\n\r\n1. Step 1, alkene A\r\n\r\n2. B, B\r\n\r\n3.<strong> <img class=\"alignnone  wp-image-5114\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/07\/23222309\/E1A3.png\" alt=\"(E)-2,2,3-trimethylhex-3-ene\" width=\"143\" height=\"101\" \/>\r\n<\/strong>\r\n\r\n4. False -\u00a0 They can be thermodynamically controlled to favor a certain product over another.\r\n\r\n5.\u00a0By definition, an E1 reaction is a Unimolecular Elimination reaction. This means the only rate determining step is that of the dissociation of the leaving group to form a carbocation. Since E2 is bimolecular and the nucleophilic attack is part of the rate determining step, a weak base\/nucleophile disfavors it and ultimately allows E1 to dominate. (Don't forget about S<sub>N<\/sub>1 which still pertains to this reaction simaltaneously).\r\n\r\n[\/hidden-answer]\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"mt-section\">\r\n<div class=\"textbox examples\">\r\n<h3>Further reading<\/h3>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><a class=\"external\" href=\"http:\/\/masterorganicchemistry.com\/2012\/10\/10\/comparing-the-e1-and-e2-reactions\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"external nofollow noopener\">Comparing the E1 and E2 Reactions<\/a><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<img class=\"alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-4657\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/07\/01164147\/static_qr_code_without_logo3-150x150.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" \/>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><a class=\"external\" href=\"http:\/\/masterorganicchemistry.com\/2012\/09\/10\/elimination-reactions-are-favored-by-heat\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"external nofollow noopener\">Elimination Reactions Are Favored By Heat<\/a><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<img class=\"alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-4658\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/07\/01164355\/static_qr_code_without_logo1-150x150.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" \/>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><a class=\"external\" href=\"http:\/\/masterorganicchemistry.com\/2012\/10\/10\/comparing-the-e1-and-e2-reactions\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"external nofollow noopener\">Comparing the E1 and E2 Reactions<\/a><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<img class=\"alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-4659\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/07\/01164632\/static_qr_code_without_logo4-150x150.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" \/>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><a class=\"external\" href=\"http:\/\/masterorganicchemistry.com\/2012\/10\/24\/bulky-bases-in-elimination-reactions\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"external nofollow noopener\">Bulky Bases In Elimination Reactions<\/a><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<img class=\"alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-4660\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/07\/01164920\/static_qr_code_without_logo3-150x150.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" \/>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<h2><em>Videos<\/em><\/h2>\r\n<img class=\"size-thumbnail wp-image-4661 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/07\/01165044\/static_qr_code_without_logo2-150x150.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" \/>\r\n<div>\r\n<h3>Outside Sources<\/h3>\r\n<ol>\r\n \t<li>Vollhardt, K. Peter C., and Neil E. Schore. Organic Chemistry Structure and Function. New York: W. H. Freeman, 2007.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>McMurry, J., Simanek, E. Fundamentals of Organic Chemistry, 6th edition. Cengage Learning, 2007.<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>","rendered":"<p>Alkyl halides undergo elimination via two common mechanisms, known as E2 and E1, which show some similarities to S<sub>N<\/sub>2 and S<sub>N<\/sub>1, respectively.\u00a0 In E2, elimination shows a second order rate law, and occurs in a single concerted step (proton abstraction at C<sub>\u03b1 <\/sub><span style=\"font-size: 16px\">occurring at the same time as C<\/span><sub>\u03b2<\/sub><span style=\"font-size: 16px\">-X bond cleavage).\u00a0 In E1, elimination goes via a first order rate law, in two steps (C<\/span><sub>\u03b2<\/sub><span style=\"font-size: 16px\">-X bond cleavage occurring first to form a carbocation intermediate, which is then &#8216;quenched&#8217; by proton abstraction at the alpha-carbon).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<section class=\"mt-content-container\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"internal default aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/06\/22200454\/image068.png\" alt=\"Fileimage034.png\" width=\"511\" height=\"235\" \/>These mechanisms are important in laboratory organic chemistry.\u00a0 As explained below, which mechanism actually occurs in a laboratory reaction will depend on the\u00a0 identity of the R groups (ie., whether the alkyl halide is primary, secondary, tertiary, etc.) as well as on the characteristics of the base.<\/p>\n<div class=\"mt-section\">\n<h3 class=\"editable\">E1 and E2 reactions in the laboratory<\/h3>\n<p>E2 elimination reactions in the laboratory are carried out with relatively strong bases, such as alkoxides (deprotonated alcohols, <sup>&#8211;<\/sup>OR).\u00a0 2-Bromopropane will react with ethoxide, for example, to give propene.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"internal default aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/06\/22200456\/image070.png\" alt=\"Fileimage035.png\" width=\"350\" height=\"129\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Propene is not the only product of this reaction, however &#8211; the ethoxide will also to some extent act as a nucleophile in an S<sub>N<\/sub>2 reaction.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"internal default aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/06\/22200459\/image072.png\" alt=\"Fileimage036.png\" width=\"347\" height=\"107\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Chemists carrying out laboratory nucleophilic substitution or elimination reactions always have to be aware of the competition between the two mechanisms, because bases can also be nucleophiles, and vice-versa.\u00a0 However, a chemist can tip the scales in one direction or another by carefully choosing reagents.\u00a0 Primary carbon electrophiles like 1-bromopropane, for example, are much more likely to undergo substitution (by the S<sub>N<\/sub>2 mechanism) than elimination (by the E2 mechanism) \u2013 this is because the electrophilic carbon is unhindered and a good target for a nucleophile.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"internal default aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/06\/22200503\/image074.png\" alt=\"Fileimage037.png\" width=\"442\" height=\"140\" \/><\/p>\n<p>S<sub>N<\/sub>1 and E1 mechanisms are unlikely with such compounds because of the relative instability of primary carbocations.<\/p>\n<p>The nature of the electron-rich species is also critical.\u00a0 Acetate, for example, is a weak base but a reasonably good nucleophile, and will react with 2-bromopropane mainly as a nucleophile.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"internal default aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/06\/22200506\/image076.png\" alt=\"Fileimage038.png\" width=\"392\" height=\"148\" \/><\/p>\n<p>In order to direct the reaction towards elimination rather than substitution, heat is often used. This is because elimination leads to an increase in the number of molecules (from two to three in the above example), and thus an increase in entropy.\u00a0 High temperatures favor reactions of this sort, where there is a large increase in entropy.\u00a0 Substitution does not usually involve a large entropy change, so if S<sub>N<\/sub>2 is desired, the reaction should be done at the lowest temperature that allows substitution to occur at a reasonable rate.<\/p>\n<p>Also, a strong <em>hindered<\/em> base such as <em>tert<\/em>-butoxide can be used.\u00a0 The bulkiness of <em>tert<\/em>-butoxide makes it difficult for the oxygen to reach the carbon (in other words, to act as a nucleophile).\u00a0 It is more likely to pluck off a proton, which is much more accessible than the electrophilic carbon).<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"internal default aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/06\/22200509\/image078-1.png\" alt=\"Fileimage039.png\" width=\"561\" height=\"157\" \/><\/p>\n<p>E1 reactions occur by the same kinds of carbocation-favoring conditions that have already been described for S<sub>N<\/sub>1 reactions (<a class=\"mt-disabled\" title=\"section 9.4\" href=\"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-potsdam-organicchemistry\/chapter\/8-3-factors-affecting-rate-of-nucleophilic-substitution-reactions\/\" rel=\"broken\">section 8.3.<\/a>):\u00a0 a secondary or tertiary substrate, a protic solvent, and a relatively weak base\/nucleophile.\u00a0 In fact, E1 and S<sub>N<\/sub>1 reactions generally occur simultaneously, giving a mixture of substitution and elimination products after formation of a common carbocation intermediate.\u00a0 When tert-butyl chloride is stirred in a mixture of ethanol and water, for example, a mixture of\u00a0 S<sub>N<\/sub>1 products (2-methylpropan-2-ol and tert-butyl ethyl ether) and E1 product (2-methylpropene) results.\u00a0 Heat is used if elimination is desired, but mixtures are still likely.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"internal default aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/06\/22200512\/image080.png\" alt=\"Fileimage040.png\" width=\"433\" height=\"228\" \/><\/p>\n<div>\n<div>\n<div>\n<div class=\"textbox exercises\">\n<h3>Exercise<\/h3>\n<div>A straightforward functional group conversion that is often carried out in the undergraduate organic lab is the phosphoric acid-catalyzed dehydration of cyclohexanol to form cyclohexene.\u00a0 No solvent is necessary in this reaction &#8211; pure liquid cyclohexanol is simply stirred together with a few drops of concentrated phosphoric acid. In order to drive the equilibrium of this reversible reaction towards the desired product, cyclohexene is distilled out of the reaction mixture as it forms (the boiling point of cyclohexene is 83 <sup>o<\/sup>C, significantly lower than that of anything else in the reaction solution). Any cyclohexyl phosphate that might form from the competing S<sub>N<\/sub>1 reaction remains in the flask, and is eventually converted to cyclohexene over time. Draw a mechanism for the cyclohexene synthesis reaction described above.\u00a0 Also, draw a mechanism showing how the undesired cyclohexyl phosphate could form.<\/div>\n<div class=\"qa-wrapper\" style=\"display: block\"><span class=\"show-answer collapsed\" style=\"cursor: pointer\" data-target=\"q673235\">Show Solution<\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"q673235\" class=\"hidden-answer\" style=\"display: none\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"internal default\" src=\"https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/@api\/deki\/files\/6964\/image757.png?revision=1\" alt=\"image750.png\" width=\"655\" height=\"234\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The cyclohexyl phosphate could form if the phosphate attacked the carbocation intermediate as a nucleophile rather than as a base:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"internal default\" src=\"https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/@api\/deki\/files\/6966\/image759.png?revision=1\" alt=\"image752.png\" width=\"394\" height=\"131\" \/><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>Next, let\u2019s put aside the issue of competition between nucleophilic substitution and elimination, and focus on the regioselectivity of elimination reactions.\u00a0 In many cases an elimination reaction can result in more than one constitutional isomer or stereoisomer.\u00a0 The elimination products of 2-chloropentane provide a good example:<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"internal default aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/06\/22200516\/image082.png\" alt=\"Fileimage041.png\" width=\"551\" height=\"317\" \/><\/p>\n<p>This reaction is both regiospecific and stereospecific. In general<strong><em>, <\/em><\/strong><em>more substituted alkenes are more stable<\/em>, and as a result, the product mixture will contain less 1-butene than 2-butene (this is the regiochemical aspect of the outcome, and is often referred to as <strong>Zaitsev&#8217;s rule<\/strong>). In addition, <em>trans<\/em><em>&#8211;<\/em>alkenes are generally more stable than <em>cis<\/em>-alkenes, so we can predict that more of the <em>trans<\/em> product will form compared to the <em>cis <\/em>product.<\/p>\n<p>However, certain other eliminations (which we will not be studying) favor the <em>least<\/em> substituted alkene as the predominant product, due to steric factors. \u00a0 Such a product is known as the Hoffmann product, and it is usually the opposite of the product predicted by Zaitsev&#8217;s Rule.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<h1>E2 eliminations<\/h1>\n<p>E2, bimolecular elimination, was proposed in the 1920s by British chemist Christopher Kelk Ingold. Unlike <a class=\"internal\" title=\"Organic Chemistry\/Reactions\/E1 Reaction\" href=\"https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/Core\/Organic_Chemistry\/Reactions\/Elimination_Reactions\/E1_Reactions\" rel=\"internal\">E1<\/a> reactions, E2 reactions remove two substituents with the addition of a strong base, resulting in an alkene.<\/p>\n<div class=\"mt-section\">\n<h3 class=\"editable\">Introduction<\/h3>\n<p>E2 reactions are typically seen with secondary and tertiary alkyl halides, but a hindered base is necessary with a primary halide. The mechanism by which it occurs is a single step <strong>concerted <\/strong>reaction with one transition state. The rate at which this mechanism occurs is second order kinetics, and depends on both the base and alkyl halide. A good leaving group is required because it is involved in the rate determining step. The leaving groups must be coplanar in order to form a pi bond; carbons go from sp<sup>3<\/sup> to sp<sup>2 <\/sup>hybridization states.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"mt-section\">\n<h3 class=\"editable\">General Reaction<\/h3>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-5107 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/07\/23181554\/E2FullMechanism.png\" alt=\"A base B- attacks the beta hydrogen of an alkyl halide, forming a double bond and expelling the leaving group\" width=\"644\" height=\"170\" \/><\/p>\n<p>In this reaction B\u00af represents the base and X represents a leaving group, typically a halogen. There is one transition state that shows the single step (concerted) reaction.\u00a0 The base is forming a bond to the hydrogen, the pi bond is forming, and the C-X bond is beginning to break. In most reactions this requires everything to be in the same plane, and the leaving group 180<sup>o<\/sup> to the H that leaves; the H and the X are said to be &#8220;antiperiplanar&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>In summary, An E2 reaction has certain requirements to proceed:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>A strong base is necessary especially necessary for primary alkyl halides. Secondary and tertiary primary halides will procede with\u00a0E2 in the presence of a base (OH-, RO-, R<sub>2<\/sub>N-)<\/li>\n<li>Both leaving groups (the H and the X) should be on the same plane, this allows the double bond to form in the reaction. In the reaction above you can see both leaving groups are in the plane of the carbons.<\/li>\n<li>Follows <a class=\"mt-disabled\" title=\"Zaitsev's Rule\" rel=\"broken\">Zaitsev&#8217;s rule,<\/a> the most substituted alkene is usually the major product.<\/li>\n<li><a title=\"Hofmann\u2019s Rule and Zaitsev\u2019s Rule\" href=\"https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/Textbook_Maps\/Organic_Chemistry\/Book%3A_Logic_of_Organic_Synthesis_(Rao)\/02._Rules_and_Guidelines_Governing_Organic_Synthesis\/Hofmann%E2%80%99s_Rule_and_Zaitsev%E2%80%99s_Rule\" rel=\"internal\">Hoffman Rule<\/a>, if a sterically hindered base will result in the least substituted product.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The reaction coordinate free energy diagram for an E2 reaction shows a concerted reaction:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-5106 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/07\/23181303\/E2GenericReactionCoordinateFreeEnergyDiagram.png\" alt=\"Free energy diagram for an E2 rxn, showing a rise to form the transition state then a fall to the products\" width=\"492\" height=\"331\" \/><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"mt-section\">\n<div class=\"textbox key-takeaways\">\n<h3>Key features of the E2 elimination<\/h3>\n<p>The main features of the E2 elimination are:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>It usually uses a strong base (often <sup>&#8211;<\/sup>OH or <sup>&#8211;<\/sup>OR) with an alkyl halide<\/li>\n<li>Primary, secondary or tertiary alkyl halides are all effective reactants, with tertiary reacting most easily.\u00a0 With primary alkyl halides, a substituted base such as KO<sup>t<\/sup>Bu and heat are often used to minimize competition from S<sub>N<\/sub>2.<\/li>\n<li>The H and the leaving group should normally be antiperiplanar (180<sup>o<\/sup>) to one another.<\/li>\n<li>Zaitsev&#8217;s Rule applies, unless a very hindered base such as KO<sup>t<\/sup>Bu is used, so the more substituted alkene is usually major.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"textbox examples\">\n<h3>Further Reading<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Elimination_reaction\">Wikipedia-Elimination reaction<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-thumbnail wp-image-4654 alignnone\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/07\/01163345\/static_qr_code_without_logo1-150x150.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" \/><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.chemhelper.com\/e2.html\">http:\/\/www.chemhelper.com\/e2.html<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-thumbnail wp-image-4655 alignnone\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/07\/01163722\/static_qr_code_without_logo2-150x150.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" \/><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"mt-section\">\n<h3 class=\"editable\">References<\/h3>\n<ol>\n<li>Vollhardt, K. Peter C., and Neil E. Schore. <u>Organic Chemistry Structure and Function<\/u>. New York: W. H. Freeman, 2007.<\/li>\n<li>Organic chemistry, b<span class=\"addmd\">y Marye Anne Fox, James K. Whitesell<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"mt-section\">\n<h1>E1 Reactions<\/h1>\n<p>Unimolecular elimination (E1) is a reaction in which the removal of an HX substituent results in the formation of a double bond. It is similar to a <a href=\"https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/Core\/Organic_Chemistry\/Reactions\/Substitution_Reactions\/SN1\">unimolecular nucleophilic substitution reaction (SN1)<\/a> in particular because the rate determining step involves heterolysis (losing the leaving group) to form a carbocation intermediate. Because the rate determining (slow) step involves only one reactant, the reaction is unimolecular with a first order rate law.\u00a0 Since these two reactions behave similarly, they compete against each other. Many times, both will occur simultaneously to form different products from a single reaction. However, one can be favored over the other by using hot or cold conditions.<\/p>\n<div>\n<h3>General reaction<\/h3>\n<p>An E1 reaction involves the deprotonation of a hydrogen nearby (usually one carbon away, or the beta position) the carbocation resulting in the formation of an alkene product. In order to accomplish this, a base\u00a0is required. For a simplified model, we\u2019ll take B to be a base, and LG to be a halogen leaving group.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/@api\/deki\/files\/41188\/E1_mechanism_2.gif?revision=1\" alt=\"image\" \/><\/p>\n<p>As can be seen above, the preliminary step is the leaving group (LG) leaving on its own. Because it takes the electrons in the bond along with it, the carbon that was attached to it loses its electron, making it a carbocation. Once it becomes a carbocation, a base ($$B^-$$)\u00a0deprotonates the intermediate carbocation at the beta position, which then donates its electrons to the neighboring C-C bond, forming a double bond. Unlike E2 reactions, which require the proton to be <em>anti <\/em>to the leaving group, E1 reactions only require a neighboring hydrogen. This is due to the fact that the leaving group has already left the molecule. The final product is an alkene along with the HB byproduct.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<h3>Reactivity<\/h3>\n<p>Due to the fact that E1 reactions create a carbocation intermediate, rules present in $$S_N1$$ reactions still apply.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"mt-section\">\n<div>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-5096 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/06\/23043929\/Carbocations.png\" alt=\"Structures of tertiary, secondary, primary and methyl carbocations\" width=\"612\" height=\"113\" \/><\/p>\n<p>As expected, tertiary carbocations are favored over secondary, primary and methyls.\u00a0 In general, primary and methyl carbocations do not proceed through the E1 pathway for this reason, unless there is a means of carbocation rearrangement to move the positive charge to a nearby carbon. Secondary and tertiary carbons form more stable carbocations, thus this formation occurs quite rapidly.<\/p>\n<p>Secondary carbocations can be subject to the E2 reaction pathway, but this generally occurs in the presence of a good \/ strong base. Adding a weak base to the reaction disfavors E2, essentially pushing towards the E1 pathway. In many instances, solvolysis occurs rather than using a base to deprotonate. This means heat is added to the solution, and the solvent itself deprotonates a hydrogen. The medium can affect the pathway of the reaction as well. Polar protic solvents may be used to hinder nucleophiles, thus disfavoring E2 \/ S<sub>N<\/sub>2 from occurring.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<h3><strong>Acid catalyzed dehydration of secondary \/ tertiary alcohols<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>We\u2019ll take a look at a mechanism involving solvolysis during an E1 reaction of cyclohexanol in sulfuric Acid.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-4851 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/07\/06144604\/CyclohexanolDehydration1.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"459\" height=\"227\" \/><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Step 1: The OH group on the cyclohexanol is hydrated by H<sub>2<\/sub>SO<sub>4<\/sub>, represented as H<sup>+<\/sup>. This allows the OH to become an H<sub>2<\/sub>O, which is\u00a0a better leaving group.<\/li>\n<li>Step 2: Once the OH has been protonated, the H<sub>2<\/sub>O molecule leaves via a heterolysis step, taking its electrons with it. This creates a carbocation intermediate on the attached carbon.<\/li>\n<li>Step 3: Another\u00a0H<sub>2<\/sub>O molecule comes in to deprotonate\u00a0the beta carbon, which then donates its electrons to the neighboring C-C bond. The carbons are rehybridized from sp<sup>3<\/sup> to sp<sup>2<\/sup>, and thus a pi bond is formed between them.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<h3>Mechanism for Alkyl Halides<\/h3>\n<p>This mechanism is a common application of E1 reactions in the synthesis of an alkene.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/4\/46\/E1EliminationReaction.png\" width=\"576\" height=\"135\" alt=\"image\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Once again, we see the basic 2 steps of the E1 mechanism.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>The leaving group leaves along with its electrons to form a carbocation intermediate.<\/li>\n<li>A base deprotonates a beta carbon to form a pi bond.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<h3>How are regiochemistry &amp; stereochemistry involved?<\/h3>\n<p>In some cases we see a mixture of products rather than one discrete one. This can happen whenthe carbocation has two or more nearby carbons that are capable of being deprotonated.\u00a0 In many cases one major product will be formed, the most stable alkene.\u00a0 In terms of regiochemistry, Zaitsev&#8217;s rule states that when more than one product can be formed, the more substituted alkene is the major product.<\/p>\n<p>Unlike E2 reactions, E1 is not stereospecific. Thus, a hydrogen is not required to be anti-periplanar to the leaving group.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/@api\/deki\/files\/7306\/zaitsev_mechanism_img.bmp?revision=1&amp;size=bestfit&amp;width=716&amp;height=314\" alt=\"zaitsev mechanism img.bmp\" \/><\/p>\n<p>In this example, we can see two possible pathways for the reaction. One in which the methyl on the right is deprotonated, and another in which the CH2 on the left is deprotonated. Either pathway leads to a plausible product, but it turns out that pent-2-ene is the major product. As stated by <a href=\"https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/Core\/Organic_Chemistry\/Alkenes\/Synthesis_of_Alkenes\/Zaitsev's_Rule\"><strong>Zaitsev&#8217;s rule<\/strong><\/a>, deprotonation will mainly happen at the most substituted carbon to form the more substituted (and more stable) alkene. In practice, the pent-2-ene product will be formed as a mixture of <em>cis<\/em> and <em>trans<\/em> alkenes, with the <em>trans<\/em> being the major isomer since it is more stable; only the <em>trans<\/em> is shown in the figure above.<\/p>\n<div class=\"mt-section\">\n<div class=\"textbox key-takeaways\">\n<h3>Key features of the E1 elimination<\/h3>\n<p>The main features of the E1 elimination are:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>It usually uses a weak base (often ROH) with an alkyl halide, or it uses an alcohol in the presence of H<sub>2<\/sub>SO<sub>4<\/sub> or H<sub>3<\/sub>PO<sub>4<\/sub>.<\/li>\n<li>Only secondary or tertiary alkyl halides are effective reactants, with tertiary reacting most easily.\u00a0 Heat is often used to minimize competition from S<sub>N<\/sub>1.<\/li>\n<li>The reaction is not stereoselective, so cis\/trans mixtures are usual.<\/li>\n<li>Zaitsev&#8217;s Rule applies, so the more substituted alkene is usually major.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<h3 class=\"editable\">Outside links<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<h3>Khan Academy video on E1<\/h3>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-4656\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/07\/01163931\/static_qr_code_without_logo3-150x150.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" \/><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>\n<div class=\"textbox exercises\">\n<div>\n<h3>Problems<\/h3>\n<p>1)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 3-Bromo-2-methylbutane is heated with methanol and an E1 elimination is observed.<\/p>\n<p>(a) Which of these steps is the rate determining step (step 1 or step 2)?<\/p>\n<p>(b) Which alkene is the major product formed (A or B)?<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone  wp-image-5113\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/07\/23221057\/E1Q1.png\" alt=\"A carbocation forms, leading to either alkene A (2-methylbut-2-ene) or B (3-methylbut-1-ene)\" width=\"526\" height=\"97\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>2) In order to produce the most stable alkene product, from which carbon should the base deprotonate (A, B, or C)?<\/p>\n<p>If the carbocation were to rearrange, on which carbon would the positive charge go onto without sacrificing stability (A, B, or C)?<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/@api\/deki\/files\/7303\/problem_2.bmp?revision=1\" alt=\"problem 2.bmp\" \/><\/p>\n<p>3) Predict the major product of the following reaction.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone  wp-image-5115\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/07\/23222505\/E1Q3.png\" alt=\"3-bromo-2,2,3-trimethylhexane is heated with butanol to produce what alkene?\" width=\"264\" height=\"111\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>4) (True or False) \u2013 There is no way of controlling the product ratio of E1 \/ Sn1 reactions.<\/p>\n<p>5) Explain why the presence of a weak base \/ nucleophile favors E1 reactions over E2.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<h3><strong>Answers<\/strong><\/h3>\n<div class=\"qa-wrapper\" style=\"display: block\"><span class=\"show-answer collapsed\" style=\"cursor: pointer\" data-target=\"q231323\">Show Answer<\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"q231323\" class=\"hidden-answer\" style=\"display: none\">\n<p>1. Step 1, alkene A<\/p>\n<p>2. B, B<\/p>\n<p>3.<strong> <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone  wp-image-5114\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/07\/23222309\/E1A3.png\" alt=\"(E)-2,2,3-trimethylhex-3-ene\" width=\"143\" height=\"101\" \/><br \/>\n<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>4. False &#8211;\u00a0 They can be thermodynamically controlled to favor a certain product over another.<\/p>\n<p>5.\u00a0By definition, an E1 reaction is a Unimolecular Elimination reaction. This means the only rate determining step is that of the dissociation of the leaving group to form a carbocation. Since E2 is bimolecular and the nucleophilic attack is part of the rate determining step, a weak base\/nucleophile disfavors it and ultimately allows E1 to dominate. (Don&#8217;t forget about S<sub>N<\/sub>1 which still pertains to this reaction simaltaneously).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"mt-section\">\n<div class=\"textbox examples\">\n<h3>Further reading<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><a class=\"external\" href=\"http:\/\/masterorganicchemistry.com\/2012\/10\/10\/comparing-the-e1-and-e2-reactions\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"external nofollow noopener\">Comparing the E1 and E2 Reactions<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-4657\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/07\/01164147\/static_qr_code_without_logo3-150x150.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" \/><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a class=\"external\" href=\"http:\/\/masterorganicchemistry.com\/2012\/09\/10\/elimination-reactions-are-favored-by-heat\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"external nofollow noopener\">Elimination Reactions Are Favored By Heat<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-4658\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/07\/01164355\/static_qr_code_without_logo1-150x150.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" \/><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a class=\"external\" href=\"http:\/\/masterorganicchemistry.com\/2012\/10\/10\/comparing-the-e1-and-e2-reactions\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"external nofollow noopener\">Comparing the E1 and E2 Reactions<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-4659\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/07\/01164632\/static_qr_code_without_logo4-150x150.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" \/><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a class=\"external\" href=\"http:\/\/masterorganicchemistry.com\/2012\/10\/24\/bulky-bases-in-elimination-reactions\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"external nofollow noopener\">Bulky Bases In Elimination Reactions<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-4660\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/07\/01164920\/static_qr_code_without_logo3-150x150.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" \/><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2><em>Videos<\/em><\/h2>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-thumbnail wp-image-4661 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3369\/2018\/07\/01165044\/static_qr_code_without_logo2-150x150.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" \/><\/p>\n<div>\n<h3>Outside Sources<\/h3>\n<ol>\n<li>Vollhardt, K. Peter C., and Neil E. Schore. Organic Chemistry Structure and Function. New York: W. H. Freeman, 2007.<\/li>\n<li>McMurry, J., Simanek, E. Fundamentals of Organic Chemistry, 6th edition. Cengage Learning, 2007.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t <section class=\"citations-section\" role=\"contentinfo\">\n\t\t\t <h3>Candela Citations<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t <div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t <div id=\"citation-list-3286\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <div class=\"licensing\"><div class=\"license-attribution-dropdown-subheading\">CC licensed content, Shared previously<\/div><ul class=\"citation-list\"><li>14.3: Elimination by the E1 and E2 mechanisms. <strong>Authored by<\/strong>: Tim Soderberg (University of Minnesota, Morris). <strong>Located at<\/strong>: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/Textbook_Maps\/Organic_Chemistry\/Book%3A_Organic_Chemistry_with_a_Biological_Emphasis_(Soderberg)\/14%3A_Reactions_with_stabilized_carbanion_intermediates%2C_part_II\/14.3%3A_Elimination_by_the_E1_and_E2_mechanisms\">https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/Textbook_Maps\/Organic_Chemistry\/Book%3A_Organic_Chemistry_with_a_Biological_Emphasis_(Soderberg)\/14%3A_Reactions_with_stabilized_carbanion_intermediates%2C_part_II\/14.3%3A_Elimination_by_the_E1_and_E2_mechanisms<\/a>. <strong>Project<\/strong>: Chemistry LibreTexts. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"license\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike<\/a><\/em><\/li><li>E2 Reactions. <strong>Located at<\/strong>: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/Textbook_Maps\/Organic_Chemistry\/Supplemental_Modules_(Organic_Chemistry)\/Reactions\/Elimination_Reactions\/E2_Reactions\">https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/Textbook_Maps\/Organic_Chemistry\/Supplemental_Modules_(Organic_Chemistry)\/Reactions\/Elimination_Reactions\/E2_Reactions<\/a>. <strong>Project<\/strong>: Chemistry LibreTexts. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"license\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike<\/a><\/em><\/li><li>E1 Reactions. <strong>Authored by<\/strong>: Satish Balasubramanian. <strong>Located at<\/strong>: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/Textbook_Maps\/Organic_Chemistry\/Supplemental_Modules_(Organic_Chemistry)\/Reactions\/Elimination_Reactions\/E1_Reactions\">https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/Textbook_Maps\/Organic_Chemistry\/Supplemental_Modules_(Organic_Chemistry)\/Reactions\/Elimination_Reactions\/E1_Reactions<\/a>. <strong>Project<\/strong>: Chemistry LibreTexts. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"license\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike<\/a><\/em><\/li><li>12.3: Comparing E1 and E2 Mechanisms. <strong>Authored by<\/strong>: William Reusch. <strong>Located at<\/strong>: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/LibreTexts\/Purdue\/Purdue%3A_Chem_26605%3A_Organic_Chemistry_II_(Lipton)\/Chapter_12._Elimination_Reactions\/12.3%3A_Comparing_E1_and_E2_Mechanisms\">https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/LibreTexts\/Purdue\/Purdue%3A_Chem_26605%3A_Organic_Chemistry_II_(Lipton)\/Chapter_12._Elimination_Reactions\/12.3%3A_Comparing_E1_and_E2_Mechanisms<\/a>. <strong>Project<\/strong>: Chemistry LibreTexts. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"license\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike<\/a><\/em><\/li><\/ul><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t <\/section>","protected":false},"author":311,"menu_order":5,"template":"","meta":{"_candela_citation":"[{\"type\":\"cc\",\"description\":\"14.3: Elimination by the E1 and E2 mechanisms\",\"author\":\"Tim Soderberg (University of Minnesota, Morris)\",\"organization\":\"\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/Textbook_Maps\/Organic_Chemistry\/Book%3A_Organic_Chemistry_with_a_Biological_Emphasis_(Soderberg)\/14%3A_Reactions_with_stabilized_carbanion_intermediates%2C_part_II\/14.3%3A_Elimination_by_the_E1_and_E2_mechanisms\",\"project\":\"Chemistry LibreTexts\",\"license\":\"cc-by-nc-sa\",\"license_terms\":\"\"},{\"type\":\"cc\",\"description\":\"E2 Reactions\",\"author\":\"\",\"organization\":\"\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/Textbook_Maps\/Organic_Chemistry\/Supplemental_Modules_(Organic_Chemistry)\/Reactions\/Elimination_Reactions\/E2_Reactions\",\"project\":\"Chemistry LibreTexts\",\"license\":\"cc-by-nc-sa\",\"license_terms\":\"\"},{\"type\":\"cc\",\"description\":\"E1 Reactions\",\"author\":\"Satish Balasubramanian\",\"organization\":\"\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/Textbook_Maps\/Organic_Chemistry\/Supplemental_Modules_(Organic_Chemistry)\/Reactions\/Elimination_Reactions\/E1_Reactions\",\"project\":\"Chemistry LibreTexts\",\"license\":\"cc-by-nc-sa\",\"license_terms\":\"\"},{\"type\":\"cc\",\"description\":\"12.3: Comparing E1 and E2 Mechanisms\",\"author\":\"William Reusch\",\"organization\":\"\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/LibreTexts\/Purdue\/Purdue%3A_Chem_26605%3A_Organic_Chemistry_II_(Lipton)\/Chapter_12._Elimination_Reactions\/12.3%3A_Comparing_E1_and_E2_Mechanisms\",\"project\":\"Chemistry LibreTexts\",\"license\":\"cc-by-nc-sa\",\"license_terms\":\"\"}]","CANDELA_OUTCOMES_GUID":"","pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-3286","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry"],"part":25,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-potsdam-organicchemistry\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/3286","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-potsdam-organicchemistry\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-potsdam-organicchemistry\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-potsdam-organicchemistry\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/311"}],"version-history":[{"count":39,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-potsdam-organicchemistry\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/3286\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5116,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-potsdam-organicchemistry\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/3286\/revisions\/5116"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-potsdam-organicchemistry\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/25"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-potsdam-organicchemistry\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/3286\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-potsdam-organicchemistry\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3286"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-potsdam-organicchemistry\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=3286"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-potsdam-organicchemistry\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=3286"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-potsdam-organicchemistry\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=3286"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}