{"id":194,"date":"2018-11-21T18:12:38","date_gmt":"2018-11-21T18:12:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-potsdam-organicchemistry2\/?post_type=chapter&#038;p=194"},"modified":"2019-01-03T04:58:34","modified_gmt":"2019-01-03T04:58:34","slug":"13-1-molecular-orbitals-for-small-%cf%80-systems","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-potsdam-organicchemistry2\/chapter\/13-1-molecular-orbitals-for-small-%cf%80-systems\/","title":{"raw":"13.2. Molecular orbitals for ethene","rendered":"13.2. Molecular orbitals for ethene"},"content":{"raw":"<h2>Simple description<\/h2>\r\n<span class=\"mt-font-arial\">Let\u2019s first consider the pi bond in ethene from a simplified MO theory standpoint (in this example we will be disregarding the sigma bonds in the molecule, and thinking <em>only<\/em> about the \u03c0 bond). We start with two atomic orbitals: one unhybridized 2p orbital from each carbon. Each contains a single electron. In MO theory, the two atomic combine mathematically to form two <strong>p<\/strong><strong>i molecular orbitals<\/strong>, one a low-energy pi bonding orbital and one a high-energy pi* antibonding orbital. <\/span>\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"552\"]<img class=\"internal default\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3773\/2018\/11\/21135048\/fig2-2-2.png\" alt=\"fig2-2-2.png\" width=\"552\" height=\"355\" \/> <strong>Molecular orbitals for ethene (ethylene)<\/strong>[\/caption]\r\n\r\n<span class=\"mt-font-size-16\"><span class=\"mt-font-arial\">In the bonding pi orbital, the two shaded lobes of the <em>p<\/em> orbitals interact <em>constructively<\/em> with each other, as do the two unshaded lobes (remember, the arbitrary shading choice represents mathematical (+) and (-) signs for the mathematical wavefunction describing the orbital). There is increased electron density between the two carbon nuclei in the molecular orbital - it is a bonding interaction.<\/span><\/span>\r\n\r\n<span class=\"mt-font-size-16\"><span class=\"mt-font-arial\">In the higher-energy antibonding pi* orbital, the shaded lobe of one <em>p<\/em> orbital interacts <em>destructively<\/em> with the unshaded lobe of the second <em>p<\/em> orbital, leading to a node between the two nuclei and overall repulsion between the carbon nuclei.<\/span><\/span>\r\n\r\n<span class=\"mt-font-size-16\"><span class=\"mt-font-arial\">Again using the 'building up' principle, we place the two electrons in the lower-energy, bonding pi molecular orbital. The antibonding pi* orbital remains empty.<\/span><\/span>\r\n<h2>More detailed MO description of ethene<\/h2>\r\nMolecular orbital theory has been very successfully applied to large conjugated systems, especially those containing chains of carbon atoms with alternating\u00a0single and double bonds. An approximation introduced by H\u00fc\u200bckel\u00a0in 1931 considers only the delocalized <em>p<\/em> electrons moving in a framework of $$\\pi$$-bonds. This is, in fact, a more sophisticated version of a free-electron\u00a0model.\u00a0 For an introductory organic chemistry course we do not need to use all of H\u00fc\u200bckel's mathematics, but for those who like to probe deeper, a more detailed analysis is given here.\r\n\r\nThe simplest hydrocarbon to consider that exhibits $$\\pi$$ bonding is ethene (ethylene), which is made up of four hydrogen atoms and two carbon atoms. Experimentally, we know that the H\u2013C\u2013H and H\u2013C\u2013C angles in ethene are approximately 120\u00b0. This angle suggests that the carbon atoms are <em class=\"emphasis\">sp<\/em><sup class=\"superscript\">2<\/sup> hybridized, which means that a singly occupied <em class=\"emphasis\">sp<\/em><sup class=\"superscript\">2<\/sup> orbital on one carbon overlaps with a singly occupied <em class=\"emphasis\">s<\/em> orbital on each H and a singly occupied <em class=\"emphasis\">sp<\/em><sup class=\"superscript\">2<\/sup> lobe on the other C. Thus each carbon forms a set of three$$\\sigma$$ bonds: two C\u2013H (<em class=\"emphasis\">sp<\/em><sup class=\"superscript\">2<\/sup>\u00a0+\u00a0<em class=\"emphasis\">s<\/em>) and one C\u2013C (<em class=\"emphasis\">sp<\/em><sup class=\"superscript\">2<\/sup>\u00a0+\u00a0<em class=\"emphasis\">sp<\/em><sup class=\"superscript\">2<\/sup>) (part (a) of Figure 13.1. below).\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"457\"]<img class=\"internal\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3773\/2018\/11\/21135248\/7d0a3cedcde70e5298739462befded02.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"457\" height=\"163\" \/> <strong>Figure 13.1.<\/strong> <em>(a) The \u03c3-bonded framework is formed by the overlap of two sets of singly occupied carbon sp<sup>2<\/sup> hybrid orbitals and four singly occupied hydrogen 1s orbitals to form electron-pair bonds. This uses 10 of the 12 valence electrons to form a total of five \u03c3 bonds (four C\u2013H bonds and one C\u2013C bond). (b) One singly occupied unhybridized 2pz orbital remains on each carbon atom to form a carbon\u2013carbon \u03c0 bond. (Note: by convention, in planar molecules the axis perpendicular to the molecular plane is the z-axis.)<\/em>[\/caption]\r\n\r\nThe H\u00fcckel approximation is used to determine the energies and shapes of the $$\\pi$$ molecular orbitals in conjugated systems. Within the H\u00fcckel approximation, the covalent bonding in these hydrocarbons can be separated into two independent \"frameworks\": the $$\\sigma$$-bonding framework and the the $$\\sigma$$-bonding framework. The wavefunctions used to describe the bonding orbitals in each framework results from different combinations of atomic orbitals. The method limits itself to addressing conjugated hydrocarbons and specifically only $$\\pi$$ electron molecular orbitals are included because these determine the general properties of these molecules; the sigma electrons are ignored. This is referred to as <em>sigma-pi separability<\/em> and is justified by the orthogonality of $$\\sigma$$ and $$\\pi$$ orbitals in planar molecules. For this reason, the H\u00fcckel method is limited to planar systems. H\u00fcckel approximation assumes that the electrons in the $$\\pi$$ bonds \u201cfeel\u201d an electrostatic potential due to the entire $$\\sigma$$-bonding framework in the molecule (i.e. it focuses only on the formation of $$\\pi$$ bonds, given that the $$\\sigma$$ bonding framework has already been formed).\r\n<div id=\"note\">\r\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\">\r\n<h3 class=\"boxtitle\">Conjugated Systems<\/h3>\r\nA conjugated system has a region of overlapping p-orbitals, bridging the interjacent single bonds, that allow a <em>delocalization <\/em>of $$\\pi$$ electrons across all the adjacent aligned p-orbitals. These $$\\pi$$ electrons do not belong to a single bond or atom, but rather to a group of atoms.\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div id=\"section_1\" class=\"mt-section\">\r\n<h2 id=\"Ethylene-13474\">Ethene<\/h2>\r\nBefore considering the\u00a0H\u00fcckel treatment for ethene, it is beneficial to review the general bonding picture of the molecule. Bonding in ethene involves the $$sp^2$$ hybridization of the $$2s$$, $$2p_x$$, and $$2p_y$$ atomic orbitals on each carbon atom; leaving the $$2p_z$$ orbitals untouched (Figure 13.2).\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"300\"]<img class=\"internal\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3773\/2018\/11\/21135253\/sp2hybrids_n.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"155\" \/> <strong>Figure 13.2.<\/strong><em> Hybridizing of the carbon atomic orbitals to give $$sp^2$$ hybrid orbitals for bonding to hydrogen atoms in ethene. Image used with permission from ChemTube (CC-SA-BY-NC; Nick Greeves).<\/em>[\/caption]\r\n\r\n<div>\r\n<div class=\"textbox\">\r\n<div>\r\n\r\nThe use of hybrid orbitals in the molecular orbital approach describe here is merely a convenience and not invoking valence bond theory (directly). An identical description can be extracted using exclusively atomic orbitals on carbon, but the interpretation of the resulting wavefunctions is less intuitive. For example, the i<sup>th<\/sup> molecular orbital can be described via hybrid orbitals\r\n\r\n\\[ | \\psi_1\\rangle = c_1 | sp^2_1 \\rangle + c_2 | 1s_a \\rangle \\nonumber\\]\r\n\r\nor via atomic orbitals.\r\n\r\n\\[ | \\psi_1\\rangle = a_1 | 2s \\rangle +\u00a0a_1 | 2p_x \\rangle + a_1 | 2p_y \\rangle + a_4| 1s_a \\rangle \\nonumber\\]\r\n\r\nwhere $$\\{a_i\\}$$ and $$\\{c_i\\}$$ are coefficients of the expansion. Either describe will work and both are identical approaches since\r\n\r\n\\[| sp^2_1 \\rangle = b_1 | 2s \\rangle + b_1 | 2p_x \\rangle + b_1 | 2p_y \\rangle \\nonumber\\]\r\n\r\nwhere $$\\{c_i\\}$$ are coefficients describing the hybridized orbital.\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<span style=\"font-size: 1rem;text-align: initial\">The bonding occurs via the mixing of the electrons in the $$sp^2$$ hybrid orbitals on carbon and the electrons in the $$1s$$ atomic orbitals of the four hydrogen atoms (Figure 13.2. above left) resulting in the $$\\sigma$$-bonding framework. The $$\\pi$$-bonding framework results from the unhybridized $$2p_z$$ orbitals (Figure 13.2. above, right). The independence of these two frameworks is demonstrated in the resulting molecular orbital diagram in the Figure below; H\u00fcckel theory is concerned only with describing the molecular orbitals and energies of the $$\\pi$$ bonding framework.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"236\"]<img class=\"internal\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3773\/2018\/11\/21135255\/OrbitalEnergy.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"236\" height=\"142\" \/> <strong>Figure 13.3<\/strong>: <em>Molecular orbitals demonstrating the sigma-pi separability of the $$\\pi$$-bonding framework (blue) and the $$\\sigma$$-bonding frameworks (red) of ethylene. <\/em>[\/caption]\r\n<blockquote><em>H\u00fcckel treatment is concerned only with describing the molecular orbitals and energies of the $$\\pi$$ bonding framework.<\/em><\/blockquote>\r\nSince H\u00fcckel theory is a special consideration of\u00a0molecular orbital theory, the molecular orbitals $$| \\psi_i \\rangle$$ can be described as a linear combination of the $$2p_z$$ atomic orbitals $$\\phi$$ at carbon with their corresponding $$\\{c_i\\}$$ coefficients:\r\n\r\n\\[ | \\psi_i \\rangle =c_1 | \\phi_{1} \\rangle +c_2 | \\phi_2 \\rangle \\label{LCAO} \\]\r\n\r\nFor the complete quantum chemistry analysis using the Schr\u00f6dinger equation (not required for the organic chemistry class), see <a href=\"https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/Bookshelves\/Inorganic_Chemistry\/Map%3A_Inorganic_Chemistry_(Housecroft)\/04%3A_Experimental_techniques\/4.13%3A_Computational_Methods\/4.13C%3A_H%C3%BCckel_MO_Theory\"><strong>this Libretexts page<\/strong><\/a>.\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div><\/div>\r\n<div class=\"mt-section\">\r\n\r\nThese molecular orbitals form the <span id=\"MathJax-Element-141-Frame\" class=\"MathJax\" role=\"presentation\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-1966\" class=\"math\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-1967\" class=\"mrow\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-1968\" class=\"mi\">\u03c0<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>-bonding framework and since each carbon contributes one electron to this framework, only the lowest molecular orbital ($$ | \\psi_1 \\rangle$$) is occupied (Figure ) in the ground state. The corresponding electron configuration is then $$ \\pi_1^2$$.\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"321\"]<img class=\"internal\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3773\/2018\/11\/21135300\/OoB6Q.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"321\" height=\"202\" \/> <strong>Figure 13.4<\/strong>: Schemetic representation of the $$\\pi$$ molecular orbitals framework for ethylene .\u00a0Notice that the antibonding molecular orbital has one more node than the bonding molecular orbital as expected since it is higher in energy.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<blockquote><em>HOMO and LUMO are acronyms for highest occupied molecular orbital and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital, respectively and are often referred to as frontier orbitals.\u00a0The energy difference between the HOMO and LUMO is termed the HOM<span id=\"selectionBoundary_1479233245938_9227343309773273\" class=\"rangySelectionBoundary\"><\/span>O\u2013LUMO gap. <\/em><\/blockquote>\r\nThe 3-D calculated $$\\pi$$ molecular orbitals are shown in Figure 13.5.<img class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3773\/2018\/11\/21135303\/150px-Ethylene-LUMO-Spartan-3D-balls.png\" \/>\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"150\"]<img class=\"internal\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3773\/2018\/11\/21135302\/150px-Ethylene-HOMO-Spartan-3D-balls.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"156\" \/> <strong>Figure 13.5<\/strong>: <em>Calculated $$\\pi$$ molecular orbitals for ethylene . (left) the bonding orbital (<span id=\"MathJax-Element-152-Frame\" class=\"MathJax\" role=\"presentation\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2046\" class=\"math\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2047\" class=\"mrow\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2049\" class=\"texatom\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2050\" class=\"mrow\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2051\" class=\"mo\"><\/span><\/span><\/span><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2052\" class=\"msubsup\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2053\" class=\"mi\">\u03c8<\/span><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2054\" class=\"mn\"><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><sub>1<\/sub>) and (right) the antibonding (<span id=\"MathJax-Element-152-Frame\" class=\"MathJax\" role=\"presentation\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2046\" class=\"math\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2047\" class=\"mrow\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2049\" class=\"texatom\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2050\" class=\"mrow\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2051\" class=\"mo\"><\/span><\/span><\/span><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2052\" class=\"msubsup\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2053\" class=\"mi\">\u03c8<\/span><sub><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2054\" class=\"mn\">2<\/span><\/sub><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>) orbital.<\/em>[\/caption]\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div id=\"section_2\" class=\"mt-section\">\r\n<h3 id=\"Contributors-13474\">Contributors<\/h3>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><a class=\"external\" title=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/S._M._Blinder\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/S._M._Blinder\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"external nofollow noopener\">Seymour Blinder<\/a> (Professor Emeritus of Chemistry and Physics at the <a class=\"external\" title=\"University of Michigan\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/University_of_Michigan\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"external nofollow noopener\">University of Michigan<\/a>, <a class=\"external\" title=\"Ann Arbor, Michigan\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ann_Arbor,_Michigan\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"external nofollow noopener\">Ann Arbor<\/a>)<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Wikipedia<\/li>\r\n \t<li>StackExchange (<a class=\"external\" href=\"http:\/\/chemistry.stackexchange.com\/users\/189\/philipp\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"external nofollow noopener\">Philipp<\/a>)<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/div>","rendered":"<h2>Simple description<\/h2>\n<p><span class=\"mt-font-arial\">Let\u2019s first consider the pi bond in ethene from a simplified MO theory standpoint (in this example we will be disregarding the sigma bonds in the molecule, and thinking <em>only<\/em> about the \u03c0 bond). We start with two atomic orbitals: one unhybridized 2p orbital from each carbon. Each contains a single electron. In MO theory, the two atomic combine mathematically to form two <strong>p<\/strong><strong>i molecular orbitals<\/strong>, one a low-energy pi bonding orbital and one a high-energy pi* antibonding orbital. <\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 562px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"internal default\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3773\/2018\/11\/21135048\/fig2-2-2.png\" alt=\"fig2-2-2.png\" width=\"552\" height=\"355\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Molecular orbitals for ethene (ethylene)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><span class=\"mt-font-size-16\"><span class=\"mt-font-arial\">In the bonding pi orbital, the two shaded lobes of the <em>p<\/em> orbitals interact <em>constructively<\/em> with each other, as do the two unshaded lobes (remember, the arbitrary shading choice represents mathematical (+) and (-) signs for the mathematical wavefunction describing the orbital). There is increased electron density between the two carbon nuclei in the molecular orbital &#8211; it is a bonding interaction.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"mt-font-size-16\"><span class=\"mt-font-arial\">In the higher-energy antibonding pi* orbital, the shaded lobe of one <em>p<\/em> orbital interacts <em>destructively<\/em> with the unshaded lobe of the second <em>p<\/em> orbital, leading to a node between the two nuclei and overall repulsion between the carbon nuclei.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"mt-font-size-16\"><span class=\"mt-font-arial\">Again using the &#8216;building up&#8217; principle, we place the two electrons in the lower-energy, bonding pi molecular orbital. The antibonding pi* orbital remains empty.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<h2>More detailed MO description of ethene<\/h2>\n<p>Molecular orbital theory has been very successfully applied to large conjugated systems, especially those containing chains of carbon atoms with alternating\u00a0single and double bonds. An approximation introduced by H\u00fc\u200bckel\u00a0in 1931 considers only the delocalized <em>p<\/em> electrons moving in a framework of $$\\pi$$-bonds. This is, in fact, a more sophisticated version of a free-electron\u00a0model.\u00a0 For an introductory organic chemistry course we do not need to use all of H\u00fc\u200bckel&#8217;s mathematics, but for those who like to probe deeper, a more detailed analysis is given here.<\/p>\n<p>The simplest hydrocarbon to consider that exhibits $$\\pi$$ bonding is ethene (ethylene), which is made up of four hydrogen atoms and two carbon atoms. Experimentally, we know that the H\u2013C\u2013H and H\u2013C\u2013C angles in ethene are approximately 120\u00b0. This angle suggests that the carbon atoms are <em class=\"emphasis\">sp<\/em><sup class=\"superscript\">2<\/sup> hybridized, which means that a singly occupied <em class=\"emphasis\">sp<\/em><sup class=\"superscript\">2<\/sup> orbital on one carbon overlaps with a singly occupied <em class=\"emphasis\">s<\/em> orbital on each H and a singly occupied <em class=\"emphasis\">sp<\/em><sup class=\"superscript\">2<\/sup> lobe on the other C. Thus each carbon forms a set of three$$\\sigma$$ bonds: two C\u2013H (<em class=\"emphasis\">sp<\/em><sup class=\"superscript\">2<\/sup>\u00a0+\u00a0<em class=\"emphasis\">s<\/em>) and one C\u2013C (<em class=\"emphasis\">sp<\/em><sup class=\"superscript\">2<\/sup>\u00a0+\u00a0<em class=\"emphasis\">sp<\/em><sup class=\"superscript\">2<\/sup>) (part (a) of Figure 13.1. below).<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 467px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"internal\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3773\/2018\/11\/21135248\/7d0a3cedcde70e5298739462befded02.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"457\" height=\"163\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 13.1.<\/strong> <em>(a) The \u03c3-bonded framework is formed by the overlap of two sets of singly occupied carbon sp<sup>2<\/sup> hybrid orbitals and four singly occupied hydrogen 1s orbitals to form electron-pair bonds. This uses 10 of the 12 valence electrons to form a total of five \u03c3 bonds (four C\u2013H bonds and one C\u2013C bond). (b) One singly occupied unhybridized 2pz orbital remains on each carbon atom to form a carbon\u2013carbon \u03c0 bond. (Note: by convention, in planar molecules the axis perpendicular to the molecular plane is the z-axis.)<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>The H\u00fcckel approximation is used to determine the energies and shapes of the $$\\pi$$ molecular orbitals in conjugated systems. Within the H\u00fcckel approximation, the covalent bonding in these hydrocarbons can be separated into two independent &#8220;frameworks&#8221;: the $$\\sigma$$-bonding framework and the the $$\\sigma$$-bonding framework. The wavefunctions used to describe the bonding orbitals in each framework results from different combinations of atomic orbitals. The method limits itself to addressing conjugated hydrocarbons and specifically only $$\\pi$$ electron molecular orbitals are included because these determine the general properties of these molecules; the sigma electrons are ignored. This is referred to as <em>sigma-pi separability<\/em> and is justified by the orthogonality of $$\\sigma$$ and $$\\pi$$ orbitals in planar molecules. For this reason, the H\u00fcckel method is limited to planar systems. H\u00fcckel approximation assumes that the electrons in the $$\\pi$$ bonds \u201cfeel\u201d an electrostatic potential due to the entire $$\\sigma$$-bonding framework in the molecule (i.e. it focuses only on the formation of $$\\pi$$ bonds, given that the $$\\sigma$$ bonding framework has already been formed).<\/p>\n<div id=\"note\">\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\">\n<h3 class=\"boxtitle\">Conjugated Systems<\/h3>\n<p>A conjugated system has a region of overlapping p-orbitals, bridging the interjacent single bonds, that allow a <em>delocalization <\/em>of $$\\pi$$ electrons across all the adjacent aligned p-orbitals. These $$\\pi$$ electrons do not belong to a single bond or atom, but rather to a group of atoms.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"section_1\" class=\"mt-section\">\n<h2 id=\"Ethylene-13474\">Ethene<\/h2>\n<p>Before considering the\u00a0H\u00fcckel treatment for ethene, it is beneficial to review the general bonding picture of the molecule. Bonding in ethene involves the $$sp^2$$ hybridization of the $$2s$$, $$2p_x$$, and $$2p_y$$ atomic orbitals on each carbon atom; leaving the $$2p_z$$ orbitals untouched (Figure 13.2).<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"internal\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3773\/2018\/11\/21135253\/sp2hybrids_n.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"155\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 13.2.<\/strong><em> Hybridizing of the carbon atomic orbitals to give $$sp^2$$ hybrid orbitals for bonding to hydrogen atoms in ethene. Image used with permission from ChemTube (CC-SA-BY-NC; Nick Greeves).<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<div class=\"textbox\">\n<div>\n<p>The use of hybrid orbitals in the molecular orbital approach describe here is merely a convenience and not invoking valence bond theory (directly). An identical description can be extracted using exclusively atomic orbitals on carbon, but the interpretation of the resulting wavefunctions is less intuitive. For example, the i<sup>th<\/sup> molecular orbital can be described via hybrid orbitals<\/p>\n<p>\\[ | \\psi_1\\rangle = c_1 | sp^2_1 \\rangle + c_2 | 1s_a \\rangle \\nonumber\\]<\/p>\n<p>or via atomic orbitals.<\/p>\n<p>\\[ | \\psi_1\\rangle = a_1 | 2s \\rangle +\u00a0a_1 | 2p_x \\rangle + a_1 | 2p_y \\rangle + a_4| 1s_a \\rangle \\nonumber\\]<\/p>\n<p>where $$\\{a_i\\}$$ and $$\\{c_i\\}$$ are coefficients of the expansion. Either describe will work and both are identical approaches since<\/p>\n<p>\\[| sp^2_1 \\rangle = b_1 | 2s \\rangle + b_1 | 2p_x \\rangle + b_1 | 2p_y \\rangle \\nonumber\\]<\/p>\n<p>where $$\\{c_i\\}$$ are coefficients describing the hybridized orbital.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;text-align: initial\">The bonding occurs via the mixing of the electrons in the $$sp^2$$ hybrid orbitals on carbon and the electrons in the $$1s$$ atomic orbitals of the four hydrogen atoms (Figure 13.2. above left) resulting in the $$\\sigma$$-bonding framework. The $$\\pi$$-bonding framework results from the unhybridized $$2p_z$$ orbitals (Figure 13.2. above, right). The independence of these two frameworks is demonstrated in the resulting molecular orbital diagram in the Figure below; H\u00fcckel theory is concerned only with describing the molecular orbitals and energies of the $$\\pi$$ bonding framework.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"width: 246px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"internal\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3773\/2018\/11\/21135255\/OrbitalEnergy.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"236\" height=\"142\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 13.3<\/strong>: <em>Molecular orbitals demonstrating the sigma-pi separability of the $$\\pi$$-bonding framework (blue) and the $$\\sigma$$-bonding frameworks (red) of ethylene. <\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<blockquote><p><em>H\u00fcckel treatment is concerned only with describing the molecular orbitals and energies of the $$\\pi$$ bonding framework.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Since H\u00fcckel theory is a special consideration of\u00a0molecular orbital theory, the molecular orbitals $$| \\psi_i \\rangle$$ can be described as a linear combination of the $$2p_z$$ atomic orbitals $$\\phi$$ at carbon with their corresponding $$\\{c_i\\}$$ coefficients:<\/p>\n<p>\\[ | \\psi_i \\rangle =c_1 | \\phi_{1} \\rangle +c_2 | \\phi_2 \\rangle \\label{LCAO} \\]<\/p>\n<p>For the complete quantum chemistry analysis using the Schr\u00f6dinger equation (not required for the organic chemistry class), see <a href=\"https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/Bookshelves\/Inorganic_Chemistry\/Map%3A_Inorganic_Chemistry_(Housecroft)\/04%3A_Experimental_techniques\/4.13%3A_Computational_Methods\/4.13C%3A_H%C3%BCckel_MO_Theory\"><strong>this Libretexts page<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div class=\"mt-section\">\n<p>These molecular orbitals form the <span id=\"MathJax-Element-141-Frame\" class=\"MathJax\" role=\"presentation\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-1966\" class=\"math\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-1967\" class=\"mrow\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-1968\" class=\"mi\">\u03c0<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>-bonding framework and since each carbon contributes one electron to this framework, only the lowest molecular orbital ($$ | \\psi_1 \\rangle$$) is occupied (Figure ) in the ground state. The corresponding electron configuration is then $$ \\pi_1^2$$.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 331px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"internal\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3773\/2018\/11\/21135300\/OoB6Q.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"321\" height=\"202\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 13.4<\/strong>: Schemetic representation of the $$\\pi$$ molecular orbitals framework for ethylene .\u00a0Notice that the antibonding molecular orbital has one more node than the bonding molecular orbital as expected since it is higher in energy.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>HOMO and LUMO are acronyms for highest occupied molecular orbital and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital, respectively and are often referred to as frontier orbitals.\u00a0The energy difference between the HOMO and LUMO is termed the HOM<span id=\"selectionBoundary_1479233245938_9227343309773273\" class=\"rangySelectionBoundary\"><\/span>O\u2013LUMO gap. <\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The 3-D calculated $$\\pi$$ molecular orbitals are shown in Figure 13.5.<img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3773\/2018\/11\/21135303\/150px-Ethylene-LUMO-Spartan-3D-balls.png\" alt=\"image\" \/><\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 160px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"internal\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3773\/2018\/11\/21135302\/150px-Ethylene-HOMO-Spartan-3D-balls.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"156\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 13.5<\/strong>: <em>Calculated $$\\pi$$ molecular orbitals for ethylene . (left) the bonding orbital (<span id=\"MathJax-Element-152-Frame\" class=\"MathJax\" role=\"presentation\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2046\" class=\"math\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2047\" class=\"mrow\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2049\" class=\"texatom\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2050\" class=\"mrow\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2051\" class=\"mo\"><\/span><\/span><\/span><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2052\" class=\"msubsup\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2053\" class=\"mi\">\u03c8<\/span><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2054\" class=\"mn\"><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><sub>1<\/sub>) and (right) the antibonding (<span id=\"MathJax-Element-152-Frame\" class=\"MathJax\" role=\"presentation\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2046\" class=\"math\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2047\" class=\"mrow\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2049\" class=\"texatom\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2050\" class=\"mrow\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2051\" class=\"mo\"><\/span><\/span><\/span><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2052\" class=\"msubsup\"><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2053\" class=\"mi\">\u03c8<\/span><sub><span id=\"MathJax-Span-2054\" class=\"mn\">2<\/span><\/sub><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>) orbital.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"section_2\" class=\"mt-section\">\n<h3 id=\"Contributors-13474\">Contributors<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><a class=\"external\" title=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/S._M._Blinder\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/S._M._Blinder\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"external nofollow noopener\">Seymour Blinder<\/a> (Professor Emeritus of Chemistry and Physics at the <a class=\"external\" title=\"University of Michigan\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/University_of_Michigan\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"external nofollow noopener\">University of Michigan<\/a>, <a class=\"external\" title=\"Ann Arbor, Michigan\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ann_Arbor,_Michigan\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"external nofollow noopener\">Ann Arbor<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Wikipedia<\/li>\n<li>StackExchange (<a class=\"external\" href=\"http:\/\/chemistry.stackexchange.com\/users\/189\/philipp\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"external nofollow noopener\">Philipp<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t <section class=\"citations-section\" role=\"contentinfo\">\n\t\t\t <h3>Candela Citations<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t <div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t <div id=\"citation-list-194\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <div class=\"licensing\"><div class=\"license-attribution-dropdown-subheading\">CC licensed content, Shared previously<\/div><ul class=\"citation-list\"><li>4.13C: Hu00fcckel MO Theory. <strong>Authored by<\/strong>: Seymour Blinder (Professor Emeritus of Chemistry and Physics at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor) Wikipedia StackExchange (Philipp). <strong>Located at<\/strong>: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/Textbook_Maps\/Inorganic_Chemistry\/Map%3A_Inorganic_Chemistry_(Housecroft)\/04%3A_Experimental_techniques\/4.13%3A_Computational_Methods\/4.13C%3A_H%C3%BCckel_MO_Theory\">https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/Textbook_Maps\/Inorganic_Chemistry\/Map%3A_Inorganic_Chemistry_(Housecroft)\/04%3A_Experimental_techniques\/4.13%3A_Computational_Methods\/4.13C%3A_H%C3%BCckel_MO_Theory<\/a>. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"license\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike<\/a><\/em><\/li><\/ul><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t <\/section>","protected":false},"author":311,"menu_order":2,"template":"","meta":{"_candela_citation":"[{\"type\":\"cc\",\"description\":\"4.13C: Hu00fcckel MO Theory\",\"author\":\"Seymour Blinder (Professor Emeritus of Chemistry and Physics at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor) Wikipedia StackExchange (Philipp)\",\"organization\":\"\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/chem.libretexts.org\/Textbook_Maps\/Inorganic_Chemistry\/Map%3A_Inorganic_Chemistry_(Housecroft)\/04%3A_Experimental_techniques\/4.13%3A_Computational_Methods\/4.13C%3A_H%C3%BCckel_MO_Theory\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"cc-by-nc-sa\",\"license_terms\":\"\"}]","CANDELA_OUTCOMES_GUID":"","pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-194","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry"],"part":313,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-potsdam-organicchemistry2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/194","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-potsdam-organicchemistry2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-potsdam-organicchemistry2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-potsdam-organicchemistry2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/311"}],"version-history":[{"count":22,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-potsdam-organicchemistry2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/194\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2635,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-potsdam-organicchemistry2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/194\/revisions\/2635"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-potsdam-organicchemistry2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/313"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-potsdam-organicchemistry2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/194\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-potsdam-organicchemistry2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=194"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-potsdam-organicchemistry2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=194"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-potsdam-organicchemistry2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=194"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-potsdam-organicchemistry2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=194"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}