{"id":279,"date":"2018-09-21T18:06:16","date_gmt":"2018-09-21T18:06:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-socialproblems\/chapter\/11-4-issues-and-problems-in-higher-education\/"},"modified":"2019-07-01T17:42:47","modified_gmt":"2019-07-01T17:42:47","slug":"11-4-issues-and-problems-in-higher-education","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-socialproblems\/chapter\/11-4-issues-and-problems-in-higher-education\/","title":{"raw":"11.4 Issues and Problems in Higher Education","rendered":"11.4 Issues and Problems in Higher Education"},"content":{"raw":"
\r\n

Learning Objectives<\/h3>\r\n
    \r\n \t
  1. Explain why certain college students flounder.<\/li>\r\n \t
  2. Describe what is meant by legacy admissions and summarize the criticism of this policy.<\/li>\r\n \t
  3. List any two factors that affect college and university graduation rates.<\/li>\r\n \t
  4. Describe the extent of physical and sexual violence on the nation\u2019s campuses.<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<\/div>\r\n

    The issues and problems discussed so far in this chapter concern elementary and secondary schools in view of their critical importance for tens of millions of children and for the nation\u2019s social and economic well-being. However, higher education has its own issues and problems. Once again, we do not have space to discuss all these matters, but we will examine some of the most interesting and important. (Recall that Chapter 7 \"Alcohol and Other Drugs\"<\/a> discussed alcohol abuse on campus, a very significant higher education problem.)<\/p>\r\n\r\n

    \r\n

    Cost<\/h2>\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_1443\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"500\"]\"Scrabble Higher education can cost students and their parents tens of thousands of dollars per year. This expense prevents many students from going to college and puts many students and parents into considerable debt.[\/caption]\r\n\r\nPerhaps the most important issue is that higher education, at least at four-year institutions, is quite expensive and can cost tens of thousands of dollars per year. This figure varies by the type of college or university, as private institutions cost much more than public institutions (for in-state students). According to the College Board (2012), only 44 percent of all students attend a four-year institution whose annual tuition and fees amount to less than $9,000. That means that more than half of students attend an institution whose annual tuition and fees are $9,000 or more; this cost averages more than $28,500 at private colleges and universities and exceeds $36,000 at many of these institutions. Tuition and fees average $8,244 at public four-year institutions. Room and board expenses for on-campus students at four-year institutions range from about $8,000 to $14,000, and books and supplies average at least an additional $1,168 for students who do not have the opportunity to read free or low-cost textbooks such as this one.\r\n

    Combining these figures, students at the least expensive four-year institutions might have bills that total $17,000 to $20,000 annually, and those at the most expensive private institutions have bills that exceed $50,000. Scholarships and other financial aid reduce these costs for many students. Private institutions actually collect only about 67 percent of their published tuition and fees because of the aid they hand out, and public institutions collect only about 82 percent (Stripling, 2010). However, many students who receive aid may still have bills totaling thousands of dollars annually and graduate with huge loans to repay. At two-year public institutions, annual tuition and fees average almost $3,000; these colleges are more affordable but nonetheless can be very costly for their students and their families.<\/p>\r\n

    In view of all these figures, it should come as no surprise that many students graduate in debt. Of all the college students who graduated in 2010, roughly two-thirds had to take out loans to pay for their various expenses. These students graduated with an average debt of $25,250 (Pope, 2011), which can certainly take many years to pay off.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n

    \r\n

    Floundering Students<\/h2>\r\n

    Although college is often said to be the best time of one\u2019s life, many students have difficulties during their college years. These students are called floundering students<\/em>. Homesickness during the first semester on campus is common, but a number of students have difficulties beyond homesickness. According to psychiatry professor David Leibow, who has studied troubled students, many floundering students mistakenly believe that they are the only ones who are floundering, and many fail to tell their parents or friends about their problems (Golden, 2010). The major cause of floundering, says Leibow, is academic difficulties; other causes include homesickness, relationship problems, family problems including family conflict and the serious illness or death of a family member, personal illness, and financial difficulties.<\/p>\r\n

    An estimated 10 percent of students annually seek psychological counseling on their college campus, primarily for depression, anxiety, and relationship problems (Epstein, 2010). About one-third of college students overall have sought counseling by the time they graduate or leave school for other reasons, and 7 percent say they have considered suicide before or after entering college (Sieben, 2011). Many students who seek counseling are given medications to treat their symptoms. Leibow says these medications are often helpful but worries that they are overprescribed. Three reasons underlie his concern. First, although the students given these medications may have problems, often the problems are a normal part of growing into adulthood and not serious enough to justify medication. Second, some of these medications can have serious side effects. Third, students who take medications may be less motivated to address the underlying reasons for their problems.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n

    \r\n

    Social Class and Race in Admissions<\/h2>\r\n

    We saw earlier in this chapter that African American, Latino, and low-income students are less likely to attend college. And when low-income students do attend college, they are much more likely to attend lower-ranking institutions than very selective campuses. At the very top colleges and universities, 74 percent of new students come from the wealthiest one-fourth of US households, and only 3 percent come from the poorest one-fourth of households (Krugman, 2012).<\/p>\r\n

    These facts raise important questions about the lack of diversity in college admissions and campus life. Chapter 3 \"Racial and Ethnic Inequality\"<\/a> discussed the debate over racially based affirmative action in higher education. Reflecting this debate, some states have passed laws prohibiting the use of race and ethnicity in admissions to public colleges and universities. One such state was California, where voters approved this type of prohibition in 1996. During the first year after this ban took effect, the number of African American and Latino students admitted to the University of California system dropped by about 25 percent and by 50 percent at the system\u2019s two most selective campuses in Berkeley and Los Angeles (UCLA). According to the head of the University of California system, \u201cIf we had affirmative action as one of our tools, we\u2019d do somewhat better for Hispanics, and we\u2019d probably do significantly better for African-Americans\u201d (P\u00e9rez-Pe\u00f1a, 2012).<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_1444\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"500\"]\"A Although colleges and universities are making a greater effort to attract and retain low-income students and students of color, these students remain greatly underrepresented at institutions of higher education.[\/caption]\r\n

    In three states with bans on affirmative action, California, Florida, and Texas, public universities automatically admit the top students in every high school. Because many of their high schools are predominantly African American or Latino, this strategy has helped counter their bans on affirmative action. However, because many more high schools in these states are mostly Latino rather than African American, the strategy has proven more beneficial for Latino admissions than for African American admissions (P\u00e9rez-Pe\u00f1a, 2012).<\/p>\r\n

    Partly because affirmative action is so controversial, attention has begun to focus on the low numbers of low-income students at many colleges and universities, and especially at the more selective institutions as ranked by US News & World Report<\/em> and other sources. Many education scholars and policymakers feel that increasing the number of low-income students would not only help these students but also increase campus diversity along the lines of socioeconomic status and race\/ethnicity (since students of color are more likely to be from low-income backgrounds). Efforts to increase the number of low-income students, these experts add, would avoid the controversy that has surrounded affirmative action.<\/p>\r\n

    In response to this new attention to social class, colleges and universities have begun to increase their efforts to attract and retain low-income students, which a recent news report called \u201cone of the most underrepresented minority groups at many four-year colleges\u201d (Schmidt, 2010). The dean of admissions and financial aid at Harvard University summarized these efforts as follows: \u201cI honestly cannot think of any admissions person I know who is not looking\u2014as sort of a major criteria [sic<\/em>] of how well their year went\u2014at how well they did in attracting people of different economic backgrounds\u201d (Schmidt, 2010).<\/p>\r\n

    As part of their strategy to attract and retain low-income students, Harvard and other selective institutions are now providing financial aid to cover all or most of the students\u2019 expenses. Despite these efforts, however, the US higher education system has become more stratified by social class in recent decades: The richest students now occupy a greater percentage of the enrollment at the most selective institutions than in the past, while the poorest students occupy a greater percentage of the enrollment at the least selective four-year institutions and at community colleges (Schmidt, 2010).<\/p>\r\n\r\n

    \r\n

    Legacy Admissions<\/h2>\r\n

    At highly selective colleges and universities, the policy of legacy admissions<\/a><\/span> makes it easier for certain wealthy students to gain admission. Under this policy, students who are daughters or sons (or other relatives) of graduates of the institution are given preference in admissions. Because their parents are very likely to be wealthy, a legacy admissions policy in effect amounts to what critics call \u201caffirmative action for the rich\u201d (Kahlenberg, 2010). According to recent research, being a child of an alumna or alumnus of one of these institutions increases one\u2019s chances of admission by forty-five percentage points (Kahlenberg, 2011). Thus if a nonlegacy applicant with certain qualifications would ordinarily have a 40 percent chance of being admitted, a legacy applicant with the same qualifications would have an 85 percent chance of being admitted. Critics say legacy admissions give an unfair advantage to wealthy students and use up valuable spots that should go to more qualified students from more varied socioeconomic backgrounds. As one critic puts it, \u201cIt\u2019s fundamentally unfair because it\u2019s a preference that advantages the already advantaged. It has nothing to do with the individual merit of the applicant\u201d (Lewin, 2010, p. A12).<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n

    \r\n

    Graduation Rates<\/h2>\r\n

    For the sake of students and of their colleges and universities, it is important that as many students as possible go on to earn their diplomas. However, only 57 percent of students at four-year institutions graduate within six years. This figure varies by type of institution. At the highly selective private institutions, 80\u201390 percent or more of students typically graduate within six years, while at many public institutions, the graduate rate is about 50 percent. Academic and financial difficulties and other problems explain why so many students fail to graduate (Gonzalez, 2010).<\/p>\r\n

    The 57 percent overall rate masks a racial\/ethnic difference in graduation rates: While 60 percent of white students graduate within six years, only 49 percent of Latino students and 40 percent of African American students graduate. At some institutions, the graduation rates of Latino and African American students match those of whites, thanks in large part to exceptional efforts by these institutions to help students of color. As one expert on this issue explains, \u201cWhat colleges do for students of color powerfully impacts the futures of these young people and that of our nation\u201d (Gonzalez, 2010). Another expert placed this issue into a larger context: \u201cFor both moral and economic reasons, colleges need to ensure that their institutions work better for all the students they serve\u201d (Stephens, 2010).<\/p>\r\n

    In this regard, it is important to note that the graduation rate of low-income students from four-year institutions is much lower than the graduation rate of wealthier students (Luhby, 2011). In fact, students with high test scores and low-income parents are less likely to graduate than students with low test scores and high-income parents (Krugman, 2012).<\/p>\r\n

    Low-income students drop out at higher rates because of academic and financial difficulties and family problems. Their academic and financial difficulties are intertwined. Low-income students often have to work many hours per week during the academic year to be able to pay their bills. Because their work schedules reduce the time they have for studying, their grades may suffer. This general problem has been made worse by cutbacks in federal grants to low-income students that began during the 1980s. These cutbacks forced low-income students to rely increasingly on loans, which have to be repaid. This fact leads some to work more hours during the academic year to limit the loans they must take out, and their increased work schedule again may affect their grades.<\/p>\r\n

    Low-income students face additional difficulties beyond the financial (Berg, 2010). Their writing and comprehension skills upon entering college are often weaker than those of wealthier students. If they are first-generation college students (meaning that neither parent went to college), they often have problems adjusting to campus life and living amid students from much more advantaged backgrounds.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n

    \r\n

    Campus Violence<\/h2>\r\n

    Earlier we discussed violence in the elementary and secondary schools. Violence can also happen on college and university campuses, although shootings are very rare. However, three recent examples illustrate that students and faculty are not immune from gun violence. In April 2012, a former student lined up and then shot and killed seven people and wounded three others at Oikos University in Oakland, California. In February 2010, Amy Bishop, a biology professor at the University of Alabama in Huntsville who had recently been denied tenure, allegedly shot and killed three faculty at a department meeting and wounded three others. Almost three years earlier, a student at Virginia Tech went on a shooting rampage and killed thirty-two students and faculty before killing himself.<\/p>\r\n

    Other types of violence are more common on the nation\u2019s campuses. Chapter 4 \"Gender Inequality\"<\/a> noted that an estimated 20\u201330 percent of women students have been raped or sexually assaulted (including attempts), usually by a male student who was an acquaintance, friend, or intimate partner. Beyond rape and sexual assault, students are also sometimes assaulted or robbed. Federal victimization data show that about 6 percent of college students are victims of at least one act of all these types of violence annually (Baum & Klaus, 2005). Because there are about 20 million students in college, this 6 percent figure translates to about 1.2 million annual violent victimizations at US colleges and universities. It is important to note that the 6 percent rate masks a significant gender difference: 8 percent of male students experience at least one act of violence annually, compared to about 4 percent of female students. Male students are thus twice as likely as female students to be victimized by violence. For just rape and sexual assault, though, female students are much more likely than male students to be victimized.<\/p>\r\n

    Many colleges and universities have been accused of not taking rape and sexual assault seriously in what one news report called a \u201cstruggle for justice\u201d for campus rape victims (Lipka, 2011; Shapiro, 2010). This criticism takes two forms. First, campuses ignore many reports of rape and sexual assault altogether. Second, they hand out weak or no discipline in cases when they do heed reports. One student\u2019s account of her university\u2019s lack of follow-up to her alleged rape illustrates this criticism. \u201cIt was as if they were going above and beyond to ensure nothing would be done in my case,\u201d the woman later recalled. \u201cI felt extremely disappointed to know that the institution in charge of ensuring my safety did not recognize the massive distress the sexual assault caused me. Furthermore, I was disappointed that when I sought justice through their system, I was treated with hostility and disrespect. I was clearly not believed, and was often blamed for what had happened\u201d (Webley, 2011).<\/p>\r\n\r\n

    \r\n

    Key Takeaways<\/h3>\r\n