{"id":172,"date":"2016-03-17T14:00:47","date_gmt":"2016-03-17T14:00:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/waymaker-level1-english\/?post_type=chapter&p=172"},"modified":"2020-01-20T19:50:32","modified_gmt":"2020-01-20T19:50:32","slug":"try-it-supporting-claims","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/waymaker-level1-english-gen\/chapter\/try-it-supporting-claims\/","title":{"raw":"Try It: Supporting Claims","rendered":"Try It: Supporting Claims"},"content":{"raw":"

Reading Journal Component #6: Supporting Claims<\/h2>\r\n
\r\n

To Do<\/h3>\r\n
    \r\n \t
  1. \"PhotoReturn to your reading selection and the Try It: Thesis exercise you did previously. As part of that exercise, you identified 2 topic sentences from your selected reading.<\/li>\r\n \t
  2. Now, look more closely at the paragraph where the first\u00a0topic sentence came from. Write a short paragraph that describes the type of support the first paragraph uses to reinforce its topic sentence. Does it make use of narrative or personal examples? Does it use facts or statistics? Does it use quotes or paraphrases from research materials?<\/li>\r\n \t
  3. Repeat this process for the 2nd topic sentence's paragraph. Write another short paragraph describing its supporting details.<\/li>\r\n \t
  4. Conclude with 1-2 sentences\u00a0that explain why you think the author chose this type of support in these paragraphs, and how those supporting details relate to the overall thesis of the reading selection.<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<\/div>\r\n \r\n

    Worked Example<\/h2>\r\nThe same\u00a0student we\u2019ve been following so far writes this:\r\n
    \r\n

    Reading Journal Component 6<\/h3>\r\n

    \u201cMultiple Intelligences\u201d by Fred Mednick<\/h4>\r\nTopic sentence #1: \u201cMindy L. Kornhaber, a researcher at Harvard University, has identified a number of reasons why teachers and policymakers have responded positively to Howard Gardner\u2019s presentation of multiple intelligences.\u201d\r\n

    This paragraph is supported by research. It doesn\u2019t use quotes, but clearly all the information in the paragraph comes from Kornhaber\u2019s work. So it paraphrases her findings about how teachers react to multiple intelligences. It also seems to summarize her thesis at the end of the paragraph.<\/p>\r\nTopic sentence #2: \u201cTo explore your intelligences, visit \u2018Lessons for Hope.\u2019\u201d\r\n

    This paragraph turns out to be quite short (only 1 more sentence after the topic sentence), so I\u2019m going to also address the paragraph immediately after this one. Between the two short paragraphs, they describe what a user will see when you visit the external link. It is supported by fact: its descriptions of the multiple intelligences self-assessment activity are all verifiable when a reader visits this website for herself.<\/p>\r\nSince this is a reading from a textbook, it makes sense that the author uses facts and outside research as supporting details in his paragraphs. He wants us to learn from the reading, and we can trust that what he says is true because it's easy to confirm his facts elsewhere.\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n

    Contribute!<\/h2>
    Did you have an idea for improving this content? We\u2019d love your input.<\/div>Improve this page<\/a>Learn More<\/a>","rendered":"

    Reading Journal Component #6: Supporting Claims<\/h2>\n
    \n

    To Do<\/h3>\n
      \n
    1. \"PhotoReturn to your reading selection and the Try It: Thesis exercise you did previously. As part of that exercise, you identified 2 topic sentences from your selected reading.<\/li>\n
    2. Now, look more closely at the paragraph where the first\u00a0topic sentence came from. Write a short paragraph that describes the type of support the first paragraph uses to reinforce its topic sentence. Does it make use of narrative or personal examples? Does it use facts or statistics? Does it use quotes or paraphrases from research materials?<\/li>\n
    3. Repeat this process for the 2nd topic sentence’s paragraph. Write another short paragraph describing its supporting details.<\/li>\n
    4. Conclude with 1-2 sentences\u00a0that explain why you think the author chose this type of support in these paragraphs, and how those supporting details relate to the overall thesis of the reading selection.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n

       <\/p>\n

      Worked Example<\/h2>\n

      The same\u00a0student we\u2019ve been following so far writes this:<\/p>\n

      \n

      Reading Journal Component 6<\/h3>\n

      \u201cMultiple Intelligences\u201d by Fred Mednick<\/h4>\n

      Topic sentence #1: \u201cMindy L. Kornhaber, a researcher at Harvard University, has identified a number of reasons why teachers and policymakers have responded positively to Howard Gardner\u2019s presentation of multiple intelligences.\u201d<\/p>\n

      This paragraph is supported by research. It doesn\u2019t use quotes, but clearly all the information in the paragraph comes from Kornhaber\u2019s work. So it paraphrases her findings about how teachers react to multiple intelligences. It also seems to summarize her thesis at the end of the paragraph.<\/p>\n

      Topic sentence #2: \u201cTo explore your intelligences, visit \u2018Lessons for Hope.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n

      This paragraph turns out to be quite short (only 1 more sentence after the topic sentence), so I\u2019m going to also address the paragraph immediately after this one. Between the two short paragraphs, they describe what a user will see when you visit the external link. It is supported by fact: its descriptions of the multiple intelligences self-assessment activity are all verifiable when a reader visits this website for herself.<\/p>\n

      Since this is a reading from a textbook, it makes sense that the author uses facts and outside research as supporting details in his paragraphs. He wants us to learn from the reading, and we can trust that what he says is true because it’s easy to confirm his facts elsewhere.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

      Contribute!<\/h2>\n
      Did you have an idea for improving this content? We\u2019d love your input.<\/div>\n

      Improve this page<\/a>Learn More<\/a><\/p>\n\n\t\t\t

      \n\t\t\t

      Candela Citations<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t
      \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
      \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
      CC licensed content, Original<\/div>