{"id":3628,"date":"2021-10-29T17:44:24","date_gmt":"2021-10-29T17:44:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-englishcomp2\/?post_type=chapter&#038;p=3628"},"modified":"2022-04-18T23:29:37","modified_gmt":"2022-04-18T23:29:37","slug":"assignment-revision-2","status":"web-only","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-englishcomp2\/chapter\/assignment-revision-2\/","title":{"raw":"Module 8 Assignment: Peer Revision","rendered":"Module 8 Assignment: Peer Revision"},"content":{"raw":"<h2>Purpose<\/h2>\r\nThis is a\u00a0chance to practice giving and receiving feedback, as well as an opportunity to revise your draft in response to peer feedback.\r\n<h2>Objectives<\/h2>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>Provide constructive peer review evaluation.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Use peer feedback to identify potential revisions in your paper draft.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<h2>Process<\/h2>\r\nFollow these steps in groups of two or more:\r\n<ol>\r\n \t<li>Group members will address the questions in the Peer Feedback Guide. (You can <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1dlVKnNVzNyI6C5B1ab-XBstWOy5IWX3gN3iy_7xhb5w\/edit?usp=sharing\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">make a copy of this Google doc<\/a> to take notes in)<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Group members will share their feedback with the author, using the SPARK feedback principles. The author takes notes on the comments. The author can ask any follow-up questions about the feedback.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Repeat the review process with the next author.<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<table style=\"border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%; height: 211px;\" border=\"1\"><caption>Peer Feedback Guide<\/caption>\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 13px;\">\r\n<th style=\"width: 41.8203%; height: 13px;\">Question<\/th>\r\n<th style=\"width: 58.1797%; height: 13px;\">Things to consider in your feedback<\/th>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 40px;\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 41.8203%; height: 40px;\">Does the introduction prepare the reader for the ideas that are discussed in the paper?<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 58.1797%; height: 40px;\">\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>Was the introduction too broad? Too narrow?<\/li>\r\n \t<li>What were the main ideas presented in the paper (that the author could address in the introduction)?<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 40px;\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 41.8203%; height: 40px;\">Does the author include a thesis statement (that explains what the paper will be about)?<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 58.1797%; height: 40px;\">\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>Underline the claim or thesis. Paraphrase the statement.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Is there too much detail? If so, what seems unnecessary?<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Is there too little information? If so, what else do you need to know?<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 26px;\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 41.8203%; height: 26px;\">Is the paper well-organized?<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 58.1797%; height: 26px;\">\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>Did the ideas flow in a way that made sense? What could be different?<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Did the order of the paragraphs make sense? What could be different?<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 41.8203%;\">Are the moves in the argument backed by appropriate evidence?<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 58.1797%;\">\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>What are the major moves in this argument?<\/li>\r\n \t<li>What kind of evidence does the author provide for each move?<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Is the evidence explained and unpacked in ways that make their significance clear?<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 53px;\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 41.8203%; height: 53px;\">Overall, was the writing clear and coherent?<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 58.1797%; height: 53px;\">\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>Was it easy to follow what the author was trying to convey? Put a star beside a section you felt was clear and easy to understand.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Circle 1-2 sections where you had difficulty understanding what the author was trying to convey. Tell what is unclear and what might make it clearer.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Are the paragraphs coherent? Circle or underline any sentences that do not fit into their paragraphs.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 26px;\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 41.8203%; height: 26px;\">What are the take-aways from this paper?<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 58.1797%; height: 26px;\">\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>Does the conclusion prompt you to think about that? Does the conclusion stray from the rest of the paper?<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>","rendered":"<h2>Purpose<\/h2>\n<p>This is a\u00a0chance to practice giving and receiving feedback, as well as an opportunity to revise your draft in response to peer feedback.<\/p>\n<h2>Objectives<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Provide constructive peer review evaluation.<\/li>\n<li>Use peer feedback to identify potential revisions in your paper draft.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Process<\/h2>\n<p>Follow these steps in groups of two or more:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Group members will address the questions in the Peer Feedback Guide. (You can <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1dlVKnNVzNyI6C5B1ab-XBstWOy5IWX3gN3iy_7xhb5w\/edit?usp=sharing\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">make a copy of this Google doc<\/a> to take notes in)<\/li>\n<li>Group members will share their feedback with the author, using the SPARK feedback principles. The author takes notes on the comments. The author can ask any follow-up questions about the feedback.<\/li>\n<li>Repeat the review process with the next author.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<table style=\"border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%; height: 211px;\">\n<caption>Peer Feedback Guide<\/caption>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"height: 13px;\">\n<th style=\"width: 41.8203%; height: 13px;\">Question<\/th>\n<th style=\"width: 58.1797%; height: 13px;\">Things to consider in your feedback<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 40px;\">\n<td style=\"width: 41.8203%; height: 40px;\">Does the introduction prepare the reader for the ideas that are discussed in the paper?<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 58.1797%; height: 40px;\">\n<ul>\n<li>Was the introduction too broad? Too narrow?<\/li>\n<li>What were the main ideas presented in the paper (that the author could address in the introduction)?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 40px;\">\n<td style=\"width: 41.8203%; height: 40px;\">Does the author include a thesis statement (that explains what the paper will be about)?<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 58.1797%; height: 40px;\">\n<ul>\n<li>Underline the claim or thesis. Paraphrase the statement.<\/li>\n<li>Is there too much detail? If so, what seems unnecessary?<\/li>\n<li>Is there too little information? If so, what else do you need to know?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 26px;\">\n<td style=\"width: 41.8203%; height: 26px;\">Is the paper well-organized?<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 58.1797%; height: 26px;\">\n<ul>\n<li>Did the ideas flow in a way that made sense? What could be different?<\/li>\n<li>Did the order of the paragraphs make sense? What could be different?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 41.8203%;\">Are the moves in the argument backed by appropriate evidence?<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 58.1797%;\">\n<ul>\n<li>What are the major moves in this argument?<\/li>\n<li>What kind of evidence does the author provide for each move?<\/li>\n<li>Is the evidence explained and unpacked in ways that make their significance clear?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 53px;\">\n<td style=\"width: 41.8203%; height: 53px;\">Overall, was the writing clear and coherent?<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 58.1797%; height: 53px;\">\n<ul>\n<li>Was it easy to follow what the author was trying to convey? Put a star beside a section you felt was clear and easy to understand.<\/li>\n<li>Circle 1-2 sections where you had difficulty understanding what the author was trying to convey. Tell what is unclear and what might make it clearer.<\/li>\n<li>Are the paragraphs coherent? Circle or underline any sentences that do not fit into their paragraphs.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 26px;\">\n<td style=\"width: 41.8203%; height: 26px;\">What are the take-aways from this paper?<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 58.1797%; height: 26px;\">\n<ul>\n<li>Does the conclusion prompt you to think about that? Does the conclusion stray from the rest of the paper?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\t\t\t <section class=\"citations-section\" role=\"contentinfo\">\n\t\t\t <h3>Candela Citations<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t <div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t <div id=\"citation-list-3628\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <div class=\"licensing\"><div class=\"license-attribution-dropdown-subheading\">CC licensed content, Shared previously<\/div><ul class=\"citation-list\"><li>Peer Review Writing Feedback. <strong>Authored by<\/strong>: Monica D. Foust. <strong>Provided by<\/strong>: CUNY Academic Works. <strong>Located at<\/strong>: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/academicworks.cuny.edu\/bm_oers\/6\/\">https:\/\/academicworks.cuny.edu\/bm_oers\/6\/<\/a>. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"license\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/\">CC BY: Attribution<\/a><\/em><\/li><\/ul><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t <\/section>","protected":false},"author":161083,"menu_order":16,"template":"","meta":{"_candela_citation":"[{\"type\":\"cc\",\"description\":\"Peer Review Writing Feedback\",\"author\":\"Monica D. Foust\",\"organization\":\"CUNY Academic Works\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/academicworks.cuny.edu\/bm_oers\/6\/\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"cc-by\",\"license_terms\":\"\"}]","CANDELA_OUTCOMES_GUID":"","pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-3628","chapter","type-chapter","status-web-only","hentry"],"part":3588,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-englishcomp2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/3628","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-englishcomp2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-englishcomp2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-englishcomp2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/161083"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-englishcomp2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/3628\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4146,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-englishcomp2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/3628\/revisions\/4146"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-englishcomp2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/3588"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-englishcomp2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/3628\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-englishcomp2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3628"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-englishcomp2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=3628"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-englishcomp2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=3628"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-englishcomp2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=3628"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}