{"id":135,"date":"2016-04-29T02:53:53","date_gmt":"2016-04-29T02:53:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontosociology-waymaker\/?post_type=chapter&p=135"},"modified":"2024-04-25T14:46:42","modified_gmt":"2024-04-25T14:46:42","slug":"outcome-theories-of-social-deviance","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-introductiontosociology\/chapter\/outcome-theories-of-social-deviance\/","title":{"raw":"Introduction to Theories of Social Deviance","rendered":"Introduction to Theories of Social Deviance"},"content":{"raw":"

What you'll learn to do: contrast the varying theoretical perspectives on deviance<\/h2>\r\n\"Three\r\n\r\nSince the early days of sociology, scholars have developed theories that attempt to explain what deviance and crime mean to society. These theories can be grouped according to the three major sociological paradigms: functionalism, symbolic interactionism, and conflict theory.\u00a0Let's revisit marijuana legalization from a theoretical perspective. How can sociological theories help explain the trends and corresponding human behavior and group patterns we discussed in the first section?\r\n\r\nConflict theorists would focus their attention on power and inequality. Who has the power to criminalize, decriminalize, and legalize marijuana use? How has the\u00a0criminalization of marijuana disproportionately affected minorities and the poor?\r\n\r\nFunctionalist theorists might examine how the legalization of marijuana might benefit state economies and also how this issue has served to increase social solidarity and redefine social norms.\r\n\r\nInteractionist theorists would likely focus on the perceptions of marijuana use and the symbolic nature of the marijuana leaf over time. Labeling is also of interest to interactionists--who\u00a0<\/em>gets labeled (the by<\/em>\u00a0whom<\/em>\u00a0is examined by conflict theorists).","rendered":"

What you’ll learn to do: contrast the varying theoretical perspectives on deviance<\/h2>\n

\"Three<\/p>\n

Since the early days of sociology, scholars have developed theories that attempt to explain what deviance and crime mean to society. These theories can be grouped according to the three major sociological paradigms: functionalism, symbolic interactionism, and conflict theory.\u00a0Let’s revisit marijuana legalization from a theoretical perspective. How can sociological theories help explain the trends and corresponding human behavior and group patterns we discussed in the first section?<\/p>\n

Conflict theorists would focus their attention on power and inequality. Who has the power to criminalize, decriminalize, and legalize marijuana use? How has the\u00a0criminalization of marijuana disproportionately affected minorities and the poor?<\/p>\n

Functionalist theorists might examine how the legalization of marijuana might benefit state economies and also how this issue has served to increase social solidarity and redefine social norms.<\/p>\n

Interactionist theorists would likely focus on the perceptions of marijuana use and the symbolic nature of the marijuana leaf over time. Labeling is also of interest to interactionists–who\u00a0<\/em>gets labeled (the by<\/em>\u00a0whom<\/em>\u00a0is examined by conflict theorists).<\/p>\n\n\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t

Candela Citations<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
CC licensed content, Original<\/div>