{"id":1014,"date":"2015-05-12T18:06:17","date_gmt":"2015-05-12T18:06:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/courses.candelalearning.com\/masterymacro1xngcxmaster\/?post_type=chapter&p=1014"},"modified":"2024-04-26T16:28:11","modified_gmt":"2024-04-26T16:28:11","slug":"why-it-matters-keynesian-economics","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-macroeconomics\/chapter\/why-it-matters-keynesian-economics\/","title":{"raw":"Why It Matters: Keynesian and Neoclassical Economics","rendered":"Why It Matters: Keynesian and Neoclassical Economics"},"content":{"raw":"

Why learn to identify and apply the key features of Keynesian and neoclassical economic models?<\/h2>\r\nMacroeconomic theory is both interesting and challenging because there is no single, universally accepted view about either how the economy works or what the appropriate role for government macro policy should be. Throughout history, there have been two competing perspectives about these questions, which we call Keynesian and Neoclassical economics. The views have had different names at different times, such as Classical and New Classical economics or Neo Keynesian and New Keynesian economics, but while these views have become more nuanced, the basic perspectives have remained the same. Both groups agree that aggregate demand and aggregate supply affect the course of the macro economy. Neoclassicals, though, argue that supply is the most important determinant, while demand just tags along, while Keynesians argue the opposite.\r\n\r\nMany mainstream economists take a Keynesian perspective (emphasizing the important of aggregate demand) in analyzing the short run, but a neoclassical perspective (emphasizing the importance of aggregate supply) for analyzing the long run.\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_4513\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"623\"]\"A Figure 1.\u00a0<\/strong>Signs of a Recession Home foreclosures were just one of the many signs and symptoms of the recent Great Recession. During that time, many businesses closed and many people lost their jobs. (Credit: modification of work by Taber Andrew Bain, CC BY).[\/caption]\r\n

The Great Recession and Economic Solutions<\/h2>\r\nThe Great Recession of 2008\u20132009 hit the U.S. economy hard. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), the number of unemployed Americans rose from 6.8 million in May 2007 to 15.4 million in October 2009. During that time, the U.S. Census Bureau estimated that approximately 170,000 small businesses closed. Mass layoffs peaked in February 2009 when 326,392 workers were given notice. U.S. productivity and output fell as well. Job losses, declining home values, declining incomes, and uncertainty about the future caused consumption expenditures to decrease. According to the BLS, household spending dropped by 7.8%.\r\n\r\nHome foreclosures and the meltdown in U.S. financial markets called for immediate action by Congress, the President, and the Federal Reserve Bank. For example, programs such as the\u00a0American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 were implemented to help millions of people by providing tax credits for homebuyers, paying \u201ccash for clunkers\u201d (a program for buying back used cars), \u00a0and extending unemployment benefits. From cutting back on spending, filing for unemployment, and losing homes, millions of people were affected by the recession. And while the United States is now on the path to recovery, the impact will be felt for many years to come.\r\n\r\nWhat caused this recession and what prevented the economy from spiraling further into another depression? Policymakers looked to the lessons learned from the Great Depression of the 1930s and to the models developed by John Maynard Keynes to analyze the causes and find solutions to the country\u2019s economic woes.\r\n\r\nWe have learned that the level of economic activity, for example output, employment, and spending, tends to grow over time.\u00a0We learned earlier\u00a0that the economy tends to cycle around the long-run trend.<\/span><\/span>\u00a0In other words, the economy does not always grow at its average growth rate. Sometimes economic activity grows at the trend rate, sometimes it grows more than the trend, sometimes it grows less than the trend, and sometimes it actually declines. You can see this cyclical behavior in Figure 2.<\/span>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_4514\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"780\"]\"The Figure 2.<\/strong> U.S. Gross Domestic Product, Percent Changes 1930\u20132012.<\/strong> The chart tracks the percent change in GDP since 1930. The magnitude of both recessions and peaks was quite large between 1930 and 1945. (Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, \u201cNational Economic Accounts\u201d).[\/caption]\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\nThis empirical reality raises two important questions: how can we explain the cycles, and to what extent can they be moderated?\u00a0To answer those questions, we turn to the Keynesian and neoclassical perspectives.\r\n