{"id":1747,"date":"2020-10-09T17:48:12","date_gmt":"2020-10-09T17:48:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-publicspeaking\/?post_type=chapter&#038;p=1747"},"modified":"2020-12-05T05:54:09","modified_gmt":"2020-12-05T05:54:09","slug":"statistical-terms-and-concepts","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-publicspeaking\/chapter\/statistical-terms-and-concepts\/","title":{"raw":"Statistical Terms and Concepts","rendered":"Statistical Terms and Concepts"},"content":{"raw":"<div class=\"textbox learning-objectives\">\r\n<h3>Learning Objectives<\/h3>\r\nRecognize key statistical terms and concepts.\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\nCredibility makes our messages believable, and a believable message is more likely to be remembered than one that is not. But gaining\u00a0credibility\u00a0is not so easy. As Chip and Dan Heath note in\u00a0<span class=\"s1\"><i>Made to Stick:\u00a0<\/i><\/span>\"If we\u2019re trying to persuade a skeptical audience to believe a new message, the reality is that we\u2019re fighting an uphill battle against a lifetime of personal learning and social relationships.\"[footnote]Heath,\u00a0Chip,\u00a0and\u00a0Heath,\u00a0Dan.\u00a0<em>Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die<\/em>. Random House, 2007, 133.[\/footnote]\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_2764\" align=\"alignright\" width=\"300\"]<img class=\"size-medium wp-image-2764\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5348\/2020\/10\/09200507\/pug-5647847_960_720-300x193.jpg\" alt=\"A pug wearing a unicorn costume\" width=\"300\" height=\"193\" \/> In\u00a02019, Americans spent almost half a billion dollars on Halloween costumes for their pets.[\/caption]\r\n\r\nSo how can we add credibility to our words? One way is to use statistics. Statistics can offer credibility by grounding a claim in verifiable numbers. If I say, \"Americans spend a lot on their pets,\" that's a judgment on my part\u2014I could equally say, \"Americans spend too much on their pets\" or \"Americans spend too little on their pets.\" Now imagine if I say, \"According to the\u00a0American Pet Products Association, Americans spent over $72 billion on their pets in 2018.\" Here we are not dealing with my judgment (how much is a lot?), but rather with a verifiable figure. An audience member could look up the source and even track down how the APPA arrived at this number.[footnote]McReynolds, Tony. \"Americans spent $72 billion on their pets in 2018.\" <em>AAHA<\/em>, 27 Mar. 2019, https:\/\/www.aaha.org\/publications\/newstat\/articles\/2019-03\/americans-spent-72-billion-on-their-pets-in-2018[\/footnote]\r\n\r\nWe should not assume, however, that this statistic alone makes our argument. Statistics only have meaning in context. For instance, I could relativize this number (and perhaps minimize it) by pointing out that Americans also spend nearly that much\u00a0on soft drinks each year ($65 billion)[footnote]https:\/\/business.time.com\/2012\/01\/23\/how-much-you-spend-each-year-on-coffee-gas-christmas-pets-beer-and-more\/[\/footnote], or take it up a notch by pointing out that in 2019, Americans spent almost half a billion dollars on Halloween costumes for their pets.[footnote]https:\/\/www.marketwatch.com\/story\/americans-are-spending-almost-half-a-billion-on-halloween-costumes-for-their-pets-2019-10-22[\/footnote]\r\n\r\nIn order to use statistics effectively and responsibly, it's important to review some key concepts.\r\n<h3>Probability<\/h3>\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_2758\" align=\"alignright\" width=\"237\"]<img class=\"size-medium wp-image-2758\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5348\/2020\/10\/09194740\/473px-Coin_Toss_3635981474-237x300.jpg\" alt=\"Coin flipping from thumb\" width=\"237\" height=\"300\" \/> One of the simplest illustrations of probability is a coin flip. For each flip, there is a 50% probability of heads and a 50% probability of tails.[\/caption]\r\n\r\nProbability is a mathematical tool used to study randomness. It deals with the chance of an event occurring. For example, if you toss a <strong>fair<\/strong> coin four times, the outcomes may not be two heads and two tails. However, if you toss the same coin 4,000 times, the outcomes will be close to half heads and half tails. The expected theoretical probability of heads in any one toss is 1\/2 or 0.5. Even though the outcomes of a few repetitions are uncertain, there is a regular pattern of outcomes when there are many repetitions. The English statistician Karl Pearson once tossed a coin 24,000 times with a result of 12,012 heads.[footnote]Pyne, Lydia. \"The Statistics of Coin Tosses for Theater Geeks.\"<em> Jstor Daily,<\/em>\u00a026\u00a0Apr, 2017, https:\/\/daily.jstor.org\/statistics-of-coin-tosses-theater-geeks\/[\/footnote]\r\n\r\nThe theory of probability began with the study of games of chance such as poker. Predictions take the form of probabilities. To predict the likelihood of an earthquake, rain, or whether you will get an A in this course, we use probabilities. Doctors use probability to determine the chance of a vaccine causing the disease the vaccination is supposed to prevent. A stockbroker uses probability to determine the rate of return on a client\u2019s investments.\r\n<h3>P-Value<\/h3>\r\nIf a process is subject to probability and chance, it becomes difficult to determine whether a given effect is due to the input being tested or just random chance.\u00a0In statistics, a\u00a0<b>p<\/b>-<b>value<\/b>\u00a0is a measure of the probability that an effect could be explained by random chance, and has nothing to do with the variables being tested. The\u00a0p-value is related to the concept of <strong>statistical significance<\/strong>. If a p-value is high\u2014that is, if there's a fairly high probability that the effect is due to chance\u2014then the result of the test is not considered statistically significant. Both of these concepts contain a lot of theory and math, but they're important to be aware of, since the question of statistical significance is one of the main critical questions we should ask of any statistical argument.\r\n\r\n<span style=\"color: #6c64ad; font-size: 1em; font-weight: 600;\">Population and Sample<\/span>\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_2757\" align=\"alignright\" width=\"300\"]<img class=\"size-medium wp-image-2757\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5348\/2020\/10\/09194434\/800px-Systematic_sampling-300x143.png\" alt=\" A visual representation of selecting a random sample using the systematic sampling technique\" width=\"300\" height=\"143\" \/> Ideally, a population is sampled systematically. In this simple system, every third person is included in the sample.[\/caption]\r\n\r\nIn statistics, we generally want to study a <strong>population<\/strong>. You can think of a population as a collection of persons, things, or objects under study. To study the population, we select a <strong>sample<\/strong>. The idea of <strong>sampling<\/strong> is to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data is the result of sampling from a population.\r\n\r\nBecause it takes a lot of time and money to examine an entire population, sampling is a very practical technique. If you wished to compute the overall grade point average at your school, it would make sense to select a sample of students who attend the school. The data collected from the sample would be the students' grade point averages. In presidential elections, opinion poll samples of [latex]1,000[\/latex]\u2013[latex]2,000[\/latex] people are taken. The opinion poll is supposed to represent the views of the people in the entire country. Manufacturers of canned carbonated drinks take samples to determine if a [latex]16[\/latex] ounce can contains [latex]16[\/latex] ounces of carbonated drink.\r\n<h3 id=\"generalizability\">Generalizability<\/h3>\r\nOne of the main concerns in the field of statistics is how accurately a particular statistic estimates a given property of the population. The accuracy really depends on how well the sample represents the population. The sample must contain the characteristics of the population in order to be a <strong>representative sample<\/strong>. The <strong>margin of error<\/strong> is a statistic expressing the amount of random sampling error in the results of a survey. The larger the margin of error, the less confidence one should have that a poll result would reflect the result of a survey of the entire population.\r\n<h3>Variables<\/h3>\r\nA variable, notated by capital letters such as [latex]X[\/latex] and [latex]Y[\/latex], is a characteristic of interest for each person or thing in a population. Variables may be <strong>numerical<\/strong> or <strong>categorical<\/strong>. Numerical variables take on values with equal units such as weight in pounds and time in hours. <strong>Categorical variables<\/strong> place the person or thing into a category. If we let [latex]X[\/latex] equal the number of points earned by one math student at the end of a term, then [latex]X[\/latex] is a numerical variable. If we let [latex]Y[\/latex] be a person's party affiliation, then some examples of [latex]Y[\/latex] include Republican, Democrat, and Independent. [latex]Y[\/latex] is a categorical variable. We could do some math with values of [latex]X[\/latex] (calculate the average number of points earned, for example), but it makes no sense to do math with values of [latex]Y[\/latex] (calculating an average party affiliation makes no sense).\r\n\r\n<strong>Data<\/strong> are the actual values of the variable. They may be numbers or they may be words. <strong>Datum<\/strong> is a single value. When you have data for a set of variables, the patterns of variation in the data are called the\u00a0<strong>distribution <\/strong>of the variable.\r\n<h3>Mean, Median, and Proportion<\/h3>\r\nWhen working with a set of data,\u00a0<strong>mean<\/strong>, <strong>median,<\/strong>\u00a0and <strong>proportion<\/strong> are important concepts. If you were to take three exams in your math classes and obtain scores of [latex]86[\/latex], [latex]75[\/latex], and [latex]92[\/latex], you would calculate your mean score by adding the three exam scores and dividing by three (your mean score would be [latex]84.3[\/latex] to one decimal place). With some data sets, the mean fails to capture a reasonable relationship between the values. If your math class were taught by billionaire Jeff Bezos, the mean net worth of everyone in the room will be something like 58 billion dollars. In cases like this, we might want to use the <strong>median<\/strong>, which means the middle term in a series ordered by magnitude. Imagine, in that same math class, if one test is particularly hard, and you and your classmates get grades of 30%, 12%, 23%, 22%, and 100% (hopefully that one's you!). While the mean score would be 37.4%, the median would be 23% (remember to order those numbers to get the median!: 12%, 22%, <strong>23%<\/strong>, 30%, 100%). Which would you use to petition the instructor to throw out that test? If, in your math class, there are [latex]40[\/latex] students and [latex]22[\/latex] are in-state and [latex]18[\/latex] are out-of-state, then the <strong>proportion<\/strong> of in-state students is [latex]\\displaystyle\\frac{{22}}{{40}}[\/latex] and the proportion of out-of-state students is [latex]\\displaystyle\\frac{{18}}{{40}}[\/latex].\r\n\r\nNOTE: The words mean and average are often used interchangeably. The substitution of one word for the other is common practice. The technical term is <em>arithmetic mean<\/em>, and <em>average<\/em>\u00a0is technically a center location. However, in practice among non-statisticians, <em>average<\/em> is commonly accepted for <em>arithmetic mean<\/em>.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<div class=\"textbox key-takeaways\">\r\n<h3>To Watch: Talithia Williams<\/h3>\r\nIn this speech, statistician and mathematician Talithia Williams talks about how collecting data on your health can make you the authority on your own body, and give you a new sense of agency and control.\r\n\r\nhttps:\/\/youtu.be\/TDCYJ3_gx2w\r\n\r\nYou can view the <a href=\"https:\/\/course-building.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/Public_Speaking\/transcripts\/ShowMeTheData_transcript.txt\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">transcript for \"Show me the data -- becoming an expert in yourself: Talithia Williams at TEDxClaremontColleges\" here (opens in new window)<\/a>.\r\n<h4>What to watch for:<\/h4>\r\nDr. Williams uses data to tell a series of gripping stories about her own health and that of her family. The information she shares is remarkably personal and revealing, but she somehow avoids giving the impression that she's oversharing. How? One might say that the use of data and statistics creates a kind of emotional filter: while the listeners process the \"data story,\" they are taken out of the emotional intensity of the personal story. If Dr. Williams had told the same stories about health scares without using data, listeners would have a very different emotional experience. Speakers often use the emotional difference between personal stories\u00a0and data stories to offer audiences several different lines of sight into their topics: for instance, a speech about wildfire recovery efforts in California might begin with an emotionally intense account of what one might have witnessed during the fires, followed by statistics about the increasing number of wildfires and their estimated yearly cost.\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n&nbsp;","rendered":"<div class=\"textbox learning-objectives\">\n<h3>Learning Objectives<\/h3>\n<p>Recognize key statistical terms and concepts.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>Credibility makes our messages believable, and a believable message is more likely to be remembered than one that is not. But gaining\u00a0credibility\u00a0is not so easy. As Chip and Dan Heath note in\u00a0<span class=\"s1\"><i>Made to Stick:\u00a0<\/i><\/span>&#8220;If we\u2019re trying to persuade a skeptical audience to believe a new message, the reality is that we\u2019re fighting an uphill battle against a lifetime of personal learning and social relationships.&#8221;<a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Heath,\u00a0Chip,\u00a0and\u00a0Heath,\u00a0Dan.\u00a0Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die. Random House, 2007, 133.\" id=\"return-footnote-1747-1\" href=\"#footnote-1747-1\" aria-label=\"Footnote 1\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[1]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_2764\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2764\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-2764\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5348\/2020\/10\/09200507\/pug-5647847_960_720-300x193.jpg\" alt=\"A pug wearing a unicorn costume\" width=\"300\" height=\"193\" \/><\/p>\n<p id=\"caption-attachment-2764\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">In\u00a02019, Americans spent almost half a billion dollars on Halloween costumes for their pets.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>So how can we add credibility to our words? One way is to use statistics. Statistics can offer credibility by grounding a claim in verifiable numbers. If I say, &#8220;Americans spend a lot on their pets,&#8221; that&#8217;s a judgment on my part\u2014I could equally say, &#8220;Americans spend too much on their pets&#8221; or &#8220;Americans spend too little on their pets.&#8221; Now imagine if I say, &#8220;According to the\u00a0American Pet Products Association, Americans spent over $72 billion on their pets in 2018.&#8221; Here we are not dealing with my judgment (how much is a lot?), but rather with a verifiable figure. An audience member could look up the source and even track down how the APPA arrived at this number.<a class=\"footnote\" title=\"McReynolds, Tony. &quot;Americans spent $72 billion on their pets in 2018.&quot; AAHA, 27 Mar. 2019, https:\/\/www.aaha.org\/publications\/newstat\/articles\/2019-03\/americans-spent-72-billion-on-their-pets-in-2018\" id=\"return-footnote-1747-2\" href=\"#footnote-1747-2\" aria-label=\"Footnote 2\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[2]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p>We should not assume, however, that this statistic alone makes our argument. Statistics only have meaning in context. For instance, I could relativize this number (and perhaps minimize it) by pointing out that Americans also spend nearly that much\u00a0on soft drinks each year ($65 billion)<a class=\"footnote\" title=\"https:\/\/business.time.com\/2012\/01\/23\/how-much-you-spend-each-year-on-coffee-gas-christmas-pets-beer-and-more\/\" id=\"return-footnote-1747-3\" href=\"#footnote-1747-3\" aria-label=\"Footnote 3\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[3]<\/sup><\/a>, or take it up a notch by pointing out that in 2019, Americans spent almost half a billion dollars on Halloween costumes for their pets.<a class=\"footnote\" title=\"https:\/\/www.marketwatch.com\/story\/americans-are-spending-almost-half-a-billion-on-halloween-costumes-for-their-pets-2019-10-22\" id=\"return-footnote-1747-4\" href=\"#footnote-1747-4\" aria-label=\"Footnote 4\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[4]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p>In order to use statistics effectively and responsibly, it&#8217;s important to review some key concepts.<\/p>\n<h3>Probability<\/h3>\n<div id=\"attachment_2758\" style=\"width: 247px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2758\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-2758\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5348\/2020\/10\/09194740\/473px-Coin_Toss_3635981474-237x300.jpg\" alt=\"Coin flipping from thumb\" width=\"237\" height=\"300\" \/><\/p>\n<p id=\"caption-attachment-2758\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">One of the simplest illustrations of probability is a coin flip. For each flip, there is a 50% probability of heads and a 50% probability of tails.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>Probability is a mathematical tool used to study randomness. It deals with the chance of an event occurring. For example, if you toss a <strong>fair<\/strong> coin four times, the outcomes may not be two heads and two tails. However, if you toss the same coin 4,000 times, the outcomes will be close to half heads and half tails. The expected theoretical probability of heads in any one toss is 1\/2 or 0.5. Even though the outcomes of a few repetitions are uncertain, there is a regular pattern of outcomes when there are many repetitions. The English statistician Karl Pearson once tossed a coin 24,000 times with a result of 12,012 heads.<a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Pyne, Lydia. &quot;The Statistics of Coin Tosses for Theater Geeks.&quot; Jstor Daily,\u00a026\u00a0Apr, 2017, https:\/\/daily.jstor.org\/statistics-of-coin-tosses-theater-geeks\/\" id=\"return-footnote-1747-5\" href=\"#footnote-1747-5\" aria-label=\"Footnote 5\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[5]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The theory of probability began with the study of games of chance such as poker. Predictions take the form of probabilities. To predict the likelihood of an earthquake, rain, or whether you will get an A in this course, we use probabilities. Doctors use probability to determine the chance of a vaccine causing the disease the vaccination is supposed to prevent. A stockbroker uses probability to determine the rate of return on a client\u2019s investments.<\/p>\n<h3>P-Value<\/h3>\n<p>If a process is subject to probability and chance, it becomes difficult to determine whether a given effect is due to the input being tested or just random chance.\u00a0In statistics, a\u00a0<b>p<\/b>&#8211;<b>value<\/b>\u00a0is a measure of the probability that an effect could be explained by random chance, and has nothing to do with the variables being tested. The\u00a0p-value is related to the concept of <strong>statistical significance<\/strong>. If a p-value is high\u2014that is, if there&#8217;s a fairly high probability that the effect is due to chance\u2014then the result of the test is not considered statistically significant. Both of these concepts contain a lot of theory and math, but they&#8217;re important to be aware of, since the question of statistical significance is one of the main critical questions we should ask of any statistical argument.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #6c64ad; font-size: 1em; font-weight: 600;\">Population and Sample<\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_2757\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2757\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-2757\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5348\/2020\/10\/09194434\/800px-Systematic_sampling-300x143.png\" alt=\"A visual representation of selecting a random sample using the systematic sampling technique\" width=\"300\" height=\"143\" \/><\/p>\n<p id=\"caption-attachment-2757\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Ideally, a population is sampled systematically. In this simple system, every third person is included in the sample.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>In statistics, we generally want to study a <strong>population<\/strong>. You can think of a population as a collection of persons, things, or objects under study. To study the population, we select a <strong>sample<\/strong>. The idea of <strong>sampling<\/strong> is to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data is the result of sampling from a population.<\/p>\n<p>Because it takes a lot of time and money to examine an entire population, sampling is a very practical technique. If you wished to compute the overall grade point average at your school, it would make sense to select a sample of students who attend the school. The data collected from the sample would be the students&#8217; grade point averages. In presidential elections, opinion poll samples of [latex]1,000[\/latex]\u2013[latex]2,000[\/latex] people are taken. The opinion poll is supposed to represent the views of the people in the entire country. Manufacturers of canned carbonated drinks take samples to determine if a [latex]16[\/latex] ounce can contains [latex]16[\/latex] ounces of carbonated drink.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"generalizability\">Generalizability<\/h3>\n<p>One of the main concerns in the field of statistics is how accurately a particular statistic estimates a given property of the population. The accuracy really depends on how well the sample represents the population. The sample must contain the characteristics of the population in order to be a <strong>representative sample<\/strong>. The <strong>margin of error<\/strong> is a statistic expressing the amount of random sampling error in the results of a survey. The larger the margin of error, the less confidence one should have that a poll result would reflect the result of a survey of the entire population.<\/p>\n<h3>Variables<\/h3>\n<p>A variable, notated by capital letters such as [latex]X[\/latex] and [latex]Y[\/latex], is a characteristic of interest for each person or thing in a population. Variables may be <strong>numerical<\/strong> or <strong>categorical<\/strong>. Numerical variables take on values with equal units such as weight in pounds and time in hours. <strong>Categorical variables<\/strong> place the person or thing into a category. If we let [latex]X[\/latex] equal the number of points earned by one math student at the end of a term, then [latex]X[\/latex] is a numerical variable. If we let [latex]Y[\/latex] be a person&#8217;s party affiliation, then some examples of [latex]Y[\/latex] include Republican, Democrat, and Independent. [latex]Y[\/latex] is a categorical variable. We could do some math with values of [latex]X[\/latex] (calculate the average number of points earned, for example), but it makes no sense to do math with values of [latex]Y[\/latex] (calculating an average party affiliation makes no sense).<\/p>\n<p><strong>Data<\/strong> are the actual values of the variable. They may be numbers or they may be words. <strong>Datum<\/strong> is a single value. When you have data for a set of variables, the patterns of variation in the data are called the\u00a0<strong>distribution <\/strong>of the variable.<\/p>\n<h3>Mean, Median, and Proportion<\/h3>\n<p>When working with a set of data,\u00a0<strong>mean<\/strong>, <strong>median,<\/strong>\u00a0and <strong>proportion<\/strong> are important concepts. If you were to take three exams in your math classes and obtain scores of [latex]86[\/latex], [latex]75[\/latex], and [latex]92[\/latex], you would calculate your mean score by adding the three exam scores and dividing by three (your mean score would be [latex]84.3[\/latex] to one decimal place). With some data sets, the mean fails to capture a reasonable relationship between the values. If your math class were taught by billionaire Jeff Bezos, the mean net worth of everyone in the room will be something like 58 billion dollars. In cases like this, we might want to use the <strong>median<\/strong>, which means the middle term in a series ordered by magnitude. Imagine, in that same math class, if one test is particularly hard, and you and your classmates get grades of 30%, 12%, 23%, 22%, and 100% (hopefully that one&#8217;s you!). While the mean score would be 37.4%, the median would be 23% (remember to order those numbers to get the median!: 12%, 22%, <strong>23%<\/strong>, 30%, 100%). Which would you use to petition the instructor to throw out that test? If, in your math class, there are [latex]40[\/latex] students and [latex]22[\/latex] are in-state and [latex]18[\/latex] are out-of-state, then the <strong>proportion<\/strong> of in-state students is [latex]\\displaystyle\\frac{{22}}{{40}}[\/latex] and the proportion of out-of-state students is [latex]\\displaystyle\\frac{{18}}{{40}}[\/latex].<\/p>\n<p>NOTE: The words mean and average are often used interchangeably. The substitution of one word for the other is common practice. The technical term is <em>arithmetic mean<\/em>, and <em>average<\/em>\u00a0is technically a center location. However, in practice among non-statisticians, <em>average<\/em> is commonly accepted for <em>arithmetic mean<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox key-takeaways\">\n<h3>To Watch: Talithia Williams<\/h3>\n<p>In this speech, statistician and mathematician Talithia Williams talks about how collecting data on your health can make you the authority on your own body, and give you a new sense of agency and control.<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" id=\"oembed-1\" title=\"Show me the data -- becoming an expert in yourself: Talithia Williams at TEDxClaremontColleges\" width=\"500\" height=\"281\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/TDCYJ3_gx2w?feature=oembed&#38;rel=0\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>You can view the <a href=\"https:\/\/course-building.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/Public_Speaking\/transcripts\/ShowMeTheData_transcript.txt\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">transcript for &#8220;Show me the data &#8212; becoming an expert in yourself: Talithia Williams at TEDxClaremontColleges&#8221; here (opens in new window)<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h4>What to watch for:<\/h4>\n<p>Dr. Williams uses data to tell a series of gripping stories about her own health and that of her family. The information she shares is remarkably personal and revealing, but she somehow avoids giving the impression that she&#8217;s oversharing. How? One might say that the use of data and statistics creates a kind of emotional filter: while the listeners process the &#8220;data story,&#8221; they are taken out of the emotional intensity of the personal story. If Dr. Williams had told the same stories about health scares without using data, listeners would have a very different emotional experience. Speakers often use the emotional difference between personal stories\u00a0and data stories to offer audiences several different lines of sight into their topics: for instance, a speech about wildfire recovery efforts in California might begin with an emotionally intense account of what one might have witnessed during the fires, followed by statistics about the increasing number of wildfires and their estimated yearly cost.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\t\t\t <section class=\"citations-section\" role=\"contentinfo\">\n\t\t\t <h3>Candela Citations<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t <div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t <div id=\"citation-list-1747\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <div class=\"licensing\"><div class=\"license-attribution-dropdown-subheading\">CC licensed content, Shared previously<\/div><ul class=\"citation-list\"><li>Introduction. <strong>Authored by<\/strong>: Boundless. <strong>Provided by<\/strong>: Lumen Learning. <strong>Located at<\/strong>: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-publicspeakingprinciples\/chapter\/using-statistics\/\">https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-publicspeakingprinciples\/chapter\/using-statistics\/<\/a>. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"license\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-SA: Attribution-ShareAlike<\/a><\/em><\/li><li>Definitions of Statistics, Probability, and Key Terms. <strong>Authored by<\/strong>: Barbara Illowski, Susan Dean, adapted by Lumen Learning. <strong>Provided by<\/strong>: Openstax. <strong>Located at<\/strong>: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/introstats1\/chapter\/definitions-of-statistics-probability-and-key-terms\/\">https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/introstats1\/chapter\/definitions-of-statistics-probability-and-key-terms\/<\/a>. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"license\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/\">CC BY: Attribution<\/a><\/em><\/li><li>Statistical Thinking. <strong>Authored by<\/strong>: Beth Chance and Allan Rossman. <strong>Provided by<\/strong>: California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. <strong>Located at<\/strong>: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/nobaproject.com\/modules\/statistical-thinking\">https:\/\/nobaproject.com\/modules\/statistical-thinking<\/a>. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"license\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-NC-SA: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike<\/a><\/em>. <strong>License Terms<\/strong>: Used with permission<\/li><li>Systematic Sampling. <strong>Authored by<\/strong>: Dan Kernler. <strong>Located at<\/strong>: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Systematic_sampling.PNG\">https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Systematic_sampling.PNG<\/a>. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"license\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-SA: Attribution-ShareAlike<\/a><\/em><\/li><li>Unicorn Pug. <strong>Authored by<\/strong>: dandarnell. <strong>Located at<\/strong>: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/pixabay.com\/photos\/pug-dog-unicorn-costume-5647847\/\">https:\/\/pixabay.com\/photos\/pug-dog-unicorn-costume-5647847\/<\/a>. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em>Other<\/em>. <strong>License Terms<\/strong>: Pixabay License<\/li><li>Coin flip. <strong>Authored by<\/strong>: ICMA Photos. <strong>Located at<\/strong>: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Coin_Toss_(3635981474).jpg\">https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Coin_Toss_(3635981474).jpg<\/a>. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"license\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-SA: Attribution-ShareAlike<\/a><\/em><\/li><\/ul><div class=\"license-attribution-dropdown-subheading\">All rights reserved content<\/div><ul class=\"citation-list\"><li>Show me the data -- becoming an expert in yourself: Talithia Williams at TEDxClaremontColleges. <strong>Provided by<\/strong>: TEDx Talks. <strong>Located at<\/strong>: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/TDCYJ3_gx2w\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/TDCYJ3_gx2w<\/a>. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em>Other<\/em>. <strong>License Terms<\/strong>: Standard YouTube License<\/li><\/ul><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t <\/section><hr class=\"before-footnotes clear\" \/><div class=\"footnotes\"><ol><li id=\"footnote-1747-1\">Heath,\u00a0Chip,\u00a0and\u00a0Heath,\u00a0Dan.\u00a0<em>Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die<\/em>. Random House, 2007, 133. <a href=\"#return-footnote-1747-1\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 1\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-1747-2\">McReynolds, Tony. \"Americans spent $72 billion on their pets in 2018.\" <em>AAHA<\/em>, 27 Mar. 2019, https:\/\/www.aaha.org\/publications\/newstat\/articles\/2019-03\/americans-spent-72-billion-on-their-pets-in-2018 <a href=\"#return-footnote-1747-2\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 2\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-1747-3\">https:\/\/business.time.com\/2012\/01\/23\/how-much-you-spend-each-year-on-coffee-gas-christmas-pets-beer-and-more\/ <a href=\"#return-footnote-1747-3\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 3\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-1747-4\">https:\/\/www.marketwatch.com\/story\/americans-are-spending-almost-half-a-billion-on-halloween-costumes-for-their-pets-2019-10-22 <a href=\"#return-footnote-1747-4\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 4\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-1747-5\">Pyne, Lydia. \"The Statistics of Coin Tosses for Theater Geeks.\"<em> Jstor Daily,<\/em>\u00a026\u00a0Apr, 2017, https:\/\/daily.jstor.org\/statistics-of-coin-tosses-theater-geeks\/ <a href=\"#return-footnote-1747-5\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 5\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><\/ol><\/div>","protected":false},"author":161083,"menu_order":12,"template":"","meta":{"_candela_citation":"[{\"type\":\"cc\",\"description\":\"Introduction\",\"author\":\"Boundless\",\"organization\":\"Lumen Learning\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/suny-publicspeakingprinciples\/chapter\/using-statistics\/\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"cc-by-sa\",\"license_terms\":\"\"},{\"type\":\"cc\",\"description\":\"Definitions of Statistics, Probability, and Key Terms\",\"author\":\"Barbara Illowski, Susan Dean, adapted by Lumen Learning\",\"organization\":\"Openstax\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/introstats1\/chapter\/definitions-of-statistics-probability-and-key-terms\/\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"cc-by\",\"license_terms\":\"\"},{\"type\":\"cc\",\"description\":\"Statistical Thinking\",\"author\":\"Beth Chance and Allan Rossman\",\"organization\":\"California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/nobaproject.com\/modules\/statistical-thinking\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"cc-by-nc-sa\",\"license_terms\":\"Used with permission\"},{\"type\":\"cc\",\"description\":\"Systematic Sampling\",\"author\":\"Dan Kernler\",\"organization\":\"\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Systematic_sampling.PNG\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"cc-by-sa\",\"license_terms\":\"\"},{\"type\":\"cc\",\"description\":\"Unicorn Pug\",\"author\":\"dandarnell\",\"organization\":\"\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/pixabay.com\/photos\/pug-dog-unicorn-costume-5647847\/\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"other\",\"license_terms\":\"Pixabay License\"},{\"type\":\"cc\",\"description\":\"Coin flip\",\"author\":\"ICMA Photos\",\"organization\":\"\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Coin_Toss_(3635981474).jpg\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"cc-by-sa\",\"license_terms\":\"\"},{\"type\":\"copyrighted_video\",\"description\":\"Show me the data -- becoming an expert in yourself: Talithia Williams at TEDxClaremontColleges\",\"author\":\"\",\"organization\":\"TEDx Talks\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/TDCYJ3_gx2w\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"other\",\"license_terms\":\"Standard YouTube License\"}]","CANDELA_OUTCOMES_GUID":"a80849fe-e5ad-4d01-a6cc-47d360f30878, dcdd12f4-7147-4246-a5c1-0dd6b0c84b8d","pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-1747","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry"],"part":181,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-publicspeaking\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/1747","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-publicspeaking\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-publicspeaking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-publicspeaking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/161083"}],"version-history":[{"count":28,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-publicspeaking\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/1747\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4306,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-publicspeaking\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/1747\/revisions\/4306"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-publicspeaking\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/181"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-publicspeaking\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/1747\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-publicspeaking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1747"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-publicspeaking\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=1747"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-publicspeaking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=1747"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-publicspeaking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=1747"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}