{"id":1869,"date":"2021-07-30T00:26:48","date_gmt":"2021-07-30T00:26:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-ushistory2\/?post_type=chapter&#038;p=1869"},"modified":"2022-09-28T23:32:39","modified_gmt":"2022-09-28T23:32:39","slug":"nixons-policies","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-ushistory2\/chapter\/nixons-policies\/","title":{"raw":"Nixon's Policies","rendered":"Nixon&#8217;s Policies"},"content":{"raw":"<section id=\"fs-idp241048464\" data-depth=\"1\">\r\n<div class=\"textbox learning-objectives\">\r\n<h3>Learning Objectives<\/h3>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>Discuss the economic challenges facing the country during Nixon's presidency<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Discuss the major\u00a0objectives\u00a0of Richard Nixon\u2019s foreign policy<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<h2 data-type=\"title\">The Domestic Nixon<\/h2>\r\n<p id=\"fs-idp224759936\">The images of violence and the impression of things spinning out of control seriously damaged Humphrey\u2019s chances for victory.\u00a0Many antiwar activists were upset that he won the Democratic nomination without competing in a single primary election, and vowed to change the convention rules that gave so much power to party insiders.<\/p>\r\nMany loyal Democratic voters at home, shocked by the violence they saw on television, turned away from their party, which seemed to have attracted dangerous \u201cradicals,\u201d and began to consider Nixon\u2019s promises of law and order. As the Democratic Party\u00a0was a house divided, Nixon successfully campaigned for the votes of both working and middle-class White Americans, winning the 1968 election. Although Humphrey's popularity improved when he distanced himself from Johnson's unpopular war policies in the campaign's final weeks, it was too little, too late.\u00a0Nixon easily won the Electoral College, gaining 301 votes to Humphrey\u2019s 191 and Wallace\u2019s 46.\r\n<p id=\"fs-idp199435456\">Once elected, Nixon began to pursue a policy of deliberate neglect of the civil rights movement and the needs of ethnic minorities. For example, in 1969, for the first time in fifteen years, federal lawyers sided with the state of Mississippi when it sought to slow the pace of school desegregation. Similarly, Nixon consistently showed his opposition to busing to achieve racial desegregation. He saw that restricting African American activity was a way of undercutting a source of votes for the Democratic Party and sought to overhaul the provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. In March 1970, he\u00a0pronounced\u00a0that he did not believe an \u201copen\u201d America had to be homogeneous or fully integrated, maintaining that it was \u201cnatural\u201d for members of ethnic groups to live together in their own enclaves. In other policy areas, especially economic ones, Nixon was either moderate or supportive of the progress of African Americans; for example, he expanded affirmative action, a program begun during the Johnson administration to improve employment and educational opportunities for racial minorities.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h2>Economic Doldrums in the 1970s<\/h2>\r\n<p id=\"fs-idp16314336\">Although Nixon always kept his eye on the political environment, the economy required attention. The nation had enjoyed seven years of expansion since 1961, but inflation (a general rise in prices) was threatening to constrict the purchasing power of the American consumer and therefore curtail economic expansion.<\/p>\r\n<p id=\"fs-idp155092000\">By mid-1970, a recession was beginning and unemployment was 6.2 percent, twice the level under Johnson. Much of the pain from these changes was felt in the <strong>Rust Belt<\/strong>, or the manufacturing cities along the Great Lakes and the industrial Midwest, such as Buffalo, Cleveland, and Detroit. A trend that began in the postwar era accelerated during the Nixon years: \u00a0As the country entered recession, wages decreased and the pay gap between workers and management expanded, reversing three decades of\u00a0relative parity between them. At the same time, dramatic increases in mass incarceration coincided with the deregulation of prison labor to allow more private companies access to cheaper inmate labor.<\/p>\r\nThe dismal prospects in the Rust Belt contrasted with the entrepreneurial energy found in the <strong>Sun Belt<\/strong>, running from Southern California to Texas to the South's Atlantic coast.\u00a0Coined by journalist Kevin Phillips in 1969, the term\u00a0<em>Sun Belt<\/em>\u00a0refers to the swath of southern and western states that saw unprecedented economic, industrial, and demographic growth after World War II.\u00a0Some of these jobs simply moved North to South; often\u00a0cheap, nonunionized labor, low wages, and lax regulations pulled northern industries away from the Rust Belt. Skilled northern workers followed the new jobs southward and westward, lured by cheap housing and a warm climate slowly made more tolerable by modern air conditioning.\r\n<p id=\"fs-idp86110224\">The flow of jobs from the Rust Belt to the Sun Belt was not the only cause of industrial decline in the northern half of the United States.\u00a0Postwar industrial development in Asia and Western Europe\u2014especially in Germany and Japan\u2014had created serious competition for American businesses. By 1971, American appetites for imports left foreign central banks with billions of U.S. currency, which had been fixed to gold in the international monetary and trade agreement of Bretton Woods back in 1944. When foreign dollar holdings exceeded U.S. gold reserves in 1971, President Nixon allowed the dollar to float freely against the price of gold. This caused an immediate 8 percent devaluation of the dollar, made American goods cheaper abroad, and stimulated exports. Nixon\u2019s move also marked the beginning of the end of the dollar\u2019s dominance in international trade.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h2>Fuel Shortages<\/h2>\r\n<p id=\"fs-idp36052128\">The situation was made worse in October 1973, when Syria and Egypt jointly attacked Israel to recover territory that had been lost in 1967, starting the <span class=\"no-emphasis\" data-type=\"term\">Yom Kippur War<\/span>. The Soviet Union significantly aided its allies, Egypt and Syria, and the United States supported Israel, souring its relations with\u00a0Arab nations. In retaliation, the Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries (OAPEC) imposed an embargo on oil shipments to the United States from October 1973 to March 1974. The ensuing shortage of oil pushed its price from three dollars a barrel to twelve dollars a barrel. The average price of gasoline in the United States shot from thirty-eight cents a gallon before the embargo to fifty-five cents a gallon in June 1974, and the prices of other goods whose manufacture and transportation relied on oil or gas also rose and did not come down. The oil embargo had a lasting impact on the economy and underscored the nation\u2019s interdependency with international political and economic developments.<\/p>\r\n<p id=\"fs-idp199250288\">Faced with high fuel prices, American consumers panicked. Gas stations limited the amount customers could purchase and closed on Sundays as supplies ran low. To conserve oil, Congress reduced the speed limit on interstate highways to fifty-five miles per hour. People were asked to turn down their thermostats, and automobile manufacturers in Detroit explored the possibility of building more fuel-efficient cars. Even after the embargo ended, prices continued to rise, and by the end of the Nixon years in 1974, inflation had soared to 12.2 percent.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<figure id=\"CNX_History_30_02_GasLine\">\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"520\"]<img src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images-archive-read-only\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/884\/2015\/08\/23203405\/CNX_History_30_02_GasLine.jpg\" alt=\"Photograph (a) shows a man standing beside a gas station reading a newspaper article with the headline \u201cGas Rationing Set Monday.\u201d A sign that reads \u201cSorry No Gasoline\u201d is visible in the background. Photograph (b) shows a sign with three stripes of color. The uppermost stripe, which is green, bears the message \u201cGreen Flag\/Everyone Welcome.\u201d The middle stripe, which is yellow, bears the message \u201cYellow Flag\/Commercial\/Trucks, Cars\/Burden of Proof on Customer.\u201d The bottom stripe, which is red, bears the message \u201cRed Flag\/Closed\/No Gas.\u201d\" width=\"520\" height=\"407\" data-media-type=\"image\/jpeg\" \/> <strong>Figure 1<\/strong>. The oil shortage triggered a rush to purchase gasoline, and gas stations around the country were choked with cars waiting to fill up. Eventually, fuel shortages caused gas stations to develop various ways to ration gasoline to their customers (a), such as the \u201cflag policy\u201d used by gas dealers in Oregon (b).[\/caption]<\/figure>\r\n<p id=\"fs-idm3474320\">Although Nixon\u2019s economic and civil rights policies differed from those of his predecessors, in other areas, he\u00a0sought continuity.\u00a0President Kennedy had committed the nation to putting a man on the moon before the end of the decade. Nixon, like Johnson before him, supported significant budget allocations to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to achieve this goal. On July 20, 1969, hundreds of millions of people around the world watched as astronauts Neil Armstrong and Edwin \u201cBuzz\u201d Aldrin walked on the surface of the moon and planted the U.S. flag. Watching from the White House, President Nixon spoke to the astronauts via satellite phone. The entire project cost the American taxpayer some $25 billion, approximately 4 percent of the nation\u2019s gross national product, and was such a source of pride for the nation that the Soviet Union and China refused to televise it. Coming amid all the struggles and crises that the country was enduring, the moon landing gave citizens a sense of accomplishment that stood in stark contrast to the foreign policy failures, growing economic challenges, and escalating divisions at home.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<div class=\"textbox tryit\">\r\n<h3>Try It<\/h3>\r\nhttps:\/\/assess.lumenlearning.com\/practice\/8f85a65f-67e7-401d-89c2-b320bfd5b714\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/section><section id=\"fs-idp35073488\" data-depth=\"1\">\r\n<h2 data-type=\"title\">Nixon the Diplomat<\/h2>\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignright\" width=\"260\"]<img src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images-archive-read-only\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/884\/2015\/08\/23203407\/CNX_History_30_02_NixonWall.jpg\" alt=\"A photograph shows Richard Nixon, Patricia Nixon, and a host of officials standing in front of the Great Wall of China.\" width=\"260\" height=\"343\" data-media-type=\"image\/jpeg\" \/> <strong>Figure 2<\/strong>. President Nixon and First Lady Patricia Nixon visited the Great Wall on their 1972 trip to China. The Chinese showed them the sights and hosted a banquet for them in the Great Hall of the People. Nixon was the first U.S. president to visit China following the Communist victory in the civil war in 1949.[\/caption]\r\n<p id=\"fs-idp13796416\">Despite the many domestic issues on Nixon\u2019s agenda, he prioritized foreign policy and clearly preferred bold and dramatic actions in that arena. Realizing that five major economic powers\u2014the United States, Western Europe, the Soviet Union, China, and Japan\u2014dominated world affairs, he sought opportunities for the United States to pit the others against each other. In 1969, he announced a new Cold War principle known as the Nixon Doctrine, a policy whereby the United States would continue to assist its allies but would not assume the responsibility of defending the entire non-Communist world. Other nations, like Japan, needed to assume more of the burden of defending themselves.<\/p>\r\n<p id=\"fs-idp309243488\">Playing what was later referred to as \u201cthe China card,\u201d Nixon abruptly reversed two decades of U.S. diplomatic sanctions and hostility to the Communist regime in the People\u2019s Republic of China, when he announced, in August 1971, that he would personally travel to Beijing and meet with China\u2019s leader, Chairman Mao Zedong. Nixon hoped that opening up to the Chinese government would prompt its bitter rival, the Soviet Union, to compete for global influence and seek a more productive relationship with the United States. He also hoped that establishing a friendly relationship with China would isolate North Vietnam and ease a peace settlement, allowing the United States to extract its troops from the war honorably. Concurring that the Soviet Union should be restrained from making advances in Asia, Nixon and Chinese premier Zhou Enlai agreed to compromise on several issues and ended up signing a friendship treaty. They promised to work towards establishing trade between the two nations and eventually establish full diplomatic relations.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<div class=\"textbox examples\">\r\n<h3>Watch It<\/h3>\r\nWatch this video to learn more about the remarkable change in U.S. relations with China following a mishap during a table tennis tournament.\r\n\r\n<center><iframe src=\"\/\/plugin.3playmedia.com\/show?mf=8207363&amp;p3sdk_version=1.10.1&amp;p=20361&amp;pt=375&amp;video_id=p9gV_Z7Hi0U&amp;video_target=tpm-plugin-zhdhlmo8-p9gV_Z7Hi0U\" width=\"800px\" height=\"450px\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0px\" marginheight=\"0px\"><\/iframe><\/center><center>You can view the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/course-building.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/US+history+II\/10thApril1971UStabletennisteamushersinpingpongdiplomacy.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">transcript for \u201c10th April 1971: US table tennis team ushers in ping pong diplomacy\u201d here (opens in new window)<\/a>.<\/center><\/div>\r\n<p id=\"fs-idp10791568\">Continuing his strategy of pitting one Communist nation against another, in May 1972, Nixon made another newsworthy trip, traveling to Moscow to meet with the Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev. The two discussed a policy of<strong> d\u00e9tente<\/strong>, a relaxation of tensions between their nations, and signed the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT), which limited each side to deploying only two antiballistic missile systems. It also limited the number of nuclear missiles maintained by each country. In 1974, a protocol was signed that reduced antiballistic missile sites to one per country, since neither country had yet begun to build its second system. Moreover, the two sides signed agreements to allow scientific and technological exchanges and promised to work towards a joint space mission.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<div class=\"textbox tryit\">\r\n<h3>Try It<\/h3>\r\nhttps:\/\/assess.lumenlearning.com\/practice\/be29a78f-bf24-4f23-be0b-314ed35bba4c\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"textbox examples\">\r\n<h3>Watch It<\/h3>\r\nThis CrashCourse video covers the evolution of the conservative movement during the 1960s. The candidacy of Republican contender Barry Goldwater took a premature turn to the hard right in 1964 that helped produce a landslide victory for his Democratic opponent, the incumbent Lyndon Johnson. Goldwater's bellicose Cold War rhetoric and lack of support for the Civil Rights Act seemed out of step to many voters in the early part of the decade. However, even though he lost the election, his conservative ideas about subjects like the importance of \"law and order\" persisted and would later lead to Richard Nixon's election by the \"silent majority.\"\r\n\r\nhttps:\/\/youtu.be\/OCrxD19DHA8?t=1s\r\n\r\nYou can view the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/course-building.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/US+history+II\/TheRiseofConservatismCrashCourseUSHistory41.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">transcript for \u201cThe Rise of Conservatism: Crash Course US History #41\u201d here (opens in new window)<\/a>.\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"textbox learning-objectives\">\r\n<h3>Glossary<\/h3>\r\n<strong>d\u00e9tente:\u00a0<\/strong>the relaxation of Cold War tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union\r\n\r\n<strong>Sun Belt: <\/strong>a region in the United States spanning from southern California to the east coast of the South that experienced great economic growth during the 1960s and 1970s\r\n\r\n<strong>Rust Belt:<\/strong>\u00a0a region of the United States in economic decline, largely consisting of manufacturing towns and cities in the Great Lakes region\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/section>","rendered":"<section id=\"fs-idp241048464\" data-depth=\"1\">\n<div class=\"textbox learning-objectives\">\n<h3>Learning Objectives<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Discuss the economic challenges facing the country during Nixon&#8217;s presidency<\/li>\n<li>Discuss the major\u00a0objectives\u00a0of Richard Nixon\u2019s foreign policy<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<h2 data-type=\"title\">The Domestic Nixon<\/h2>\n<p id=\"fs-idp224759936\">The images of violence and the impression of things spinning out of control seriously damaged Humphrey\u2019s chances for victory.\u00a0Many antiwar activists were upset that he won the Democratic nomination without competing in a single primary election, and vowed to change the convention rules that gave so much power to party insiders.<\/p>\n<p>Many loyal Democratic voters at home, shocked by the violence they saw on television, turned away from their party, which seemed to have attracted dangerous \u201cradicals,\u201d and began to consider Nixon\u2019s promises of law and order. As the Democratic Party\u00a0was a house divided, Nixon successfully campaigned for the votes of both working and middle-class White Americans, winning the 1968 election. Although Humphrey&#8217;s popularity improved when he distanced himself from Johnson&#8217;s unpopular war policies in the campaign&#8217;s final weeks, it was too little, too late.\u00a0Nixon easily won the Electoral College, gaining 301 votes to Humphrey\u2019s 191 and Wallace\u2019s 46.<\/p>\n<p id=\"fs-idp199435456\">Once elected, Nixon began to pursue a policy of deliberate neglect of the civil rights movement and the needs of ethnic minorities. For example, in 1969, for the first time in fifteen years, federal lawyers sided with the state of Mississippi when it sought to slow the pace of school desegregation. Similarly, Nixon consistently showed his opposition to busing to achieve racial desegregation. He saw that restricting African American activity was a way of undercutting a source of votes for the Democratic Party and sought to overhaul the provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. In March 1970, he\u00a0pronounced\u00a0that he did not believe an \u201copen\u201d America had to be homogeneous or fully integrated, maintaining that it was \u201cnatural\u201d for members of ethnic groups to live together in their own enclaves. In other policy areas, especially economic ones, Nixon was either moderate or supportive of the progress of African Americans; for example, he expanded affirmative action, a program begun during the Johnson administration to improve employment and educational opportunities for racial minorities.<\/p>\n<h2>Economic Doldrums in the 1970s<\/h2>\n<p id=\"fs-idp16314336\">Although Nixon always kept his eye on the political environment, the economy required attention. The nation had enjoyed seven years of expansion since 1961, but inflation (a general rise in prices) was threatening to constrict the purchasing power of the American consumer and therefore curtail economic expansion.<\/p>\n<p id=\"fs-idp155092000\">By mid-1970, a recession was beginning and unemployment was 6.2 percent, twice the level under Johnson. Much of the pain from these changes was felt in the <strong>Rust Belt<\/strong>, or the manufacturing cities along the Great Lakes and the industrial Midwest, such as Buffalo, Cleveland, and Detroit. A trend that began in the postwar era accelerated during the Nixon years: \u00a0As the country entered recession, wages decreased and the pay gap between workers and management expanded, reversing three decades of\u00a0relative parity between them. At the same time, dramatic increases in mass incarceration coincided with the deregulation of prison labor to allow more private companies access to cheaper inmate labor.<\/p>\n<p>The dismal prospects in the Rust Belt contrasted with the entrepreneurial energy found in the <strong>Sun Belt<\/strong>, running from Southern California to Texas to the South&#8217;s Atlantic coast.\u00a0Coined by journalist Kevin Phillips in 1969, the term\u00a0<em>Sun Belt<\/em>\u00a0refers to the swath of southern and western states that saw unprecedented economic, industrial, and demographic growth after World War II.\u00a0Some of these jobs simply moved North to South; often\u00a0cheap, nonunionized labor, low wages, and lax regulations pulled northern industries away from the Rust Belt. Skilled northern workers followed the new jobs southward and westward, lured by cheap housing and a warm climate slowly made more tolerable by modern air conditioning.<\/p>\n<p id=\"fs-idp86110224\">The flow of jobs from the Rust Belt to the Sun Belt was not the only cause of industrial decline in the northern half of the United States.\u00a0Postwar industrial development in Asia and Western Europe\u2014especially in Germany and Japan\u2014had created serious competition for American businesses. By 1971, American appetites for imports left foreign central banks with billions of U.S. currency, which had been fixed to gold in the international monetary and trade agreement of Bretton Woods back in 1944. When foreign dollar holdings exceeded U.S. gold reserves in 1971, President Nixon allowed the dollar to float freely against the price of gold. This caused an immediate 8 percent devaluation of the dollar, made American goods cheaper abroad, and stimulated exports. Nixon\u2019s move also marked the beginning of the end of the dollar\u2019s dominance in international trade.<\/p>\n<h2>Fuel Shortages<\/h2>\n<p id=\"fs-idp36052128\">The situation was made worse in October 1973, when Syria and Egypt jointly attacked Israel to recover territory that had been lost in 1967, starting the <span class=\"no-emphasis\" data-type=\"term\">Yom Kippur War<\/span>. The Soviet Union significantly aided its allies, Egypt and Syria, and the United States supported Israel, souring its relations with\u00a0Arab nations. In retaliation, the Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries (OAPEC) imposed an embargo on oil shipments to the United States from October 1973 to March 1974. The ensuing shortage of oil pushed its price from three dollars a barrel to twelve dollars a barrel. The average price of gasoline in the United States shot from thirty-eight cents a gallon before the embargo to fifty-five cents a gallon in June 1974, and the prices of other goods whose manufacture and transportation relied on oil or gas also rose and did not come down. The oil embargo had a lasting impact on the economy and underscored the nation\u2019s interdependency with international political and economic developments.<\/p>\n<p id=\"fs-idp199250288\">Faced with high fuel prices, American consumers panicked. Gas stations limited the amount customers could purchase and closed on Sundays as supplies ran low. To conserve oil, Congress reduced the speed limit on interstate highways to fifty-five miles per hour. People were asked to turn down their thermostats, and automobile manufacturers in Detroit explored the possibility of building more fuel-efficient cars. Even after the embargo ended, prices continued to rise, and by the end of the Nixon years in 1974, inflation had soared to 12.2 percent.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"CNX_History_30_02_GasLine\">\n<div style=\"width: 530px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images-archive-read-only\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/884\/2015\/08\/23203405\/CNX_History_30_02_GasLine.jpg\" alt=\"Photograph (a) shows a man standing beside a gas station reading a newspaper article with the headline \u201cGas Rationing Set Monday.\u201d A sign that reads \u201cSorry No Gasoline\u201d is visible in the background. Photograph (b) shows a sign with three stripes of color. The uppermost stripe, which is green, bears the message \u201cGreen Flag\/Everyone Welcome.\u201d The middle stripe, which is yellow, bears the message \u201cYellow Flag\/Commercial\/Trucks, Cars\/Burden of Proof on Customer.\u201d The bottom stripe, which is red, bears the message \u201cRed Flag\/Closed\/No Gas.\u201d\" width=\"520\" height=\"407\" data-media-type=\"image\/jpeg\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 1<\/strong>. The oil shortage triggered a rush to purchase gasoline, and gas stations around the country were choked with cars waiting to fill up. Eventually, fuel shortages caused gas stations to develop various ways to ration gasoline to their customers (a), such as the \u201cflag policy\u201d used by gas dealers in Oregon (b).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<p id=\"fs-idm3474320\">Although Nixon\u2019s economic and civil rights policies differed from those of his predecessors, in other areas, he\u00a0sought continuity.\u00a0President Kennedy had committed the nation to putting a man on the moon before the end of the decade. Nixon, like Johnson before him, supported significant budget allocations to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to achieve this goal. On July 20, 1969, hundreds of millions of people around the world watched as astronauts Neil Armstrong and Edwin \u201cBuzz\u201d Aldrin walked on the surface of the moon and planted the U.S. flag. Watching from the White House, President Nixon spoke to the astronauts via satellite phone. The entire project cost the American taxpayer some $25 billion, approximately 4 percent of the nation\u2019s gross national product, and was such a source of pride for the nation that the Soviet Union and China refused to televise it. Coming amid all the struggles and crises that the country was enduring, the moon landing gave citizens a sense of accomplishment that stood in stark contrast to the foreign policy failures, growing economic challenges, and escalating divisions at home.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox tryit\">\n<h3>Try It<\/h3>\n<p>\t<iframe id=\"assessment_practice_8f85a65f-67e7-401d-89c2-b320bfd5b714\" class=\"resizable\" src=\"https:\/\/assess.lumenlearning.com\/practice\/8f85a65f-67e7-401d-89c2-b320bfd5b714?iframe_resize_id=assessment_practice_id_8f85a65f-67e7-401d-89c2-b320bfd5b714\" frameborder=\"0\" style=\"border:none;width:100%;height:100%;min-height:300px;\"><br \/>\n\t<\/iframe><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"fs-idp35073488\" data-depth=\"1\">\n<h2 data-type=\"title\">Nixon the Diplomat<\/h2>\n<div style=\"width: 270px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images-archive-read-only\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/884\/2015\/08\/23203407\/CNX_History_30_02_NixonWall.jpg\" alt=\"A photograph shows Richard Nixon, Patricia Nixon, and a host of officials standing in front of the Great Wall of China.\" width=\"260\" height=\"343\" data-media-type=\"image\/jpeg\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 2<\/strong>. President Nixon and First Lady Patricia Nixon visited the Great Wall on their 1972 trip to China. The Chinese showed them the sights and hosted a banquet for them in the Great Hall of the People. Nixon was the first U.S. president to visit China following the Communist victory in the civil war in 1949.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p id=\"fs-idp13796416\">Despite the many domestic issues on Nixon\u2019s agenda, he prioritized foreign policy and clearly preferred bold and dramatic actions in that arena. Realizing that five major economic powers\u2014the United States, Western Europe, the Soviet Union, China, and Japan\u2014dominated world affairs, he sought opportunities for the United States to pit the others against each other. In 1969, he announced a new Cold War principle known as the Nixon Doctrine, a policy whereby the United States would continue to assist its allies but would not assume the responsibility of defending the entire non-Communist world. Other nations, like Japan, needed to assume more of the burden of defending themselves.<\/p>\n<p id=\"fs-idp309243488\">Playing what was later referred to as \u201cthe China card,\u201d Nixon abruptly reversed two decades of U.S. diplomatic sanctions and hostility to the Communist regime in the People\u2019s Republic of China, when he announced, in August 1971, that he would personally travel to Beijing and meet with China\u2019s leader, Chairman Mao Zedong. Nixon hoped that opening up to the Chinese government would prompt its bitter rival, the Soviet Union, to compete for global influence and seek a more productive relationship with the United States. He also hoped that establishing a friendly relationship with China would isolate North Vietnam and ease a peace settlement, allowing the United States to extract its troops from the war honorably. Concurring that the Soviet Union should be restrained from making advances in Asia, Nixon and Chinese premier Zhou Enlai agreed to compromise on several issues and ended up signing a friendship treaty. They promised to work towards establishing trade between the two nations and eventually establish full diplomatic relations.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox examples\">\n<h3>Watch It<\/h3>\n<p>Watch this video to learn more about the remarkable change in U.S. relations with China following a mishap during a table tennis tournament.<\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: center;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"\/\/plugin.3playmedia.com\/show?mf=8207363&amp;p3sdk_version=1.10.1&amp;p=20361&amp;pt=375&amp;video_id=p9gV_Z7Hi0U&amp;video_target=tpm-plugin-zhdhlmo8-p9gV_Z7Hi0U\" width=\"800px\" height=\"450px\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0px\" marginheight=\"0px\"><\/iframe><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: center;\">You can view the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/course-building.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/US+history+II\/10thApril1971UStabletennisteamushersinpingpongdiplomacy.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">transcript for \u201c10th April 1971: US table tennis team ushers in ping pong diplomacy\u201d here (opens in new window)<\/a>.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p id=\"fs-idp10791568\">Continuing his strategy of pitting one Communist nation against another, in May 1972, Nixon made another newsworthy trip, traveling to Moscow to meet with the Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev. The two discussed a policy of<strong> d\u00e9tente<\/strong>, a relaxation of tensions between their nations, and signed the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT), which limited each side to deploying only two antiballistic missile systems. It also limited the number of nuclear missiles maintained by each country. In 1974, a protocol was signed that reduced antiballistic missile sites to one per country, since neither country had yet begun to build its second system. Moreover, the two sides signed agreements to allow scientific and technological exchanges and promised to work towards a joint space mission.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox tryit\">\n<h3>Try It<\/h3>\n<p>\t<iframe id=\"assessment_practice_be29a78f-bf24-4f23-be0b-314ed35bba4c\" class=\"resizable\" src=\"https:\/\/assess.lumenlearning.com\/practice\/be29a78f-bf24-4f23-be0b-314ed35bba4c?iframe_resize_id=assessment_practice_id_be29a78f-bf24-4f23-be0b-314ed35bba4c\" frameborder=\"0\" style=\"border:none;width:100%;height:100%;min-height:300px;\"><br \/>\n\t<\/iframe><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"textbox examples\">\n<h3>Watch It<\/h3>\n<p>This CrashCourse video covers the evolution of the conservative movement during the 1960s. The candidacy of Republican contender Barry Goldwater took a premature turn to the hard right in 1964 that helped produce a landslide victory for his Democratic opponent, the incumbent Lyndon Johnson. Goldwater&#8217;s bellicose Cold War rhetoric and lack of support for the Civil Rights Act seemed out of step to many voters in the early part of the decade. However, even though he lost the election, his conservative ideas about subjects like the importance of &#8220;law and order&#8221; persisted and would later lead to Richard Nixon&#8217;s election by the &#8220;silent majority.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" id=\"oembed-1\" title=\"The Rise of Conservatism: Crash Course US History #41\" width=\"500\" height=\"281\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/OCrxD19DHA8?start=1&#38;feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>You can view the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/course-building.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/US+history+II\/TheRiseofConservatismCrashCourseUSHistory41.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">transcript for \u201cThe Rise of Conservatism: Crash Course US History #41\u201d here (opens in new window)<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"textbox learning-objectives\">\n<h3>Glossary<\/h3>\n<p><strong>d\u00e9tente:\u00a0<\/strong>the relaxation of Cold War tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sun Belt: <\/strong>a region in the United States spanning from southern California to the east coast of the South that experienced great economic growth during the 1960s and 1970s<\/p>\n<p><strong>Rust Belt:<\/strong>\u00a0a region of the United States in economic decline, largely consisting of manufacturing towns and cities in the Great Lakes region<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n\n\t\t\t <section class=\"citations-section\" role=\"contentinfo\">\n\t\t\t <h3>Candela Citations<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t <div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t <div id=\"citation-list-1869\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <div class=\"licensing\"><div class=\"license-attribution-dropdown-subheading\">CC licensed content, Original<\/div><ul class=\"citation-list\"><li>Modification, adaptation, and original content. <strong>Authored by<\/strong>: Mark Lempke for Lumen Learning. <strong>Provided by<\/strong>: Lumen Learning. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"license\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/\">CC BY: Attribution<\/a><\/em><\/li><\/ul><div class=\"license-attribution-dropdown-subheading\">CC licensed content, Shared previously<\/div><ul class=\"citation-list\"><li>US History. <strong>Provided by<\/strong>: OpenStax. <strong>Located at<\/strong>: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/openstaxcollege.org\/textbooks\/us-history\">http:\/\/openstaxcollege.org\/textbooks\/us-history<\/a>. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"license\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/\">CC BY: Attribution<\/a><\/em>. <strong>License Terms<\/strong>: Access for free at https:\/\/openstax.org\/books\/us-history\/pages\/1-introduction<\/li><\/ul><div class=\"license-attribution-dropdown-subheading\">All rights reserved content<\/div><ul class=\"citation-list\"><li>The Rise of Conservatism: Crash Course US History #41. <strong>Provided by<\/strong>: Crash Course. <strong>Located at<\/strong>: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/OCrxD19DHA8?t=1s\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/OCrxD19DHA8?t=1s<\/a>. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em>All Rights Reserved<\/em>. <strong>License Terms<\/strong>: Standard YouTube License<\/li><li>Ping-pong diplomacy. <strong>Provided by<\/strong>: History Pod. <strong>Located at<\/strong>: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=p9gV_Z7Hi0U\">https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=p9gV_Z7Hi0U<\/a>. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em>Other<\/em>. <strong>License Terms<\/strong>: Standard YouTube License<\/li><\/ul><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t <\/section>","protected":false},"author":23592,"menu_order":7,"template":"","meta":{"_candela_citation":"[{\"type\":\"cc\",\"description\":\"US History\",\"author\":\"\",\"organization\":\"OpenStax\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/openstaxcollege.org\/textbooks\/us-history\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"cc-by\",\"license_terms\":\"Access for free at https:\/\/openstax.org\/books\/us-history\/pages\/1-introduction\"},{\"type\":\"copyrighted_video\",\"description\":\"The Rise of Conservatism: Crash Course US History #41\",\"author\":\"\",\"organization\":\"Crash Course\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/OCrxD19DHA8?t=1s\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"arr\",\"license_terms\":\"Standard YouTube License\"},{\"type\":\"original\",\"description\":\"Modification, adaptation, and original content\",\"author\":\"Mark Lempke for Lumen Learning\",\"organization\":\"Lumen Learning\",\"url\":\"\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"cc-by\",\"license_terms\":\"\"},{\"type\":\"copyrighted_video\",\"description\":\"Ping-pong diplomacy\",\"author\":\"\",\"organization\":\"History Pod\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=p9gV_Z7Hi0U\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"other\",\"license_terms\":\"Standard YouTube License\"}]","CANDELA_OUTCOMES_GUID":"7e437aa1-7213-497e-8c3b-fb47b1698ca4,4e44c59a-b3b1-43d5-82d1-6f5807268d0e,9e072e40-0b35-4d63-a26b-8c6b3ffa67d5","pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-1869","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry"],"part":389,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-ushistory2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/1869","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-ushistory2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-ushistory2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-ushistory2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/23592"}],"version-history":[{"count":32,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-ushistory2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/1869\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9676,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-ushistory2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/1869\/revisions\/9676"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-ushistory2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/389"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-ushistory2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/1869\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-ushistory2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1869"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-ushistory2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=1869"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-ushistory2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=1869"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-ushistory2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=1869"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}