{"id":342,"date":"2015-08-21T18:07:00","date_gmt":"2015-08-21T18:07:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/courses.candelalearning.com\/ushistory2os2xmaster\/?post_type=chapter&#038;p=342"},"modified":"2022-09-22T18:25:06","modified_gmt":"2022-09-22T18:25:06","slug":"the-cold-war","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-ushistory2\/chapter\/the-cold-war\/","title":{"raw":"The Cold War Background","rendered":"The Cold War Background"},"content":{"raw":"<div class=\"bcc-box bcc-highlight\">\r\n<h3>Learning Objectives<\/h3>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>Explain how and why the Cold War emerged in the wake of World War II<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Describe the steps taken by the U.S. government to oppose the communist expansion in Europe and Asia<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<h2>The U.S. and the Soviet Union Emerge as the World's Superpowers<\/h2>\r\n<p id=\"fs-idp112479456\">As World War II drew to a close, the alliance that had made the United States and the Soviet Union partners in their defeat of the Axis powers\u2014Germany, Italy, and Japan\u2014began to fall apart. Both sides realized that their visions for the future of Europe and the world were incompatible. Joseph Stalin, the premier of the Soviet Union, wished to retain control of Eastern Europe and establish communist,\u00a0pro-Soviet governments there, in an effort to both expand Soviet influence and protect the Soviet Union from future invasions. He also sought to bring the communist revolution to Asia and to developing nations elsewhere in the world. The United States wanted to expand its influence as well by protecting or installing democratic governments throughout the world. It sought to combat the influence of the Soviet Union by forming alliances with Asian, African, and Latin American nations, and by helping these countries to establish or expand free-market economies. The end of the war left the industrialized nations of Europe and Asia physically devastated and economically exhausted by years of invasion, battle, and bombardment. With Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and China reduced to shadows of their former selves, the United States and the Soviet Union emerged as the last two superpowers and quickly found themselves in a contest for military, economic, technological, and ideological supremacy.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h2>The U.S. Shifts From Isolationism to Engagement: The Potsdam Conference<\/h2>\r\n<section id=\"fs-idm3903552\" data-depth=\"1\">\r\n<p id=\"fs-idp71916080\">The United States had a long history of avoiding foreign alliances that might require the commitment of its troops abroad. However, in accepting the realities of the post-World War II world, in which traditional powers like Great Britain or France were no longer strong enough to police the globe, the United States realized that it would have to make a permanent change in its foreign policy, shifting from relative isolation to active engagement.<\/p>\r\nWith Germany\u2019s defeat imminent, the Allies set terms for unconditional surrender. At the same time, deliberation began over reparations, tribunals, and the nature of an occupation regime that would initially be divided into American, British, French, and Soviet zones. Suspicion and mistrust were already mounting. The political landscape was altered drastically by Franklin Roosevelt\u2019s sudden death in April 1945, just days before the inaugural meeting of the UN. Although Roosevelt was skeptical of Stalin, he always held out hope that the Soviets could be brought into the \u201cFree World.\u201d Truman had no such illusions. He committed the United States to a hard-line, anti-Soviet approach.\r\n<p id=\"fs-idm46156000\">On assuming the office of president, Harry Truman was already troubled by Soviet actions in Europe. He disliked the concessions made by Roosevelt at Yalta, which had allowed the Soviet Union to install a Communist government in Poland. At the Potsdam conference, held from July 17 to August 2, 1945, Truman also opposed Stalin\u2019s plans to demand large reparations from Germany.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<figure id=\"CNX_History_28_02_Potsdam\">\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignright\" width=\"390\"]<img src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images-archive-read-only\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/884\/2015\/08\/23203256\/CNX_History_28_02_Potsdam.jpg\" alt=\"A photograph shows Clement Atlee, Harry Truman, and Joseph Stalin standing in front of a group of officials.\" width=\"390\" height=\"273\" data-media-type=\"image\/jpeg\" \/> <strong>Figure 1<\/strong>. At the postwar conference in Potsdam, Germany, Harry Truman stands between Joseph Stalin (right) and Clement Atlee (left). Atlee became prime minister of Great Britain, replacing Winston Churchill, while the conference was taking place.[\/caption]<\/figure>\r\n<h2>The Cold War<\/h2>\r\n<p id=\"fs-idm210518768\">Although the United States and the Soviet Union did finally reach an agreement at Potsdam, this was the final occasion on which they cooperated for quite some time. Each remained convinced that its own economic and political system was superior to the other\u2019s, and the two superpowers quickly found themselves drawn into conflict. The decades-long struggle between them for technological and ideological supremacy became known as the <strong>Cold War<\/strong>. So called because it did not include direct military confrontation between Soviet and U.S. troops, the Cold War was fought with a variety of other weapons: espionage and surveillance, political assassinations, propaganda, and the formation of alliances with other nations. It also became an arms race, as both countries competed to build the greatest stockpile of nuclear weapons, and proxy wars were fought on their behalf, primarily by the citizens of poorer nations, such as Korea and Vietnam.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h2>Containment Abroad<\/h2>\r\n<\/section><section id=\"fs-idm126830768\" data-depth=\"1\">\r\n<h3>The \"Long Telegram\"<\/h3>\r\n<p id=\"fs-idm194634384\">In February 1946, George Kennan, a State Department official stationed at the U.S. embassy in Moscow, sent an eight-thousand-word message to Washington, DC. In what became known as <strong>the \u201c<span class=\"no-emphasis\" data-type=\"term\">Long Telegram<\/span>,\u201d<\/strong> Kennan maintained that Soviet leaders believed that the only way to protect the Soviet Union was to destroy \u201crival\u201d nations and their influence over weaker nations. According to Kennan, the Soviet Union was not so much a revolutionary regime as a totalitarian bureaucracy that was unable to accept the prospect of a peaceful coexistence with the United States. He advised that the best way to thwart Soviet plans for the world was to limit Soviet influence\u2014primarily through economic policy\u2014to those places where it already existed and prevent its political expansion into new areas. This strategy, which came to be known as the policy of <strong>containment<\/strong>, formed the basis for U.S. foreign policy and military decision making for more than thirty years.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h3>The Domino Theory and the Iron Curtain<\/h3>\r\n<p id=\"fs-idp53720992\">As communist governments came to power elsewhere in the world, American policymakers extended the rationale of containment to what became known as the <strong>domino theory<\/strong> under the Eisenhower administration: Neighbors to communist nations, so was the assumption, were likely to succumb to the same allegedly dangerous and infectious ideology. Like dominos toppling one another, entire regions would eventually be controlled by the Soviets. The demand for anti-communist containment appeared as early as March 1946 in a speech by Winston Churchill, in which he referred to an <strong>Iron Curtain<\/strong> that divided Europe into the \u201cfree\u201d West and the communist East controlled by the Soviet Union.<\/p>\r\n<p id=\"fs-idp4013760\">The commitment to containing Soviet expansion made necessary the ability to mount a strong military offense and defense. In pursuit of this goal, the U.S. military was reorganized under the <strong>National Security Act of 1947<\/strong>. This act streamlined the government in matters of security by creating the National Security Council and establishing the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to conduct surveillance and espionage in foreign nations. It also created the Department of the Air Force, which was combined with the Departments of the Army and Navy in 1949 to form one Department of Defense.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<section id=\"fs-idm157011696\" data-depth=\"2\">\r\n<h2 data-type=\"title\">The Truman Doctrine<\/h2>\r\n<p id=\"fs-idm179186944\">In Europe, the end of World War II witnessed the rise of internal struggles for control of countries that had been occupied by Nazi Germany. Great Britain occupied Greece as the Nazi regime there collapsed. The British aided the authoritarian government of Greece in its battles against Greek communists. In March 1947, Great Britain announced that it could no longer afford the cost of supporting government military activities and withdrew from participation in the <span class=\"no-emphasis\" data-type=\"term\">Greek civil war<\/span>. Stepping into this power vacuum, the United States announced the Truman Doctrine, which offered support to Greece and Turkey in the form of financial assistance, weaponry, and troops to help train their militaries and bolster their governments against communism. Eventually, the program was expanded to include any state trying to withstand a communist takeover. The Truman Doctrine thus became a foundational part of U.S. Cold War policy.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<div class=\"textbox exercises\">\r\n<h3>A Closer Look at The Truman Doctrine<\/h3>\r\n<p id=\"fs-idp181137584\">In 1947, Great Britain, which had assumed responsibility for the disarming of German troops in Greece at the end of World War II, could no longer afford to provide financial support for the authoritarian Greek government, which was attempting to win a civil war against Greek leftist rebels. President Truman, unwilling to allow a communist government to come to power there, requested Congress to provide funds for the government of Greece to continue its fight against the rebels. Truman also requested aid for the government of Turkey to fight the forces of communism in that country. He said:<\/p>\r\n\r\n<blockquote>\r\n<div>\r\n\r\nAt the present moment in world history nearly every nation must choose between alternative ways of life. The choice is too often not a free one.\r\n\r\nShould we fail to aid Greece and Turkey in this fateful hour, the effect will be far reaching to the West as well as to the East.\r\n\r\nThe seeds of totalitarian regimes are nurtured by misery and want. They spread and grow in the evil soil of poverty and strife. They reach their full growth when the hope of a people for a better life has died. We must keep that hope alive.\r\n\r\nThe free peoples of the world look to us for support in maintaining their freedoms.\r\n\r\nIf we falter in our leadership, we may endanger the peace of the world\u2014and we shall surely endanger the welfare of our own nation.\r\n\r\nGreat responsibilities have been placed upon us by the swift movement of events.\r\n\r\nI am confident that the Congress will face these responsibilities squarely.\r\n\r\n<\/div><\/blockquote>\r\n<p id=\"fs-idp87684112\">What role is Truman suggesting that the United States assume in the postwar world? Does the United States still assume this role?<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/section><section id=\"fs-idp32556448\" data-depth=\"2\">\r\n<h2 data-type=\"title\">The Marshall Plan<\/h2>\r\n<p id=\"fs-idm3603184\">By 1946, the American economy was growing significantly. At the same time, the economic situation in Europe was disastrous. The war had turned much of Western Europe into a battlefield, and the rebuilding of factories, public transportation systems, and power stations progressed exceedingly slowly. Starvation loomed as a real possibility for many. As a result of these conditions, communism was making significant inroads in both Italy and France. These concerns led Truman, along with Secretary of State George C. Marshall, to propose to Congress the European Recovery Program, popularly known as the <strong>Marshall Plan<\/strong>. Between its implantation in April 1948 and its termination in 1951, this program gave $13 billion in economic aid to rebuild European nations.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<div class=\"textbox examples\">\r\n<h3>Watch It<\/h3>\r\nThis video summarizes the goals of the Marshall Plan and how the plan led to increased tensions with the Soviet Union.\r\n\r\n<center><iframe src=\"\/\/plugin.3playmedia.com\/show?mf=8202227&amp;p3sdk_version=1.10.1&amp;p=20361&amp;pt=375&amp;video_id=tMXjsVLOznc&amp;video_target=tpm-plugin-ejyzk20v-tMXjsVLOznc\" width=\"800px\" height=\"450px\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0px\" marginheight=\"0px\"><\/iframe><\/center><center>You can view the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/course-building.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/US+history+II\/WhatWastheMarshallPlanHistory.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">transcript for \u201cWhat Was the Marshall Plan? | History\u201d here (opens in new window)<\/a>.<\/center><\/div>\r\n<h3>The Economic, Political, and Humanitarian Motivations of the Marshall Plan<\/h3>\r\n<p id=\"fs-idm97140528\">Truman\u2019s motivation was economic and political, as well as humanitarian. The plan stipulated that the European nations had to work together in order to receive aid, thus enforcing unity through enticement, while seeking to undercut the political popularity of French and Italian Communists and dissuading moderates from forming coalition governments with them. Likewise, much of the money had to be spent on American goods, boosting the postwar economy of the United States as well as the American cultural presence in Europe. Stalin regarded the program as a form of bribery. The Soviet Union refused to accept aid from the Marshall Plan, even though it could have done so, and forbade the Communist states of Eastern Europe to accept U.S. funds as well. Those states that did accept aid began to experience an economic recovery.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<div class=\"textbox tryit\">\r\n<h3>Try It<\/h3>\r\nhttps:\/\/assess.lumenlearning.com\/practice\/315ee08b-e55f-47e8-8545-6cec280fddf3\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"textbox key-takeaways\">\r\n<h3>George C. Marshall and the Nobel Peace Prize<\/h3>\r\n<p id=\"fs-idm89392080\">The youngest child of a Pennsylvania businessman and Democrat, George C. Marshall\u00a0chose a military career. He attended the Virginia Military Institute, was a veteran of World War I, and spent the rest of his life either in the military or otherwise in the service of his country, including as President Truman\u2019s Secretary of State. He was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1953, the only soldier to ever receive that honor. Below is an excerpt of his remarks as he accepted the award.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<figure id=\"CNX_History_28_02_Marshall\">\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignleft\" width=\"195\"]<img src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images-archive-read-only\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/884\/2015\/08\/23203257\/CNX_History_28_02_Marshall.jpg\" alt=\"A photograph of George C. Marshall is shown.\" width=\"195\" height=\"293\" data-media-type=\"image\/jpeg\" \/> <strong>Figure 2<\/strong>. During World War II, George C. Marshall was responsible for expanding the 189,000-member U.S. Army into a modern, fighting force of eight million by 1942. As Secretary of State under Truman, he proposed the European Recovery Program to aid European economies struggling after the war.[\/caption]<\/figure>\r\n<blockquote>\r\n<div>\r\n\r\nThere has been considerable comment over the awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize to a soldier. I am afraid this does not seem as remarkable to me as it quite evidently appears to others. I know a great deal of the horrors and tragedies of war. Today, as chairman of the American Battle Monuments Commission, it is my duty to supervise the construction and maintenance of military cemeteries in many countries overseas, particularly in Western Europe. The cost of war in human lives is constantly spread before me, written neatly in many ledgers whose columns are gravestones. I am deeply moved to find some means or method of avoiding another calamity of war. Almost daily I hear from the wives, or mothers, or families of the fallen. The tragedy of the aftermath is almost constantly before me.\r\n\r\nI share with you an active concern for some practical method for avoiding war.\u00a0.\u00a0.\u00a0. A very strong military posture is vitally necessary today. How long it must continue I am not prepared to estimate, but I am sure that it is too narrow a basis on which to build a dependable, long-enduring peace. The guarantee for a long continued peace will depend on other factors in addition to a moderated military strength, and no less important. Perhaps the most important single factor will be a spiritual regeneration to develop goodwill, faith, and understanding among nations. Economic factors will undoubtedly play an important part. Agreements to secure a balance of power, however disagreeable they may seem, must likewise be considered. And with all these there must be wisdom and the will to act on that wisdom.\r\n\r\n<\/div><\/blockquote>\r\n<p id=\"fs-idp21177552\">What steps did Marshall recommend be taken to maintain a lasting peace? To what extent have today\u2019s nations heeded his advice?<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/section><\/section>\r\n<div class=\"textbox tryit\">\r\n<h3>Try It<\/h3>\r\nhttps:\/\/assess.lumenlearning.com\/practice\/b69d8b6f-2e17-4b4c-bc23-e3919c183c1d\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"textbox exercises\">\r\n<h3>Disagreement Over the Cold War<\/h3>\r\nYou\u2019ve learned about containment and how leaders in the United States reacted to Soviet behavior after World War II. While most U.S. politicians embraced the Cold War and anti-communism, not everybody accepted it immediately.\r\n\r\n<a href=\"http:\/\/historymatters.gmu.edu\/d\/6906\/\">In this letter<\/a> from Henry Wallace to Truman from 1946, Wallace explains why he thinks the United States is making a mistake with the Soviet Union. Wallace had been Franklin Roosevelt\u2019s Secretary of Agriculture, and served as Secretary of Commerce for Truman until 1946, when Truman fired him for making public statements critical of government policy toward the Soviet Union. By reading this, you can learn more about why some people were critical of the U.S. position in the budding Cold War, and which policies or actions they objected to.\r\n\r\nAfter greeting Truman, Wallace asks this: \u201cHow do American actions since V-J Day appear to other nations? I mean by actions the concrete things like $13 billion for the War and Navy Departments, the Bikini tests of the atomic bomb and continued production of bombs\u2026and the effort to secure air bases spread over half the globe from which the other half of the globe can be bombed.\u201d\r\n\r\nIn the next section, Wallace explains why he thinks a buildup of nuclear weapons will only make the world less safe.\r\n<blockquote>\u201cThe flaw in this policy is simply that it will not work. In a world of atomic bombs and other revolutionary new weapons, such as radioactive poison gases and biological warfare, a peace maintained by a predominance of force is no longer possible.\r\n\r\nWhy is this so? The reasons are clear:\r\n\r\nFIRST. Atomic warfare is cheap and easy compared with old-fashioned war\u2026Compared with the cost of large armies and the manufacture of old-fashioned weapons, atomic bombs cost very little and require only a relatively small part of a nation\u2019s production plant and labor force.\r\n\r\nSECOND. So far as winning a war is concerned, having more bombs\u2014even many more bombs\u2014than the other fellow is no longer a decisive advantage. If another nation had enough bombs to eliminate all of our principal cities and our heavy industry, it wouldn\u2019t help us very much if we had ten times as many bombs as we needed to do the same to them.\r\n\r\nTHIRD. And most important, the very fact that several nations have atomic bombs will inevitably result in a neurotic, fear-ridden, itching-trigger psychology in all the peoples of the world, and because of our wealth and vulnerability we would be among the most seriously affected\u2026In a world armed with atomic weapons, some incident will lead to the use of those weapons.\u201d<\/blockquote>\r\nBecause Wallace believed that a preemptive strike would fail, he wanted to find common ground with the Soviet Union: \u201cWe should be prepared to judge her requirements against the background of what we ourselves and the British have insisted upon as essential to our respective security. We should be prepared, even at the expense of risking epithets of appeasement, to agree to reasonable Russian guarantees of security\u2026\u201d\r\n\r\nUltimately, Wallace was ignored by Truman, and his foreign policy views fell out of favor; he later supported the Korean War. However, Wallace\u2019s views about nuclear weapons became mainstream in subsequent decades, with many Americans believing that the nuclear arms race could lead to a catastrophic war.\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"textbox tryit\">\r\n<h3>Try It<\/h3>\r\nhttps:\/\/assess.lumenlearning.com\/practice\/7c7a87e7-611b-416a-95a9-b1e85dda2648\r\n\r\nhttps:\/\/assess.lumenlearning.com\/practice\/66d55614-84d7-4ccb-8dd4-dff8f58a0edc\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"textbox learning-objectives\">\r\n<h3>Glossary<\/h3>\r\n<strong>Cold War:\u00a0<\/strong>the prolonged period of tension between the United States and the Soviet Union, based on ideological conflicts and competition for military, economic, social, and technological superiority, and marked by surveillance and espionage, political assassinations, an arms race, attempts to secure alliances with developing nations, and proxy wars\r\n\r\n<strong>containment:\u00a0<\/strong>the U.S. policy that sought to limit the expansion of communism abroad\r\n\r\n<strong>domino theory:\u00a0<\/strong>the theory that if communism made inroads in one nation, surrounding nations would also succumb one by one, like a chain of dominos toppling one another\r\n\r\n<strong>The Long Telegram:<\/strong>\u00a0George Kennan, a State Department official stationed at the U.S. embassy in Moscow, sent an eight-thousand-word message to Washington, DC communicating that Soviet leaders believed that the only way to protect the Soviet Union was to destroy \u201crival\u201d nations and their influence over weaker nations.\r\n\r\n<strong>Iron Curtain:\u00a0<\/strong>a term coined by Winston Churchill to refer to portions of Eastern Europe that the Soviet Union had incorporated into its sphere of influence and that no longer were free to manage their own affairs\r\n\r\n<strong>Marshall Plan:\u00a0<\/strong>a program giving billions of dollars of U.S. aid to European countries to prevent them from turning to communism\r\n\r\n<strong>The National Security Act of 1947:<\/strong>\u00a0this act streamlined the government in matters of security by creating the National Security Council and establishing the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to conduct surveillance and espionage in foreign nations. It also created the Department of the Air Force, which was combined with the Departments of the Army and Navy in 1949 to form one Department of Defense.\r\n\r\n<\/div>","rendered":"<div class=\"bcc-box bcc-highlight\">\n<h3>Learning Objectives<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Explain how and why the Cold War emerged in the wake of World War II<\/li>\n<li>Describe the steps taken by the U.S. government to oppose the communist expansion in Europe and Asia<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<h2>The U.S. and the Soviet Union Emerge as the World&#8217;s Superpowers<\/h2>\n<p id=\"fs-idp112479456\">As World War II drew to a close, the alliance that had made the United States and the Soviet Union partners in their defeat of the Axis powers\u2014Germany, Italy, and Japan\u2014began to fall apart. Both sides realized that their visions for the future of Europe and the world were incompatible. Joseph Stalin, the premier of the Soviet Union, wished to retain control of Eastern Europe and establish communist,\u00a0pro-Soviet governments there, in an effort to both expand Soviet influence and protect the Soviet Union from future invasions. He also sought to bring the communist revolution to Asia and to developing nations elsewhere in the world. The United States wanted to expand its influence as well by protecting or installing democratic governments throughout the world. It sought to combat the influence of the Soviet Union by forming alliances with Asian, African, and Latin American nations, and by helping these countries to establish or expand free-market economies. The end of the war left the industrialized nations of Europe and Asia physically devastated and economically exhausted by years of invasion, battle, and bombardment. With Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and China reduced to shadows of their former selves, the United States and the Soviet Union emerged as the last two superpowers and quickly found themselves in a contest for military, economic, technological, and ideological supremacy.<\/p>\n<h2>The U.S. Shifts From Isolationism to Engagement: The Potsdam Conference<\/h2>\n<section id=\"fs-idm3903552\" data-depth=\"1\">\n<p id=\"fs-idp71916080\">The United States had a long history of avoiding foreign alliances that might require the commitment of its troops abroad. However, in accepting the realities of the post-World War II world, in which traditional powers like Great Britain or France were no longer strong enough to police the globe, the United States realized that it would have to make a permanent change in its foreign policy, shifting from relative isolation to active engagement.<\/p>\n<p>With Germany\u2019s defeat imminent, the Allies set terms for unconditional surrender. At the same time, deliberation began over reparations, tribunals, and the nature of an occupation regime that would initially be divided into American, British, French, and Soviet zones. Suspicion and mistrust were already mounting. The political landscape was altered drastically by Franklin Roosevelt\u2019s sudden death in April 1945, just days before the inaugural meeting of the UN. Although Roosevelt was skeptical of Stalin, he always held out hope that the Soviets could be brought into the \u201cFree World.\u201d Truman had no such illusions. He committed the United States to a hard-line, anti-Soviet approach.<\/p>\n<p id=\"fs-idm46156000\">On assuming the office of president, Harry Truman was already troubled by Soviet actions in Europe. He disliked the concessions made by Roosevelt at Yalta, which had allowed the Soviet Union to install a Communist government in Poland. At the Potsdam conference, held from July 17 to August 2, 1945, Truman also opposed Stalin\u2019s plans to demand large reparations from Germany.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"CNX_History_28_02_Potsdam\">\n<div style=\"width: 400px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images-archive-read-only\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/884\/2015\/08\/23203256\/CNX_History_28_02_Potsdam.jpg\" alt=\"A photograph shows Clement Atlee, Harry Truman, and Joseph Stalin standing in front of a group of officials.\" width=\"390\" height=\"273\" data-media-type=\"image\/jpeg\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 1<\/strong>. At the postwar conference in Potsdam, Germany, Harry Truman stands between Joseph Stalin (right) and Clement Atlee (left). Atlee became prime minister of Great Britain, replacing Winston Churchill, while the conference was taking place.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<h2>The Cold War<\/h2>\n<p id=\"fs-idm210518768\">Although the United States and the Soviet Union did finally reach an agreement at Potsdam, this was the final occasion on which they cooperated for quite some time. Each remained convinced that its own economic and political system was superior to the other\u2019s, and the two superpowers quickly found themselves drawn into conflict. The decades-long struggle between them for technological and ideological supremacy became known as the <strong>Cold War<\/strong>. So called because it did not include direct military confrontation between Soviet and U.S. troops, the Cold War was fought with a variety of other weapons: espionage and surveillance, political assassinations, propaganda, and the formation of alliances with other nations. It also became an arms race, as both countries competed to build the greatest stockpile of nuclear weapons, and proxy wars were fought on their behalf, primarily by the citizens of poorer nations, such as Korea and Vietnam.<\/p>\n<h2>Containment Abroad<\/h2>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"fs-idm126830768\" data-depth=\"1\">\n<h3>The &#8220;Long Telegram&#8221;<\/h3>\n<p id=\"fs-idm194634384\">In February 1946, George Kennan, a State Department official stationed at the U.S. embassy in Moscow, sent an eight-thousand-word message to Washington, DC. In what became known as <strong>the \u201c<span class=\"no-emphasis\" data-type=\"term\">Long Telegram<\/span>,\u201d<\/strong> Kennan maintained that Soviet leaders believed that the only way to protect the Soviet Union was to destroy \u201crival\u201d nations and their influence over weaker nations. According to Kennan, the Soviet Union was not so much a revolutionary regime as a totalitarian bureaucracy that was unable to accept the prospect of a peaceful coexistence with the United States. He advised that the best way to thwart Soviet plans for the world was to limit Soviet influence\u2014primarily through economic policy\u2014to those places where it already existed and prevent its political expansion into new areas. This strategy, which came to be known as the policy of <strong>containment<\/strong>, formed the basis for U.S. foreign policy and military decision making for more than thirty years.<\/p>\n<h3>The Domino Theory and the Iron Curtain<\/h3>\n<p id=\"fs-idp53720992\">As communist governments came to power elsewhere in the world, American policymakers extended the rationale of containment to what became known as the <strong>domino theory<\/strong> under the Eisenhower administration: Neighbors to communist nations, so was the assumption, were likely to succumb to the same allegedly dangerous and infectious ideology. Like dominos toppling one another, entire regions would eventually be controlled by the Soviets. The demand for anti-communist containment appeared as early as March 1946 in a speech by Winston Churchill, in which he referred to an <strong>Iron Curtain<\/strong> that divided Europe into the \u201cfree\u201d West and the communist East controlled by the Soviet Union.<\/p>\n<p id=\"fs-idp4013760\">The commitment to containing Soviet expansion made necessary the ability to mount a strong military offense and defense. In pursuit of this goal, the U.S. military was reorganized under the <strong>National Security Act of 1947<\/strong>. This act streamlined the government in matters of security by creating the National Security Council and establishing the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to conduct surveillance and espionage in foreign nations. It also created the Department of the Air Force, which was combined with the Departments of the Army and Navy in 1949 to form one Department of Defense.<\/p>\n<section id=\"fs-idm157011696\" data-depth=\"2\">\n<h2 data-type=\"title\">The Truman Doctrine<\/h2>\n<p id=\"fs-idm179186944\">In Europe, the end of World War II witnessed the rise of internal struggles for control of countries that had been occupied by Nazi Germany. Great Britain occupied Greece as the Nazi regime there collapsed. The British aided the authoritarian government of Greece in its battles against Greek communists. In March 1947, Great Britain announced that it could no longer afford the cost of supporting government military activities and withdrew from participation in the <span class=\"no-emphasis\" data-type=\"term\">Greek civil war<\/span>. Stepping into this power vacuum, the United States announced the Truman Doctrine, which offered support to Greece and Turkey in the form of financial assistance, weaponry, and troops to help train their militaries and bolster their governments against communism. Eventually, the program was expanded to include any state trying to withstand a communist takeover. The Truman Doctrine thus became a foundational part of U.S. Cold War policy.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox exercises\">\n<h3>A Closer Look at The Truman Doctrine<\/h3>\n<p id=\"fs-idp181137584\">In 1947, Great Britain, which had assumed responsibility for the disarming of German troops in Greece at the end of World War II, could no longer afford to provide financial support for the authoritarian Greek government, which was attempting to win a civil war against Greek leftist rebels. President Truman, unwilling to allow a communist government to come to power there, requested Congress to provide funds for the government of Greece to continue its fight against the rebels. Truman also requested aid for the government of Turkey to fight the forces of communism in that country. He said:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<div>\n<p>At the present moment in world history nearly every nation must choose between alternative ways of life. The choice is too often not a free one.<\/p>\n<p>Should we fail to aid Greece and Turkey in this fateful hour, the effect will be far reaching to the West as well as to the East.<\/p>\n<p>The seeds of totalitarian regimes are nurtured by misery and want. They spread and grow in the evil soil of poverty and strife. They reach their full growth when the hope of a people for a better life has died. We must keep that hope alive.<\/p>\n<p>The free peoples of the world look to us for support in maintaining their freedoms.<\/p>\n<p>If we falter in our leadership, we may endanger the peace of the world\u2014and we shall surely endanger the welfare of our own nation.<\/p>\n<p>Great responsibilities have been placed upon us by the swift movement of events.<\/p>\n<p>I am confident that the Congress will face these responsibilities squarely.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p id=\"fs-idp87684112\">What role is Truman suggesting that the United States assume in the postwar world? Does the United States still assume this role?<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"fs-idp32556448\" data-depth=\"2\">\n<h2 data-type=\"title\">The Marshall Plan<\/h2>\n<p id=\"fs-idm3603184\">By 1946, the American economy was growing significantly. At the same time, the economic situation in Europe was disastrous. The war had turned much of Western Europe into a battlefield, and the rebuilding of factories, public transportation systems, and power stations progressed exceedingly slowly. Starvation loomed as a real possibility for many. As a result of these conditions, communism was making significant inroads in both Italy and France. These concerns led Truman, along with Secretary of State George C. Marshall, to propose to Congress the European Recovery Program, popularly known as the <strong>Marshall Plan<\/strong>. Between its implantation in April 1948 and its termination in 1951, this program gave $13 billion in economic aid to rebuild European nations.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox examples\">\n<h3>Watch It<\/h3>\n<p>This video summarizes the goals of the Marshall Plan and how the plan led to increased tensions with the Soviet Union.<\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: center;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"\/\/plugin.3playmedia.com\/show?mf=8202227&amp;p3sdk_version=1.10.1&amp;p=20361&amp;pt=375&amp;video_id=tMXjsVLOznc&amp;video_target=tpm-plugin-ejyzk20v-tMXjsVLOznc\" width=\"800px\" height=\"450px\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0px\" marginheight=\"0px\"><\/iframe><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: center;\">You can view the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/course-building.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/US+history+II\/WhatWastheMarshallPlanHistory.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">transcript for \u201cWhat Was the Marshall Plan? | History\u201d here (opens in new window)<\/a>.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h3>The Economic, Political, and Humanitarian Motivations of the Marshall Plan<\/h3>\n<p id=\"fs-idm97140528\">Truman\u2019s motivation was economic and political, as well as humanitarian. The plan stipulated that the European nations had to work together in order to receive aid, thus enforcing unity through enticement, while seeking to undercut the political popularity of French and Italian Communists and dissuading moderates from forming coalition governments with them. Likewise, much of the money had to be spent on American goods, boosting the postwar economy of the United States as well as the American cultural presence in Europe. Stalin regarded the program as a form of bribery. The Soviet Union refused to accept aid from the Marshall Plan, even though it could have done so, and forbade the Communist states of Eastern Europe to accept U.S. funds as well. Those states that did accept aid began to experience an economic recovery.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox tryit\">\n<h3>Try It<\/h3>\n<p>\t<iframe id=\"assessment_practice_315ee08b-e55f-47e8-8545-6cec280fddf3\" class=\"resizable\" src=\"https:\/\/assess.lumenlearning.com\/practice\/315ee08b-e55f-47e8-8545-6cec280fddf3?iframe_resize_id=assessment_practice_id_315ee08b-e55f-47e8-8545-6cec280fddf3\" frameborder=\"0\" style=\"border:none;width:100%;height:100%;min-height:300px;\"><br \/>\n\t<\/iframe><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"textbox key-takeaways\">\n<h3>George C. Marshall and the Nobel Peace Prize<\/h3>\n<p id=\"fs-idm89392080\">The youngest child of a Pennsylvania businessman and Democrat, George C. Marshall\u00a0chose a military career. He attended the Virginia Military Institute, was a veteran of World War I, and spent the rest of his life either in the military or otherwise in the service of his country, including as President Truman\u2019s Secretary of State. He was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1953, the only soldier to ever receive that honor. Below is an excerpt of his remarks as he accepted the award.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"CNX_History_28_02_Marshall\">\n<div style=\"width: 205px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images-archive-read-only\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/884\/2015\/08\/23203257\/CNX_History_28_02_Marshall.jpg\" alt=\"A photograph of George C. Marshall is shown.\" width=\"195\" height=\"293\" data-media-type=\"image\/jpeg\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 2<\/strong>. During World War II, George C. Marshall was responsible for expanding the 189,000-member U.S. Army into a modern, fighting force of eight million by 1942. As Secretary of State under Truman, he proposed the European Recovery Program to aid European economies struggling after the war.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<blockquote>\n<div>\n<p>There has been considerable comment over the awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize to a soldier. I am afraid this does not seem as remarkable to me as it quite evidently appears to others. I know a great deal of the horrors and tragedies of war. Today, as chairman of the American Battle Monuments Commission, it is my duty to supervise the construction and maintenance of military cemeteries in many countries overseas, particularly in Western Europe. The cost of war in human lives is constantly spread before me, written neatly in many ledgers whose columns are gravestones. I am deeply moved to find some means or method of avoiding another calamity of war. Almost daily I hear from the wives, or mothers, or families of the fallen. The tragedy of the aftermath is almost constantly before me.<\/p>\n<p>I share with you an active concern for some practical method for avoiding war.\u00a0.\u00a0.\u00a0. A very strong military posture is vitally necessary today. How long it must continue I am not prepared to estimate, but I am sure that it is too narrow a basis on which to build a dependable, long-enduring peace. The guarantee for a long continued peace will depend on other factors in addition to a moderated military strength, and no less important. Perhaps the most important single factor will be a spiritual regeneration to develop goodwill, faith, and understanding among nations. Economic factors will undoubtedly play an important part. Agreements to secure a balance of power, however disagreeable they may seem, must likewise be considered. And with all these there must be wisdom and the will to act on that wisdom.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p id=\"fs-idp21177552\">What steps did Marshall recommend be taken to maintain a lasting peace? To what extent have today\u2019s nations heeded his advice?<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/section>\n<div class=\"textbox tryit\">\n<h3>Try It<\/h3>\n<p>\t<iframe id=\"assessment_practice_b69d8b6f-2e17-4b4c-bc23-e3919c183c1d\" class=\"resizable\" src=\"https:\/\/assess.lumenlearning.com\/practice\/b69d8b6f-2e17-4b4c-bc23-e3919c183c1d?iframe_resize_id=assessment_practice_id_b69d8b6f-2e17-4b4c-bc23-e3919c183c1d\" frameborder=\"0\" style=\"border:none;width:100%;height:100%;min-height:300px;\"><br \/>\n\t<\/iframe><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"textbox exercises\">\n<h3>Disagreement Over the Cold War<\/h3>\n<p>You\u2019ve learned about containment and how leaders in the United States reacted to Soviet behavior after World War II. While most U.S. politicians embraced the Cold War and anti-communism, not everybody accepted it immediately.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/historymatters.gmu.edu\/d\/6906\/\">In this letter<\/a> from Henry Wallace to Truman from 1946, Wallace explains why he thinks the United States is making a mistake with the Soviet Union. Wallace had been Franklin Roosevelt\u2019s Secretary of Agriculture, and served as Secretary of Commerce for Truman until 1946, when Truman fired him for making public statements critical of government policy toward the Soviet Union. By reading this, you can learn more about why some people were critical of the U.S. position in the budding Cold War, and which policies or actions they objected to.<\/p>\n<p>After greeting Truman, Wallace asks this: \u201cHow do American actions since V-J Day appear to other nations? I mean by actions the concrete things like $13 billion for the War and Navy Departments, the Bikini tests of the atomic bomb and continued production of bombs\u2026and the effort to secure air bases spread over half the globe from which the other half of the globe can be bombed.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In the next section, Wallace explains why he thinks a buildup of nuclear weapons will only make the world less safe.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cThe flaw in this policy is simply that it will not work. In a world of atomic bombs and other revolutionary new weapons, such as radioactive poison gases and biological warfare, a peace maintained by a predominance of force is no longer possible.<\/p>\n<p>Why is this so? The reasons are clear:<\/p>\n<p>FIRST. Atomic warfare is cheap and easy compared with old-fashioned war\u2026Compared with the cost of large armies and the manufacture of old-fashioned weapons, atomic bombs cost very little and require only a relatively small part of a nation\u2019s production plant and labor force.<\/p>\n<p>SECOND. So far as winning a war is concerned, having more bombs\u2014even many more bombs\u2014than the other fellow is no longer a decisive advantage. If another nation had enough bombs to eliminate all of our principal cities and our heavy industry, it wouldn\u2019t help us very much if we had ten times as many bombs as we needed to do the same to them.<\/p>\n<p>THIRD. And most important, the very fact that several nations have atomic bombs will inevitably result in a neurotic, fear-ridden, itching-trigger psychology in all the peoples of the world, and because of our wealth and vulnerability we would be among the most seriously affected\u2026In a world armed with atomic weapons, some incident will lead to the use of those weapons.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Because Wallace believed that a preemptive strike would fail, he wanted to find common ground with the Soviet Union: \u201cWe should be prepared to judge her requirements against the background of what we ourselves and the British have insisted upon as essential to our respective security. We should be prepared, even at the expense of risking epithets of appeasement, to agree to reasonable Russian guarantees of security\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Ultimately, Wallace was ignored by Truman, and his foreign policy views fell out of favor; he later supported the Korean War. However, Wallace\u2019s views about nuclear weapons became mainstream in subsequent decades, with many Americans believing that the nuclear arms race could lead to a catastrophic war.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"textbox tryit\">\n<h3>Try It<\/h3>\n<p>\t<iframe id=\"assessment_practice_7c7a87e7-611b-416a-95a9-b1e85dda2648\" class=\"resizable\" src=\"https:\/\/assess.lumenlearning.com\/practice\/7c7a87e7-611b-416a-95a9-b1e85dda2648?iframe_resize_id=assessment_practice_id_7c7a87e7-611b-416a-95a9-b1e85dda2648\" frameborder=\"0\" style=\"border:none;width:100%;height:100%;min-height:300px;\"><br \/>\n\t<\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>\t<iframe id=\"assessment_practice_66d55614-84d7-4ccb-8dd4-dff8f58a0edc\" class=\"resizable\" src=\"https:\/\/assess.lumenlearning.com\/practice\/66d55614-84d7-4ccb-8dd4-dff8f58a0edc?iframe_resize_id=assessment_practice_id_66d55614-84d7-4ccb-8dd4-dff8f58a0edc\" frameborder=\"0\" style=\"border:none;width:100%;height:100%;min-height:300px;\"><br \/>\n\t<\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"textbox learning-objectives\">\n<h3>Glossary<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Cold War:\u00a0<\/strong>the prolonged period of tension between the United States and the Soviet Union, based on ideological conflicts and competition for military, economic, social, and technological superiority, and marked by surveillance and espionage, political assassinations, an arms race, attempts to secure alliances with developing nations, and proxy wars<\/p>\n<p><strong>containment:\u00a0<\/strong>the U.S. policy that sought to limit the expansion of communism abroad<\/p>\n<p><strong>domino theory:\u00a0<\/strong>the theory that if communism made inroads in one nation, surrounding nations would also succumb one by one, like a chain of dominos toppling one another<\/p>\n<p><strong>The Long Telegram:<\/strong>\u00a0George Kennan, a State Department official stationed at the U.S. embassy in Moscow, sent an eight-thousand-word message to Washington, DC communicating that Soviet leaders believed that the only way to protect the Soviet Union was to destroy \u201crival\u201d nations and their influence over weaker nations.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Iron Curtain:\u00a0<\/strong>a term coined by Winston Churchill to refer to portions of Eastern Europe that the Soviet Union had incorporated into its sphere of influence and that no longer were free to manage their own affairs<\/p>\n<p><strong>Marshall Plan:\u00a0<\/strong>a program giving billions of dollars of U.S. aid to European countries to prevent them from turning to communism<\/p>\n<p><strong>The National Security Act of 1947:<\/strong>\u00a0this act streamlined the government in matters of security by creating the National Security Council and establishing the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to conduct surveillance and espionage in foreign nations. It also created the Department of the Air Force, which was combined with the Departments of the Army and Navy in 1949 to form one Department of Defense.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t <section class=\"citations-section\" role=\"contentinfo\">\n\t\t\t <h3>Candela Citations<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t <div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t <div id=\"citation-list-342\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <div class=\"licensing\"><div class=\"license-attribution-dropdown-subheading\">CC licensed content, Original<\/div><ul class=\"citation-list\"><li>Disagreement Over the Cold War section. <strong>Authored by<\/strong>: Zeb Larson for Lumen Learning. <strong>Provided by<\/strong>: Lumen Learning. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"license\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/\">CC BY: Attribution<\/a><\/em><\/li><li>Modification, adaptation, and original content. <strong>Authored by<\/strong>: Scott Barr fo Lumen Learning. <strong>Provided by<\/strong>: Lumen Learning. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"license\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-SA: Attribution-ShareAlike<\/a><\/em><\/li><\/ul><div class=\"license-attribution-dropdown-subheading\">CC licensed content, Shared previously<\/div><ul class=\"citation-list\"><li>US History. <strong>Provided by<\/strong>: OpenStax. <strong>Located at<\/strong>: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/openstaxcollege.org\/textbooks\/us-history\">http:\/\/openstaxcollege.org\/textbooks\/us-history<\/a>. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"license\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/\">CC BY: Attribution<\/a><\/em>. <strong>License Terms<\/strong>: Access for free at https:\/\/openstax.org\/books\/us-history\/pages\/1-introduction<\/li><li><strong>Provided by<\/strong>: Crash Course. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em>All Rights Reserved<\/em>. <strong>License Terms<\/strong>: Standard YouTube License<\/li><li>Paragraph about the Cold War. <strong>Located at<\/strong>: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/digitalcommons.northgeorgia.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&#038;context=books\">https:\/\/digitalcommons.northgeorgia.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&#038;context=books<\/a>. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"license\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/about\/pdm\">Public Domain: No Known Copyright<\/a><\/em><\/li><li>The Cold War. <strong>Provided by<\/strong>: American Yawp. <strong>Located at<\/strong>: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.americanyawp.com\/text\/25-the-cold-war\/\">https:\/\/www.americanyawp.com\/text\/25-the-cold-war\/<\/a>. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"license\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/4.0\/\">CC BY-SA: Attribution-ShareAlike<\/a><\/em><\/li><\/ul><div class=\"license-attribution-dropdown-subheading\">All rights reserved content<\/div><ul class=\"citation-list\"><li>The Marshall Plan. <strong>Provided by<\/strong>: History. <strong>Located at<\/strong>: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=tMXjsVLOznc\">https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=tMXjsVLOznc<\/a>. <strong>License<\/strong>: <em>Other<\/em>. <strong>License Terms<\/strong>: Standard YouTube License<\/li><\/ul><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t <\/section>","protected":false},"author":19,"menu_order":4,"template":"","meta":{"_candela_citation":"[{\"type\":\"cc\",\"description\":\"US History\",\"author\":\"\",\"organization\":\"OpenStax\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/openstaxcollege.org\/textbooks\/us-history\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"cc-by\",\"license_terms\":\"Access for free at https:\/\/openstax.org\/books\/us-history\/pages\/1-introduction\"},{\"type\":\"cc\",\"description\":\"\",\"author\":\"\",\"organization\":\"Crash Course\",\"url\":\"\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"arr\",\"license_terms\":\"Standard YouTube License\"},{\"type\":\"cc\",\"description\":\"Paragraph about the Cold War\",\"author\":\"\",\"organization\":\"\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/digitalcommons.northgeorgia.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=books\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"pd\",\"license_terms\":\"\"},{\"type\":\"cc\",\"description\":\"The Cold War\",\"author\":\"\",\"organization\":\"American Yawp\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.americanyawp.com\/text\/25-the-cold-war\/\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"cc-by-sa\",\"license_terms\":\"\"},{\"type\":\"copyrighted_video\",\"description\":\"The Marshall Plan\",\"author\":\"\",\"organization\":\"History\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=tMXjsVLOznc\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"other\",\"license_terms\":\"Standard YouTube License\"},{\"type\":\"original\",\"description\":\"Disagreement Over the Cold War section\",\"author\":\"Zeb Larson for Lumen Learning\",\"organization\":\"Lumen Learning\",\"url\":\"\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"cc-by\",\"license_terms\":\"\"},{\"type\":\"original\",\"description\":\"Modification, adaptation, and original content\",\"author\":\"Scott Barr fo Lumen Learning\",\"organization\":\"Lumen Learning\",\"url\":\"\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"cc-by-sa\",\"license_terms\":\"\"}]","CANDELA_OUTCOMES_GUID":"1392addf-96f2-42ee-9296-047516f00db3,6671eb8b-7c7c-4b30-ae5a-d369c9fa1428,fbff99d2-6ba6-4c6b-b6f0-966a3238e137","pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-342","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry"],"part":331,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-ushistory2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/342","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-ushistory2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-ushistory2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-ushistory2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/19"}],"version-history":[{"count":55,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-ushistory2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/342\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9529,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-ushistory2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/342\/revisions\/9529"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-ushistory2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/331"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-ushistory2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/342\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-ushistory2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=342"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-ushistory2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=342"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-ushistory2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=342"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.lumenlearning.com\/wm-ushistory2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=342"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}