Putting It Together: Differential Equations

Chapter Opener: Examining the Carrying Capacity of a Deer Population

This is a photograph of a deer.

(credit: modification of work by Rachel Kramer, Flickr)

Let’s consider the population of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in the state of Kentucky. The Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources (KDFWR) sets guidelines for hunting and fishing in the state. Before the hunting season of 2004, it estimated a population of 900,000 deer. Johnson notes: “A deer population that has plenty to eat and is not hunted by humans or other predators will double every three years.” (George Johnson, “The Problem of Exploding Deer Populations Has No Attractive Solutions,” January 12,2001, accessed April 9, 2015, http://www.txtwriter.com/onscience/Articles/deerpops.html.) This observation corresponds to a rate of increase r=ln(2)3=0.2311, so the approximate growth rate is 23.11% per year. (This assumes that the population grows exponentially, which is reasonable––at least in the short term––with plentiful food supply and no predators.) The KDFWR also reports deer population densities for 32 counties in Kentucky, the average of which is approximately 27 deer per square mile. Suppose this is the deer density for the whole state (39,732 square miles). The carrying capacity K is 39,732 square miles times 27 deer per square mile, or 1,072,764 deer.

  1. For this application, we have P0=900,000,K=1,072,764, and r=0.2311. Substitute these values into the logistic differential equation and form the initial-value problem.
  2. Solve the initial-value problem from part a.
  3. According to this model, what will be the population in 3 years? Recall that the doubling time predicted by Johnson for the deer population was 3 years. How do these values compare?
  4. Suppose the population managed to reach 1,200,000 deer. What does the logistic equation predict will happen to the population in this scenario?

 

Watch the following video to see the worked solution to Chapter Opener: Examining the Carrying Capacity of a Deer Population

You can view the transcript for “4.4.3” here (opens in new window).

Now that we have the solution to the initial-value problem, we can choose values for P0,r, and K and study the solution curve. Above, we used the values r=0.2311,K=1,072,764, and an initial population of 900,000 deer. This leads to the solution P(t)=P0Kert(KP0)+P0ert=900,000(1,072,764)e0.2311t(1,072,764900,000)+900,000e0.2311t=900,000(1,072,764)e0.2311t172,764+900,000e0.2311t.
 

Dividing top and bottom by 900,000 gives

P(t)=1,072,764e0.2311t0.19196+e0.2311t.

 

This is the same as the original solution. The graph of this solution is shown again in blue in Figure 3, superimposed over the graph of the exponential growth model with initial population 900,000 and growth rate 0.2311 (appearing in green). The red dashed line represents the carrying capacity, and is a horizontal asymptote for the solution to the logistic equation.

A graph showing exponential and logistic growth for the same initial population of 900,000 organisms and growth rate of 23.11%. Both begin in quadrant two close to the x-axis as increasing concave up curves. The exponential growth curve continues to grow, passing P = 1,072,764 while still in quadrant two. The logistic growth curve changes concavity, crosses the x-axis at P_0 = 900,000, and asymptotically approaches P = 1,072,764.

Figure 3. A comparison of exponential versus logistic growth for the same initial population of 900,000 organisms and growth rate of 23.11%.

Working under the assumption that the population grows according to the logistic differential equation, this graph predicts that approximately 20 years earlier (1984), the growth of the population was very close to exponential. The net growth rate at that time would have been around 23.1% per year. As time goes on, the two graphs separate. This happens because the population increases, and the logistic differential equation states that the growth rate decreases as the population increases. At the time the population was measured (2004), it was close to carrying capacity, and the population was starting to level off.