Telescoping Series

Learning Outcomes

  • Evaluate a telescoping series

Consider the series n=11n(n+1). We discussed this series in the example: Evaluating Limits of Sequences of Partial Sums, showing that the series converges by writing out the first several partial sums S1,S2,,S6 and noticing that they are all of the form Sk=kk+1. Here we use a different technique to show that this series converges. By using partial fractions, we can write

1n(n+1)=1n1n+1.

 

Therefore, the series can be written as

n=1[1n1n+1]=(1+12)+(1213)+(1314)+.

 

Writing out the first several terms in the sequence of partial sums {Sk}, we see that

S1=112S2=(112)+(1213)=113S3=(112)+(1213)+(1314)=114.

 

In general,

Sk=(112)+(1213)+(1314)++(1k1k+1)=11k+1.

 

We notice that the middle terms cancel each other out, leaving only the first and last terms. In a sense, the series collapses like a spyglass with tubes that disappear into each other to shorten the telescope. For this reason, we call a series that has this property a telescoping series. For this series, since Sk=11(k+1) and 1(k+1)0 as k, the sequence of partial sums converges to 1, and therefore the series converges to 1.

Definition


A telescoping series is a series in which most of the terms cancel in each of the partial sums, leaving only some of the first terms and some of the last terms.

For example, any series of the form

n=1[bnbn+1]=(b1b2)+(b2b3)+(b3b4)+

 

is a telescoping series. We can see this by writing out some of the partial sums. In particular, we see that

S1=b1b2S2=(b1b2)+(b2b3)=b1b3S3=(b1b2)+(b2b3)+(b3b4)=b1b4.

 

In general, the kth partial sum of this series is

Sk=b1bk+1.

 

Since the kth partial sum can be simplified to the difference of these two terms, the sequence of partial sums {Sk} will converge if and only if the sequence {bk+1} converges. Moreover, if the sequence bk+1 converges to some finite number B, then the sequence of partial sums converges to b1B, and therefore

n=1[bnbn+1]=b1B.

 

In the next example, we show how to use these ideas to analyze a telescoping series of this form.

Example: Evaluating a Telescoping Series

Determine whether the telescoping series

n=1[cos(1n)cos(1n+1)]

 

converges or diverges. If it converges, find its sum.

try it

Determine whether n=1[e1ne1(n+1)] converges or diverges. If it converges, find its sum.

Watch the following video to see the worked solution to the above Try IT.

For closed captioning, open the video on its original page by clicking the Youtube logo in the lower right-hand corner of the video display. In YouTube, the video will begin at the same starting point as this clip, but will continue playing until the very end.

You can view the transcript for this segmented clip of “5.2.3” here (opens in new window).

Try It

Activity: Euler’s Constant

We have shown that the harmonic series n=11n diverges. Here we investigate the behavior of the partial sums Sk as k. In particular, we show that they behave like the natural logarithm function by showing that there exists a constant γ such that

n=1k1nlnkγask.

 

This constant γ is known as Euler’s constant.

  1. Let Tk=n=1k1nlnk. Evaluate Tk for various values of k.
  2. For Tk as defined in part 1. show that the sequence {Tk} converges by using the following steps.
    1. Show that the sequence {Tk} is monotone decreasing. (Hint: Show that ln(1+1k>1(k+1))
    2. Show that the sequence {Tk} is bounded below by zero. (Hint: Express lnk as a definite integral.)
    3. Use the Monotone Convergence Theorem to conclude that the sequence {Tk} converges. The limit γ is Euler’s constant.
  3. Now estimate how far Tk is from γ for a given integer k. Prove that for k1, 0<Tkγ1k by using the following steps.
    1. Show that ln(k+1)lnk<1k.
    2. Use the result from part a. to show that for any integer k,

      TkTk+1<1k1k+1.

       

    3. For any integers k and j such that j>k, express TkTj as a telescoping sum by writing

      TkTj=(TkTk+1)+(Tk+1Tk+2)+(Tk+2Tk+3)++(Tj1Tj).



      Use the result from part b. combined with this telescoping sum to conclude that

      TkTj<1k1j.

       

    4. Apply the limit to both sides of the inequality in part c. to conclude that

      Tkγ1k.

       

    5. Estimate γ to an accuracy of within 0.001.