For this assignment, review the feedback posted from your peer review, work your way through the revising and proofreading stages of your writing process, then submit your final version.
Assignment Instructions
STEP 1: Review the grading rubric below, and familiarize yourself with the expectations of your final draft.
STEP 2: Locate and review the feedback you received on your Argument Essay draft. Based on the feedback you received and the requirements provided in the rubric, revise and proofread your essay to create a final draft.
Ensure that your paper meets the following formatting guidelines:
- 3–4 typed, double-spaced pages (about 600–750 words), 12 pt font size, Times New Roman
- MLA formatting (see the MLA Format page as needed)
- Submitted as either a .doc, .docx, .rtf file.
Papers submitted that do not meet these formatting requirements will be returned to you ungraded.
STEP 3: Submit your final draft of your Argument Essay as a single file upload.
Rubric
Grading Rubric: Argument Essay—Final Draft |
|||
Criteria | Rating: Meets Expectation | Approaching Expectation | Point Total: 100 |
Ideas | The paper demonstrates outstanding or above average idea development, with a thesis that articulates a clear stance about a controversial topic. | The writer sufficiently defines the topic, even though development is still basic or general. | __/30 pts |
Content | The paper demonstrates outstanding or above average evidence of supporting the main point with at least three lives of reasoning. Paragraphs are well-developed and clear, demonstrating research about the topic. Research may include examples, testimony, and fact/data that supports your position. | The writer demonstrates sufficient support of the main point, but could use more supporting details. | __/30 pts |
Organization | The organization is clear and showcases the central theme. The presentation of information is compelling. Opposing viewpoints are addressed in a logical way, and refuted. | The organizational structure is strong enough to move the reader through the text without too much confusion. | __/30 pts |
Word Choice, Sentence Fluency, Conventions | The writer demonstrates an outstanding word choice selection, flow and cadence, with well-built sentences and strong grasp of standard writing conventions. | The writer demonstrates sufficient selection of words. The text tends to be more mechanical and contains some errors of standard writing conventions. | __/10 pts |
Candela Citations
- Provided by: Lumen Learning. Located at: http://lumenlearning.com/. License: CC BY: Attribution
- Authored by: Daryl Smith O' Hare and Susan C. Hines. Provided by: Chadron State College. Project: Kaleidoscope Open Course Initiative. License: CC BY: Attribution
- Authored by: Paul Powell. Provided by: Central Community College. Project: Kaleidoscope Open Course Initiative. License: CC BY: Attribution