For this assignment, review the feedback posted from your peer review, work your way through the revising and proofreading stages of your writing process, then submit your final version.
Assignment Instructions
- Review the grading rubric as listed on this page.
- Review the feedback posted from your peer review
- Work through the revising and proofreading stages of the writing process.
- Create a final version of your Argument Essay according to the following. Papers submitted that do not meet the requirements will be returned to you ungraded.
- Minimum of 4 typed, double-spaced pages (about 800–950 words), Times New Roman, 12 pt font size (not including the Works Cited page)
- Minimum of 3 credible outside sources formatted on a source page (MLA, Works Cited)
- MLA formatting
- Submit your final version of your Argument Essay as a single file upload.
Rubric
Grading Rubric: Argument Essay—Final Draft |
|||
Criteria | Rating: Meets Expectation | Approaching Expectation | Point Total: 100 |
Ideas | The paper demonstrates outstanding or above average idea development, with a thesis that articulates a clear stance about a controversial topic. | The writer sufficiently defines the topic, even though development is still basic or general. | __/30 pts |
Content | The paper demonstrates outstanding or above average evidence of supporting the main point with at least three lives of reasoning. Paragraphs are well-developed and clear, demonstrating research about the topic. Research may include examples, testimony, and fact/data that supports your position. | The writer demonstrates sufficient support of the main point, but could use more supporting details. | __/30 pts |
Organization | The organization is clear and showcases the central theme. The presentation of information is compelling. Opposing viewpoints are addressed in a logical way, and refuted. | The organizational structure is strong enough to move the reader through the text without too much confusion. | __/30 pts |
Word Choice, Sentence Fluency, Conventions | The writer demonstrates an outstanding word choice selection, flow and cadence, with well-built sentences and strong grasp of standard writing conventions. | The writer demonstrates sufficient selection of words. The text tends to be more mechanical and contains some errors of standard writing conventions. | __/10 pts |
Candela Citations
CC licensed content, Original
- Provided by: Lumen Learning. Located at: http://lumenlearning.com/. License: CC BY: Attribution
CC licensed content, Shared previously
- Authored by: Daryl Smith O' Hare and Susan C. Hines. Provided by: Chadron State College. Project: Kaleidoscope Open Course Initiative. License: CC BY: Attribution
- Authored by: Paul Powell. Provided by: Central Community College. Project: Kaleidoscope Open Course Initiative. License: CC BY: Attribution