12.7 Optional Case Study: Leadership Development at Starbucks

 

Figure 12.15 Source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/94/starbucks_in_WashingtonDC.jpg by Elvert Barnes.

Leadership development is a core element of the business process at Starbucks, which ensures that the organizational culture of the company is maintained with every CEO successor. Starbucks is forward looking in this respect and strives to attract future business leaders and managers. The idea of planning for one’s own succession can often make people uneasy, but this idea is openly embraced at Starbucks. The company plans far in advance to replace its top-level successors. The importance of leadership is not only ingrained in the upper management team, but Starbucks also ensures that this is an understood value throughout the organization. In 2004, the Coffee Master program was introduced to teach employees about regional coffee flavors. Graduates of the Coffee Master program earn a prestigious black apron and a special insignia on their business cards. In creating this ethos, Starbucks excels at its ability to attract an educated workforce with a high satisfaction level where individuals often move up to become effective leaders within the company.

With the recession of 2009, Starbucks has been forced to rethink its traditional strategy of accelerated growth by closing over 30,000 stores. CEO Howard Schultz has cut his salary to less than $10,000 a year, down from $1.2 million. Despite these slowdowns, Starbucks continues to call employees “partners” and offers a dynamic place to work. As a result, the company had more than 150,000 people apply for jobs last year, a sure indication that the company’s ability to cultivate talented leaders is as strong as ever.

Discussion Questions

  1. Why does Starbucks Coffee consider internal leadership development such an important part of its core business process?
  2. What possible negative repercussions can the aggressive growth strategy that Starbucks exhibits have on its leadership agenda?
  3. With the slowdown of business, how can Starbucks ensure that the importance of leadership development does not get overlooked?
  4. How does your experience with leadership and management compare with the case of Starbucks?