In this discussion, you will apply the SPARK strategy to create meaningful and supportive peer review questions for your class. The SPARK approach helps ensure that feedback is Specific, Prescriptive, Actionable, Referenced, and Kind. Using SPARK effectively can make the peer review process beneficial for both the reviewer and the writer.

Discussion Instructions

STEP 1: First, review what the acronym SPARK stands for:

• Specific: Provide clear and detailed feedback instead of vague comments like “Good introduction.” Explain why something is effective or where improvements could be made.
• Prescriptive: Offer concrete suggestions to address identified issues. If the thesis lacks clarity, suggest ways to refine or clarify it.
• Actionable: Ensure your feedback provides clear steps that the writer can act on.
• Referenced: Connect your feedback to the assignment guidelines or grading criteria.
• Kind: Deliver feedback with a respectful and supportive tone. Constructive criticism should help, not discourage.

STEP 2: Next, you will work collaboratively in groups of four to brainstorm a total of five thoughtful questions for peer review. These questions should help guide classmates in evaluating and improving each other’s writing. When brainstorming, consider what kind of feedback would be most helpful to receive on your own writing.

STEP 3: Choose one or two questions from your group’s discussion and post them in the forum. Your questions should reflect the SPARK principles, encouraging constructive and helpful feedback.

STEP 4: Read and respond to two classmates’ posts. Each response should be less than 250 words. In your response, provide feedback on their proposed questions. Are the questions clear, constructive, and aligned with the SPARK principles? Suggest any refinements to make the questions more effective for peer review. Additionally, if you find a question particularly useful, explain why you think it will generate meaningful feedback.

Rubric