Module 12 Discussion: Commonalities and Conflict Among Civil Rights Movements 

In this module, we learned about the work of several different movements and activist groups who were striving to make the United States a more just and inclusive nation. In this discussion forum, you’ll pick at least two of these movements and compare their goals and strategies.

Step 1: First, pick at least two movements to compare.

  • African American civil rights movement
  • Black Power
  • Mexican American civil rights movement
  • Chicano movement
  • Student movements (such as La Raza Unida, SDS, and Berkeley Free Speech)
  • Women’s movement

Step 2: In the discussion form, answer the following:

  • What goals and/or strategies did these movements share in common?
    • Examples of movements’ goals included voting rights, antidiscrimination legislation, or an end to poverty, among others.
    • The movements’ strategies included, but were not limited to, sit-ins, protests, grassroots initiatives, and literary publications.
  • In what ways did their goals and/or strategies conflict?

This step can be completed in one of two ways:

  1. A written response of approximately a paragraph discussing the two movements goals/strategies.
  2. A Venn diagram listing the goals and/or strategies of the movements, with commonalities listed in the middle. One to two brief sentences summarizing the diagram will help peers understand your ideas.

Step 3: Respond in two separate posts to two classmates (in at least 75 words).

  • Explicitly address their examples and try to extend, complicate, or redirect their points in a substantive, knowledge-demonstrating way.
  • Be sure to cite relevant concepts and key terms from the reading.

Tip: You may respond to peers in any way that is respectful and focuses on what your classmate wrote. However, the following prompts may help you craft your reply:

  • Does your peer’s post contain ideas similar to what you wrote about? If so, this is a great opportunity to point out commonalities or differences among multiple organizations, not just the two in the post.
  • Did you notice something in the module readings related to a classmate’s post? Consider sharing this example and explaining how it reinforces or contradicts their post.
  • Ask a peer for their take on something that doesn’t make sense to you or that you didn’t notice in the module.

Rubric

Please customize as needed.

Criteria Developing Satisfactory Excellent Points
Responds to prompt Response shows learner’s effort to answer the prompt, but response is surface-level. Future responses should include analysis or critique. Learner can also work to contribute novel ideas, connections, or applications. Response is accurate, but could be more fully developed. Learner should focus on providing more information and thoughtful analysis in future responses. Response is thoughtful and clearly addresses the content and questions asked. This response is excellent due to the presence of original thoughts and novel ideas. __/4
Supporting Details Response demonstrates learner’s effort to participate, but response is short on details and evidence to back up opinion with facts. Response includes opinions supported with details, but connections could be clearer, more firmly established, or made explicit. Response is excellent due to inclusion of supporting evidence and clear connections to course content and/or other experiences. Evidence is cited when appropriate. __/2
Comments and participation Responses are brief or absent. Participation in the learning community should be increased in future discussions. Responses are kind and build on the comments of others, but could more fully demonstrate deep thought or include more detail or explanation. Responses are kind and thoroughly extend discussions already taking place. Responses excel by posing new possibilities or opinions not previously voiced. Responses are substantive and constructive. __/4
Total __/10